Article 167-17Special Provisions on Petitions for Asset Disclosure Procedures, etc. Based on a Claim Related to Duty to Support
第百六十七条の十七（扶養義務等に係る債権に基づく財産開示手続等の申立ての特例）
If an obligee who has an authenticated copy of an enforceable title of obligation on a claim related to the obligations stated in the items of Article 151-2, paragraph (1) has filed a petition stated in any of the following items, the obligee is deemed to have filed the petition provided for in that item at the same time as that petition; provided, however, that this does not apply if the obligee has expressed a contrary intention at the time of filing the petition stated in that item.
第百五十一条の二第一項各号に掲げる義務に係る請求権について執行力のある債務名義の正本を有する債権者が次の各号に掲げる申立てをした場合には、当該申立てと同時に、当該各号に定める申立てをしたものとみなす。ただし、当該債権者が当該各号に掲げる申立ての際に反対の意思を表示したときは、この限りでない。
a petition under Article 197, paragraph (1): a petition for an order of seizure against a claim (limited to a claim prescribed in the items of Article 206, paragraph (1)) disclosed by the obligor (or, if the obligor has a statutory agent, the statutory agent) in the procedure related to that petition, or against a claim whose information has been provided pursuant to the provisions of the following paragraph;
a petition under Article 206, paragraph (1): a petition for an order of seizure against a claim prescribed in the items of that paragraph whose information has been provided by a person stated in the items of that paragraph in the procedure related to that petition.
In the case prescribed in the preceding paragraph (limited to the case where a petition stated in item (i) of that paragraph has been filed), if the obligor (or, if the obligor has a statutory agent, the statutory agent) who was summoned by the enforcement court does not disclose their property, the enforcement court must, except where the obligee has expressed a different intention, order the municipality (including special wards; the same applies in Article 206, paragraph (1), item (i)) in which the obligor's address is located to provide information on the matters specified in that item.
前項に規定する場合（同項第一号に掲げる申立てをした場合に限る。）において、執行裁判所の呼出しを受けた債務者（債務者に法定代理人がある場合にあつては、当該法定代理人）がその財産を開示しなかつたときは、債権者が別段の意思を表示した場合を除き、執行裁判所は、債務者の住所のある市町村（特別区を含む。第二百六条第一項第一号において同じ。）に対し、同号に定める事項について情報の提供をすべき旨を命じなければならない。
The provisions of Article 205, paragraphs (3) through (5) apply mutatis mutandis to a judicial decision under the preceding paragraph, and the provisions of Article 208 apply mutatis mutandis to the provision of information ordered by that judicial decision, respectively.
第二百五条第三項から第五項までの規定は前項の規定による裁判について、第二百八条の規定は当該裁判により命じられた情報の提供について、それぞれ準用する。
A request under Article 17 regarding the portion of the record of an asset disclosure case that relates to the provision of information under Article 208, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph may be made only by the following persons:
the petitioner;
申立人
obligee having an authenticated copy of an enforceable title of obligation on a claim related to the obligations stated in the items of Article 151-2, paragraph (1) or a right to demand compensation for damage for infringement on human life or body from an obligor;
債務者に対する第百五十一条の二第一項各号に掲げる義務に係る請求権又は人の生命若しくは身体の侵害による損害賠償請求権について執行力のある債務名義の正本を有する債権者
obligee who has submitted a document proving that the obligee has a general statutory lien (limited to one pertaining to Article 306, item (iii) of the Civil Code) for property of the obligor;
債務者の財産について一般の先取特権（民法第三百六条第三号に係るものに限る。）を有することを証する文書を提出した債権者
obligor; or
債務者
person who has provided the information.
当該情報の提供をした者
The provisions of Article 210, paragraph (2) apply mutatis mutandis to a person stated in item (ii) or (iii) of the preceding paragraph who has obtained information on the portion of the record of an asset disclosure case that relates to the provision of information under Article 208, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (3).
If a petition for an order of seizure against a claim is deemed to have been filed pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1), and the enforcement court is still unable to specify the claim to be seized even after carrying out the procedure on the asset disclosure date prescribed in Article 197, paragraph (3) or making a judicial decision under paragraph (2) or Article 206, paragraph (1), the enforcement court may specify a reasonable period and order the obligee to make, within that period, a proposal of the matters necessary for specifying the claim to be seized. In this case, if the obligee does not make a proposal of the matters necessary for specifying the claim to be seized within that period, the petition for an order of seizure is deemed to have been withdrawn.
Read this with the articles around it