The provisions of Articles 132-10, 132-11 and 132-12 (excluding the part pertaining to paragraph (1), item (i)) of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to a petition or other statement in the proceedings of domestic relations cases (referred to as "petition, etc." in the following paragraph and the following Article). In this case: the term "service" in Article 132-10, paragraphs (5) and (6) and Article 132-12, paragraphs (2) and (3) of the Code is deemed to be replaced with "service or transmission"; in Article 132-11, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Code, the phrase "the proviso to Article 54, paragraph (1)" is deemed to be replaced with "the proviso to Article 22, paragraph (1) of the Domestic Relations Case Procedure Act"; in item (ii) of that paragraph, the phrase "Article 2" is deemed to be replaced with "Article 2 of the Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 9"; and in Article 132-12, paragraph (1), item (iii) of the Code, the phrase "a petition as referred to in Article 133-2, paragraph (2) concerning the paper document that has been used to file the motion or statement in question is filed together with that document" is deemed to be replaced with "a ruling under Article 133, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing certain terms and phrases pursuant to Article 38-2 of the Domestic Relations Case Procedure Act has been made", the phrase "the petition referred to in that paragraph is denied or a judicial decision setting aside a ruling on the petition referred to in that paragraph" is deemed to be replaced with "a judicial decision setting aside a ruling", and the phrase "the part of a record containing the personal information of a person seeking anonymity prescribed in that paragraph" is deemed to be replaced with "the personal information of a person seeking anonymity (meaning the address or identifying information of the person filing the petition, etc. prescribed in that paragraph or of that person's legal representative; the same applies in this item) or information from which that personal information can be inferred".
家事事件の手続における申立てその他の申述(次項及び次条において「申立て等」という。)については、民事訴訟法第百三十二条の十、第百三十二条の十一及び第百三十二条の十二(第一項第一号に係る部分を除く。)の規定を準用する。この場合において、同法第百三十二条の十第五項及び第六項並びに第百三十二条の十二第二項及び第三項中「送達」とあるのは「送達又は送付」と、同法第百三十二条の十一第一項第一号中「第五十四条第一項ただし書」とあるのは「家事事件手続法第二十二条第一項ただし書」と、同項第二号中「第二条」とあるのは「第九条において準用する同法第二条」と、同法第百三十二条の十二第一項第三号中「当該申立て等に係る書面等について、当該申立て等とともに第百三十三条の二第二項の申立てがされた」とあるのは「家事事件手続法第三十八条の二において読み替えて準用する第百三十三条第一項の決定があった」と、「申立てが却下されたとき又は当該同項の申立てに係る決定」とあるのは「決定」と、「同項に規定する秘匿事項記載部分」とあるのは「秘匿事項(同項に規定する申立て等をする者又はその法定代理人の住所等又は氏名等をいう。以下この号において同じ。)又は秘匿事項を推知することができる事項」と読み替えるものとする。