The main text is read a page at a time: a chapter to a page, and a long chapter in runs of articles. The whole main text, and the supplementary provisions and appended tables this amendment changes. Those it leaves untouched are on the page for the text in force.
Article 64第六十四条
Examination of Evidence(証拠調べ)
Article 64, paragraph (1)
With regard to the examination of evidence in proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations, the provisions of Part II, Chapter 4, Sections 1 through 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure (excluding Articles 179 and 182, Article 185, paragraph (3), Articles 187 through 189, Article 205, paragraph (2), Article 207, paragraph (2), Article 208, Article 215, paragraph (2), Article 224 (including the cases applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 229, paragraph (2) and Article 232, paragraph (1) of the Code), Article 227, paragraph (2), Article 229, paragraph (4) and Article 232-2 of the Code) apply mutatis mutandis. In this case, the phrase "the information given in a paper document under paragraph (1), or the information recorded in the court's computer files or the information recorded in a recording medium under the preceding paragraph" in Article 205, paragraph (3) of the Code and the phrase "the information detailed in a document under paragraph (1), or the information recorded in the court's computer files pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) or the particulars recorded in a recording medium as referred to in that paragraph" in Article 215, paragraph (4) of the Code are deemed to be replaced with "information"; in Article 231-2, paragraph (2) of the Code, the phrase "a recording medium on which the electronic or magnetic record has been recorded or by using an Electronic Data Processing System as specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court" is deemed to be replaced with "a recording medium on which the electronic or magnetic record has been recorded"; and in Article 231-3, paragraph (2) of the Code, the phrase "submitting or sending a recording medium on which the electronic or magnetic record has been stored or by using an Electronic Data Processing System as specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court" is deemed to be replaced with "submitting or sending a recording medium on which the electronic or magnetic record has been stored".
An immediate appeal under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph has the effect of a stay of execution.
前項において準用する民事訴訟法の規定による即時抗告は、執行停止の効力を有する。
Article 64, paragraph (3)
If a party falls under any of the following items, the family court punishes the party by a non-criminal fine of up to 200,000 yen:
当事者が次の各号のいずれかに該当するときは、家庭裁判所は、二十万円以下の過料に処する。
Article 64, paragraph (3), item (i)
when the party does not comply with an order to submit issued under the provisions of Article 223, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 231 and Article 231-3, paragraph (1) of the Code) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (1), or where the party, without justifiable grounds, does not comply with an order to submit issued under the provisions of Article 223, paragraph (1) of the Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 232, paragraph (1) of the Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (1); or
when the party, for the purpose of obstructing the examination of documentary evidence, causes a document that must be submitted under the provisions of Article 220 of the Code of Civil Procedure (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 231 and Article 231-3, paragraph (1) of the Code) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (1) (including an object equivalent to a document as prescribed in Article 231 of the Code and an electronic or magnetic record as prescribed in Article 231-2 of the Code) to be lost or otherwise renders it unusable, or where the party, for the purpose of obstructing observation, causes the subject matter of the observation to be lost or otherwise renders it unusable.
If a party falls under any of the following items, the family court punishes them by a non-criminal fine of up to 100,000 yen:
当事者が次の各号のいずれかに該当するときは、家庭裁判所は、十万円以下の過料に処する。
Article 64, paragraph (4), item (i)
when the party, without justifiable grounds, does not comply with an order to submit issued under the provisions of Article 223, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 229, paragraph (2) of the Code (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 231 of the Code) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (1);
when the party causes a document or any other object, which shows a person's handwriting or an impression of a seal to be used for comparison, to be lost or otherwise renders it unusable, for the purpose of obstructing the use for comparison; or
when the party, without justifiable grounds, does not comply with an order issued under the provisions of Article 229, paragraph (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 231 of the Code) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (1), or where the party writes letters to be used for comparison under the order, with a style of handwriting that is different from the party's own.
The provisions of Articles 192 through 194 of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis when a party who is ordered to appear pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph does not appear without justifiable grounds, and the provisions of Article 209, paragraphs (1) and (2) of the Code apply mutatis mutandis when a party appears but refuses to swear under oath or make statements without justifiable grounds.
