第三百七十二条
An appeal to the court of second instance may be filed against the judgment that a district court or the summary court has made in the first instance.
控訴は、地方裁判所又は簡易裁判所がした第一審の判決に対してこれをすることができる。
第三百七十三条
The period for appeal to the court of second instance shall be 14 days.
控訴の提起期間は、十四日とする。
第三百七十四条
An appeal to the court of second instance shall be filed by submitting a written application to the court of first instance.
控訴をするには、申立書を第一審裁判所に差し出さなければならない。
第三百七十五条
When it is clear that an appeal to the court of second instance has been filed after the right to appeal has expired, the court of first instance shall, on a ruling, dismiss such an appeal. An immediate appeal against such a ruling may be filed.
控訴の申立が明らかに控訴権の消滅後にされたものであるときは、第一審裁判所は、決定でこれを棄却しなければならない。この決定に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。
第三百七十六条
A person who has filed an appeal to the court of second instance shall submit to the court of second instance a statement of the reasons for said appeal within the period of time set forth in the Rules of Court.
控訴申立人は、裁判所の規則で定める期間内に控訴趣意書を控訴裁判所に差し出さなければならない。
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
The statement of the reasons for appeal shall be accompanied by any necessary material or a written guarantee from the public prosecutor or defense counsel in accordance with this Code or the Rules of Court.
控訴趣意書には、この法律又は裁判所の規則の定めるところにより、必要な疎明資料又は検察官若しくは弁護人の保証書を添附しなければならない。
第三百七十七条
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
When an appeal to the court of second instance has been filed based on one of the grounds listed in the following items, the statement of the reasons for appeal shall be accompanied by a written guarantee from the public prosecutor or defense counsel which indicates that there is sufficient proof of the existence of the items:
左の事由があることを理由として控訴の申立をした場合には、控訴趣意書に、その事由があることの充分な証明をすることができる旨の検察官又は弁護人の保証書を添附しなければならない。
The court that rendered the judgment was not configured in accordance with law;
法律に従つて判決裁判所を構成しなかつたこと。
A judge who cannot take part in a judgment in accordance with laws and regulations took part in the judgment; or
法令により判決に関与することができない裁判官が判決に関与したこと。
There was a violation of legal provisions pertaining to the trial being open to the public.
審判の公開に関する規定に違反したこと。
第三百七十八条
When an appeal to the court of second instance has been filed based on any of the grounds listed in the following items, facts which appear in the case records and evidence examined by the court of first instance which are sufficient to show the existence of the grounds in the item shall be cited in the statement of the reasons for appeal:
左の事由があることを理由として控訴の申立をした場合には、控訴趣意書に、訴訟記録及び原裁判所において取り調べた証拠に現われている事実であつてその事由があることを信ずるに足りるものを援用しなければならない。
The court unlawfully found jurisdiction or lack of jurisdiction;
不法に管轄又は管轄違を認めたこと。
The court unlawfully accepted or dismissed prosecution;
不法に、公訴を受理し、又はこれを棄却したこと。
The court did not reach a judgment in a case for which a trial had been requested, or did reach a judgment in a case for which a trial had not been requested; or
審判の請求を受けた事件について判決をせず、又は審判の請求を受けない事件について判決をしたこと。
The judgment stated no reasons, or there was a discrepancy in its reasons.
判決に理由を附せず、又は理由にくいちがいがあること。
第三百七十九条
Other than the cases set forth in the provisions of the preceding two articles, when an appeal to the court of second instance has been made on the grounds that there was a violation of laws and regulations in the court proceedings and it is clear that that violation has affected the judgment, facts which appear in the case records and evidence examined by the court of first instance which are sufficient to show that there was a violation of laws and regulations which would clearly affect the judgment shall be cited in the statement of the reasons for appeal.
前二条の場合を除いて、訴訟手続に法令の違反があつてその違反が判決に影響を及ぼすことが明らかであることを理由として控訴の申立をした場合には、控訴趣意書に、訴訟記録及び原裁判所において取り調べた証拠に現われている事実であつて明らかに判決に影響を及ぼすべき法令の違反があることを信ずるに足りるものを援用しなければならない。
第三百八十条
When an appeal to the court of second instance has been made on the grounds that there was an error in the application of laws and regulations and it is clear that that error has affected the judgment, the error and the fact that said error would clearly affect the judgment shall be indicated in the statement of the reasons for appeal.
