Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

1 article

Article 143Provisional Order during a Case on the Merits to Adjudicate Commencement of Assistance

第百四十三条(補助開始の審判事件を本案とする保全処分)

Removed by (Act No. 45 of 2026)

The provisions of Article 126, paragraph (1) apply mutatis mutandis to a provisional order sought by designating an adjudication case for the commencement of assistance as a case on the merits.

補助開始の審判事件を本案とする保全処分については、第百二十六条第一項の規定を準用する。

Removed by (Act No. 45 of 2026)

When a petition for the commencement of assistance and a petition for the determination of acts which require the consent of an assistant is filed, and when it is particularly necessary for the preservation of the property of a person who is to be a person under assistance, the family court (or a high court in the case set forth in Article 105, paragraph (2)) may, upon the petition of the person who has filed the petition, order that the person who is to be a person under assistance be subject to the assistance of the administrator of property to be appointed pursuant to the provisions of Article 126, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph (hereinafter simply referred to as an "administrator of property" in this Article) in performing acts in relation to property (limited to the acts prescribed in Article 13, paragraph (1) of the Civil Code, which are addressed in the petition for the determination of acts which require the consent of an assistant; the same applies in paragraph (5)), until a ruling on the petition for the commencement of assistance becomes effective.

家庭裁判所(第百五条第二項の場合にあっては、高等裁判所)は、補助開始及び補助人の同意を得なければならない行為の定めの申立てがあった場合において、被補助人となるべき者の財産の保全のため特に必要があるときは、当該申立てをした者の申立てにより、補助開始の申立てについての審判が効力を生ずるまでの間、被補助人となるべき者の財産上の行為(民法第十三条第一項に規定する行為であって、当該補助人の同意を得なければならない行為の定めの申立てに係るものに限る。第五項において同じ。)につき、前項において準用する第百二十六条第一項の規定により選任される財産の管理者(以下この条において単に「財産の管理者」という。)の補助を受けることを命ずることができる。

Removed by (Act No. 45 of 2026)

Notice of a ruling under the provisions of the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as a "ruling of an order for assistance" in the following paragraph and paragraph (5)) must be given to an Administrator of Property, beyond the persons prescribed in Article 74, paragraph (1).

前項の規定による審判(次項及び第五項において「補助命令の審判」という。)は、第七十四条第一項に規定する者のほか、財産の管理者に告知しなければならない。

Removed by (Act No. 45 of 2026)

The period for filing an immediate appeal against a ruling of an order for assistance to be filed by a person other than a person who receives notice of a ruling and by a person who is to be a person under assistance runs from the latest day, out of the day on which the person who is to be a person under assistance receives notice of a ruling and the day on which an administrator of property receives notice of a ruling under the provisions of the preceding paragraph.

審判の告知を受ける者でない者及び被補助人となるべき者による補助命令の審判に対する即時抗告の期間は、被補助人となるべき者が審判の告知を受けた日及び財産の管理者が前項の規定による審判の告知を受けた日のうち最も遅い日から進行する。

Removed by (Act No. 45 of 2026)

When a ruling of an order for assistance is made, the person who is to be a person under assistance and the administrator of property may rescind acts in relation to property performed by the person who is to be a person under assistance without having obtained consent from the administrator of property. In this case, the provisions of the Civil Code concerning the rescission of acts performed by a person with limited capacity to act apply mutatis mutandis.

補助命令の審判があったときは、被補助人となるべき者及び財産の管理者は、被補助人となるべき者が財産の管理者の同意を得ないでした財産上の行為を取り消すことができる。この場合においては、制限行為能力者の行為の取消しに関する民法の規定を準用する。

Removed by (Act No. 45 of 2026)

The provisions of Article 125, paragraphs (1) through (6), as well as the provisions of Articles 27 through 29 of the Civil Code (excluding Article 27, paragraph (2) of the Code) apply mutatis mutandis to an administrator of property. In this case, the term "an adult under guardianship" in Article 125, paragraph (3) is deemed to be replaced with "a person who is to be a person under assistance".

第百二十五条第一項から第六項までの規定及び民法第二十七条から第二十九条まで(同法第二十七条第二項を除く。)の規定は、財産の管理者について準用する。この場合において、第百二十五条第三項中「成年被後見人」とあるのは、「被補助人となるべき者」と読み替えるものとする。

Read this in its chapter

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (源氏道合同会社) · contact@genjido.comContactSourcesTermsPrivacy