The district court having jurisdiction in the locality of the general venue of the obligor has jurisdiction over enforcement against a claim as the enforcement court, and if there is no general venue, the district court having jurisdiction in the locality of the claim to be seized has jurisdiction over enforcement as the enforcement court.
A claim to be seized is deemed to exist within the locality of the general venue of the obligor of that claim (referred to as the "third party obligor" below); provided, however, that a claim for delivery of a vessel or movables and a claim secured by a security interest in property is deemed to exist within the locality of the property.
If another order of seizure has been issued for a claim subject to a seizure (limited to a claim that has been seized based on an order of seizure; the same applies in this Division), if the enforcement court that has issued that order of seizure is different from the earlier enforcement court, either enforcement court may transfer its case to the other enforcement court.
差押えに係る債権（差押命令により差し押さえられた債権に限る。以下この目において同じ。）について更に差押命令が発せられた場合において、差押命令を発した執行裁判所が異なるときは、執行裁判所は、事件を他の執行裁判所に移送することができる。
No appeal may be entered against an order under the preceding paragraph.
前項の規定による決定に対しては、不服を申し立てることができない。
Read this with the articles around it