The main text is read a page at a time: a chapter to a page, and a long chapter in runs of articles. The whole main text, and the supplementary provisions and appended tables this amendment changes. Those it leaves untouched are on the page for the text in force.
An adjudication case for the commencement of assistance (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (36); the same applies hereinafter) is subject to the jurisdiction of the family court which has jurisdiction over the place of domicile of a person who is to be a person under assistance.
Adjudication cases regarding assistance (meaning the adjudication cases regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, rows (36) through (54)), except for an adjudication case for the commencement of assistance, are subject to the jurisdiction of a family court that has made a ruling of the commencement of assistance (if the court in charge of an appeal has made a judicial decision of the commencement of assistance, the family court that is the court of first instance); provided, however, that if an adjudication case for the commencement of assistance is pending before a family court, these cases are subject to the jurisdiction of that family court.
Article 137, paragraph (1)(手続行為能力)(Capacity to Participate in Proceedings)Removed
The provisions of Article 118 apply mutatis mutandis to a person who is to be a person under assistance and to a person under assistance in the following adjudication cases (including adjudication cases for a provisional order sought by designating the adjudication cases set forth in items (i), (vii), and (ix) as cases on the merits):
Article 137, paragraph (1), item (i)(手続行為能力)(Capacity to Participate in Proceedings)Removed
an adjudication case for the commencement of assistance;
補助開始の審判事件
Article 137, paragraph (1), item (ii)(手続行為能力)(Capacity to Participate in Proceedings)Removed
an adjudication case for the determination of acts which require the consent of an assistant (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (37));
Article 137, paragraph (1), item (iii)(手続行為能力)(Capacity to Participate in Proceedings)Removed
an adjudication case for permission in lieu of the consent of an assistant (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (38));
補助人の同意に代わる許可の審判事件(別表第一の三十八の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)
Article 137, paragraph (1), item (iv)(手続行為能力)(Capacity to Participate in Proceedings)Removed
an adjudication case for the revocation of a ruling of the commencement of assistance (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (39));
補助開始の審判の取消しの審判事件(別表第一の三十九の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)
Article 137, paragraph (1), item (v)(手続行為能力)(Capacity to Participate in Proceedings)Removed
an adjudication case for the revocation of a ruling to determine acts which require the consent of an assistant (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (40));
Article 137, paragraph (1), item (vi)(手続行為能力)(Capacity to Participate in Proceedings)Removed
an adjudication case for the appointment of an assistant (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (41));
補助人の選任の審判事件(別表第一の四十一の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)
Article 137, paragraph (1), item (vii)(手続行為能力)(Capacity to Participate in Proceedings)Removed
an adjudication case for the dismissal of an assistant (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (43); the same applies in Article 144);
Article 137, paragraph (1), item (viii)(手続行為能力)(Capacity to Participate in Proceedings)Removed
an adjudication case for the appointment of a supervisor of an assistant (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (45));
補助監督人の選任の審判事件(別表第一の四十五の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)
Article 137, paragraph (1), item (ix)(手続行為能力)(Capacity to Participate in Proceedings)Removed
an adjudication case for the dismissal of a supervisor of an assistant (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (47); the same applies in Article 144);
Article 137, paragraph (1), item (x)(手続行為能力)(Capacity to Participate in Proceedings)Removed
an adjudication case for vesting the authority of representation in an assistant (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (51));
補助人に対する代理権の付与の審判事件(別表第一の五十一の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)
Article 137, paragraph (1), item (xi)(手続行為能力)(Capacity to Participate in Proceedings)Removed
an adjudication case for the revocation of a ruling to vest the authority of representation in an assistant (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (52)); and
Article 137, paragraph (1), item (xii)(手続行為能力)(Capacity to Participate in Proceedings)Removed
an adjudication case for the supervision of the affairs of assistance (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (53)).
補助の事務の監督の審判事件(別表第一の五十三の項の事項についての審判事件をいう。)
Article 138第百三十八条Caption removed
Hearing of Opinions Concerning Mental State
精神の状況に関する意見の聴取
Article 138, paragraph (1)(精神の状況に関する意見の聴取)(Hearing of Opinions Concerning Mental State)Removed
A family court may not make a ruling of the commencement of assistance unless it hears the opinion of a physician or any other appropriate person concerning the mental state of the person who is to be a person under assistance.
