Chapter V Mergers, Company Splits, or Business Transfers or Acquisitions
第五章 合併、会社分割又は事業の譲渡若しくは譲受け
Article 30Authorization for a Merger, Company Split, or Business Transfer or Acquisition
第三十条(合併、会社分割又は事業の譲渡若しくは譲受けの認可等)
A merger in which banks are all or some of the parties (limited to one in which the surviving company or the company incorporated in the merger is a bank, and excluding a merger that falls under the merger pursuant to the provisions of Article 3 (Mergers) of the Act on Financial Institutions' Merger and Conversion; hereinafter referred to as a "merger" in this Chapter) does not become effective without the authorization by the Prime Minister.
銀行を全部又は一部の当事者とする合併(当該合併後存続する会社又は当該合併により設立される会社が銀行であるものに限るものとし、金融機関の合併及び転換に関する法律第三条(合併)の規定による合併に該当するものを除く。以下この章において「合併」という。)は、内閣総理大臣の認可を受けなければ、その効力を生じない。
Except as specified by Cabinet Order, a company split to which a bank is a party does not become effective without the authorization by the Prime Minister.
銀行を当事者とする会社分割は、政令で定めるものを除き、内閣総理大臣の認可を受けなければ、その効力を生じない。
Except as specified by Cabinet Order, a business transfer or acquisition to which a bank is a party and which involves all or part of a business does not become effective without the authorization by the Prime Minister.
銀行を当事者とする事業の全部又は一部の譲渡又は譲受けは、政令で定めるものを除き、内閣総理大臣の認可を受けなければ、その効力を生じない。
If a bank acquires all or part of the business of a Shinkin bank, credit cooperative, or labor bank (including a federation consisting of those corporations; hereinafter referred to as a "Shinkin bank, etc." in this Chapter), the Shinkin bank, etc. is deemed to be a company and the provisions of Article 16 (Restriction on Business Acquisitions) of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (Act No. 54 of 1947) and other related provisions of that Act apply.
銀行が信用金庫、信用協同組合又は労働金庫(これらの法人をもつて組織する連合会を含む。以下この章において「信用金庫等」という。)から事業の全部又は一部を譲り受ける場合においては、当該信用金庫等を会社とみなして、私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律(昭和二十二年法律第五十四号)第十六条(事業の譲受け等の制限)及び同条に係る同法の規定を適用する。
第三十一条
When an application is filed for the authorization referred to in the preceding Article, the Prime Minister must examine whether the following criteria are met:
内閣総理大臣は、前条の認可の申請があつたときは、次に掲げる基準に適合するかどうかを審査しなければならない。
a merger, company split, or transfer or acquisition of all or part of a business, pursuant to the provisions of the preceding Article (hereinafter referred to as the "merger, etc." in this Article) is appropriate in light of the smooth supply and demand of funds and customer convenience in the region where the bank, etc. (meaning a bank or long-term credit bank; hereinafter the same applies except in Article 52-60-2) or Shinkin bank, etc. which is party to the merger, etc. performs services (if a part of the business has been succeeded or is to be succeeded to in a company split or a part of the business is to be transferred or acquired, limited to the region in which that part of business is conducted);
it is unlikely that the merger, etc. is to disrupt the order of the financial system by impeding fair competition among financial institutions or in any other way; and
合併等が金融機関相互間の適正な競争関係を阻害する等金融秩序を乱すおそれがないものであること。
the bank filing the application for the authorization referred to in the preceding Article or the bank incorporated in the merger is fully expected to perform its services appropriately, fairly, and efficiently after the merger, etc.
第三十二条(みなし免許)
A company engaged in banking which is incorporated as a result of merger by obtaining the authorization referred to in Article 30, paragraph (1) is deemed to have obtained the license referred to in Article 4, paragraph (1) granted by the Prime Minister at the time of its incorporation.
Article 33Demands for Objection by the Creditors in a Merger
第三十三条(合併の場合の債権者の異議の催告)
If a bank passes a resolution for a merger, the bank is not required to make the demand under the provisions of Article 789, paragraph (2), Article 799, paragraph (2), or Article 810, paragraph (2) (Objection by the Creditors) of the Companies Act to depositors, etc. or other creditors specified by Cabinet Order.
銀行が合併の決議をした場合においては、預金者等その他政令で定める債権者に対する会社法第七百八十九条第二項、第七百九十九条第二項又は第八百十条第二項(債権者の異議)の規定による催告は、することを要しない。
Article 33-2Demand for Objection by the Creditors in the Case of Company Split
第三十三条の二(会社分割の場合の債権者の異議の催告)
If a bank passes a resolution for a company split, the bank is not required to make the demand under the provisions of Article 789, paragraph (2), Article 799, paragraph (2), or Article 810, paragraph (2) (Objection by the Creditors) of the Companies Act to depositors, etc. or other creditors specified by Cabinet Order.
