An appeal against a ruling may be filed against a ruling or order to deny a petition involved in the litigation proceedings, without oral arguments being heard.
口頭弁論を経ないで訴訟手続に関する申立てを却下した決定又は命令に対しては、抗告をすることができる。
Search provisions, jump to a law or an article
This text is not in force yetIt on a date not yet set
Read the text in force →民事訴訟法
Chapter III Appeal Against a Ruling
The law as Act on the Arrangement of Related Acts upon the Enforcement of the Act Partially Amending the Civil Code, etc. (Act No. 46 of 2026) leaves it, with the words it changes marked.
The main text is read a page at a time: a chapter to a page, and a long chapter in runs of articles. The whole main text, and the supplementary provisions and appended tables this amendment changes. Those it leaves untouched are on the page for the text in force.
An appeal against a ruling may be filed against a ruling or order to deny a petition involved in the litigation proceedings, without oral arguments being heard.
口頭弁論を経ないで訴訟手続に関する申立てを却下した決定又は命令に対しては、抗告をすることができる。
An appeal against a ruling may be filed against a ruling or order if this has been issued in a matter that may not be decided through a ruling or order.
決定又は命令により裁判をすることができない事項について決定又は命令がされたときは、これに対して抗告をすることができる。
A party who disagrees with the judicial decision of an authorized or commissioned judge may file an objection with the court in charge of the case; provided, however, that this applies only if the judicial decision is one that it would be possible to appeal in the form of an appeal against a ruling, if it were the judicial decision of the court in charge of the case.
受命裁判官又は受託裁判官の裁判に対して不服がある当事者は、受訴裁判所に異議の申立てをすることができる。ただし、その裁判が受訴裁判所の裁判であるとした場合に抗告をすることができるものであるときに限る。
An appeal may be filed against a judicial decision on an objection as referred to in the preceding paragraph.
抗告は、前項の申立てについての裁判に対してすることができる。
To apply the provisions of paragraph (1) if the Supreme Court or a high court is the court in charge of a case, the phrase "the court in charge of the case" in the proviso to that paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "the district court".
最高裁判所又は高等裁判所が受訴裁判所である場合における第一項の規定の適用については、同項ただし書中「受訴裁判所」とあるのは、「地方裁判所」とする。
A further appeal may be filed against the ruling of the court in charge of an appeal against a ruling, but only on the grounds that the ruling reflects an error in the interpretation of the Constitution or is otherwise unconstitutional, or that a violation of law or regulation has clearly influenced the ruling.
抗告裁判所の決定に対しては、その決定に憲法の解釈の誤りがあることその他憲法の違反があること、又は決定に影響を及ぼすことが明らかな法令の違反があることを理由とするときに限り、更に抗告をすることができる。
The provisions of Chapter I, unless it is contrary to their nature, apply mutatis mutandis to an appeal against a ruling and to litigation proceedings in the court in charge of an appeal against a ruling; provided, however, that with regard to the appeal against a ruling as referred to in the preceding Article and litigation proceedings for the appeal, the provisions of the preceding Chapter concerning a final appeal against the final judgment of the court of second instance or the court of first instance and concerning litigation proceedings in the final appellate instance apply mutatis mutandis.
抗告及び抗告裁判所の訴訟手続には、その性質に反しない限り、第一章の規定を準用する。ただし、前条の抗告及びこれに関する訴訟手続には、前章の規定中第二審又は第一審の終局判決に対する上告及びその上告審の訴訟手続に関する規定を準用する。
An immediate appeal must be filed within an inalterable time frame of one week from the day on which notice of a judicial decision is received.
即時抗告は、裁判の告知を受けた日から一週間の不変期間内にしなければならない。
If the court or presiding judge that has made the judicial decision in the prior instance finds that there are grounds for an appeal against a ruling, the court or the presiding judge must correct that judicial decision.
原裁判をした裁判所又は裁判長は、抗告を理由があると認めるときは、その裁判を更正しなければならない。
An appeal against a ruling has the effect of a stay of enforcement, but only if it is filed as an immediate appeal.
抗告は、即時抗告に限り、執行停止の効力を有する。
The court in charge of an appeal against a ruling or the court or judge that has made the judicial decision in the prior instance may order a stay of enforcement of the judicial decision in the prior instance or any other necessary disposition until the time as a ruling is issued on the appeal against the ruling.
