Changes by (Act No. 45 of 2026)
A family court may, at any time, replace an administrator whom it has appointed in an adjudication case for a disposition regarding the administration of property offered to an adult under guardianship by a third party, with another.
家庭裁判所は、いつでも、第三者が成年被後見人に与えた財産の管理に関する処分の審判事件において選任した管理者を改任することができる。
Changes by (Act No. 45 of 2026)
A family court may order an administrator whom it has appointed in an adjudication case for a disposition regarding the administration of property offered to an adult under guardianship by a third party (including an administrator appointed as a replacement pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph; hereinafter referred to as an "administrator of property" in this Article) to report on the status of the property and settle the account for administration.
家庭裁判所は、第三者が成年被後見人に与えた財産の管理に関する処分の審判事件において選任した管理者(前項の規定により改任された管理者を含む。以下この条において「財産の管理者」という。)に対し、財産の状況の報告及び管理の計算を命ずることができる。
Removed by (Act No. 45 of 2026)
The costs required for the report and settlement of the account set forth in the preceding paragraph are paid out of the property of an adult under guardianship.
前項の報告及び計算に要する費用は、成年被後見人の財産の中から支弁する。
Changes and moves to paragraph (3) by (Act No. 45 of 2026)
A family court may issue an order to an Administrator of Property for an increase or decrease in or a change to the security that the administrator has provided, or an exemption from providing the security.
家庭裁判所は、財産の管理者に対し、その提供した担保の増減、変更又は免除を命ずることができる。
Removed by (Act No. 45 of 2026)
When a ruling to order a mortgage to be established on the real property or a vessel owned by an administrator of property becomes effective, a court clerk must commission the registration of the establishment thereof. The same applies to a registration of change or the extinction of a mortgage thus established.
財産の管理者の不動産又は船舶の上に抵当権の設定を命ずる審判が効力を生じたときは、裁判所書記官は、その設定の登記を嘱託しなければならない。設定した抵当権の変更又は消滅の登記についても、同様とする。
Changes and moves to paragraph (4) by (Act No. 45 of 2026)
The provisions of Articles 644, 646, 647, and 650 of the Civil Code apply mutatis mutandis to an Administrator of Property.
Removed by (Act No. 45 of 2026)
When an adult under guardianship has become able to administer their own property, the property under administration no longer exists, or it has otherwise become inappropriate to continue to place the property of the adult under guardianship under administration, the family court must make a ruling to revoke the appointment of an administrator of property or any other disposition regarding the administration of property, upon the petition of the adult under guardianship, the administrator of property or any interested party or by its own authority.
家庭裁判所は、成年被後見人が財産を管理することができるようになったとき、管理すべき財産がなくなったときその他財産の管理を継続することが相当でなくなったときは、成年被後見人、財産の管理者若しくは利害関係人の申立てにより又は職権で、財産の管理者の選任その他の財産の管理に関する処分の取消しの審判をしなければならない。
Read this with the articles around it
administrator of property
「財産の管理者」
In Article 125, an administrator the family court appointed in a case on a disposition concerning the management of property a third party gave to an adult ward (成年被後見人), including one appointed as a replacement.
Short name set inArticle 125, paragraph (2)· applies only in this article
registration
登記
Entry in a public register kept by a registry office (登記所) — a Legal Affairs Bureau or one of its branch offices — so that the matter is made public (Real Property Registration Act, Articles 1 and 6, paragraph (1)). Rights in land and buildings, such as ownership, a superficies (地上権), a statutory lien (先取特権), a mortgage and a right of lease (賃借権), can be registered under that Act (Article 3), and matters the Commercial Code, the Companies Act and other Acts require to be registered are registered under the Commercial Registration Act (Article 1). Registration also lets a right be asserted against third parties: acquiring, losing or changing a right in rem (物権) in land or a building, such as ownership, cannot be asserted against third parties until it is registered (Civil Code, Article 177), and a matter the Companies Act requires to be registered cannot be asserted against a third party who does not know of it until it has been registered, nor, even after that, against one who had a justifiable reason for not knowing of the registration (Companies Act, Article 908, paragraph (1)).
Written by AI using Real Property Registration Act, Arts. 1, 3, 6, Commercial Registration Act, Art. 1, Civil Code, Art. 177 and Companies Act, Art. 908 as a reference.