Chapter VI Procedural Costs
第六章 手続費用
Section 1 Burden of Procedural Costs
第一節 手続費用の負担
Article 28Burden of Procedural Costs
第二十八条(手続費用の負担)
With regard to procedural costs (meaning costs for proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations (hereinafter referred to as "adjudication costs") and costs for proceedings for mediation of domestic relations (hereinafter referred to as "mediation costs"); the same applies hereinafter), each person bears their own costs.
手続費用(家事審判に関する手続の費用(以下「審判費用」という。)及び家事調停に関する手続の費用(以下「調停費用」という。)をいう。以下同じ。)は、各自の負担とする。
Depending on the circumstances, the court may impose the whole or part of the procedural costs, which are to be borne by a party and by an interested party intervenor (meaning the interested party intervenor prescribed in Article 42, paragraph (7); the same applies in item (i)) under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, on a person other than the party or intervenor who is to bear the costs, as set forth in the following:
another party or interested party intervenor;
当事者又は利害関係参加人
a person who is to be subject to adjudication, except for the person set forth in the preceding item; or
前号に掲げる者以外の審判を受ける者となるべき者
a person equivalent to the person set forth in the preceding item, who is to benefit directly from the judicial decision concerned.
前号に掲げる者に準ずる者であって、その裁判により直接に利益を受けるもの
Any procedural costs to be borne by a public prosecutor under the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs are to be borne by the national treasury.
Article 29Judicial Decision on the Burden of Procedural Costs
第二十九条(手続費用の負担の裁判等)
When the court makes a judicial decision to conclude a case, it must, by its own authority, make a judicial decision on the burden of all adjudication costs incurred in the instance thereof (if the case has gone through mediation proceedings, including mediation costs); provided, however, that depending on the circumstances, when the court makes a judicial decision on part of a case or on an interlocutory dispute, it may make a judicial decision on the burden of costs thereof.
Where an upper instance court modifies a judicial decision on merits, it must make a judicial decision on the burden of the total costs of the proceedings (if the case has gone through mediation proceedings, including mediation costs). The same applies when the court that has accepted a case remanded or transferred thereto makes a judicial decision to conclude the case.
上級の裁判所が本案の裁判を変更する場合には、手続の総費用(調停手続を経ている場合にあっては、調停費用を含む。)について、その負担の裁判をしなければならない。事件の差戻し又は移送を受けた裁判所がその事件を完結する裁判をする場合も、同様とする。
When mediation is successful, and if the burden of mediation costs (if the case has gone through adjudication proceedings, including adjudication costs) is not specially specified, each person bears their own costs.
When a litigation case is pending before a court with regard to a case for which mediation may be conducted pursuant to the provisions of Article 244, and the court has referred the case to mediation pursuant to the provisions of Article 257, paragraph (2) or Article 274, paragraph (1), and if mediation is successful and the burden of court costs incurred for the litigation case is not specially specified, each person bears their own costs.
第二百四十四条の規定により調停を行うことができる事件についての訴訟が係属する裁判所が第二百五十七条第二項又は第二百七十四条第一項の規定により事件を調停に付した場合において、調停が成立し、その訴訟についての訴訟費用の負担について特別の定めをしなかったときは、その費用は、各自が負担する。
Article 30Temporary Payment of Procedural Costs
第三十条(手続費用の立替え)
The costs required for the investigation of facts, examination of evidence, issuance of a summons, giving of notice or any other proceedings of domestic relations cases may be temporarily paid by the national treasury on behalf of a person who is obliged to pay them.
事実の調査、証拠調べ、呼出し、告知その他の家事事件の手続に必要な行為に要する費用は、国庫において立て替えることができる。
Changes by (Act No. 53 of 2023)
The provisions of Articles 69 through 74 of the Code of Civil Procedure (excluding Article 71, paragraph (2) of the Code (including the cases applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the second sentence of Article 72 of the Code) and Article 71, paragraph (8) of the Code (including the cases applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the second sentence of Article 72 and Article 74, paragraph (2) of the Code)) apply mutatis mutandis to the burden of procedural costs. In this case: in Article 72 of the Code, the phrase "If the parties reach a court settlement" is deemed to be replaced with "If mediation is successful", and the phrase "settlement costs or court costs" is deemed to be replaced with "mediation costs under Article 29, paragraph (3) of the Domestic Relations Case Procedure Act or court costs under paragraph (4) of that Article"; in Article 73, paragraph (1) of the Code, the phrase "judicial decision or settlement" is deemed to be replaced with "judicial decision or successful mediation", and the phrase "an application for supporting intervention is withdrawn or if an objection to supporting intervention is withdrawn" is deemed to be replaced with "an application for intervention under the provisions of Article 41, paragraph (1) or Article 42, paragraph (1) of the Domestic Relations Case Procedure Act is withdrawn or a petition for permission for intervention under paragraph (2) of that Article is withdrawn"; and in Article 73, paragraph (2) of the Code, the phrase "Articles 61 through 66 and Article 71, paragraph (8)" is deemed to be replaced with "Article 71, paragraph (8) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 31, paragraph (1) of the Domestic Relations Case Procedure Act", the phrase "a ruling on a petition under the preceding paragraph; the provisions of Article 71, paragraph (2) apply mutatis mutandis to a petition under the preceding paragraph" is deemed to be replaced with "a ruling on a petition under the preceding paragraph", the phrase "paragraphs (5) through (8)" is deemed to be replaced with "paragraphs (5) through (7)", and the phrase "apply mutatis mutandis to an objection to such a disposition. In such a case, the term 'from the day when the judicial decision on the bearing of costs becomes final and binding' in Article 71, paragraph (2) is deemed to be replaced with 'from the day when the litigation is concluded'" is deemed to be replaced with "apply mutatis mutandis to an objection to such a disposition".
