Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

This text is not in force yetIt by 23 December 2028, on a day set by — at the latest in 2 years

Read the text in force →

Domestic Relations Case Procedure Act

家事事件手続法(かじじけんてつづきほう)

Chapter I General Provisions (Articles 269 to 276)

The law as Act Partially Amending the Civil Code, etc. (Act No. 45 of 2026) leaves it, with the words it changes marked.

The main text is read a page at a time: a chapter to a page, and a long chapter in runs of articles. The whole main text, and the supplementary provisions and appended tables this amendment changes. Those it leaves untouched are on the page for the text in force.

How the changes are shown

Underlined: words the amendment adds. A bar: where it removes words.Underlined: words the amendment adds. Struck through: the words it removes.Underlined: words the amendment adds. Struck through: the words it removes.

Article 269第二百六十九条

Order of the Correction of Electronic Records of Mediation(調停に係る電子調書の更正決定)
Article 269, paragraph (1)

If there is a miscalculation, clerical error, or any other clear error similar thereto in the contents of an electronic record recorded in a file pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, a family court may, upon petition or by its own authority, make a ruling of correction at any time.

前条第一項の規定によりファイルに記録された電子調書につきその内容に計算違い、誤記その他これらに類する明白な誤りがあるときは、家庭裁判所は、申立てにより又は職権で、いつでも更正決定をすることができる。

Article 269, paragraph (2)

A ruling of correction must be made, as prescribed by the Rules of the Supreme Court, by preparing an electronic written order.

更正決定は、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、電子決定書を作成してしなければならない。

Article 269, paragraph (3)

An immediate appeal may be filed against a ruling of correction.

更正決定に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。

Article 269, paragraph (4)

An immediate appeal may be filed against an order to dismiss the petition set forth in paragraph (1) as unlawful.

第一項の申立てを不適法として却下した決定に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。

Article 270第二百七十条

Acceptance of Proposed Terms of Mediation in Writing(調停条項案の書面による受諾)
Article 270, paragraph (1)

When it is found to be difficult for one of the parties to appear, if the party has submitted a document stating that the party accepts the proposed terms of mediation presented in advance by a mediation committee (if the proceedings for mediation of domestic relations are conducted by a sole judge, the judge; the same applies in the following paragraph, the following Article and Article 272, paragraph (1)), and the other party has appeared on a date for the proceedings for mediation of domestic relations and accepted the proposed terms for mediation, it is deemed that both parties have reached an agreement.

当事者の一方が出頭することが困難であると認められる場合において、その当事者があらかじめ調停委員会(裁判官のみで家事調停の手続を行う場合にあっては、その裁判官。次項、次条及び第二百七十二条第一項において同じ。)から提示された調停条項案を受諾する旨の書面を提出し、他の当事者が家事調停の手続の期日に出頭して当該調停条項案を受諾したときは、当事者間に合意が成立したものとみなす。

Article 270, paragraph (2)

When it is found to be difficult for both parties to appear, if both parties have submitted a document stating that they accept the proposed terms of mediation presented in advance by the mediation committee with the date and time at which mediation is to be successful specified, and that date and time has passed, it is deemed that an agreement has been reached between the parties at that date and time.

当事者双方が出頭することが困難であると認められる場合において、当事者双方があらかじめ調停委員会から調停が成立すべき日時を定めて提示された調停条項案を受諾する旨の書面を提出し、その日時が経過したときは、その日時に、当事者間に合意が成立したものとみなす。

Article 270, paragraph (3)

The provisions of the preceding two paragraphs do not apply to a mediation case regarding divorce or dissolution of an adoptive relationship.

前二項の規定は、離婚又は離縁についての調停事件については、適用しない。

Section 5 Closing of Cases Without Successful Mediation第五節 調停の成立によらない事件の終了

Article 271第二百七十一条

Closing of Cases Without Conducting Mediation(調停をしない場合の事件の終了)
Article 271, paragraph (1)

When a mediation committee finds that because of the nature of a case it is unsuitable for mediation, or finds that a party has filed a petition for mediation for an unjust purpose and without good reason, the mediation committee may close the case for mediation of domestic relations, deciding not to conduct a mediation.