Article 139, paragraph (1)(陳述及び意見の聴取)(Hearing Statements and Opinions)Removed
When making the rulings set forth in the following items, the family court must hear statements from the persons specified respectively in these items (in items (i), (iii), and (iv), excluding the petitioner):
Article 139, paragraph (1), item (i)(陳述及び意見の聴取)(Hearing Statements and Opinions)Removed
a ruling of the commencement of assistance:the person who is to be a person under assistance;
補助開始の審判 被補助人となるべき者
Article 139, paragraph (1), item (ii)(陳述及び意見の聴取)(Hearing Statements and Opinions)Removed
a ruling of permission in lieu of the consent of an assistant:the assistant;
補助人の同意に代わる許可の審判 補助人
Article 139, paragraph (1), item (iii)(陳述及び意見の聴取)(Hearing Statements and Opinions)Removed
a ruling to revoke a ruling of the commencement of assistance (limited to the case under the provisions of Article 18, paragraph (1) or (3) of the Civil Code):the person under assistance and the assistant;
Article 139, paragraph (1), item (iv)(陳述及び意見の聴取)(Hearing Statements and Opinions)Removed
a ruling of the appointment of an assistant or a supervisor of an assistant:the person who is to be a person under assistance or the person under assistance;
補助人又は補助監督人の選任の審判 被補助人となるべき者又は被補助人
Article 139, paragraph (1), item (v)(陳述及び意見の聴取)(Hearing Statements and Opinions)Removed
a ruling of the dismissal of an assistant:the assistant; and
補助人の解任の審判 補助人
Article 139, paragraph (1), item (vi)(陳述及び意見の聴取)(Hearing Statements and Opinions)Removed
a ruling of the dismissal of a supervisor of an assistant:the supervisor of an assistant.
補助監督人の解任の審判 補助監督人
Article 139, paragraph (2)(陳述及び意見の聴取)(Hearing Statements and Opinions)Removed
When making the rulings set forth in the following items, the family court must hear the opinions of the persons specified respectively in these items:
家庭裁判所は、次の各号に掲げる審判をする場合には、当該各号に定める者の意見を聴かなければならない。
Article 139, paragraph (2), item (i)(陳述及び意見の聴取)(Hearing Statements and Opinions)Removed
a ruling of the appointment of an assistant:the person who is to be an assistant; and
補助人の選任の審判 補助人となるべき者
Article 139, paragraph (2), item (ii)(陳述及び意見の聴取)(Hearing Statements and Opinions)Removed
a ruling of the appointment of a supervisor of an assistant:the person who is to be a supervisor of an assistant.
補助監督人の選任の審判 補助監督人となるべき者
Article 140第百四十条Caption removed
Notice of Rulings
審判の告知
Article 140, paragraph (1)(審判の告知)(Notice of Rulings)Removed
Notice of the rulings set forth in the following items must be given to the persons specified respectively in these items, beyond the persons prescribed in Article 74, paragraph (1):
Article 140, paragraph (1), item (i)(審判の告知)(Notice of Rulings)Removed
a ruling of the commencement of assistance:the person who is appointed as an assistant pursuant to the provisions of Article 876-7, paragraph (1) of the Civil Code, and the voluntarily appointed guardian and the supervisor of the voluntarily appointed guardian under a voluntary guardianship contract that is to terminate pursuant to Article 10, paragraph (3) of the Voluntary Guardianship Contract Act;
Article 140, paragraph (1), item (ii)(審判の告知)(Notice of Rulings)Removed
a ruling to determine acts which require the consent of an assistant:the assistant and the supervisor of the assistant (if this ruling is made simultaneously upon making a ruling of the appointment of an assistant or a supervisor of an assistant, the person who is to be an assistant or the person who is to be a supervisor of an assistant);
Article 140, paragraph (1), item (iii)(審判の告知)(Notice of Rulings)Removed
a ruling of permission in lieu of the consent of an assistant:the assistant and the supervisor of the assistant;
補助人の同意に代わる許可の審判 補助人及び補助監督人
Article 140, paragraph (1), item (iv)(審判の告知)(Notice of Rulings)Removed
a ruling to revoke a ruling of the commencement of assistance:the assistant and the supervisor of the assistant;
補助開始の審判の取消しの審判 補助人及び補助監督人
Article 140, paragraph (1), item (v)(審判の告知)(Notice of Rulings)Removed
a ruling to revoke a ruling to determine acts which require the consent of an assistant:the assistant and the supervisor of the assistant;