法令の適用に誤があつてその誤が判決に影響を及ぼすことが明らかであることを理由として控訴の申立をした場合には、控訴趣意書に、その誤及びその誤が明らかに判決に影響を及ぼすべきことを示さなければならない。
第三百八十一条
When an appeal to the court of second instance has been made on the grounds that a sentence is unreasonable, facts which appear in the case records and evidence examined by the court of first instance which are sufficient to show that the sentence is unreasonable shall be cited in the statement of the reasons for appeal.
刑の量定が不当であることを理由として控訴の申立をした場合には、控訴趣意書に、訴訟記録及び原裁判所において取り調べた証拠に現われている事実であつて刑の量定が不当であることを信ずるに足りるものを援用しなければならない。
第三百八十二条
When an appeal to the court of second instance has been made on the grounds that there was an error in the finding of facts and it is clear that that error has affected the judgment, facts which appear in the case records and evidence examined by the court of first instance which are sufficient to show that there is an error which would clearly affect the judgment shall be cited in the statement of the reasons for appeal.
事実の誤認があつてその誤認が判決に影響を及ぼすことが明らかであることを理由として控訴の申立をした場合には、控訴趣意書に、訴訟記録及び原裁判所において取り調べた証拠に現われている事実であつて明らかに判決に影響を及ぼすべき誤認があることを信ずるに足りるものを援用しなければならない。
第三百八十二条の二
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
Facts which can be proven by evidence whose examination could not be requested before oral arguments were concluded in the first instance due to unavoidable circumstances, and which are sufficient to show that there are grounds for an appeal to the court of second instance as set forth in the provisions of the two preceding articles may be cited in the statement of the reasons for appeal even if such facts do not appear in the case records or are based on evidence not examined by the court of first instance.
やむを得ない事由によつて第一審の弁論終結前に取調を請求することができなかつた証拠によつて証明することのできる事実であつて前二条に規定する控訴申立の理由があることを信ずるに足りるものは、訴訟記録及び原裁判所において取り調べた証拠に現われている事実以外の事実であつても、控訴趣意書にこれを援用することができる。
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
Facts which occurred before the rendering of a judgment and after the oral arguments were concluded in the first instance, and which are sufficient to show that there are grounds for appeal to the court of second instance as set forth in the provisions of the two preceding articles may be cited in the statement of the reasons for appeal even if such facts do not appear in the case records or are based on evidence not examined by the court of first instance.
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
In the cases set forth in the provisions of the two preceding paragraphs, the statement of the reasons for appeal to the court of second instance shall be accompanied by material which makes prima facie showing of the facts. In a case set forth in the provisions of the paragraph (1), the paper also shall be accompanied by material which makes prima facie showing that examination could not be requested due to unavoidable circumstances.
第三百八十三条
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
When an appeal to the court of second instance has been filed on the grounds listed in the following items, the statement of the reasons for appeal shall be accompanied by material which makes prima facie showing of the existence of the grounds of one of those items:
左の事由があることを理由として控訴の申立をした場合には、控訴趣意書に、その事由があることを疎明する資料を添附しなければならない。
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
There are grounds on which it is possible to request a retrial; or
再審の請求をすることができる場合にあたる事由があること。
There was abolition or a change of punishment or a general pardon was granted after the judgment was rendered.
判決があつた後に刑の廃止若しくは変更又は大赦があつたこと。
第三百八十四条
An appeal to the court of second instance can be filed only when the reason for the appeal is the existence of at least one of the grounds set forth in the provisions of Articles 377 through Article 382, and Article 383.
控訴の申立は、第三百七十七条乃至第三百八十二条及び前条に規定する事由があることを理由とするときに限り、これをすることができる。
第三百八十五条
When it is clear that an appeal to the court of second instance violates a form specified in laws and regulations, or that it was filed after the expiration of the right to appeal, the court of second instance shall, on a ruling, dismiss said appeal.
