Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

9 articles

Article 97-4Conclusion of Review Proceedings

第九十七条の四(審理手続の終結)

When the presiding tribunal judge finds that the necessary examination has been completed, the presiding tribunal judge is to conclude the review proceedings.

担当審判官は、必要な審理を終えたと認めるときは、審理手続を終結するものとする。

Beyond what is provided for in the preceding paragraph, the presiding tribunal judge may conclude the review proceedings if any of the following items applies:

前項に定めるもののほか、担当審判官は、次の各号のいずれかに該当するときは、審理手続を終結することができる。

if the articles specified respectively in (a) through (e) below are not submitted within the reasonable period under the provisions listed in (a) through (e), and, even though their submission has been requested with a further fixed period indicated, those articles are not submitted within that submission period;

次のイからホまでに掲げる規定の相当の期間内に、当該イからホまでに定める物件が提出されない場合において、更に一定の期間を示して、当該物件の提出を求めたにもかかわらず、当該提出期間内に当該物件が提出されなかつたとき。

the first sentence of Article 93, paragraph (1) (Submission of Written Answer, etc.): written answer;

第九十三条第一項前段(答弁書の提出等) 答弁書

the second sentence of Article 95, paragraph (1) (Submission of Written Rebuttal, etc.): written rebuttal;

第九十五条第一項後段(反論書等の提出) 反論書

Article 96, paragraph (3) (Submission of Documentary Evidence, etc.): documentary evidence or articles of evidence, or documents or other articles;

第九十六条第三項(証拠書類等の提出) 証拠書類若しくは証拠物又は書類その他の物件

Article 97, paragraph (1), item (ii) (Questioning, Inspection, etc. for Review): books and documents, or other articles;

第九十七条第一項第二号(審理のための質問、検査等) 帳簿書類その他の物件

if a requester for review or an intervenor who has filed the petition prescribed in Article 95-2, paragraph (1) (Oral Statement of Opinion) fails to appear for the oral statement of opinion without justifiable grounds.

第九十五条の二第一項(口頭意見陳述)に規定する申立てをした審査請求人又は参加人が、正当な理由がなく、口頭意見陳述に出頭しないとき。

When the presiding tribunal judge has concluded the review proceedings pursuant to the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs, the presiding tribunal judge is to promptly notify the parties to the proceedings that the review proceedings have been concluded.

担当審判官が前二項の規定により審理手続を終結したときは、速やかに、審理関係人に対し、審理手続を終結した旨を通知するものとする。

Article 98Decisions

第九十八条(裁決)

If a request for review has been made after the expiration of the statutory period or is otherwise unlawful, the President of the National Tax Tribunal dismisses the request for review by a decision.

審査請求が法定の期間経過後にされたものである場合その他不適法である場合には、国税不服審判所長は、裁決で、当該審査請求を却下する。

If a request for review is groundless, the President of the National Tax Tribunal rejects the request for review by a decision.

審査請求が理由がない場合には、国税不服審判所長は、裁決で、当該審査請求を棄却する。

If a request for review is well-grounded, the President of the National Tax Tribunal, by a decision, revokes the disposition to which the request for review pertains in whole or in part, or changes it; provided, however, that the disposition may not be changed to the disadvantage of the requester for review.

審査請求が理由がある場合には、国税不服審判所長は、裁決で、当該審査請求に係る処分の全部若しくは一部を取り消し、又はこれを変更する。ただし、審査請求人の不利益に当該処分を変更することはできない。

When making a decision (excluding where the President dismisses the request for review pursuant to the provisions of Article 92 (Decision of Dismissal Made without Review Proceedings)), the President of the National Tax Tribunal must make it based on the resolution of the presiding tribunal judge and the associate tribunal examiners.

国税不服審判所長は、裁決をする場合(第九十二条(審理手続を経ないでする却下裁決)の規定により当該審査請求を却下する場合を除く。)には、担当審判官及び参加審判官の議決に基づいてこれをしなければならない。

When making a decision based on an interpretation different from the interpretation of laws and regulations indicated in a circular issued by the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency, or making a decision that is found to be an important precedent for the interpretation of laws and regulations in making dispositions concerning other national taxes, the President of the National Tax Tribunal must notify the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency of the President's opinion in advance.