補助人の同意を得なければならない行為の定めの審判の取消しの審判 補助人及び補助監督人
Article 140, paragraph (1), item (vi)(審判の告知)(Notice of Rulings)Removed
a ruling to vest the authority of representation in an assistant:the person under assistance and the supervisor of an assistant (if this ruling is made simultaneously upon making a ruling of the appointment of a supervisor of an assistant, the person who is to be a supervisor of an assistant); and
An immediate appeal may be filed against the rulings set forth in the following items by the persons specified respectively in these items (in item (i), excluding the petitioner):
a ruling of the commencement of assistance:the persons prescribed in the main clause of Article 15, paragraph (1) of the Civil Code and those prescribed in Article 10, paragraph (2) of the Voluntary Guardianship Contract Act;
a ruling to dismiss a petition for the revocation of a ruling of the commencement of assistance:the persons prescribed in Article 18, paragraph (1) of the Civil Code;
a ruling to dismiss a petition for the dismissal of an assistant:the petitioner, the supervisor of the assistant, as well as the person under assistance and the person's relative;
a ruling to dismiss a petition for the dismissal of a supervisor of an assistant:the petitioner, as well as the person under assistance and the person's relative.
The period for filing an immediate appeal against a ruling of the commencement of assistance to be filed by a person other than a person who receives notice of a ruling and by the person who is to be a person under assistance runs from the latest day, out of the day on which the person who is to be a person under assistance received notice of a ruling and the day on which a person who is appointed as an assistant pursuant to the provisions of Article 876-7, paragraph (1) of the Civil Code received notice of a ruling.
Application Mutatis Mutandis of Provisions Concerning Adjudication Cases Regarding the Guardianship of Adults
成年後見に関する審判事件の規定の準用
Article 142, paragraph (1)(成年後見に関する審判事件の規定の準用)(Application Mutatis Mutandis of Provisions Concerning Adjudication Cases Regarding the Guardianship of Adults)Removed
The provisions of Article 121 apply mutatis mutandis to the withdrawal of a petition for the commencement of assistance and the withdrawal of a petition for the appointment of an assistant, and the provisions of Article 124 apply mutatis mutandis to the supervision of the affairs of assistance.
Provisional Order during a Case on the Merits to Adjudicate Commencement of Assistance
補助開始の審判事件を本案とする保全処分
Article 143, paragraph (1)(補助開始の審判事件を本案とする保全処分)(Provisional Order during a Case on the Merits to Adjudicate Commencement of Assistance)Removed
The provisions of Article 126, paragraph (1) apply mutatis mutandis to a provisional order sought by designating an adjudication case for the commencement of assistance as a case on the merits.
補助開始の審判事件を本案とする保全処分については、第百二十六条第一項の規定を準用する。
Article 143, paragraph (2)(補助開始の審判事件を本案とする保全処分)(Provisional Order during a Case on the Merits to Adjudicate Commencement of Assistance)Removed
When a petition for the commencement of assistance and a petition for the determination of acts which require the consent of an assistant is filed, and when it is particularly necessary for the preservation of the property of a person who is to be a person under assistance, the family court (or a high court in the case set forth in Article 105, paragraph (2)) may, upon the petition of the person who has filed the petition, order that the person who is to be a person under assistance be subject to the assistance of the administrator of property to be appointed pursuant to the provisions of Article 126, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph (hereinafter simply referred to as an "administrator of property" in this Article) in performing acts in relation to property (limited to the acts prescribed in Article 13, paragraph (1) of the Civil Code, which are addressed in the petition for the determination of acts which require the consent of an assistant; the same applies in paragraph (5)), until a ruling on the petition for the commencement of assistance becomes effective.
