Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

1 article

Supplementary Provisions, Article 3

第三条

The provisions of Article 16-2, paragraph (4), paragraph (13) (excluding the portion pertaining to the case where a bank seeks to make a company set forth in the items of paragraph (1) of that Article that it actually has as its subsidiary company a subsidiary company that falls under a company set forth in another of those items (limited to a bank, etc. eligible to be a subsidiary company prescribed in paragraph (4) of that Article)) and paragraph (16) of the new Banking Act do not apply to a company set forth in of the former Banking Act in the case where, at the time this Act comes into effect, a bank has actually obtained the authorization under the provisions of of the former Banking Act (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to ), the proviso to , or , and the bank or its subsidiary company holds voting rights in that company (meaning voting rights prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (6) of the Banking Act; the same applies in Article 6 of the Supplementary Provisions), when combined, in excess of the maximum threshold for voting rights (meaning the maximum threshold for voting rights prescribed in of the former Banking Act).

新銀行法第十六条の二第四項、第十三項(銀行が、現に子会社としている同条第一項各号に掲げる会社を当該各号のうち他の号に掲げる会社(同条第四項に規定する子会社対象銀行等に限る。)に該当する子会社としようとするときに係る部分を除く。)及び第十六項の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に銀行が(において準用する場合を含む。)、ただし書又はの規定による認可を受けて当該銀行又はその子会社がに掲げる会社の議決権(銀行法第二条第六項に規定する議決権をいう。附則第六条において同じ。)を合算してその基準議決権数(に規定する基準議決権数をいう。)を超えて保有している場合における当該会社については、適用しない。

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.SourcesTermsPrivacy