Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
The court (in the case of items (i) and (iv), including the presiding judge and the judges of the panel; in the case of items (ii) and (iii), including the judge under Article 66, paragraph (4), and the presiding judge and the judges of the panel; and in the case of item (v), meaning the judge) may, with regard to a case for which the extract of the charging sheet, etc. has been submitted pursuant to Article 271-2, paragraph (2), if it finds that, among the particulars identifying an individual stated in the charging sheet, those not stated in the extract of the charging sheet, etc. are those of a person set forth in paragraph (1), item (i) or item (ii) of that Article, and finds it appropriate, take the following measures:
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
giving notice of the case charged under Article 61 by a method that does not disclose those particulars identifying an individual;
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
when issuing a subpoena or detention warrant, delivering at the same time, as the document to be shown to the defendant, an extract of the subpoena stating an outline of the facts of the charges by a method that does not disclose those particulars identifying an individual, or other substitute for the subpoena, or an extract of the detention warrant or other substitute for the detention warrant;
勾引状又は勾留状を発する場合において、これと同時に、被告人に示すものとして、当該個人特定事項を明らかにしない方法により公訴事実の要旨を記載した勾引状の抄本その他の勾引状に代わるもの又は勾留状の抄本その他の勾留状に代わるものを交付すること。
giving, or having given, notice of an outline of the charged facts under Article 76, paragraph (1) by a method that does not disclose those particulars identifying an individual;
giving, or having given, notice of an outline of the charged facts under Article 77, paragraph (3) by a method that does not disclose those particulars identifying an individual;
giving notice of the case charged under Article 280, paragraph (2) by a method that does not disclose those particulars identifying an individual.
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
With regard to the application of Article 73, paragraphs (1) and (3) where a substitute for the subpoena has been delivered pursuant to paragraph (1) (limited to the part pertaining to item (ii)), the phrase "said subpoena" in the first sentence of paragraph (1) of that Article, the phrase "the subpoena or detention warrant" in paragraph (3) of that Article, and the phrase "the warrant" in the proviso of that paragraph are deemed to be replaced with "the substitute for the subpoena prescribed in Article 271-8, paragraph (1), item (ii)", and the phrase "an outline of the facts of the charges to the defendant and" in that paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "an outline of the facts of the charges to the defendant by a method that does not disclose those particulars identifying an individual stated in the subpoena that are not stated in the substitute for the subpoena prescribed in Article 271-8, paragraph (1), item (ii), and".
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
With regard to the application of Article 73, paragraphs (2) and (3) where a substitute for the detention warrant has been delivered pursuant to paragraph (1) (limited to the part pertaining to item (ii)), the phrase "said warrant" in paragraph (2) of that Article, the phrase "the subpoena or detention warrant" in paragraph (3) of that Article, and the phrase "the warrant" in the proviso of that paragraph are deemed to be replaced with "the substitute for the detention warrant prescribed in Article 271-8, paragraph (1), item (ii)", and the phrase "an outline of the facts of the charges to the defendant and" in that paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "an outline of the facts of the charges to the defendant by a method that does not disclose those particulars identifying an individual stated in the detention warrant that are not stated in the substitute for the detention warrant prescribed in Article 271-8, paragraph (1), item (ii), and".
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
The presiding judge or a judge of the panel may, where a substitute for the detention warrant has been delivered pursuant to paragraph (1) (limited to the part pertaining to item (ii)) or where a substitute for the detention warrant has been delivered pursuant to Article 207-2, paragraph (2), if the presiding judge or that judge finds that, among the particulars identifying an individual stated in the detention warrant, those not stated in those substitutes for the detention warrant (excluding those that are to be notified by a ruling under Article 271-5, paragraph (1) or a judicial decision under Article 207-3, paragraph (1)) are those of a person set forth in Article 271-2, paragraph (1), item (i) or item (ii), and, after hearing the opinions of the public prosecutor and the defense counsel, finds it appropriate, state the case charged, when disclosing the grounds for detention, by a method that does not disclose those particulars identifying an individual.