Article 143, paragraph (3)(補助開始の審判事件を本案とする保全処分)(Provisional Order during a Case on the Merits to Adjudicate Commencement of Assistance)Removed
Notice of a ruling under the provisions of the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as a "ruling of an order for assistance" in the following paragraph and paragraph (5)) must be given to an Administrator of Property, beyond the persons prescribed in Article 74, paragraph (1).
Article 143, paragraph (4)(補助開始の審判事件を本案とする保全処分)(Provisional Order during a Case on the Merits to Adjudicate Commencement of Assistance)Removed
The period for filing an immediate appeal against a ruling of an order for assistance to be filed by a person other than a person who receives notice of a ruling and by a person who is to be a person under assistance runs from the latest day, out of the day on which the person who is to be a person under assistance receives notice of a ruling and the day on which an administrator of property receives notice of a ruling under the provisions of the preceding paragraph.
Article 143, paragraph (5)(補助開始の審判事件を本案とする保全処分)(Provisional Order during a Case on the Merits to Adjudicate Commencement of Assistance)Removed
When a ruling of an order for assistance is made, the person who is to be a person under assistance and the administrator of property may rescind acts in relation to property performed by the person who is to be a person under assistance without having obtained consent from the administrator of property. In this case, the provisions of the Civil Code concerning the rescission of acts performed by a person with limited capacity to act apply mutatis mutandis.
Article 143, paragraph (6)(補助開始の審判事件を本案とする保全処分)(Provisional Order during a Case on the Merits to Adjudicate Commencement of Assistance)Removed
The provisions of Article 125, paragraphs (1) through (6), as well as the provisions of Articles 27 through 29 of the Civil Code (excluding Article 27, paragraph (2) of the Code) apply mutatis mutandis to an administrator of property. In this case, the term "an adult under guardianship" in Article 125, paragraph (3) is deemed to be replaced with "a person who is to be a person under assistance".
Provisional Order Sought by Designating an Adjudication Case for Dismissal of an Assistant as a Case on the Merits
補助人の解任の審判事件等を本案とする保全処分
Article 144, paragraph (1)(補助人の解任の審判事件等を本案とする保全処分)(Provisional Order Sought by Designating an Adjudication Case for Dismissal of an Assistant as a Case on the Merits)Removed
The provisions of Article 127, paragraphs (1) through (4) apply mutatis mutandis to a provisional order sought by designating an adjudication case for the dismissal of an assistant or an adjudication case for the dismissal of a supervisor of an assistant as a case on the merits.
An adjudication case for the declaration of presumed death (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (56); the same applies in the following paragraph) is subject to the jurisdiction of the family court which has jurisdiction over the previous place of domicile or residence of an absentee.
The provisions of Article 118 apply mutatis mutandis to an absentee in an adjudication case for declaration of presumed death.
第百十八条の規定は、失踪の宣告の審判事件における不在者について準用する。
Article 148, paragraph (3)
A family court may not make a ruling of adjudication of declaration of presumed death unless it gives public notice of the following matters and the period set forth in items (ii) and (iv) has passed. In this case, the period set forth in items (ii) and (iv) must not be shorter than three months in the case set forth in Article 30, paragraph (1) of the Civil Code or one month in the case set forth in paragraph (2) of the Article:
the fact that a petition for adjudication of the declaration of presumed death of an absentee has been filed;
不在者について失踪の宣告の申立てがあったこと。
Article 148, paragraph (3), item (ii)
the requirement that the absentee should provide notification of their existence within a certain period;
不在者は、一定の期間までにその生存の届出をすべきこと。
Article 148, paragraph (3), item (iii)
the rule that the absentee's declaration of presumed death will be adjudicated if the notification set forth in the preceding item is not made; and
前号の届出がないときは、失踪の宣告がされること。
Article 148, paragraph (3), item (iv)
the requirement that any person who knows whether the absentee is alive or dead should make a notification of the fact within a certain period.
不在者の生死を知る者は、一定の期間までにその届出をすべきこと。
Article 148, paragraph (4)
Notice of a ruling of adjudication of declaration of presumed death is not required to be given to the absentee.
