If a person files a petition for a compulsory auction of immovable property for which an order commencing compulsory auction proceedings or the auctioning of property as a means of enforcing a security interest (referred to as an "auction" in this Section) has been issued, the enforcement court is to issue another order commencing compulsory auction proceedings.
強制競売又は担保権の実行としての競売（以下この節において「競売」という。）の開始決定がされた不動産について強制競売の申立てがあつたときは、執行裁判所は、更に強制競売の開始決定をするものとする。
If a petition for a compulsory auction or auction connected with a previous commencement order is withdrawn or if the proceedings for the compulsory auction or auction connected with a previous commencement order are canceled, the enforcement court must continue the proceedings based on the subsequent commencing compulsory auction proceedings.
先の開始決定に係る強制競売若しくは競売の申立てが取り下げられたとき、又は先の開始決定に係る強制競売若しくは競売の手続が取り消されたときは、執行裁判所は、後の強制競売の開始決定に基づいて手続を続行しなければならない。
In the cases of the preceding paragraph, if the subsequent commencing compulsory auction proceedings are connected with a petition that is filed after the deadline for a distribution demand, the court clerk must set a new deadline for a distribution demand. In this case, it is not required to demand a notification under Article 49, paragraph (2) from any person who has already filed a proof as referred to in Article 50, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 188).
A person may file an objection with the enforcement court to a court clerk's disposition under the preceding paragraph.
前項の規定による裁判所書記官の処分に対しては、執行裁判所に異議を申し立てることができる。
The provisions of the first sentence of Article 10, paragraph (6) and Article 10, paragraph (9) apply mutatis mutandis to cases where an objection under the preceding paragraph has been filed.
If the proceedings for a compulsory auction or auction connected with a previous commencement order are stayed, the enforcement court, upon petition, may make a judicial decision to continue the proceedings based on subsequent commencing compulsory-auction proceedings (limited to one resulting from a petition filed no later than the deadline for a distribution demand); provided, however, that this does not apply if the cancellation of the proceedings connected with the previous order would change the matter stated in Article 62, paragraph (1), item (ii).
先の開始決定に係る強制競売又は競売の手続が停止されたときは、執行裁判所は、申立てにより、後の強制競売の開始決定（配当要求の終期までにされた申立てに係るものに限る。）に基づいて手続を続行する旨の裁判をすることができる。ただし、先の開始決定に係る強制競売又は競売の手続が取り消されたとすれば、第六十二条第一項第二号に掲げる事項について変更が生ずるときは、この限りでない。
An appeal may be filed against an order to deny the petition referred to in the preceding paragraph.
前項の申立てを却下する決定に対しては、執行抗告をすることができる。
Read this with the articles around it