The main text is read a page at a time: a chapter to a page, and a long chapter in runs of articles. The whole main text, and the supplementary provisions and appended tables this amendment changes. Those it leaves untouched are on the page for the text in force.
Article 254-2第二百五十四条の二
Inspection, etc. of an Electronic or Magnetic Record of a Case for Mediation of Domestic Relations(電磁的家事調停事件記録の閲覧等)
Article 254-2, paragraph (1)
A party or a third party who has made a prima facie showing of interest may, with permission from the family court, make a request to a court clerk, as provided by the Rules of the Supreme Court, for the inspection of the contents of an electronic or magnetic record of a case for mediation of domestic relations (meaning the part of the record of a case for mediation of domestic relations that relates to matters recorded in a file pursuant to the provisions of this Act or other laws and regulations; the same applies hereinafter in this Article) displayed by the method specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court.
A party or a third party who has made a prima facie showing of interest may, with permission from the family court, make a request to a court clerk for the copying of the matters recorded in an electronic or magnetic record of a case for mediation of domestic relations, as provided by the Rules of the Supreme Court, by a method of recording them in a file kept on the computer used by that person using the Electronic Data Processing System specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court, or by any other method specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court.
A party or a third party who has made a prima facie showing of interest may, with permission from the family court, make a request to a court clerk, as provided by the Rules of the Supreme Court, for the issuance of a paper document stating all or part of the matters recorded in an electronic or magnetic record of a case for mediation of domestic relations, for which the court clerk has certified, by the method specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court, that the contents of the paper document are identical to the matters recorded in the electronic or magnetic record of a case for mediation of domestic relations, or for the provision of an electronic or magnetic record recording all or part of those matters, for which the court clerk has certified, by the method specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court, that the contents of the electronic or magnetic record are identical to the matters recorded in the electronic or magnetic record of a case for mediation of domestic relations, by a method of recording it in a file kept on the computer used by that person using the Electronic Data Processing System specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court, or by any other method specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court.
With regard to the part of an electronic or magnetic record of a case for mediation of domestic relations that relates to the following matters, a party may, notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding three paragraphs, make a request to a court clerk, without permission from the family court, for the inspection, etc. of an electronic or magnetic record of a case for mediation of domestic relations (meaning the inspection under the provisions of paragraph (1), the copying under the provisions of paragraph (2), or the issuance of a paper document or the provision of an electronic or magnetic record under the provisions of the preceding paragraph; the same applies in the following paragraph and paragraph (6)):
the matters recorded in an electronic written ruling prescribed in Article 76, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 258, paragraph (1) (limited to one recorded in a file pursuant to the provisions of Article 76, paragraph (3)) or in an electronic written order (meaning an electronic or magnetic record prepared pursuant to the provisions of Article 76, paragraphs (2) and (3) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 81, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 258, paragraph (1) and recorded in a file; the same applies in Article 269, paragraph (2));
the matters recorded in an electronic record that records an agreement reached through mediation, or records to the effect that the court has closed the case while deciding not to conduct a mediation or considering that mediation has been unsuccessful;
the matters that that party has recorded in a file, using the Electronic Data Processing System specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court, pursuant to the provisions of this Act or other laws and regulations;
the matters entered or recorded in a paper document, etc. or recording medium submitted by that party, in the case where such matters have been recorded in a file pursuant to the provisions of Article 132-12, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing certain terms and phrases pursuant to Article 38, paragraph (1), or pursuant to the provisions of Article 132-13 of that Code as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing certain terms and phrases pursuant to Article 38, paragraph (2).
The provisions of paragraph (3) of the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis to a petition for permission for the inspection, etc. of an electronic or magnetic record of a case for mediation of domestic relations, and the provisions of paragraph (5) of that Article apply mutatis mutandis to a request for the inspection and copying of an electronic or magnetic record of a case for mediation of domestic relations, respectively.
When a petition for permission for the inspection, etc. of an electronic or magnetic record of a case for mediation of domestic relations is filed by a party in a mediation case regarding the matter prescribed in Article 277, paragraph (1), the provisions of Article 47, paragraphs (3), (4), and (8) through (10) apply mutatis mutandis.
Certification of Matters Concerning a Case for Mediation of Domestic Relations(家事調停事件に関する事項の証明)
Article 254-3, paragraph (1)
A party may make a request to a court clerk, as provided by the Rules of the Supreme Court, for the issuance of a paper document stating matters concerning a case for mediation of domestic relations, for which the court clerk has certified those matters by the method specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court, or for the provision of an electronic or magnetic record recording those matters, for which the court clerk has certified those matters by the method specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court, by a method of recording it in a file kept on the computer used by that person using the Electronic Data Processing System specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court, or by any other method specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court.
A third party who has made a prima facie showing of interest may, with permission from the family court, make a request to a court clerk under the provisions of the preceding paragraph.
When a petition for permission under the provisions of the preceding paragraph is filed by a third party who has made a prima facie showing of interest, the family court may grant permission thereto when it finds it to be appropriate.
