Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

1 article

Article 93-4Suspension of the Effects of a Conflicting Order of Seizure of Claims on the Delivery Claim

第九十三条の四(給付請求権に対する競合する債権差押命令等の効力の停止等)

When a commencement order for forced administration has become effective against a person obligated to deliver pursuant to the provisions of Article 93, paragraph (4), the effects of any order of seizure or disposition of seizure against the delivery claim, which is already effective, are suspended; provided, however, that this not applies to cases where the commencement order for forced administration becomes effective against the person obligated to deliver after the times stated in the items of Article 165 (including the cases where the provisions of the items of Article 165 (excluding item (iii) and item (iv)) are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 167-14, paragraph (1) and the cases where they are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 193, paragraph (2)).

第九十三条第四項の規定により強制管理の開始決定の効力が給付義務者に対して生じたときは、給付請求権に対する差押命令又は差押処分であつて既に効力が生じていたものは、その効力を停止する。ただし、強制管理の開始決定の給付義務者に対する効力の発生が第百六十五条各号(第百六十七条の十四第一項において第百六十五条各号(第三号及び第四号を除く。)の規定を準用する場合及び第百九十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。)に掲げる時後であるときは、この限りでない。

When a commencement order for forced administration has become effective against a person obligated to deliver pursuant to the provisions of Article 93, paragraph (4), the effects of any order of provisional seizure against the delivery claim, which is already effective, are suspended.

第九十三条第四項の規定により強制管理の開始決定の効力が給付義務者に対して生じたときは、給付請求権に対する仮差押命令であつて既に効力が生じていたものは、その効力を停止する。

The obligee in the order of seizure or disposition of seizure referred to in paragraph (1), an obligee who made a distribution demand in the procedure of enforcement against a claim (meaning the enforcement against a claim prescribed in Article 143) or enforcement against a claim arising from a small claims action (meaning enforcement against a claim arising from a small claims action as prescribed in Article 167-2, paragraph (2)) by the time of suspension of the effects of the order of seizure or disposition of seizure referred to in paragraph (1), and the obligee in the order of provisional seizure referred to in the preceding paragraph may receive distribution or payment in the forced administration procedure referred to in the preceding two paragraphs, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 107, paragraph (4).

第一項の差押命令又は差押処分の債権者、同項の差押命令又は差押処分が効力を停止する時までに当該債権執行(第百四十三条に規定する債権執行をいう。)又は少額訴訟債権執行(第百六十七条の二第二項に規定する少額訴訟債権執行をいう。)の手続において配当要求をした債権者及び前項の仮差押命令の債権者は、第百七条第四項の規定にかかわらず、前二項の強制管理の手続において配当等を受けることができる。

Read this with the articles around it

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (Genjido 合同会社) · [email protected]ContactSourcesTermsPrivacy