Subsection 5 Understanding of the Intentions of Children in Proceedings for Adjudication of Domestic Relations第五款 家事審判の手続における子の意思の把握等
Article 65第六十五条
Article 65, paragraph (1)
In proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations regarding a parent and child, parental authority or guardianship of a minor, or in proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations, the outcome of which would affect a minor (including a minor ward; hereinafter the same applies in this Article), the family court must try to understand the intentions of the child by hearing statements from the child, having a family court investigating officer conduct an examination or using any other appropriate methods, and to take the child's intentions into consideration in adjudicating the case, according to the child's age or degree of development.
Subsection 6 Special Provisions for Proceedings for Adjudication of Domestic Relations Regarding Matters Eligible for Mediation of Domestic Relations第六款 家事調停をすることができる事項についての家事審判の手続の特則
Article 66第六十六条
Jurisdiction by Agreement(合意管轄)
Article 66, paragraph (1)
Adjudication cases regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 2 are subject to the jurisdiction of a family court determined by agreement between the parties, in addition to a family court determined pursuant to other provisions of this Act.
The provisions of Article 11, paragraphs (2) and (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to the agreement set forth in the preceding paragraph.
民事訴訟法第十一条第二項及び第三項の規定は、前項の合意について準用する。
Article 67第六十七条
Sending of Copy of Written Petition for Adjudication of Domestic Relations(家事審判の申立書の写しの送付等)
Article 67, paragraph (1)
When a petition for adjudication of domestic relations regarding any of the matters set forth in Appended Table 2 is filed, the family court must send a copy of a written petition for adjudication of domestic relations to the respondent, except when the petition is unlawful or the petition is clearly groundless; provided, however, that if it is found that there is a risk of interfering with smooth progress in the proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations, the family court may give notice to the respondent of the fact that a petition for adjudication of domestic relations is filed, in lieu of sending a copy of a written petition for adjudication of domestic relations.
The provisions of Article 49, paragraphs (4) through (6) apply mutatis mutandis when it is impossible to send a copy of a written petition for adjudication of domestic relations or to give notice in lieu of sending the copy under the provisions of the preceding paragraph.
When the presiding judge specifies a reasonable period and orders a petitioner to prepay costs for sending a copy of a written petition for adjudication of domestic relations or for giving notice in lieu of sending such copy under the provisions of paragraph (1), but the costs are not prepaid, the presiding judge must, by a direction, dismiss the written petition for adjudication of domestic relations.
An immediate appeal may be filed against the direction set forth in the preceding paragraph.
前項の命令に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。
Article 68第六十八条
Hearing Statements(陳述の聴取)
Article 68, paragraph (1)
In proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations regarding any of the matters set forth in Appended Table 2, the family court must hear statements from a party, except when the petition is unlawful or the petition is clearly groundless.
Upon the request of a party, the family court must hear the party's statements as provided for in the provisions of the preceding paragraph on the hearing date.
前項の規定による陳述の聴取は、当事者の申出があるときは、審問の期日においてしなければならない。
Article 69第六十九条
Hearing Date(審問の期日)
Article 69, paragraph (1)
In proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations regarding any of the matters set forth in Appended Table 2, when the family court investigates facts by holding a hearing on a date set therefor and hearing statements from a party, another party may attend the hearing on the date; provided, however, that this does not apply if it is found that the attendance of the other party at the hearing on the date is likely to interfere with the investigation of facts.
When a family court has investigated the facts in proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations regarding any of the matters set forth in Appended Table 2, it must give notice to that effect to a party and an interested party intervenor, except when it finds it not to be particularly necessary to do so.
In proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations regarding any of the matters set forth in Appended Table 2, the family court must specify a date for concluding the proceedings, while leaving a reasonable grace period until the date, except when the petition is unlawful or the petition is clearly groundless; provided, however, that on a date for proceedings for adjudication of domestic relations on which both parties can attend, the family court may declare the conclusion of the proceedings immediately.
When a family court concludes proceedings under the provisions of the preceding Article, it must specify a date for making a ruling.
