Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

1 article

Article 167-15Indirect Judicial Enforcement for a Monetary Claim Related to Duty to Support

第百六十七条の十五(扶養義務等に係る金銭債権についての間接強制)

Judicial enforcement for a monetary claim related to any of the duties stated in the items of Article 151-2, paragraph (1) is carried out pursuant to the provisions of the preceding Subsections, and also, when a petition has been filed by the obligee, is carried out by the enforcement court by the method prescribed in Article 172, paragraph (1); provided, however, that this does not apply when the obligor is unable to perform the obligation related to that monetary claim due to a lack of the ability to pay or when the obligor is to fall into extreme poverty through performance of the obligation.

第百五十一条の二第一項各号に掲げる義務に係る金銭債権についての強制執行は、前各款の規定により行うほか、債権者の申立てがあるときは、執行裁判所が第百七十二条第一項に規定する方法により行う。ただし、債務者が、支払能力を欠くためにその金銭債権に係る債務を弁済することができないとき、又はその債務を弁済することによつてその生活が著しく窮迫するときは、この限りでない。

In the case of carrying out judicial enforcement for the monetary claim prescribed in the preceding paragraph pursuant to the provisions of the paragraph by the method prescribed in Article 172, paragraph (1), the enforcement court must, when determining the amount of money to be paid by the obligor to the obligee, particularly take into account the disadvantages to be incurred by the obligee through default of the obligation and the financial resources of the obligor and the mode of their performance of the obligation in the past.

前項の規定により同項に規定する金銭債権について第百七十二条第一項に規定する方法により強制執行を行う場合において、債務者が債権者に支払うべき金銭の額を定めるに当たつては、執行裁判所は、債務不履行により債権者が受けるべき不利益並びに債務者の資力及び従前の債務の履行の態様を特に考慮しなければならない。

When there has been a change in circumstances, an enforcement court may, upon petition by the obligor, set aside an order under paragraph (1) retroactively as of the time when that petition is filed (or, if there is a change in circumstances after that petition is filed, the time of the change in circumstances).

事情の変更があつたときは、執行裁判所は、債務者の申立てにより、その申立てがあつた時(その申立てがあつた後に事情の変更があつたときは、その事情の変更があつた時)までさかのぼつて、第一項の規定による決定を取り消すことができる。

When the petition referred to in the preceding paragraph has been filed, an enforcement court may order a stay of enforcement for an order under paragraph (1) until a judicial decision on the petition becomes effective, while either requiring or not requiring security to be provided.

前項の申立てがあつたときは、執行裁判所は、その裁判が効力を生ずるまでの間、担保を立てさせ、又は立てさせないで、第一項の規定による決定の執行の停止を命ずることができる。

No appeal may be entered against an order under the preceding paragraph.

前項の規定による決定に対しては、不服を申し立てることができない。

The provisions of Article 172, paragraph (2) through (5) apply mutatis mutandis to the case referred to in paragraph (1), the provisions of paragraph (3) and paragraph (5) of that Article apply mutatis mutandis to the case referred to in paragraph (3), and the provisions of Article 173, paragraph (2) apply mutatis mutandis to the enforcement court referred to in paragraph (1).

第百七十二条第二項から第五項までの規定は第一項の場合について、同条第三項及び第五項の規定は第三項の場合について、第百七十三条第二項の規定は第一項の執行裁判所について準用する。

Read this with the articles around it

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (Genjido 合同会社) · [email protected]ContactSourcesTermsPrivacy