控訴の申立が法令上の方式に違反し、又は控訴権の消滅後にされたものであることが明らかなときは、控訴裁判所は、決定でこれを棄却しなければならない。
An objection as in paragraph (2) of Article 428 may be filed against the ruling prescribed in the preceding paragraph. In this case, the provisions concerning an immediate appeal shall also apply mutatis mutandis.
前項の決定に対しては、第四百二十八条第二項の異議の申立をすることができる。この場合には、即時抗告に関する規定をも準用する。
第三百八十六条
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
The court of second instance shall, on a ruling, dismiss an appeal to the court of second instance when:
左の場合には、控訴裁判所は、決定で控訴を棄却しなければならない。
The statement of the reasons for appeal is not submitted within the period of time set forth in paragraph (1) of Article 376;
第三百七十六条第一項に定める期間内に控訴趣意書を差し出さないとき。
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
The statement of the reasons for appeal violates a form set forth in this Code or the Rules of Court, or the statement of the reasons for appeal is not accompanied by the necessary materials or a written guarantee pursuant to this Code or the Rules of Court; or
控訴趣意書がこの法律若しくは裁判所の規則で定める方式に違反しているとき、又は控訴趣意書にこの法律若しくは裁判所の規則の定めるところに従い必要な疎明資料若しくは保証書を添附しないとき。
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
The grounds for appeal to the court of second instance in the statement of the reasons for appeal clearly do not apply to the items set forth in the provisions of Article 377 through Article 382 and Article 383.
控訴趣意書に記載された控訴の申立の理由が、明らかに第三百七十七条乃至第三百八十二条及び第三百八十三条に規定する事由に該当しないとき。
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
The provisions of paragraph (2) of the preceding article shall apply mutatis mutandis to a ruling as set forth in the preceding paragraph.
第三百八十七条
Persons other than attorneys may not be appointed as defense counsel at the court of second instance.
控訴審では、弁護士以外の者を弁護人に選任することはできない。
第三百八十八条
Arguments for the defendant at the court of second instance cannot be made by persons other than defense counsel.
控訴審では、被告人のためにする弁論は、弁護人でなければ、これをすることができない。
第三百八十九条
During the trial, the public prosecutor and defense counsel shall base their arguments on the statement of the reasons for appeal to the court of second instance.
公判期日には、検察官及び弁護人は、控訴趣意書に基いて弁論をしなければならない。
第三百九十条
The defendant need not appear at the trial at the court of second instance; provided, however, that for offenses other than those punishable by a fine not exceeding 500,000 yen (50,000 yen for offenses other than those prescribed in the Penal Code, the Law concerning Punishment of Physical Violence and Others and the Act on Penal Provisions related to Economic Activities, until otherwise stipulated) or a petty fine, the court may order him/her to appear when it deems this to be essential for the protection of his/her rights.
控訴審においては、被告人は、公判期日に出頭することを要しない。ただし、裁判所は、五十万円(刑法、暴力行為等処罰に関する法律及び経済関係罰則の整備に関する法律の罪以外の罪については、当分の間、五万円)以下の罰金又は科料に当たる事件以外の事件について、被告人の出頭がその権利の保護のため重要であると認めるときは、被告人の出頭を命ずることができる。
第三百九十条の二
Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding Article, the court of second instance must order a defendant who has been indicted for a crime punishable by imprisonment or a heavier sentence and who has been granted bail or suspension of execution of detention to appear on the trial date on which the judgment is to be pronounced; provided, however, that this does not apply when it finds that it is difficult for the defendant to appear on that trial date due to a serious illness or injury or any other unavoidable grounds.
前条の規定にかかわらず、控訴裁判所は、拘禁刑以上の刑に当たる罪で起訴されている被告人であつて、保釈又は勾留の執行停止をされているものについては、判決を宣告する公判期日への出頭を命じなければならない。ただし、重い疾病又は傷害その他やむを得ない事由により被告人が当該公判期日に出頭することが困難であると認めるときは、この限りでない。
第三百九十一条
When defense counsel does not appear or has not been appointed, the court may render a judgment after hearing the opinion of the public prosecutor, except when the appointment of defense counsel is necessary pursuant to this Code or when the court, on a ruling, appoints defense counsel.
