A family court may have an appropriate person examine the affairs of the guardianship of an adult or the status of the property of an adult under guardianship, or administer such property temporarilyNotwithstanding the provisions of Article 89, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 96, paragraph (1) and Article 98, paragraph (1)), in an adjudication case for the commission of, or the rescission or change of the commission of, delivery of a postal item, etc. addressed to a person subject to a ruling of a disposition appointing a specified assistant, the court in charge of an appeal is not required to hear statements of a person engaged in the correspondence delivery service.
家庭裁判所は、適当な者に、成年後見の事務若しくは成年被後見人の財産の状況を調査させ、又は臨時に財産の管理をさせることができる特定補助人を付する処分の審判を受けた者に宛てた郵便物等の配達の嘱託等の審判事件においては、第八十九条第一項(第九十六条第一項及び第九十八条第一項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定にかかわらず、抗告裁判所は、信書の送達の事業を行う者の陳述を聴くことを要しない。