Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

1 article

Article 316-27

第三百十六条の二十七

Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)

If the court deems it necessary in making a ruling for the request prescribed in Article 316-25, paragraph (1) or paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, it may order the public prosecutor, the defendant or the defense counsel to present the evidence which is requested. In this case, the court may not let anyone inspect or copy the evidence.

裁判所は、第三百十六条の二十五第一項又は前条第一項の請求について決定をするに当たり、必要があると認めるときは、検察官、被告人又は弁護人に対し、当該請求に係る証拠の提示を命ずることができる。この場合においては、裁判所は、何人にも、当該証拠の閲覧又は謄写をさせることができない。

Changes by (Act No. 39 of 2025)

If the court deems it necessary in making a ruling for the request made by the defendant or the defense counsel prescribed in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, it may order the public prosecutor to present a list of the evidence that said prosecutor holds which falls within the range specified by the court. In this case, the court may not let anyone inspect or copy the list.

裁判所は、被告人又は弁護人がする前条第一項の請求について決定をするに当たり、必要があると認めるときは、検察官に対し、その保管する証拠であつて、裁判所の指定する範囲に属するものの標目を記載した一覧表の提示を命ずることができる。この場合においては、裁判所は、何人にも、当該一覧表の閲覧又は謄写をさせることができない。

Changes and moves to paragraph (4) by (Act No. 39 of 2025)

The provisions of paragraph (1) apply mutatis mutandis to the court where the immediate appeal prescribed in the provisions of Article 316-25, paragraph (3) or paragraph (3) of the preceding Article is pending and the provisions of the preceding paragraph apply mutatis mutandis to the court where the immediate appeal prescribed in the provisions of paragraph (3) of the same Article is pending.

第一項の規定は第三百十六条の二十五第三項又は前条第三項の即時抗告が係属する抗告裁判所について、前項の規定は同条第三項の即時抗告が係属する抗告裁判所について、それぞれ準用する。

Read this with the articles around it

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (源氏道合同会社) · contact@genjido.comContactSourcesTermsPrivacy