Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

This text is not in force yetIt by 23 June 2027, on a day set by — at the latest in 8 months

Read the text in force →

Domestic Relations Case Procedure Act

家事事件手続法(かじじけんてつづきほう)

Chapter III Rulings in Lieu of Mediation

The law as Act Partially Amending the Civil Code, etc. (Act No. 45 of 2026) leaves it, with the words it changes marked.

The main text is read a page at a time: a chapter to a page, and a long chapter in runs of articles. The whole main text, and the supplementary provisions and appended tables this amendment changes. Those it leaves untouched are on the page for the text in force.

How the changes are shown

Underlined: words the amendment adds. A bar: where it removes words.Underlined: words the amendment adds. Struck through: the words it removes.Underlined: words the amendment adds. Struck through: the words it removes.

Chapter III Rulings in Lieu of Mediation第三章 調停に代わる審判

Article 284第二百八十四条

Subject and Requirements of Rulings in Lieu of Mediation(調停に代わる審判の対象及び要件)
Article 284, paragraph (1)

When mediation is unsuccessful and when the family court finds it to be appropriate, it may make a necessary ruling for the resolution of a case (hereinafter referred to as a "ruling in lieu of mediation") by its own authority, giving consideration to equity in the interests of both parties and taking into account all relevant circumstances; provided, however, that this does not apply in proceedings for mediation of domestic relations regarding the matters prescribed in Article 277, paragraph (1).

家庭裁判所は、調停が成立しない場合において相当と認めるときは、当事者双方のために衡平に考慮し、一切の事情を考慮して、職権で、事件の解決のため必要な審判(以下「調停に代わる審判」という。)をすることができる。ただし、第二百七十七条第一項に規定する事項についての家事調停の手続においては、この限りでない。

Article 284, paragraph (2)

When proceedings for mediation of domestic relations are conducted by a mediation committee, and when the family court makes a ruling in lieu of mediation, the family court must hear the opinions of the domestic relations mediation commissioners who compose the mediation committee.

家事調停の手続が調停委員会で行われている場合において、調停に代わる審判をするときは、家庭裁判所は、その調停委員会を組織する家事調停委員の意見を聴かなければならない。

Article 284, paragraph (3)

In a ruling in lieu of mediation, the family court may order a party to surrender custody of a child, pay money, or provide any other economic benefit or perform any other act.

家庭裁判所は、調停に代わる審判において、当事者に対し、子の引渡し又は金銭の支払その他の財産上の給付その他の給付を命ずることができる。

Article 285第二百八十五条

Special Provisions for Rulings in Lieu of Mediation(調停に代わる審判の特則)
Article 285, paragraph (1)

Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 273, paragraph (1), a petition for mediation of domestic relations may not be withdrawn after a ruling in lieu of mediation is made.

家事調停の申立ての取下げは、第二百七十三条第一項の規定にかかわらず、調停に代わる審判がされた後は、することができない。

Article 285, paragraph (2)

Notice of a ruling in lieu of mediation may not be effected by service through publication.

調停に代わる審判の告知は、公示送達の方法によっては、することができない。

Article 285, paragraph (3)

When it is impossible to give notice of a ruling in lieu of mediation, the family court must revoke the ruling.

調停に代わる審判を告知することができないときは、家庭裁判所は、これを取り消さなければならない。

Article 286第二百八十六条

Objections(異議の申立て等)
Article 286, paragraph (1)

A party may file an objection with a family court with regard to a ruling in lieu of mediation.

当事者は、調停に代わる審判に対し、家庭裁判所に異議を申し立てることができる。

Article 286, paragraph (2)

The provisions of Article 279, paragraphs (2) through (4) apply mutatis mutandis to an objection filed under the provisions of the preceding paragraph.

第二百七十九条第二項から第四項までの規定は、前項の規定による異議の申立てについて準用する。

Article 286, paragraph (3)

A family court must dismiss an objection filed under paragraph (1) when it is unlawful.

家庭裁判所は、第一項の規定による異議の申立てが不適法であるときは、これを却下しなければならない。

Article 286, paragraph (4)

An objector may file an immediate appeal against a ruling to dismiss the objector's objection pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph.

異議の申立人は、前項の規定により異議の申立てを却下する審判に対し、即時抗告をすることができる。

Article 286, paragraph (5)

When a lawful objection is filed, a ruling in lieu of mediation ceases to be effective. In this case, the family court must give notice to that effect to the parties.

適法な異議の申立てがあったときは、調停に代わる審判は、その効力を失う。この場合においては、家庭裁判所は、当事者に対し、その旨を通知しなければならない。

Article 286, paragraph (6)

When, within two weeks from the day on which a party has received the notice under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the party files an action on the case for which a petition for mediation of domestic relations has been filed, the action is deemed to have been filed at the time of the filing of the petition for mediation of domestic relations.

当事者が前項の規定による通知を受けた日から二週間以内に家事調停の申立てがあった事件について訴えを提起したときは、家事調停の申立ての時に、その訴えの提起があったものとみなす。

Article 286, paragraph (7)

When a ruling in lieu of mediation regarding any of the matters set forth in Appended Table 2 has ceased to be effective pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (5), it is deemed that a petition for adjudication of domestic relations regarding the matter has been filed at the time of the filing of the petition for mediation of domestic relations.

第五項の規定により別表第二に掲げる事項についての調停に代わる審判が効力を失った場合には、家事調停の申立ての時に、当該事項についての家事審判の申立てがあったものとみなす。

Article 286, paragraph (8)

The provisions of paragraph (1) do not apply when the parties file a joint notification that they will be subject to a ruling in lieu of mediation in proceedings for mediation of domestic relations pertaining to the petition (excluding mediation of domestic relations regarding divorce or the dissolution of an adoptive relationship).

当事者が、申立てに係る家事調停(離婚又は離縁についての家事調停を除く。)の手続において、調停に代わる審判に服する旨の共同の申出をしたときは、第一項の規定は、適用しない。

Article 286, paragraph (9)

The joint notification set forth in the preceding paragraph must be filed in writing.

前項の共同の申出は、書面でしなければならない。

Article 286, paragraph (10)

A party may revoke a joint notification set forth in paragraph (8) only before notice of a ruling in lieu of mediation is given. In this case, the party is not to be required to obtain the consent of the other party.

当事者は、調停に代わる審判の告知前に限り、第八項の共同の申出を撤回することができる。この場合においては、相手方の同意を得ることを要しない。

Article 287第二百八十七条

Effect of Ruling in Lieu of Mediation(調停に代わる審判の効力)
Article 287, paragraph (1)

If no objection is filed under the provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, or a ruling to dismiss an objection becomes final and binding, a ruling in lieu of mediation regarding any of the matters set forth in Appended Table 2 has the same effect as a final and binding ruling made under the provisions of Article 39, and a ruling in lieu of mediation regarding other matters has the same effect as a final and binding judgment.

前条第一項の規定による異議の申立てがないとき、又は異議の申立てを却下する審判が確定したときは、別表第二に掲げる事項についての調停に代わる審判は確定した第三十九条の規定による審判と同一の効力を、その余の調停に代わる審判は確定判決と同一の効力を有する。

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (源氏道合同会社) · contact@genjido.comContactSourcesTermsPrivacy