Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

1 article

Article 47Enforcement Approval Order of Orders for Interim Measures

第四十七条(暫定保全措置命令の執行等認可決定)

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (1) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

With the person that received an order for interim measures (irrespective of whether or not the place of arbitration is in Japan; hereinafter the same applies in this Chapter) as the respondent, in accordance with the categories stated in each of the following items, a person that filed a petition for the order for interim measures may file a petition with the court to issue the orders specified in those items (hereinafter referred to as "enforcement approval orders"):

暫定保全措置命令(仲裁地が日本国内にあるかどうかを問わない。以下この章において同じ。)の申立てをした者は、当該暫定保全措置命令を受けた者を被申立人として、裁判所に対し、次の各号に掲げる区分に応じ、当該各号に定める決定(以下「執行等認可決定」という。)を求める申立てをすることができる。

Changes and moves to Article 49, paragraph (1), item (i) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

an order for interim measures that orders taking measures stated in Article 24, paragraph (1), item (iii):an order allowing the civil enforcement based on the order for interim measures; and

暫定保全措置命令のうち第二十四条第一項第三号に掲げる措置を講ずることを命ずるもの 当該暫定保全措置命令に基づく民事執行を許す旨の決定

Changes and moves to Article 49, paragraph (1), item (ii) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

an order for interim measures that orders taking measures stated in Article 24, paragraph (1), items (i), (ii), (iv) or (v):an order allowing issuance of an order for payment of money stated in Article 49, paragraph (1), if the court finds that the respondent violates or is likely to violate the order for interim measures.

暫定保全措置命令のうち第二十四条第一項第一号、第二号、第四号又は第五号に掲げる措置を講ずることを命ずるもの 当該暫定保全措置命令に違反し、又は違反するおそれがあると認めるときに第四十九条第一項の規定による金銭の支払命令を発することを許す旨の決定

Changes and moves to Article 49, paragraph (2) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

When filing the petition referred to in the preceding paragraph, the party must submit a copy of the written order for interim measures, a document certifying that the content of the copy is the same as that in the written order for interim measures, and a Japanese translation of the written order for interim measures (excluding one prepared in Japanese; hereinafter the same applies in this paragraph); provided, however, that if the court finds it appropriate, after hearing the opinions of the respondent, the court may decide not to require the submission of the Japanese translation of the whole or part of the written order for interim measures.

前項の申立てをするときは、暫定保全措置命令の命令書の写し、当該写しの内容が暫定保全措置命令の命令書と同一であることを証明する文書及び暫定保全措置命令の命令書(日本語で作成されたものを除く。以下この項において同じ。)の日本語による翻訳文を提出しなければならない。ただし、裁判所は、相当と認めるときは、被申立人の意見を聴いて、暫定保全措置命令の命令書の全部又は一部について日本語による翻訳文を提出することを要しないものとすることができる。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (3) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

If the court with which the petition referred to in paragraph (1) is filed has come to acknowledge that a petition for revoking, amending or suspending the order for interim measures is filed with the arbitral tribunal or judicial body (limited to the case in which the judicial body of the country to which the place of arbitration belongs has authority, according to the laws and regulations of that country (or if the laws and regulations applied to the order for interim measures are laws and regulations of a country other than the country to which the place of arbitration belongs, according to the laws and regulations of that other country)) and finds it necessary to do so, the court may suspend the procedure for the petition referred to in that paragraph. In this case, the court may order the respondent to provide security, upon the petition of the person that filed the petition referred to in that paragraph.

第一項の申立てを受けた裁判所は、仲裁廷又は裁判機関(仲裁地が属する国の法令(当該暫定保全措置命令に適用された法令が仲裁地が属する国以外の国の法令である場合にあっては、当該法令)により当該国の裁判機関がその権限を有する場合に限る。)に対して暫定保全措置命令の取消し、変更又はその効力の停止を求める申立てがあったことを知った場合において、必要があると認めるときは、同項の申立てに係る手続を中止することができる。この場合において、裁判所は、同項の申立てをした者の申立てにより、被申立人に対し、担保を立てるべきことを命ずることができる。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (4) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 5, paragraphs (1) and (2), the case subject to the petition referred to in paragraph (1) is under the exclusive jurisdiction of the following courts:

第一項の申立てに係る事件は、第五条第一項及び第二項の規定にかかわらず、次に掲げる裁判所の管轄に専属する。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (4), item (ii) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

the district court which has jurisdiction over the location of the subject matter of the claim or the seizable property of the respondent; and

請求の目的又は差し押さえることができる被申立人の財産の所在地を管轄する地方裁判所

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (4), item (iii) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

the Tokyo District Court and the Osaka District Court (limited to the case in which the place of arbitration, the location of the general venue of the respondent, or the location of the subject matter of the claim or the seizable property of the respondent is in Japan).

東京地方裁判所及び大阪地方裁判所(仲裁地、被申立人の普通裁判籍の所在地又は請求の目的若しくは差し押さえることができる被申立人の財産の所在地が日本国内にある場合に限る。)

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (5) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

An immediate appeal may be filed against the decision under Article 5, paragraph (4) or (5) with regard to a case related to the petition referred to in paragraph (1).

第一項の申立てに係る事件についての第五条第四項又は第五項の規定による決定に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (6) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

The court is required to make an enforcement approval order, except the case in which it dismisses the petition referred to in paragraph (1) without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of the following paragraph or paragraph (8).

