Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

1 article

Article 167-12Discretionary Transfer

第百六十七条の十二(裁量移行)

An enforcement court may, when it finds it to be reasonable by taking into consideration the contents of the monetary claim to be seized and any other circumstances, transfer its case to the procedure of enforcement against a claim at the district court having jurisdiction in the locality of the enforcement court.

執行裁判所は、差し押さえるべき金銭債権の内容その他の事情を考慮して相当と認めるときは、その所在地を管轄する地方裁判所における債権執行の手続に事件を移行させることができる。

No appeal may be entered against an order under the preceding paragraph.

前項の規定による決定に対しては、不服を申し立てることができない。

The provisions of Article 167-10, paragraph (3) apply mutatis mutandis to an order under paragraph (1), and the provisions of paragraph (6) of that Article apply mutatis mutandis to cases where an order under paragraph (1) has become effective. In this case, the phrase "the petition for a disposition of seizure or the petition referred to in paragraph (1)" in paragraph (6) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "the petition for a disposition of seizure," and the phrase "the petition for an order of seizure or the petition for an order for realizing a claim" in the paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "the petition for an order of seizure."

第百六十七条の十第三項の規定は第一項の規定による決定について、同条第六項の規定は第一項の規定による決定が効力を生じた場合について準用する。この場合において、同条第六項中「差押処分の申立て又は第一項の申立て」とあるのは「差押処分の申立て」と、「それぞれ差押命令の申立て又は転付命令等の申立て」とあるのは「差押命令の申立て」と読み替えるものとする。

Read this with the articles around it

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (Genjido 合同会社) · [email protected]ContactSourcesTermsPrivacy