調停委員会は、事件が性質上調停を行うのに適当でないと認めるとき、又は当事者が不当な目的でみだりに調停の申立てをしたと認めるときは、調停をしないものとして、家事調停事件を終了させることができる。

Article 272第二百七十二条

Closing of Cases due to Unsuccessful Mediation(調停の不成立の場合の事件の終了)
Article 272, paragraph (1)

When there is no likelihood of any agreement to be reached between the parties (including the agreement set forth in Article 277, paragraph (1), item (i)) or when a mediation committee finds that an agreement that has been reached is inappropriate, the mediation committee may close the case for mediation of domestic relations, considering that mediation has been unsuccessful; provided, however, that this does not apply when a family court has made a ruling in lieu of mediation under the provisions of Article 284, paragraph (1).

調停委員会は、当事者間に合意(第二百七十七条第一項第一号の合意を含む。)が成立する見込みがない場合又は成立した合意が相当でないと認める場合には、調停が成立しないものとして、家事調停事件を終了させることができる。ただし、家庭裁判所が第二百八十四条第一項の規定による調停に代わる審判をしたときは、この限りでない。

Article 272, paragraph (2)

When a case for mediation of domestic relations has been closed pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, a family court must give notice to that effect to the parties.

前項の規定により家事調停事件が終了したときは、家庭裁判所は、当事者に対し、その旨を通知しなければならない。

Article 272, paragraph (3)

If, with regard to a case for which a petition for mediation of domestic relations has been filed, a party has filed an action within two weeks from the day on which the party has received notice under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the action is deemed to have been filed at the time of the filing of the petition for mediation of domestic relations.

当事者が前項の規定による通知を受けた日から二週間以内に家事調停の申立てがあった事件について訴えを提起したときは、家事調停の申立ての時に、その訴えの提起があったものとみなす。

Article 272, paragraph (4)

When a mediation case regarding any of the matters set forth in Appended Table 2 has been closed pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1), it is deemed that a petition for the adjudication of domestic relations regarding the matter has been filed at the time of the filing of the petition for mediation of domestic relations.

第一項の規定により別表第二に掲げる事項についての調停事件が終了した場合には、家事調停の申立ての時に、当該事項についての家事審判の申立てがあったものとみなす。

Article 273第二百七十三条

Withdrawal of Petitions for Mediation of Domestic Relations(家事調停の申立ての取下げ)
Article 273, paragraph (1)

A petition for mediation of domestic relations may be withdrawn in whole or in part until a case for mediation of domestic relations is closed.

家事調停の申立ては、家事調停事件が終了するまで、その全部又は一部を取り下げることができる。

Article 273, paragraph (2)

Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the withdrawal of a petition for mediation regarding the division of an estate does not become effective without the consent of the respondent after 10 years have passed from the time of the commencement of the succession.

前項の規定にかかわらず、遺産の分割の調停の申立ての取下げは、相続開始の時から十年を経過した後にあっては、相手方の同意を得なければ、その効力を生じない。

Article 273, paragraph (3)

Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (1), a petition for mediation regarding the designation of a person who has parental authority may not be withdrawn without permission from the family court, even before a case for mediation of domestic relations is closed.

第一項の規定にかかわらず、親権者の指定の調停の申立ては、家事調停事件が終了する前であっても、家庭裁判所の許可を得なければ、取り下げることができない。

Article 273, paragraph (4)

The provisions of Article 82, paragraphs (3) and (4), and the provisions of Article 261, paragraphs (3) and (4) and Article 262, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to the withdrawal of a petition for mediation of domestic relations. In this case, the phrase "the proviso to the preceding paragraph, Article 153 (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 199, paragraph (1)), and Article 199, paragraph (2)" in Article 82, paragraph (3) is deemed to be replaced with "Article 273, paragraph (2)"; and the phrase "date for oral arguments, preparatory proceedings, or settlement (referred to below as a "proceeding date" in this Chapter)" in Article 261, paragraph (4) of that Code is deemed to be replaced with "date for proceedings for mediation of domestic relations".

