Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

1 article

Article 104Judicial Decision of a Stay of Execution

第百四条(執行停止の裁判)

When the petition for readjudication set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article is filed, and if the circumstances alleged as reasons for an appeal appear to be legally well-grounded, a prima facie showing is made on factual matters, and a prima facie showing is made to the effect that execution is likely to cause damage that cannot be compensated for, the court may, upon petition, order a temporary stay of compulsory execution while requiring or not requiring the provision of security, or order the revocation of the disposition of execution already taken while requiring the provision of security.

裁判所は、前条第一項の再審の申立てがあった場合において、不服の理由として主張した事情が法律上理由があるとみえ、事実上の点につき疎明があり、かつ、執行により償うことができない損害が生ずるおそれがあることにつき疎明があったときは、申立てにより、担保を立てさせて、若しくは立てさせないで強制執行の一時の停止を命じ、又は担保を立てさせて既にした執行処分の取消しを命ずることができる。

No appeal may be entered against a judicial decision on a petition filed under the provisions of the preceding paragraph.

前項の規定による申立てについての裁判に対しては、不服を申し立てることができない。

The provisions of Article 95, paragraphs (2) and (3) apply mutatis mutandis to the security deposit and security if security is provided under the provisions of paragraph (1).

第九十五条第二項及び第三項の規定は、第一項の規定により担保を立てる場合における供託及び担保について準用する。

Read this with the articles around it

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (源氏道合同会社) · contact@genjido.comContactSourcesTermsPrivacy