失踪の宣告の審判は、不在者に告知することを要しない。
Article 148, paragraph (5)
An immediate appeal may be filed against the rulings set forth in the following items by the persons specified respectively in these items (in item (i), excluding the petitioner):
a ruling of adjudication of declaration of presumed death:the absentee and an interested party; and
失踪の宣告の審判 不在者及び利害関係人
Article 148, paragraph (5), item (ii)
a ruling to dismiss a petition for adjudication of declaration of presumed death:the petitioner.
失踪の宣告の申立てを却下する審判 申立人
第二款 失踪の宣告の取消しの審判事件Added
Article 149第百四十九条
Article 149, paragraph (1)
An adjudication case for the revocation of adjudication of declaration of presumed death is subject to the jurisdiction of the family court which has jurisdiction over the place of domicile of an absentee.
失踪の宣告の取消しの審判事件は、失踪者の住所地を管轄する家庭裁判所の管轄に属する。
Article 149, paragraph (2)
The provisions of Article 118 apply mutatis mutandis to an absentee in an adjudication case for the revocation of adjudication of declaration of presumed death.
第百十八条の規定は、失踪の宣告の取消しの審判事件における失踪者について準用する。
Article 149, paragraph (3)
Only if the domicile or residence of an absentee is known from the case record is it necessary to give notice of a ruling to revoke the adjudication of declaration of presumed death to the absentee.
An immediate appeal may be filed against the rulings set forth in the following items by the persons specified respectively in these items:
次の各号に掲げる審判に対しては、当該各号に定める者は、即時抗告をすることができる。
Article 149, paragraph (4), item (i)
a ruling to revoke the adjudication of declaration of presumed death:an interested party (excluding the petitioner); and
失踪の宣告の取消しの審判 利害関係人(申立人を除く。)
Article 149, paragraph (4), item (ii)
a ruling to dismiss a petition for the revocation of an adjudication of declaration of presumed death:the absentee and an interested party.
失踪の宣告の取消しの申立てを却下する審判 失踪者及び利害関係人
Change 1 of 55
Copy link
Coming into force施行
The day a law or an amendment starts to apply. It is often months or years after promulgation, so that people have time to prepare. The Ministry of Justice's English usually says a law "comes into force" or "comes into effect", and sometimes calls the day its "enforcement date". Its "enforcement" more often means the word's other sense, carrying a law out, as in an Order for Enforcement (施行令), the Cabinet Order (政令) that sets out the details for carrying out an Act.
Rules made by the Cabinet to carry out the Constitution and Acts. A Cabinet Order cannot impose duties, restrict rights or set penalties unless an Act delegates that to it.
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
Adjudication cases regarding assistance (meaning the adjudication cases regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, rows (36) through (54)), except for an adjudication case for the commencement of assistance, are subject to the jurisdiction of a family court that has made a ruling of the commencement of assistance (if the court in charge of an appeal has made a judicial decision of the commencement of assistance, the family court that is the court of first instance); provided, however, that if an adjudication case for the commencement of assistance is pending before a family court, these cases are subject to that family court.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
The provisions of Article 118 applies mutatis mutandis to a person who is to be a person under assistance and to a person under assistance in the following adjudication cases (including adjudication cases for a provisional order sought by designating the adjudication cases set forth in items (i), (vii), and (ix) as cases on the merits):
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
an adjudication case for the revocation of a ruling of the commencement of assistance (meaning an adjudication case regarding the particulars set forth in Appended Table 1, row (39));
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
The provisions of Article 121 applies mutatis mutandis to the withdrawal of a petition for the commencement of assistance and the withdrawal of a petition for the appointment of an assistant, and the provisions of Article 124 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the supervision of the affairs of assistance.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
When a ruling of an order for assistance is made, the person who is to be a person under assistance and the administrator of property may rescind acts in relation to property performed by the person who is to be a person under assistance without having obtained consent from the administrator of property. In this case, the provisions of the Civil Code concerning the rescission of acts performed by a person with qualified legal capacity to act apply mutatis mutandis.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
An adjudication case for the adjudication of a presumed death (meaning an adjudication case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 1, row (56); the same applies in the following paragraph) is subject to the jurisdiction of the family court which has jurisdiction over the previous place of domicile or residence of an absentee.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
If the domicile or residence of an absentee is known from the case record, it is sufficient to give notice of a ruling to revoke the adjudication of declaration of presumed death to the absentee.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)