民事訴訟法第六十九条から第七十四条までの規定(同法第七十一条第二項(同法第七十二条後段において準用する場合を含む。)及び第八項(同法第七十二条後段及び第七十四条第二項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定を除く。)は、手続費用の負担について準用する。この場合において、同法第七十二条中「当事者が裁判所において和解をした場合」とあるのは「調停が成立した場合」と、「和解の費用又は訴訟費用」とあるのは「家事事件手続法第二十九条第三項の調停費用又は同条第四項の訴訟費用」と、同法第七十三条第一項中「裁判及び和解」とあるのは「裁判及び調停の成立」と、「補助参加の申出の取下げ又は補助参加についての異議の取下げ」とあるのは「家事事件手続法第四十一条第一項若しくは第四十二条第一項の規定による参加の申出の取下げ又は同条第二項の規定による参加の許可の申立ての取下げ」と、同条第二項中「第六十一条から第六十六条まで及び」とあるのは「家事事件手続法第三十一条第一項において準用する」と、「について、同条第二項の規定は前項の申立てについて」とあるのは「について」と、「第八項まで」とあるのは「第七項まで」と、「準用する。この場合において、同条第二項中「訴訟費用の負担の裁判が確定した」とあるのは、「訴訟が完結した」と読み替えるものとする」とあるのは「準用する」と読み替えるものとする。
An immediate appeal under the provisions of Article 69, paragraph (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph and an immediate appeal against a judicial decision on an objection under Article 71, paragraph (5) of the Code (including the cases applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the second sentence of Article 72 of the Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph) and Article 73, paragraph (2) and Article 74, paragraph (2) of the Code have the effect of a stay of execution.
前項において準用する民事訴訟法第六十九条第三項の規定による即時抗告並びに同法第七十一条第五項(前項において準用する同法第七十二条後段において準用する場合を含む。)、第七十三条第二項及び第七十四条第二項の異議の申立てについての裁判に対する即時抗告は、執行停止の効力を有する。
Section 2 Procedural Aid
第二節 手続上の救助
第三十二条
For a person who lacks the financial resources to pay the costs necessary to prepare for and undertake a domestic relations case or for a person who will suffer substantial detriment to their standard of living by paying the costs, the court may, upon petition, make a judicial decision to grant judicial aid to the person; provided, however, that this does not apply where it is clear that a person who seeks aid files a petition for adjudication of domestic relations or mediation of domestic relations or performs any other procedural acts for unjust purposes.
The provisions of Article 82, paragraph (2), and Articles 83 through 86 of the Code of Civil Procedure (excluding Article 83, paragraph (1), item (iii) of the Code) apply mutatis mutandis to procedural aid. In this case, the phrase "main clause of Article 82, paragraph (1)" in Article 84 of the Code is deemed to be replaced with "main clause of Article 32, paragraph (1) of the Domestic Relations Case Procedure Act".
民事訴訟法第八十二条第二項及び第八十三条から第八十六条まで(同法第八十三条第一項第三号を除く。)の規定は、手続上の救助について準用する。この場合において、同法第八十四条中「第八十二条第一項本文」とあるのは、「家事事件手続法第三十二条第一項本文」と読み替えるものとする。
domestic relations cases
「家事事件」
A case of adjudication of domestic relations (家事審判) or of mediation of domestic relations (家事調停): the family matters whose procedure this Act governs.
Short name set inArticle 1, paragraph (1)
procedural actmachine translation
「手続行為」
An act a person performs in the proceedings of a domestic relations case (家事事件).
Short name set inArticle 17, paragraph (1)
adjudication costs
「審判費用」
The costs of proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations (家事審判).
Short name set inArticle 28, paragraph (1)
procedural costsmachine translation
「手続費用」
The costs of proceedings: the costs of adjudication of domestic relations (審判費用) and the costs of mediation (調停費用), which as a rule each person bears for themselves.
Defined inArticle 28, paragraph (1)
mediation costscorrected by this site
「調停費用」
The costs of proceedings for mediation of domestic relations (家事調停).
Short name set inArticle 28, paragraph (1)
interested party intervenor
「利害関係参加人」
A person who has joined proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations (家事審判) under Article 42, paragraphs (1) to (3) — as a person who is to be subject to the ruling, or, with the family court's permission or by its order, as a person directly affected by its outcome or qualified to be a party — and who may then perform most of the procedural acts a party can.
Defined inArticle 28, paragraph (2)· applies only in this provision
public prosecutor
検察官
The official who brings a prosecution (公訴) for a crime before a court (Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 247), and who may decide not to prosecute where, in view of the offender's character, age and circumstances, the gravity and circumstances of the offence and what happened after it, prosecution is not needed (Article 248). In criminal cases a public prosecutor asks the court to apply the law correctly and oversees the carrying out of its judgments; and, as the representative of the public interest, a public prosecutor also does the work other laws and regulations assign to a public prosecutor, which is not limited to criminal cases (Public Prosecutors Office Act, Article 4). A public prosecutor may investigate any crime (Article 6, paragraph (1)). Public prosecutors work through the public prosecutors offices (検察庁): the Supreme, High, District and Local Public Prosecutors Offices (Article 1).
Written by AI using Code of Criminal Procedure, Arts. 247, 248 and Public Prosecutors Office Act, Arts. 1, 4, 6 as a reference.