①For cases in which an application pursuant to the provisions of Article 67, paragraph (2) of the Offenders Rehabilitation Act (Act No. 88 of 2007) is filed, the family court, by a ruling, must conduct the disposition for rehabilitation of an adjudicated delinquent prescribed in Article 24, paragraph (1), item (ii) or (iii), if the court, as a result of the trial and decision, finds that the person who is subject to the disposition for rehabilitation of an adjudicated delinquent prescribed in Article 24, paragraph (1), item (i), failed to comply with the matters to be complied with, and there are grounds that the person has continued to fail to comply with the matters to be complied with despite being admonished as prescribed in Article 67, paragraph (1) of that Act, and finds that the failure is so serious that the disposition for rehabilitation of an adjudicated delinquent is not sufficient enough to improve or rehabilitate that person.

②When subjecting a person of 20 years of age or above to the disposition for rehabilitation of an adjudicated delinquent prescribed in Article 24, paragraph (1), item (iii) pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the family court must specify, concurrently with the decision, the period of detention in a juvenile training school before they reach 23 years of age.

③Beyond what is stated in the preceding paragraph, the procedure of a case on disposition for rehabilitation of an adjudicated delinquent pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1), is to be governed by the procedure of the case concerned with the disposition for rehabilitation of an adjudicated delinquent pursuant to the provisions of Article 24, paragraph (1), unless it contradicts its nature.

①When a criminal conviction against a person becomes final and binding while the disposition for rehabilitation of an adjudicated delinquent are in place, the family court that implemented the disposition may, by a ruling, revoke those measures when it is found to be appropriate.

②When a person is subjected to new disposition for rehabilitation of an adjudicated delinquent while the previous disposition for rehabilitation of an adjudicated delinquent are in place, the family court implementing the new disposition may hear the opinion from the family court which has implemented the previous disposition and revoke either of them by a ruling.

①If, while the disposition is in place, any new materials are discovered that clearly indicate that the family court had no jurisdiction over the person in question, or that the family court has subjected a juvenile under 14 years of age to disposition for rehabilitation of an adjudicated delinquent without procedure for referral from the prefectural governor or a director of a child guidance center, the family court implementing the disposition must revoke that disposition by a ruling.

②If any new materials are discovered that clearly indicate that the family court has subjected a person to disposition for rehabilitation of an adjudicated delinquent without any grounds to subject the person to a trial and decision, even after the disposition had been completed, the preceding paragraph applies; provided, however, that this does not apply if the person has died.

③If the director of a probation office, children's self-reliance support facility, foster home or juvenile training school finds any new materials related to a person who has been subjected to the disposition for rehabilitation of an adjudicated delinquent showing probable grounds of suspicion prescribed in paragraph (1), they must give notice to that effect to the family court that has conducted the measures.

④The provisions of Article 18, paragraph (1) and Article 19, paragraph (2) apply mutatis mutandis if the family court revokes the disposition for rehabilitation of an adjudicated delinquent pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1).

⑤If the family court revokes the disposition for rehabilitation of an adjudicated delinquent against a person detained in a juvenile training school pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1), the family court, by a ruling, may have the person stay on at the juvenile training school if it is found necessary; provided, however, that this period must not exceed three days.

⑥Beyond what is stated in the preceding three paragraphs, the procedure in the case of revocation of the disposition for rehabilitation of an adjudicated delinquent referred to in Article 24, paragraph (1) pursuant to the provisions of paragraphs (1) and (2) is governed by the same rules as those applicable to the procedure in the case on the disposition for rehabilitation of an adjudicated delinquent referred to in Article 24, paragraph (1) unless it is contrary to its nature.

When the family court has given a ruling prescribed in Article 24 or 25, it may request that the institution, organization, individual, probation office, child welfare institution or juvenile training school to submit reports and opinions concerning the juvenile.

When a family court requests correctional guidance from an appropriate institution, organization or individual as a measure prescribed in Article 25, paragraph (2), item (iii), the family court may pay all or part of the expenses incurred to the institution, organization or individual.

①The provisions in laws and regulations concerning the costs of criminal proceedings apply mutatis mutandis to the travel expenses, daily allowances, accommodation fees and other costs payable to witnesses, expert witnesses, translators and interpreters.

②A person of reference may request their travel expenses, daily allowances and accommodation fees.

③The costs payable to the person of reference are deemed as costs payable to the witness, and the provisions of paragraph (1) is to be applied.

④The amounts of travel expenses, daily allowances, accommodation fees and remuneration payable to an attendant pursuant to the provisions of Article 22-3, paragraph (4) is governed by the provisions of Article 38, paragraph (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure concerning those payable to a defense counsel.

When the family court has a volunteer probation officer or a commissioned child welfare volunteer provide assistance in investigation and observation pursuant to the provisions of Article 16, paragraph (1), the family court may pay all or part of its costs as prescribed by the Supreme Court.

①The family court may collect from the juvenile, or the person having a duty to support the juvenile, all or part of the travel expenses, daily allowances, accommodation fees and other costs paid to witnesses, expert witnesses, interpreters, translators, person of reference, attendants appointed pursuant to the provisions of Article 22-3, paragraph (3) (including if it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 22-5, paragraph (4)) and those commissioned to give correctional guidance, and the costs incurred by the juvenile classification home and juvenile training school.

②With regard to the collection of the costs prescribed in the preceding paragraph, the provisions of Article 121, paragraphs (1), (2) and (4) of the Non-Contentious Case Procedures Act (Act No. 51 of 2011) and Article 508, paragraph (1), main clause and paragraph (2), and Article 514 of the Code of Criminal Procedure apply mutatis mutandis. In this case, the term "public prosecutor" in Article 121, paragraph (1) of the Non-Contentious Case Procedures Act is deemed to be replaced with "family court".