裁判長又は合議体の構成員は、第一項(第二号に係る部分に限る。)の規定による勾留状に代わるものの交付があつた場合又は第二百七条の二第二項の規定による勾留状に代わるものの交付があつた場合において、勾留状に記載された個人特定事項のうちこれらの勾留状に代わるものに記載がないもの(第二百七十一条の五第一項の決定又は第二百七条の三第一項の裁判により通知することとされたものを除く。)が第二百七十一条の二第一項第一号又は第二号に掲げる者のものに該当すると認める場合であつて、検察官及び弁護人の意見を聴き、相当と認めるときは、勾留の理由の開示をするに当たり、当該個人特定事項を明らかにしない方法により被告事件を告げることができる。
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
With regard to the application of Article 98 where a substitute for the detention warrant has been delivered pursuant to paragraph (1) (limited to the part pertaining to item (ii)) or where a substitute for the detention warrant has been delivered pursuant to Article 207-2, paragraph (2), the phrase "a transcript of the detention warrant" in Article 98, paragraph (1) is deemed to be replaced with "the substitute for the detention warrant prescribed in Article 271-8, paragraph (1), item (ii) or the substitute for the detention warrant prescribed in the main clause of Article 207-2, paragraph (2)".
第一項(第二号に係る部分に限る。)の規定による勾留状に代わるものの交付があつた場合又は第二百七条の二第二項の規定による勾留状に代わるものの交付があつた場合における第九十八条の規定の適用については、同条第一項中「勾留状の謄本」とあるのは、「第二百七十一条の八第一項第二号の勾留状に代わるもの又は第二百七条の二第二項本文の勾留状に代わるもの」とする。
Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)
The provisions of the preceding paragraph apply mutatis mutandis to the application of the provisions of Article 98 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 167-2, paragraph (2), in the case prescribed in that paragraph, where a substitute for the detention warrant has been delivered pursuant to paragraph (1) (limited to the part pertaining to item (ii)) or where a substitute for the detention warrant has been delivered pursuant to Article 207-2, paragraph (2).
前項の規定は、第一項(第二号に係る部分に限る。)の規定による勾留状に代わるものの交付があつた場合又は第二百七条の二第二項の規定による勾留状に代わるものの交付があつた場合であつて、第百六十七条の二第二項に規定するときにおける同項において準用する第九十八条の規定の適用について準用する。
Read this with the articles around it
particulars identifying an individualmachine translation
「個人特定事項」
A person's name, address or any other matter that would identify an individual.
Defined inArticle 201-2, paragraph (1)
extract of the charging sheet, etc.machine translation
「起訴状抄本等」
An extract of the charging sheet (起訴状) with the particulars identifying an individual (個人特定事項) concerned left out, or another document in place of a copy of it, which a public prosecutor submits with the charging sheet when instituting prosecution, to be served on the defendant, when asking the court under Article 271-2 to keep those particulars from the defendant.
Short name set inArticle 271-2, paragraph (2)
public prosecutor
検察官
The official who brings a prosecution (公訴) for a crime before a court (Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 247), and who may decide not to prosecute where, in view of the offender's character, age and circumstances, the gravity and circumstances of the offence and what happened after it, prosecution is not needed (Article 248). In criminal cases a public prosecutor asks the court to apply the law correctly and oversees the carrying out of its judgments; and, as the representative of the public interest, a public prosecutor also does the work other laws and regulations assign to a public prosecutor, which is not limited to criminal cases (Public Prosecutors Office Act, Article 4). A public prosecutor may investigate any crime (Article 6, paragraph (1)). Public prosecutors work through the public prosecutors offices (検察庁): the Supreme, High, District and Local Public Prosecutors Offices (Article 1).
Written by AI using Code of Criminal Procedure, Arts. 247, 248 and Public Prosecutors Office Act, Arts. 1, 4, 6 as a reference.