弁護人が出頭しないとき、又は弁護人の選任がないときは、この法律により弁護人を要する場合又は決定で弁護人を附した場合を除いては、検察官の陳述を聴いて判決をすることができる。
fine
罰金
A criminal punishment of paying money to the state, of 10,000 yen or more, or less where it is reduced (Penal Code, Article 15). It ranks below imprisonment (拘禁刑) and above penal detention (拘留) and a petty fine (科料) (Articles 9 and 10, paragraph (1)). A person who cannot pay it in full is held in a workhouse (労役場) for one day to two years, or up to three years where fines are imposed together, a period set when the sentence is passed (Article 18, paragraphs (1), (3) and (4)); not within thirty days of the sentence becoming final without the person's consent (paragraph (5)). If it is not enforced for three years after the sentence becomes final, the person is released from it by prescription (Articles 31 and 32, item (v)); the three years do not run while its execution is suspended under law or the person is abroad, and an act of execution interrupts them (Articles 33 and 34, paragraph (2)).
Written by AI using Penal Code, Arts. 9, 10, 15, 18, 31 to 34 as a reference.
imprisonment
拘禁刑
The punishment of being held in a penal institution (刑事施設), for life or for a fixed term of one month to twenty years (Penal Code, Article 12, paragraphs (1) and (2)); a fixed term can be raised to thirty years where the punishment is aggravated, or cut below one month where it is reduced (Article 14, paragraph (2)). To help the person reform and rehabilitate, they may be made to do work or given guidance (Article 12, paragraph (3)). It ranks below the death penalty and above a fine (罰金) among the principal punishments (Articles 9 and 10, paragraph (1)). It replaced imprisonment with work (懲役) and imprisonment without work (禁錮) when the Act Partially Amending the Penal Code, etc. (Act No. 67 of 2022) came into force (Act No. 67 of 2022, Article 2), and a person sentenced to either is treated, for the rules on a person's qualifications, as sentenced to imprisonment for the same term (Act No. 68 of 2022, Article 443, paragraph (1)).
Written by AI using Penal Code, Arts. 9, 10, 12, 14, Act No. 67 of 2022, Art. 2 and Act No. 68 of 2022, Art. 443 as a reference.
petty fine
科料
The lightest criminal punishment: paying 1,000 yen or more but less than 10,000 yen (Penal Code, Articles 9, 10 and 17). A person who cannot pay it in full is held in a workhouse (労役場) for one day to thirty days (Article 18, paragraph (2)).
Written by AI using Penal Code, Arts. 9, 10, 17, 18 as a reference.
public prosecutor
検察官
The official who brings a prosecution (公訴) for a crime before a court (Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 247), and who may decide not to prosecute where, in view of the offender's character, age and circumstances, the gravity and circumstances of the offence and what happened after it, prosecution is not needed (Article 248). In criminal cases a public prosecutor asks the court to apply the law correctly and oversees the carrying out of its judgments; and, as the representative of the public interest, a public prosecutor also does the work other laws and regulations assign to a public prosecutor, which is not limited to criminal cases (Public Prosecutors Office Act, Article 4). A public prosecutor may investigate any crime (Article 6, paragraph (1)). Public prosecutors work through the public prosecutors offices (検察庁): the Supreme, High, District and Local Public Prosecutors Offices (Article 1).
Written by AI using Code of Criminal Procedure, Arts. 247, 248 and Public Prosecutors Office Act, Arts. 1, 4, 6 as a reference.
summary court
簡易裁判所
One of the four kinds of lower court (下級裁判所) beneath the Supreme Court, with the high courts (高等裁判所), the district courts (地方裁判所) and the family courts (家庭裁判所) (Courts Act, Article 1, and Article 2, paragraph (1)). A summary court has jurisdiction at first instance over civil claims whose value does not exceed 1.4 million yen, other than claims in administrative cases, and over criminal cases for offences punishable by no more than a fine or for which a fine is one of the penalties the law allows, among others (Article 33, paragraph (1)). A petition for court mediation goes, unless a special rule says otherwise, to the summary court for the place where the other party lives or has its business office or other office, or to a district court or summary court the parties agree on (Civil Mediation Act, Article 3, paragraph (1)).
Written by AI using Courts Act, Arts. 1, 2, 33 and Civil Mediation Act, Art. 3 as a reference.