第八十二条第三項及び第四項並びに民事訴訟法第二百六十一条第三項及び第四項並びに第二百六十二条第一項の規定は、家事調停の申立ての取下げについて準用する。この場合において、第八十二条第三項中「前項ただし書、第百五十三条(第百九十九条第一項において準用する場合を含む。)及び第百九十九条第二項」とあるのは「第二百七十三条第二項」と、同法第二百六十一条第四項中「口頭弁論、弁論準備手続又は和解の期日(以下この章において「口頭弁論等の期日」という。)」とあるのは「家事調停の手続の期日」と読み替えるものとする。

Section 6 Referral to Mediation, etc.第六節 付調停等

Article 274第二百七十四条

Referral to Mediation(付調停)
Article 274, paragraph (1)

Where a litigation case or a case for adjudication of domestic relations is pending with regard to a case for which mediation may be conducted pursuant to the provisions of Article 244, a court may by its own authority refer the case to mediation of domestic relations at any time, while hearing the opinions of the parties (before a defendant or respondent makes statements on the merits, limited to a plaintiff or petitioner).

第二百四十四条の規定により調停を行うことができる事件についての訴訟又は家事審判事件が係属している場合には、裁判所は、当事者(本案について被告又は相手方の陳述がされる前にあっては、原告又は申立人に限る。)の意見を聴いて、いつでも、職権で、事件を家事調停に付することができる。

Article 274, paragraph (2)

When referring a case to mediation pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, a court must have the case processed by the family court which has jurisdiction over the case; provided, however, that if a court finds it to be particularly necessary in order to process a case for mediation of domestic relations, it may have the case processed by a family court other than the family court which has jurisdiction over the case.

裁判所は、前項の規定により事件を調停に付する場合においては、事件を管轄権を有する家庭裁判所に処理させなければならない。ただし、家事調停事件を処理するために特に必要があると認めるときは、事件を管轄権を有する家庭裁判所以外の家庭裁判所に処理させることができる。

Article 274, paragraph (3)

Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, when a family court and a high court refer a case to mediation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1), they may process the case for mediation of domestic relations by themselves.

家庭裁判所及び高等裁判所は、第一項の規定により事件を調停に付する場合には、前項の規定にかかわらず、その家事調停事件を自ら処理することができる。

Article 274, paragraph (4)

When a family court or a high court conducts mediation through a mediation committee pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the mediation committee is composed of a judge appointed by the court from among the judges assigned thereto, and two or more domestic relations mediation commissioners.

前項の規定により家庭裁判所又は高等裁判所が調停委員会で調停を行うときは、調停委員会は、当該裁判所がその裁判官の中から指定する裁判官一人及び家事調停委員二人以上で組織する。

Article 274, paragraph (5)

For the purpose of the application of the provisions of this Part in cases where a high court conducts mediation by itself pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (3): in the provisions of Article 244, Article 247, Article 248, paragraph (2), Article 254, paragraphs (1) through (4), Article 254-2, paragraphs (1) through (4), Article 254-3, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 264, paragraph (2), Article 266, paragraph (4), the proviso to Article 268, paragraph (3), Article 269, paragraph (1), and the proviso to paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of Article 272, as well as the provisions of the following Chapter and Chapter III, the term "family court" is deemed to be replaced with "high court"; in Article 244, Article 258, paragraph (1), Article 276, Article 277, paragraph (1), item (i), Article 279, paragraph (3), and Article 284, paragraph (1), the term "ruling" is deemed to be replaced with "judicial decision in lieu of a ruling"; in Article 267, paragraph (1), the term "a family court" is deemed to be replaced with "a high court"; in the provisions of the following Chapter, the phrase "ruling equivalent to an agreement" is deemed to be replaced with "judicial decision in lieu of a ruling equivalent to an agreement"; in the proviso to Article 272, paragraph (1) and the provisions of Chapter III (excluding the provisions of Article 286, paragraph (7)), the phrase "ruling in lieu of mediation" is deemed to be replaced with "judicial decision in lieu of a ruling in lieu of mediation"; and in Article 281 and Article 287, the phrase "ruling to dismiss" is deemed to be replaced with "judicial decision in lieu of a ruling to dismiss".

