The provisions of Article 2 through Article 8 (excluding the items of Article 2, paragraph (3) and the items of Article 4, paragraph (3)) of the Act on the Succession to Labor Contracts upon Company Split (Act No. 103 of 2000) and Article 5, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions of the Act Partially Amending the Commercial Code, etc. (Act No. 90 of 2000) apply mutatis mutandis to the case where a splitting fund carries out an absorption-type split under the provisions of the preceding Division. In this case, the term "succeeding company, etc." in Article 2, paragraphs (1) and (2) of the Act on the Succession to Labor Contracts upon Company Split is deemed to be replaced with "succeeding fund"; the term "splitting company" in that paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "splitting fund"; the term "specified in the relevant one of the following items according to the case falling under it" in paragraph (3) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "upon the elapse of two weeks from the date of resolution prescribed in Article 137-3-10, paragraph (1) of the National Pension Act (Act No. 141 of 1959)"; the terms "splitting company" and "succeeding company, etc." in the provisions of Article 3 through Article 8 (excluding Article 4, paragraph (3)) of that Act are deemed to be replaced with "splitting fund" and "succeeding fund", respectively; and the term "in the relevant one of the following items according to the case falling under it" in Article 4, paragraph (3) of that Act is deemed to be replaced with "on a day, specified by the splitting fund, that is on or before the day preceding the day on which the authorization under Article 137-3-7, paragraph (1) of the National Pension Act is obtained"; and, beyond that, necessary technical replacement of terms is specified by Cabinet Order.