抗告裁判所又は原裁判をした裁判所若しくは裁判官は、抗告について決定があるまで、原裁判の執行の停止その他必要な処分を命ずることができる。
If the court in charge of an appeal against a ruling does not hold oral arguments on in the appeal against the ruling, it may hear the appellant and any other interested party.
抗告裁判所は、抗告について口頭弁論をしない場合には、抗告人その他の利害関係人を審尋することができる。
A special appeal against a ruling may be filed with the Supreme Court against any ruling or order of a district court or summary court against which no objection may be entered or with regard to the ruling or order of the high court, on the grounds that the ruling or order reflects an error in the interpretation of the Constitution or that it is otherwise unconstitutional.
地方裁判所及び簡易裁判所の決定及び命令で不服を申し立てることができないもの並びに高等裁判所の決定及び命令に対しては、その裁判に憲法の解釈の誤りがあることその他憲法の違反があることを理由とするときに、最高裁判所に特に抗告をすることができる。
An appeal against a ruling as referred to in the preceding paragraph must be filed within an inalterable time frame of five days from the day on which notice of the judicial decision is received.
前項の抗告は、裁判の告知を受けた日から五日の不変期間内にしなければならない。
Unless contrary to their nature, provisions on the final appeal and litigation proceedings in the final appellate instance referred to in Article 327, paragraph (1), as well as the provisions of Article 334, paragraph (2), apply mutatis mutandis to an appeal against a ruling as referred to in paragraph (1) and litigation proceedings in such an appeal.
第一項の抗告及びこれに関する訴訟手続には、その性質に反しない限り、第三百二十七条第一項の上告及びその上告審の訴訟手続に関する規定並びに第三百三十四条第二項の規定を準用する。
An appeal may be specially filed with the Supreme Court against a ruling or order of the high court (excluding a ruling or order on an appeal against a ruling as referred to in Article 330 or on a petition as referred to in the following paragraph) other than in a case under the provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, but only if the high court permits it pursuant to the provisions of the following paragraph; provided, however, that this applies only if the judicial decision in question is one that it would be possible to appeal in the form of an appeal against a ruling, if it were the judicial decision of the district court.
高等裁判所の決定及び命令(第三百三十条の抗告及び次項の申立てについての決定及び命令を除く。)に対しては、前条第一項の規定による場合のほか、その高等裁判所が次項の規定により許可したときに限り、最高裁判所に特に抗告をすることができる。ただし、その裁判が地方裁判所の裁判であるとした場合に抗告をすることができるものであるときに限る。
Upon petition, the high court referred to in the preceding paragraph must rule to permit an appeal against a ruling in respect of the judicial decision referred to in the preceding paragraph, if it reflects a determination that is inconsistent with Supreme Court precedent (or, if there is no Supreme Court precedent, conflicts with precedent of the former Great Court of Cassation or precedent of the high court as the final appellate court or the court in charge of the appeal against the ruling) or if it is otherwise found to involve matters of material import involving the interpretation of laws and regulations.
前項の高等裁判所は、同項の裁判について、最高裁判所の判例(これがない場合にあっては、大審院又は上告裁判所若しくは抗告裁判所である高等裁判所の判例)と相反する判断がある場合その他の法令の解釈に関する重要な事項を含むと認められる場合には、申立てにより、決定で、抗告を許可しなければならない。
The circumstances provided for in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article may not be given as the grounds for the petition in a petition as referred to in the preceding paragraph.
前項の申立てにおいては、前条第一項に規定する事由を理由とすることはできない。
If permission under the provisions of paragraph (2) is granted, the appeal against a ruling as referred to in paragraph (1) is deemed to have been filed.
第二項の規定による許可があった場合には、第一項の抗告があったものとみなす。
The Supreme Court may reverse the judicial decision of the prior instance if a violation of law or regulation has clearly influenced the judicial decision.
最高裁判所は、裁判に影響を及ぼすことが明らかな法令の違反があるときは、原裁判を破棄することができる。
The provisions of Article 313; Article 315; and paragraph (2) of the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis to a petition as referred to in paragraph (2); the provisions of Article 318, paragraph (3) apply mutatis mutandis if the court grants the permission under the provisions of paragraph (2); and the provisions of the second sentence of Article 318, paragraph (4) and paragraph (3) of the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis if the permission under the provisions of paragraph (2) is granted.
第三百十三条、第三百十五条及び前条第二項の規定は第二項の申立てについて、第三百十八条第三項の規定は第二項の規定による許可をする場合について、同条第四項後段及び前条第三項の規定は第二項の規定による許可があった場合について準用する。