Section 2 Petitions for Mediation of Domestic Relations第二節 家事調停の申立て等
Article 255第二百五十五条
Petition for Mediation of Domestic Relations(家事調停の申立て)
Article 255, paragraph (1)
A petition for mediation of domestic relations must be filed by submitting a written petition (referred to as a "written petition for mediation of domestic relations" in the following paragraph and the following Article) to a family court.
A written petition for mediation of domestic relations must state the following matters:
家事調停の申立書には、次に掲げる事項を記載しなければならない。
Article 255, paragraph (2), item (i)
the party (parties) and the legal representative(s); and
当事者及び法定代理人
Article 255, paragraph (2), item (ii)
the object of and reasons for the petition.
申立ての趣旨及び理由
Article 255, paragraph (3)
An immediate appeal may be filed against a ruling to dismiss a petition for mediation of domestic relations as unlawful.
家事調停の申立てを不適法として却下する審判に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。
Article 255, paragraph (4)
The provisions of Article 49, paragraphs (3) through (7) and Article 50 (excluding the proviso to paragraph (1)) apply mutatis mutandis to a petition for mediation of domestic relations. In this case, the term "paragraph (2)" in Article 49, paragraph (4) is deemed to be replaced with "Article 255, paragraph (2)".
Sending of Copies of Written Petitions for Mediation of Domestic Relations(家事調停の申立書の写しの送付等)
Article 256, paragraph (1)
When a petition for mediation of domestic relations is filed, the family court must send a copy of a written petition for mediation of domestic relations to the respondent, except when the petition is unlawful or when it closes the case for mediation of domestic relations pursuant to the provisions of Article 271 without holding a date for proceedings for mediation of domestic relations; provided, however, that if it is found that there is a risk of interfering with the smooth progress in proceedings for mediation of domestic relations, the family court may give notice to the respondent of the fact that a petition for mediation of domestic relations is filed, in lieu of sending a copy of a written petition for mediation of domestic relations.
The provisions of Article 49, paragraphs (4) through (6) apply mutatis mutandis when it is impossible to send a copy of a written petition for mediation of domestic relations or to give notice in lieu of sending the copy under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, and the provisions of Article 67, paragraphs (3) and (4) apply mutatis mutandis to the prepayment of costs for sending a copy of a written petition for mediation of domestic relations or for giving notice in lieu of sending the copy under the provisions of the preceding paragraph.
A person who intends to file an action on a case where a mediation may be possible pursuant to the provisions of Article 244 must first file a petition for mediation of domestic relations with a family court.
When a person files an action on the case set forth in the preceding paragraph without filing a petition for mediation of domestic relations, the court must, by its own authority, refer the case to a mediation of domestic relations; provided, however, that this does not apply when the court finds it to be inappropriate to refer the case to mediation.
When the court refers a case pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, it must have the case processed by a family court which has jurisdiction over the case; provided, however, that when it finds it to be particularly necessary in order to process a case for mediation of domestic relations, it may have the case processed by a family court other than the family court which has jurisdiction over the case.
The day a law or an amendment starts to apply. It is often months or years after promulgation, so that people have time to prepare. The Ministry of Justice's English usually says a law "comes into force" or "comes into effect", and sometimes calls the day its "enforcement date". Its "enforcement" more often means the word's other sense, carrying a law out, as in an Order for Enforcement (施行令), the Cabinet Order (政令) that sets out the details for carrying out an Act.
Rules made by the Cabinet to carry out the Constitution and Acts. A Cabinet Order cannot impose duties, restrict rights or set penalties unless an Act delegates that to it.
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
A petition for conciliation of domestic relations must be filed by submitting a written petition (referred to as a "written petition for conciliation of domestic relations" in the following paragraph and the following Article) to a family court.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
When a petition for conciliation of domestic relations is filed, the family court must send a copy of a written petition for conciliation of domestic relations to the respondent, except when the petition is unlawful or when it closes the case for conciliation of domestic relations pursuant to the provisions of Article 271 without holding a date for proceedings for conciliation of domestic relations; provided, however, that if it is found that there is a risk of interfering with the smooth progress in proceedings for conciliation of domestic relations, the family court may give notice to the respondent of the fact that a petition for conciliation of domestic relations is filed, in lieu of sending a copy of a written petition for conciliation of domestic relations.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
The provisions of Article 49, paragraphs (4) through (6) apply mutatis mutandis when it is impossible to send a copy of a written petition for conciliation of domestic relations or to give notice in lieu of sending the copy under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, and the provisions of Article 67, paragraphs (3) and (4) apply mutatis mutandis to sending a copy of a written petition for conciliation of domestic relations or the prepayment of costs for giving notice in lieu of sending the copy under the provisions of the preceding paragraph.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
A person who intends to file an action on a case where a conciliation may be possible pursuant to the provisions of Article 244 must first file a petition for conciliation of domestic relations with a family court.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
When a person files an action on the case set forth in the preceding paragraph without filing a petition for conciliation of domestic relations, the court must, by its own authority, refer the case to a conciliation of domestic relations; provided, however, that this does not apply when the court finds it to be inappropriate to refer the case to conciliation.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
When the court refers a case pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, it must have the case processed by a family court which has jurisdiction over the case; provided, however, that when it finds it to be particularly necessary in order to process a case for conciliation of domestic relations, it may have the case processed by a family court other than the family court which has jurisdiction over the case.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)