Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

1 article

Article 17Measure for Observation and Protection

第十七条(観護の措置)

A family court may implement measures for observation and protection listed in the following items by a ruling if the measures are needed for its trial and decision:

家庭裁判所は、審判を行うため必要があるときは、決定をもつて、次に掲げる観護の措置をとることができる。

to put under the observation and protection of a family court investigating officer;

家庭裁判所調査官の観護に付すること。

to refer to a juvenile classification home.

少年鑑別所に送致すること。

Measures for observation and protection regarding an escorted juvenile must be implemented within 24 hours, at the latest, from the time of the arrival. This also applies to the measures regarding a juvenile who has been detained or arrested, and is referred to the court by a public prosecutor or a judicial police officer.

同行された少年については、観護の措置は、遅くとも、到着のときから二十四時間以内に、これを行わなければならない。検察官又は司法警察員から勾留又は逮捕された少年の送致を受けたときも、同様である。

If the measures prescribed in item (ii) of paragraph (1) are implemented, then the period of detention of the juvenile at the juvenile classification home may not exceed two weeks; provided, however, that the period may be renewed by the court's ruling if continued custody is particularly needed.

第一項第二号の措置においては、少年鑑別所に収容する期間は、二週間を超えることができない。ただし、特に継続の必要があるときは、決定をもつて、これを更新することができる。

The renewal pursuant to the proviso of the preceding paragraph is not to take place more than once; provided, however, that the renewal may take place with a limit of up to two additional times if the family court has decided to conduct an examination of a witness, seek an expert's opinion, or conduct an inspection or has implemented these measures to find out the facts of the delinquent act (including motive for the offense, the manner and impact of the crime, or other important facts closely related to the crime; this also applies below) punishable by imprisonment or a heavier punishment, concerning a juvenile as prescribed in Article 3, paragraph (1), item (i), and if there are reasonable grounds to suspect that a family court trial and decision would be severely hindered without detaining the juvenile.

前項ただし書の規定による更新は、一回を超えて行うことができない。ただし、第三条第一項第一号に掲げる少年に係る拘禁刑以上の刑に当たる罪の事件でその非行事実(犯行の動機、態様及び結果その他の当該犯罪に密接に関連する重要な事実を含む。以下同じ。)の認定に関し証人尋問、鑑定若しくは検証を行うことを決定したもの又はこれを行つたものについて、少年を収容しなければ審判に著しい支障が生じるおそれがあると認めるに足りる相当の理由がある場合には、その更新は、更に二回を限度として、行うことができる。

Notwithstanding the proviso of paragraph (3), the period of detention in a case once again referred by a public prosecutor may not be renewed if the measures prescribed in item (ii) of paragraph (1) have already been implemented or a detention warrant has already been issued regarding the case.

第三項ただし書の規定にかかわらず、検察官から再び送致を受けた事件が先に第一項第二号の措置がとられ、又は勾留状が発せられた事件であるときは、収容の期間は、これを更新することができない。

If the judge implements the measures prescribed in paragraph (1), item (i) of this Article upon request pursuant to the provisions of Article 43, paragraph (1), the measures are deemed as those prescribed in paragraph (1), item (i) of this Article if the case is subsequently referred to a family court.

裁判官が第四十三条第一項の請求により、第一項第一号の措置をとつた場合において、事件が家庭裁判所に送致されたときは、その措置は、これを第一項第一号の措置とみなす。

If the judge implements the measures prescribed in item (ii), paragraph (1) of this Article upon request pursuant to the provisions of Article 43, paragraph (1), the measures are deemed to be those prescribed in item (ii), paragraph (1) of this Article if the case is subsequently referred to a family court. In this case, the period prescribed in paragraph (3) begins from the day when the case is referred to a family court.

裁判官が第四十三条第一項の請求により第一項第二号の措置をとつた場合において、事件が家庭裁判所に送致されたときは、その措置は、これを第一項第二号の措置とみなす。この場合には、第三項の期間は、家庭裁判所が事件の送致を受けた日から、これを起算する。

The measures for observation and protection may be repealed or amended by a ruling.

観護の措置は、決定をもつて、これを取り消し、又は変更することができる。

Regarding the measures provided in paragraph (1), item (ii), the total period of detention may not exceed eight weeks; provided, however, that no ruling that makes a total custody period longer than four weeks is to be rendered without the grounds prescribed in the proviso of paragraph (4).

第一項第二号の措置については、収容の期間は、通じて八週間を超えることができない。ただし、その収容の期間が通じて四週間を超えることとなる決定を行うときは、第四項ただし書に規定する事由がなければならない。

In case of emergency, the presiding judge may take the dispositions prescribed in paragraphs (1) or (8), or have a member of the panel of judges do this.

裁判長は、急速を要する場合には、第一項及び第八項の処分をし、又は合議体の構成員にこれをさせることができる。

Read this with the articles around it

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (源氏道合同会社) · contact@genjido.comContactSourcesTermsPrivacy