裁判所は、次項又は第八項の規定により第一項の申立てを却下する場合を除き、執行等認可決定をしなければならない。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (7) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

If a petition referred to in paragraph (1) has been filed, the court may dismiss the petition without prejudice only when it finds that any of the grounds stated in the following items exist (for the grounds stated in items (i) through (viii), limited to the case in which the respondent has proved the existence of the grounds):

裁判所は、第一項の申立てがあった場合において、次の各号に掲げる事由のいずれかがあると認めるとき(第一号から第八号までに掲げる事由にあっては、被申立人が当該事由の存在を証明した場合に限る。)に限り、当該申立てを却下することができる。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (7), item (i) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

the arbitration agreement is not valid due to the limitation on the legal capacity of a party;

仲裁合意が、当事者の行為能力の制限により、その効力を有しないこと。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (7), item (ii) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

the arbitration agreement is not valid on grounds other than the limitation on the legal capacity of a party pursuant to the laws and regulations designated by the agreement of the parties as those which should be applied to the arbitration agreement (or if the designation has not been made, pursuant to the laws and regulations of the country to which the place of arbitration belongs);

仲裁合意が、当事者が合意により仲裁合意に適用すべきものとして指定した法令(当該指定がないときは、仲裁地が属する国の法令)によれば、当事者の行為能力の制限以外の事由により、その効力を有しないこと。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (7), item (iii) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

the party did not receive the notice that is required pursuant to the laws and regulations of the country to which the place of arbitration belongs (or if the parties have reached an agreement on the matters concerning the provisions unrelated to public order in those laws and regulations, pursuant to the agreement) in the procedure of appointing arbitrators or in the arbitration procedure (limited to the part which concerns an order for interim measures; the same applies in the following item and item (vi));

当事者が、仲裁人の選任手続又は仲裁手続(暫定保全措置命令に関する部分に限る。次号及び第六号において同じ。)において、仲裁地が属する国の法令の規定(その法令の公の秩序に関しない規定に関する事項について当事者間に合意があるときは、当該合意)により必要とされる通知を受けなかったこと。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (7), item (iv) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

the party was unable to conduct a defense in the arbitration procedure;

当事者が、仲裁手続において防御することが不可能であったこと。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (7), item (v) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

the order for interim measures was issued concerning matters beyond the scope of the arbitration agreement or other agreement concerning an order for interim measures or concerning matters beyond the scope of a petition for an order for interim measures;

暫定保全措置命令が、仲裁合意若しくは暫定保全措置命令に関する別段の合意又は暫定保全措置命令の申立ての範囲を超える事項について発せられたものであること。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (7), item (vi) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

the composition of the arbitral tribunal or the arbitration procedure is in violation of the laws and regulations of the country to which the place of arbitration belongs (or if the parties have reached an agreement concerning the matters concerning the provisions unrelated to public order in those laws and regulations, in violation of the agreement);

仲裁廷の構成又は仲裁手続が、仲裁地が属する国の法令の規定(その法令の公の秩序に関しない規定に関する事項について当事者間に合意があるときは、当該合意)に違反するものであったこと。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (7), item (vii) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

when the arbitral tribunal has ordered the party requesting an order for interim measures to provide appropriate security, and the party is in violation of the order and is not providing appropriate security;

仲裁廷が暫定保全措置命令の申立てをした者に対して相当な担保を提供すべきことを命じた場合において、その者が当該命令に違反し、相当な担保を提供していないこと。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (7), item (viii) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

the order for interim measures has been revoked, amended or suspended by the arbitral tribunal or the judicial body stated in paragraph (3);

暫定保全措置命令が、仲裁廷又は第三項に規定する裁判機関により、取り消され、変更され、又はその効力を停止されたこと。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (7), item (ix) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

the petition filed in the arbitration procedure is concerned with a dispute which may not be subject to an arbitration agreement pursuant to the provisions of Japanese laws and regulations; or

仲裁手続における申立てが、日本の法令によれば、仲裁合意の対象とすることができない紛争に関するものであること。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (7), item (x) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

the content of the order for interim measures is contrary to public policy in Japan.

暫定保全措置命令の内容が、日本における公の秩序又は善良の風俗に反すること。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (8) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

If the grounds stated in item (v) of the preceding paragraph exist, and the part concerning the matters provided for in that item can be separated from the other parts of the order for interim measures, the relevant part and the other parts of the order for interim measures are respectively deemed to be independent orders for interim measures, and the provisions of that paragraph apply.

前項第五号に掲げる事由がある場合において、当該暫定保全措置命令から同号に規定する事項に関する部分を区分することができるときは、当該部分及び当該暫定保全措置命令のその他の部分をそれぞれ独立した暫定保全措置命令とみなして、同項の規定を適用する。

Moves to Article 49, paragraph (9) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

An enforcement approval order is not effective until it becomes final and binding.

執行等認可決定は、確定しなければその効力を生じない。

Changes and moves to Article 49, paragraph (10) by (Act No. 53 of 2023)

The provisions of Article 44, paragraphs (4) and (7) apply mutatis mutandis to the decision on the petition referred to in paragraph (1).

第四十四条第四項及び第七項の規定は、第一項の申立てについての決定について準用する。

Read this with the articles around it

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (源氏道合同会社) · contact@genjido.comContactSourcesTermsPrivacy