When execution of a judicial decision of provisional payment has been carried out for an amount equivalent to a fine, a detention warrant pertaining to a ruling under the provisions of Article 345-2 (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 404; the same applies in Article 494-3, Article 494-5 (excluding item (iii)), Article 494-6, Article 494-8, paragraph (1), Article 494-12, paragraph (1) and Article 494-14) and a ruling under the provisions of Article 342-8, paragraph (1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) as applied mutatis mutandis with replacement of terms pursuant to Article 345-3 (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 404; the same applies in Article 494-2) ceases to be effective.

①In cases where the decisions are rendered for provisional payment in the first and second instances and the decision for provisional payment in the first instance has already been executed, execution of that decision shall be deemed to be execution of the final decision of provisional payment in the second instance, to the extent that said provisional payment was within the limit of the amount that was ordered to be paid in the decision for provisional payment in the second instance.

②In the case set forth in the preceding paragraph, when the amount procured through the execution of the decision for provisional payment in the first instance exceeds the amount which was ordered to be paid in the decision for provisional payment in the second instance, such excess amount shall be returned.

①In cases where the decision for a fine, petty fine, or collection of a sum of equivalent value in lieu of confiscation becomes final and binding after execution of the decision for provisional payment, the sentence shall be deemed to have been executed to the extent of that executed amount.

②In the case set forth in the preceding paragraph, where the amount procured through execution of the decision for provisional payment exceeds the amount of the fine, petty fine, or collection of a sum of equivalent value in lieu of confiscation, that excess amount shall be returned.

The court that announced a judicial decision imposing a fine is, when it finds that there is a risk that a person in relation to whom the decision has become final and binding will be unable to pay the fine in full (excluding when the ruling under the provisions of Article 345-2 that the person received has not lost its effect), to order, by ruling, upon the request of a public prosecutor, except where it issues a confinement warrant, that the person must not depart from Japan without receiving the permission of the court.

The court that made a ruling under the provisions of Article 345-2 or Article 494-3 may, upon the request of a public prosecutor, when it finds that there is a risk that a person in relation to whom a judicial decision imposing a fine has become final and binding and who falls under any of the following items will be unable to pay the fine in full, confine that person in a penal institution until 30 days have elapsed after that decision has become final and binding.

Confinement under the provisions of the preceding Article may be carried out only after the reasons have been told to the person who has received a ruling under the provisions of Article 345-2 or Article 494-3 and the person has been heard on the matter; provided, however, that this does not apply if the person has fled.