国税不服審判所長は、国税庁長官が発した通達に示されている法令の解釈と異なる解釈により裁決をするとき、又は他の国税に係る処分を行う際における法令の解釈の重要な先例となると認められる裁決をするときは、あらかじめその意見を国税庁長官に通知しなければならない。

In the case where notice under the preceding paragraph has been given, the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency must consult the National Tax Council on the opinion jointly with the President of the National Tax Tribunal, except where the opinion of the President of the National Tax Tribunal upholds the assertions of the requester for review and the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency finds that opinion to be reasonable.

国税庁長官は、前項の通知があつた場合において、国税不服審判所長の意見が審査請求人の主張を認容するものであり、かつ、国税庁長官が当該意見を相当と認める場合を除き、国税不服審判所長と共同して当該意見について国税審議会に諮問しなければならない。

If the President of the National Tax Tribunal has consulted the National Tax Council jointly with the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the President of the National Tax Tribunal must make the decision based on the resolution of the National Tax Council.

国税不服審判所長は、前項の規定により国税庁長官と共同して国税審議会に諮問した場合には、当該国税審議会の議決に基づいて裁決をしなければならない。

Article 100

第百条

削除 · deleted

No English for this paragraph yet.

削除

Article 101Form of Decisions, etc.

第百一条(裁決の方式等)

A decision must be made by means of a written decision stating the following matters and bearing the name and seal of the President of the National Tax Tribunal:

裁決は、次に掲げる事項を記載し、国税不服審判所長が記名押印した裁決書によりしなければならない。

main text;

主文

outline of the case;

事案の概要

summary of the assertions of the parties to the proceedings;

審理関係人の主張の要旨

reasons.

理由

The provisions of Article 84, paragraph (8) (Procedures for Determinations, etc.) apply mutatis mutandis to the decision referred to in the preceding paragraph.

第八十四条第八項(決定の手続等)の規定は、前項の裁決について準用する。

A decision becomes effective when a transcript of the written decision is served on the requester for review (or, in the case of a decision under the provisions of Article 98, paragraph (3) (Decisions) where the request for review was made by a person other than the addressee of the disposition, on the requester for review and the addressee of the disposition).

裁決は、審査請求人(当該審査請求が処分の相手方以外の者のしたものである場合における第九十八条第三項(裁決)の規定による裁決にあつては、審査請求人及び処分の相手方)に裁決書の謄本が送達された時に、その効力を生ずる。

The President of the National Tax Tribunal must send a transcript of the written decision to the intervenors and the agency that made the original disposition (in the case of a request for review concerning a disposition prescribed in Article 75, paragraph (2) (limited to the part pertaining to item (i)) (Appeals against Dispositions concerning National Taxes), including the district director connected with that disposition).

国税不服審判所長は、裁決書の謄本を参加人及び原処分庁(第七十五条第二項(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(国税に関する処分についての不服申立て)に規定する処分に係る審査請求にあつては、当該処分に係る税務署長を含む。)に送付しなければならない。

Article 102Binding Effect of Decisions

第百二条(裁決の拘束力)

A decision binds the relevant administrative agencies.

裁決は、関係行政庁を拘束する。

If a disposition made on the basis of an application or request is revoked by a decision on the grounds that the procedure was unlawful or unjust, or if a disposition dismissing or rejecting an application or request is revoked by a decision, the head of the administrative organ connected with that disposition must make a new disposition on the application or request in accordance with the purport of the decision.

申請若しくは請求に基づいてした処分が手続の違法若しくは不当を理由として裁決で取り消され、又は申請若しくは請求を却下し若しくは棄却した処分が裁決で取り消された場合には、当該処分に係る行政機関の長は、裁決の趣旨に従い、改めて申請又は請求に対する処分をしなければならない。

If a disposition publicly notified under a law concerning national taxes is revoked or changed by a decision, the head of the administrative organ connected with that disposition must give public notice that the disposition has been revoked or changed.