第三項の規定により高等裁判所が自ら調停を行う場合についてのこの編の規定の適用については、第二百四十四条、第二百四十七条、第二百四十八条第二項、第二百五十四条第一項から第四項まで、第二百五十四条の二第一項から第四項まで、第二百五十四条の三第二項及び第三項、第二百六十四条第二項、第二百六十六条第四項、第二百六十八条第三項ただし書、第二百六十九条第一項並びに第二百七十二条第一項ただし書及び第二項並びに次章及び第三章の規定中「家庭裁判所」とあるのは「高等裁判所」と、第二百四十四条、第二百五十八条第一項、第二百七十六条、第二百七十七条第一項第一号、第二百七十九条第三項及び第二百八十四条第一項中「審判」とあるのは「審判に代わる裁判」と、第二百六十七条第一項中「家庭裁判所は」とあるのは「高等裁判所は」と、次章の規定中「合意に相当する審判」とあるのは「合意に相当する審判に代わる裁判」と、第二百七十二条第一項ただし書及び第三章の規定(第二百八十六条第七項の規定を除く。)中「調停に代わる審判」とあるのは「調停に代わる審判に代わる裁判」と、第二百八十一条及び第二百八十七条中「却下する審判」とあるのは「却下する審判に代わる裁判」とする。

Article 275第二百七十五条

Suspension of Litigation Proceedings and Proceedings for Adjudication of Domestic Relations(訴訟手続及び家事審判の手続の中止)
Article 275, paragraph (1)

When a suit is pending with regard to a case for which a petition for mediation of domestic relations is filed, or a court before which a suit is pending refers the case to mediation pursuant to provisions of Article 257, paragraph (2) or paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, the court before which the suit is pending may suspend litigation proceedings until a case for mediation of domestic relations is closed.

家事調停の申立てがあった事件について訴訟が係属しているとき、又は訴訟が係属している裁判所が第二百五十七条第二項若しくは前条第一項の規定により事件を調停に付したときは、訴訟が係属している裁判所は、家事調停事件が終了するまで訴訟手続を中止することができる。

Article 275, paragraph (2)

When a case for adjudication of domestic relations is pending with regard to a case for which a petition for mediation of domestic relations is filed, or a court before which a case for adjudication of domestic relations is pending refers the case to mediation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, the court before which the case for adjudication of domestic relations is pending may suspend proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations until a case for mediation of domestic relations is closed.

家事調停の申立てがあった事件について家事審判事件が係属しているとき、又は家事審判事件が係属している裁判所が前条第一項の規定により事件を調停に付したときは、家事審判事件が係属している裁判所は、家事調停事件が終了するまで、家事審判の手続を中止することができる。

Article 276第二百七十六条

Constructive Withdrawal of an Action, etc.(訴えの取下げの擬制等)
Article 276, paragraph (1)

When a court before which a suit is pending has referred the case to mediation pursuant to the provisions of Article 257, paragraph (2) or Article 274, paragraph (1), and when mediation is successful or the ruling under the provisions of paragraph (1) of the following Article or Article 284, paragraph (1) becomes final and binding, it is deemed that an action relating to the suit has been withdrawn.

訴訟が係属している裁判所が第二百五十七条第二項又は第二百七十四条第一項の規定により事件を調停に付した場合において、調停が成立し、又は次条第一項若しくは第二百八十四条第一項の規定による審判が確定したときは、当該訴訟について訴えの取下げがあったものとみなす。

Article 276, paragraph (2)

When a court before which a case for adjudication of domestic relations is pending has referred the case to mediation pursuant to the provisions of Article 274, paragraph (1), and when mediation is successful or the ruling set forth in Article 284, paragraph (1) becomes final and binding, the case for adjudication of domestic relations is closed.

家事審判事件が係属している裁判所が第二百七十四条第一項の規定により事件を調停に付した場合において、調停が成立し、又は第二百八十四条第一項の審判が確定したときは、当該家事審判事件は、終了する。

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (源氏道合同会社) · contact@genjido.comContactSourcesTermsPrivacy