Article 231-3Mutatis Mutandis Application of Provisions Concerning Documentary Evidence

①The provisions of Articles 220 through 228 (excluding paragraph (4) of that Article) and Article 230 apply mutatis mutandis to the examination of evidence under paragraph (1) of the preceding Article. In such a case, the phrase "the person in possession of a document" in Article 220, Article 221, paragraph (1), item (iii), Article 222, Article 223, paragraph (1) and paragraphs (4) through (6) and Article 226 is deemed to be replaced with "the person with the authority to use an electronic or magnetic record"; the phrase "personally in possession of a document" in Article 220, item (i) is deemed to be replaced with "personally authorized to use an electronic or magnetic record"; the term "deliver" in item (ii) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "provide"; the phrase "a document held by the State or a local public entity" in item (iv)(d) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "an electronic or magnetic record that the State or a local public entity is authorized to use"; the terms "documents" and "a document" in (e) of that item are deemed to be replaced with "electronic or magnetic records" and "an electronic or magnetic record recorded in a recording medium", respectively; the phrase "order to submit documents" in Article 221 (including the title), Article 222, the title of Article 223, Article 223, paragraphs (1), (3), (6) and (7), the title of Article 224, Article 224, paragraph (1), the title of Article 225 and Article 225, paragraph (1) is deemed to be replaced with "order to submit electronic or magnetic records"; the phrase "the content of that document" in Article 224, paragraphs (1) and (3) is deemed to be replaced with "the content of information recorded in the electronic or magnetic records"; the phrase "Article 219" in Article 226 is deemed to be replaced with "Article 231-2, paragraph (1)"; the phrase "the issuance of an authenticated copy or transcript of the document" in the proviso to that Article is to be deemed to be replaced with "the issuance of a document certifying the full particulars of information recorded in the electronic or magnetic record or the provisions of an electronic or magnetic record certifying the full particulars of the information"; the term "a document" in Article 227 is deemed to be replaced with "a recording medium storing electronic or magnetic record"; the phrase "an official document of authentic provenance" in Article 228, paragraph (2) is deemed to be replaced with "of authentic provenance"; and the term "an official document" in paragraph (3) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "an electronic or magnetic record to be created by a public office or public officer".

②As provided for by the Rules of the Supreme Court, a person is to submit an electronic or magnetic record subject to an order under Article 223, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph or to transmit electronic or magnetic records subject to a request under Article 226 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph by submitting or sending a recording medium on which the electronic or magnetic record has been stored or by using an electronic data processing system as specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court.