国税に関する法律に基づいて公示された処分が裁決で取り消され、又は変更された場合には、当該処分に係る行政機関の長は、当該処分が取り消され、又は変更された旨を公示しなければならない。

If a disposition notified under a law concerning national taxes to an interested person prescribed in Article 109, paragraph (1) (Intervenors) other than the addressee of the disposition is revoked or changed by a decision, the head of the administrative organ connected with that disposition must notify the persons who received that notice (excluding the requester for review and the intervenors) that the disposition has been revoked or changed.

国税に関する法律に基づいて処分の相手方以外の第百九条第一項(参加人)に規定する利害関係人に通知された処分が裁決で取り消され、又は変更された場合には、当該処分に係る行政機関の長は、その通知を受けた者(審査請求人及び参加人を除く。)に、当該処分が取り消され、又は変更された旨を通知しなければならない。

Article 103Return of Documentary Evidence, etc.

第百三条(証拠書類等の返還)

When the President of the National Tax Tribunal has made a decision, the President of the National Tax Tribunal must promptly return to the persons who submitted them the documentary evidence or articles of evidence, or documents or other articles, submitted pursuant to the provisions of Article 96, paragraph (1) or (2) (Submission of Documentary Evidence, etc.) and the books and documents, or other articles submitted in response to a request for submission under the provisions of Article 97, paragraph (1), item (ii) (Questioning, Inspection, etc. for Review).

国税不服審判所長は、裁決をしたときは、速やかに、第九十六条第一項又は第二項(証拠書類等の提出)の規定により提出された証拠書類若しくは証拠物又は書類その他の物件及び第九十七条第一項第二号(審理のための質問、検査等)の規定による提出要求に応じて提出された帳簿書類その他の物件をその提出人に返還しなければならない。

Subsection 4 Miscellaneous Provisions

第四款 雑則

Article 104Consolidated Review, etc.

第百四条(併合審理等)

The reinvestigation authority, or the President of the National Tax Tribunal or the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency (hereinafter referred to as the "President of the National Tax Tribunal, etc."), may, if they find it necessary, consolidate the review proceedings for multiple appeals, or separate the review proceedings for multiple consolidated appeals.

再調査審理庁又は国税不服審判所長若しくは国税庁長官(以下「国税不服審判所長等」という。)は、必要があると認める場合には、数個の不服申立てに係る審理手続を併合し、又は併合された数個の不服申立てに係る審理手続を分離することができる。

If an appeal has been filed against a reassessment or determination, etc., and there is another reassessment or determination, etc. made with regard to the tax basis, etc. or tax amount, etc. of the national tax to which that reassessment or determination, etc. pertains, the President of the National Tax Tribunal, etc. may, beyond what is done under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, also review that other reassessment or determination, etc.; provided, however, that this does not apply if a determination or decision on an appeal has already been made with regard to that other reassessment or determination, etc.

更正決定等について不服申立てがされている場合において、当該更正決定等に係る国税の課税標準等又は税額等についてされた他の更正決定等があるときは、国税不服審判所長等は、前項の規定によるもののほか、当該他の更正決定等について併せて審理することができる。ただし、当該他の更正決定等について不服申立ての決定又は裁決がされているときは、この限りでない。

In the case where the provisions of the preceding paragraph apply, the President of the National Tax Tribunal, etc. may, in the determination or decision on the appeal, revoke that other reassessment or determination, etc. in whole or in part.

前項の規定の適用がある場合には、国税不服審判所長等は、当該不服申立てについての決定又は裁決において当該他の更正決定等の全部又は一部を取り消すことができる。

The provisions of the preceding two paragraphs apply mutatis mutandis in the case where an appeal has been filed against a disposition in response to a request for reassessment and there is another reassessment or determination made with regard to the tax basis, etc. or tax amount, etc. of the national tax to which that request for reassessment pertains.

