A party and an interested party may file an objection with a family court with regard to a ruling equivalent to an agreement; provided, however, that a party may do so only on the grounds that the requirements set forth in the items of Article 277, paragraph (1) are not satisfied.
当事者及び利害関係人は、合意に相当する審判に対し、家庭裁判所に異議を申し立てることができる。ただし、当事者にあっては、第二百七十七条第一項各号に掲げる要件に該当しないことを理由とする場合に限る。
The objection under the provisions of the preceding paragraph must be filed within an unextendable period of two weeks.
前項の規定による異議の申立ては、二週間の不変期間内にしなければならない。
The period set forth in the preceding paragraph runs from the day on which a person who may file an objection receives notice of a ruling if an objection may be filed by a person who is to receive notice of a ruling, or from the day on which the party receives notice of a ruling if an objection may be filed by a person other than a person who is to receive notice of a ruling (if there are two or more such days, the latest day), respectively.
前項の期間は、異議の申立てをすることができる者が、審判の告知を受ける者である場合にあってはその者が審判の告知を受けた日から、審判の告知を受ける者でない場合にあっては当事者が審判の告知を受けた日（二以上あるときは、当該日のうち最も遅い日）から、それぞれ進行する。
A right to file an objection under the provisions of paragraph (1) may be waived.
第一項の規定による異議の申立てをする権利は、放棄することができる。
ruling equivalent to an agreement
「合意に相当する審判」
A ruling (審判) to the effect the parties have agreed on, which the family court may make in mediation of domestic relations (家事調停) of a matter on which an action concerning personal status (人事に関する訴え) other than divorce or dissolution of an adoption could be brought, where the parties agree to accept such a ruling and do not dispute its grounds, and the court, having examined the facts, finds the agreement proper.
Short name set inArticle 277, paragraph (1)