銀行が会社分割の決議をした場合においては、預金者等その他政令で定める債権者に対する会社法第七百八十九条第二項、第七百九十九条第二項又は第八百十条第二項(債権者の異議)の規定による催告は、することを要しない。
The provisions of Article 759, paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) (Effectuation of an Absorption-Type Company Split Which Causes the Succession of Rights and Obligations by a Stock Company), Article 761, paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) (Effectuation of an Absorption-Type Company Split Which Causes the Succession of Rights and Obligations by a Membership Company), Article 764, paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) (Effectuation of an Incorporation-type Company Split by Which a Stock Company Is Established), and Article 766, paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) (Effectuation of an Incorporation-type Company Split by Which a Membership Company is Established) of the Companies Act do not apply to depositors, etc. or to the creditors specified by Cabinet Order to which the demand for objection is not required to be made pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph.
会社法第七百五十九条第二項及び第三項(株式会社に権利義務を承継させる吸収分割の効力の発生等)、第七百六十一条第二項及び第三項(持分会社に権利義務を承継させる吸収分割の効力の発生等)、第七百六十四条第二項及び第三項(株式会社を設立する新設分割の効力の発生等)並びに第七百六十六条第二項及び第三項(持分会社を設立する新設分割の効力の発生等)の規定は、前項の規定により催告をすることを要しないものとされる預金者等その他政令で定める債権者には、適用しない。
Article 34Demand for Objection by the Creditors in the Case of Business Transfer or Acquisition
第三十四条(事業の譲渡又は譲受けの場合の債権者の異議の催告等)
If a resolution at a shareholders meeting is passed for a business transfer or acquisition to which a bank is party which involves all of a business (or a board of directors' resolution or a decision of the executive officers, if the bank's acquisition of all of the business is to be made without the resolution referred to in Article 467, paragraph (1) (Approval for the Assignment of Business) of the Companies Act pursuant to the provisions of Article 468 (Cases where Approval for the Assignment of Business Is Not Required) of that Act), within two weeks after the day of the resolution or decision, the bank must issue public notice in the Official Gazette that gives an overview of the resolution or the decision and indicate that a creditor who has an objection to the transfer or acquisition of all of the business is required to state the objection within a fixed period of time, and must issue a demand separately to each known creditor other than a depositor, etc. or a creditor specified by Cabinet Order.
銀行を当事者とする事業の全部の譲渡又は譲受けについて株主総会の決議(会社法第四百六十八条(事業譲渡等の承認を要しない場合)の規定により同法第四百六十七条第一項(事業譲渡等の承認等)の決議によらずに事業の全部の譲受けを行う場合には、取締役会の決議又は執行役の決定)がされたときは、当該銀行は、当該決議又は決定の日から二週間以内に、当該決議又は決定の要旨及び当該事業の全部の譲渡又は譲受けに異議のある債権者は一定の期間内に異議を述べるべき旨を官報に公告し、かつ、預金者等その他政令で定める債権者以外の知れている債権者には、各別にこれを催告しなければならない。
The period referred to in the preceding paragraph must not be less than one month.
前項の期間は、一月を下つてはならない。
Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (1), if, in addition to issuing public notice referred to in that paragraph in the Official Gazette, a bank issues public notice using a means of public notice set forth in the items of Article 57 in accordance with the provisions of the articles of incorporation pursuant to the provisions of that Article, the bank is not required to issue the separate demands referred to in paragraph (1).
If a creditor does not state an objection within the period referred to in paragraph (1), it is deemed that the creditor has accepted the transfer or acquisition of all of the business.
債権者が第一項の期間内に異議を述べなかつたときは、当該債権者は、当該事業の全部の譲渡又は譲受けについて承認したものとみなす。
If a creditor states an objection within the period referred to in paragraph (1), the bank must make payment or provide suitable collateral to the creditor, or must deposit suitable property with a trust company or other financial institutions engaging in trust business for the purpose of ensuring that the creditor will receive payment; provided, however, that this does not apply if the transfer or acquisition of all of the business is unlikely to harm the creditor.
第三十五条
If a resolution at a shareholders meeting or of board of directors has been passed, or a decision of the executive officers has been made for the transfer or acquisition of part of the business to which a bank is party, within two weeks after the day of the resolution or decision, the bank may issue public notice in the Official Gazette that gives an overview of the resolution or the decision and indicate that a creditor who has an objection to the transfer or acquisition of part of the business is required to state the objection within a fixed period of time; provided, however, that the bank must issue a demand separately to each known creditor other than a depositor, etc. or a creditor specified by Cabinet Order.
The period referred to in the preceding paragraph must not be less than one month.
前項の期間は、一月を下つてはならない。
The provisions of paragraphs (3) through (5) of the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis to the objection by a creditor that is subject to public notice or demand issued pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1).
前条第三項から第五項までの規定は、第一項の規定によりされた公告及び催告に係る債権者の異議について準用する。
Article 36Public Notice of Company Split or Business Transfer
第三十六条(会社分割又は事業の譲渡の公告等)
If a bank has all or part of its business succeeded to in a company split or transfers all or part of its business, the bank must issue public notice of this without delay.
銀行は、会社分割により事業の全部若しくは一部を承継させ、又は事業の全部若しくは一部を譲渡したときは、遅滞なくその旨を公告しなければならない。
If a bank whose means of public notice is the means set forth in Article 57, item (i) issues public notice pursuant to the preceding paragraph, notice is deemed to have been given to the debtors of the bank issuing that public notice, through an instrument bearing a fixed date pursuant to the provisions of Article 467 (Requirement of Perfection upon Assignment of Claim) of the Civil Code. In such a case, the date of the public notice is deemed to be the fixed date.