前二項の規定は、更正の請求に対する処分について不服申立てがされている場合において、当該更正の請求に係る国税の課税標準等又は税額等についてされた他の更正又は決定があるときについて準用する。

Article 105Relationship between Appeals and the Collection of National Taxes

第百五条(不服申立てと国税の徴収との関係)

An appeal against a disposition under a law concerning national taxes does not preclude the effect of the disposition that is its subject, the execution of the disposition, or the continuation of procedures; provided, however, that property attached for the collection of the national tax (including the specified real property under participatory attachment prescribed in ) may not be converted into cash through a delinquent tax collection procedure (including a disposition conducted in accordance with the rules for that procedure; the same applies hereinafter in this Article) until a determination or decision on the appeal is made, except where the value of the property is likely to decrease significantly or where the appellant (or, if the appellant is not the addressee of the disposition, the appellant and the addressee of the disposition) has requested otherwise.

国税に関する法律に基づく処分に対する不服申立ては、その目的となつた処分の効力、処分の執行又は手続の続行を妨げない。ただし、その国税の徴収のため差し押さえた財産((参加差押えをした税務署長による換価)に規定する特定参加差押不動産を含む。)の滞納処分(その例による処分を含む。以下この条において同じ。)による換価は、その財産の価額が著しく減少するおそれがあるとき、又は不服申立人(不服申立人が処分の相手方でないときは、不服申立人及び処分の相手方)から別段の申出があるときを除き、その不服申立てについての決定又は裁決があるまで、することができない。

The reinvestigation authority or the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency may, if they find it necessary, upon the petition of the requester for reinvestigation or of a person who has made a request for review under the provisions of Article 75, paragraph (1), item (ii) or paragraph (2) (limited to the part pertaining to item (ii)) (Appeals against Dispositions concerning National Taxes) (referred to as a "requester for reinvestigation, etc." in the following paragraph), or on their own authority, grant a grace period for the collection of the whole or part of the national tax connected with the disposition that is the subject of the appeal, or suspend the continuation of the delinquent tax collection procedure, or order these measures.

再調査審理庁又は国税庁長官は、必要があると認める場合には、再調査の請求人又は第七十五条第一項第二号若しくは第二項(第二号に係る部分に限る。)(国税に関する処分についての不服申立て)の規定による審査請求をした者(次項において「再調査の請求人等」という。)の申立てにより、又は職権で、不服申立ての目的となつた処分に係る国税の全部若しくは一部の徴収を猶予し、若しくは滞納処分の続行を停止し、又はこれらを命ずることができる。

If a requester for reinvestigation, etc. has provided security and requested that, with regard to the national tax connected with the disposition that is the subject of the appeal, no attachment be made through a delinquent tax collection procedure or an attachment already made through a delinquent tax collection procedure be released, the reinvestigation authority or the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency may, if they find it reasonable, refrain from making that attachment or release that attachment, or order these measures.

再調査審理庁又は国税庁長官は、再調査の請求人等が、担保を提供して、不服申立ての目的となつた処分に係る国税につき、滞納処分による差押えをしないこと又は既にされている滞納処分による差押えを解除することを求めた場合において、相当と認めるときは、その差押えをせず、若しくはその差押えを解除し、又はこれらを命ずることができる。

The President of the National Tax Tribunal may, if the President of the National Tax Tribunal finds it necessary, upon the petition of the requester for review or on the President's own authority, after hearing the opinion of the regional commissioner, district director, or director-general of a customs house who has the authority to collect the national tax connected with the disposition that is the subject of the request for review pursuant to the provisions of Article 43 (Competent Collection Agency for National Taxes) and Article 44 (Special Provisions on the Competent Collection Agency Where Reorganization Proceedings, etc. Have Commenced) (hereinafter referred to as the "competent collection agency" in this Article), request the competent collection agency to grant a grace period for the collection of the whole or part of that national tax or to suspend the continuation of the delinquent tax collection procedure.

国税不服審判所長は、必要があると認める場合には、審査請求人の申立てにより、又は職権で、審査請求の目的となつた処分に係る国税につき、第四十三条(国税の徴収の所轄庁)及び第四十四条(更生手続等が開始した場合の徴収の所轄庁の特例)の規定により徴収の権限を有する国税局長、税務署長又は税関長(以下この条において「徴収の所轄庁」という。)の意見を聴いた上、当該国税の全部若しくは一部の徴収を猶予し、又は滞納処分の続行を停止することを徴収の所轄庁に求めることができる。

If the requester for review has provided security to the competent collection agency and requested that, with regard to the national tax connected with the disposition that is the subject of the request for review, no attachment be made through a delinquent tax collection procedure or an attachment already made through a delinquent tax collection procedure be released, the President of the National Tax Tribunal may, if the President of the National Tax Tribunal finds it reasonable, request the competent collection agency not to make that attachment or to release that attachment.

国税不服審判所長は、審査請求人が、徴収の所轄庁に担保を提供して、審査請求の目的となつた処分に係る国税につき、滞納処分による差押えをしないこと又は既にされている滞納処分による差押えを解除することを求めた場合において、相当と認めるときは、徴収の所轄庁に対し、その差押えをしないこと又はその差押えを解除することを求めることができる。

When the competent collection agency has been requested by the President of the National Tax Tribunal, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (4), to grant a collection grace period or to suspend the continuation of the delinquent tax collection procedure, or, pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, not to make an attachment or to release the attachment, the competent collection agency must grant a grace period for the collection of the whole or part of the national tax connected with the disposition that is the subject of the request for review, or suspend the continuation of the delinquent tax collection procedure, or refrain from making that attachment or release that attachment.

徴収の所轄庁は、国税不服審判所長から第四項の規定により徴収の猶予若しくは滞納処分の続行の停止を求められ、又は前項の規定により差押えをしないこと若しくはその差押えを解除することを求められたときは、審査請求の目的となつた処分に係る国税の全部若しくは一部の徴収を猶予し、若しくは滞納処分の続行を停止し、又はその差押えをせず、若しくはその差押えを解除しなければならない。

The provisions of Article 49, paragraph (1), items (i) and (iii), paragraph (2), and paragraph (3) (Revocation of Tax Payment Grace Period) apply mutatis mutandis to the revocation of a disposition under the provisions of paragraph (2), paragraph (3), or the preceding paragraph. In this case, when the provisions of paragraph (1) of that Article are applied mutatis mutandis to the revocation of a disposition under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the phrase "the district director, etc." in that paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "the competent collection agency, with the consent of the President of the National Tax Tribunal,".

第四十九条第一項第一号及び第三号、第二項並びに第三項(納税の猶予の取消し)の規定は、第二項、第三項又は前項の規定に基づく処分の取消しについて準用する。この場合において、同項の規定による処分の取消しについて同条第一項の規定を準用するときは、同項中「税務署長等は」とあるのは、「徴収の所轄庁は、国税不服審判所長の同意を得て」と読み替えるものとする。

The review officer (meaning a review officer prescribed in Article 11, paragraph (2) (Representatives) of the Administrative Complaint Review Act; the same applies in Article 108, paragraph (5) (Representatives)) for a request for review under the provisions of Article 75, paragraph (1), item (ii) or paragraph (2) (limited to the part pertaining to item (ii)) may, if the review officer finds it necessary, submit to the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency a written opinion stating that the Commissioner should order the competent collection agency to grant a collection grace period or to suspend the continuation of the delinquent tax collection procedure under the provisions of paragraph (2), or to refrain from making an attachment or to release the attachment under the provisions of paragraph (3).

第七十五条第一項第二号又は第二項(第二号に係る部分に限る。)の規定による審査請求に係る審理員(行政不服審査法第十一条第二項(総代)に規定する審理員をいう。第百八条第五項(総代)において同じ。)は、必要があると認める場合には、国税庁長官に対し、第二項の規定に基づき徴収を猶予し、若しくは滞納処分の続行を停止すること又は第三項の規定に基づき差押えをせず、若しくはその差押えを解除することを徴収の所轄庁に命ずべき旨の意見書を提出することができる。

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (Genjido 合同会社) · [email protected]ContactSourcesTermsPrivacy