家庭裁判所は、前条の規定により審理を終結したときは、審判をする日を定めなければならない。
Subsection 7 Rulings第七款 審判等
Article 73第七十三条
Rulings(審判)
Article 73, paragraph (1)
When a case for adjudication of domestic relations is ready for making a judicial decision, the family court makes a ruling.
家庭裁判所は、家事審判事件が裁判をするのに熟したときは、審判をする。
Article 73, paragraph (2)
When part of a case for adjudication of domestic relations is ready for making a judicial decision, the family court may make a ruling for the part of the case. The same applies when one of the cases for adjudication of domestic relations for which consolidation of proceedings has been ordered is ready for making a judicial decision.
Except as otherwise provided, notice of a ruling must be given to parties and an interested party intervenor as well as any other person subject to adjudication, by means considered to be appropriate.
Except as otherwise provided, a ruling (excluding a ruling to dismiss a petition) becomes effective when notice thereof is given to a person subject to adjudication (if there are two or more persons subject to adjudication, one of these persons); provided, however, that a ruling against which an immediate appeal may be filed will not be effective unless it becomes final and binding.
A ruling to dismiss a petition becomes effective when notice thereof is given to the petitioner.
申立てを却下する審判は、申立人に告知することによってその効力を生ずる。
Article 74, paragraph (4)
A ruling is not to become final and binding prior to the expiration of the period for filing an immediate appeal.
審判は、即時抗告の期間の満了前には確定しないものとする。
Article 74, paragraph (5)
The process of a ruling becoming final and binding is interrupted by an immediate appeal filed during the period set forth in the preceding paragraph.
審判の確定は、前項の期間内にした即時抗告の提起により、遮断される。
Article 75第七十五条
Enforceability of Rulings(審判の執行力)
Article 75, paragraph (1)
A ruling to order the payment of money, delivery of an object, performance of an obligation to register or performance of any other act has the same effect as an enforceable title of obligation.
A ruling must be made by preparing a written ruling; provided, however, that in making a ruling against which an immediate appeal may not be filed, the main text of a ruling may be stated in the written petition for adjudication of domestic relations or in a record, in lieu of preparing a written ruling.
A written ruling must state the following matters:
審判書には、次に掲げる事項を記載しなければならない。
Article 76, paragraph (2), item (i)
the main text;
主文
Article 76, paragraph (2), item (ii)
the essentials of the reasons;
理由の要旨
Article 76, paragraph (2), item (iii)
the party (parties) and the legal representative(s); and
当事者及び法定代理人
Article 76, paragraph (2), item (iv)
the court.
裁判所
Article 77第七十七条
Order of Correction(更正決定)
Article 77, paragraph (1)
If there is a miscalculation, clerical error, or any other clear error similar thereto in a ruling, the family court may, upon petition or by its own authority, make a ruling of correction at any time.
A ruling of correction must be made by preparing a written judgment.
更正決定は、裁判書を作成してしなければならない。
Article 77, paragraph (3)
An immediate appeal may be filed against a ruling of correction only by a person who may file an immediate appeal on the assumption that the corrected ruling is the original ruling.
An immediate appeal may be filed against a judicial decision to dismiss the petition set forth in paragraph (1) as unlawful.
第一項の申立てを不適法として却下する裁判に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。
Article 77, paragraph (5)
When a lawful immediate appeal is filed against a ruling, the immediate appeal set forth in the preceding two paragraphs may not be filed.
審判に対し適法な即時抗告があったときは、前二項の即時抗告は、することができない。
Copy link
Coming into force施行
The day a law or an amendment starts to apply. It is often months or years after promulgation, so that people have time to prepare. The Ministry of Justice's English usually says a law "comes into force" or "comes into effect", and sometimes calls the day its "enforcement date". Its "enforcement" more often means the word's other sense, carrying a law out, as in an Order for Enforcement (施行令), the Cabinet Order (政令) that sets out the details for carrying out an Act.
Rules made by the Cabinet to carry out the Constitution and Acts. A Cabinet Order cannot impose duties, restrict rights or set penalties unless an Act delegates that to it.
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
The provisions of Articles 192 through 194 of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis when a party who is ordered to appear pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph does not appear without justifiable grounds, and the provisions of Article 290, paragraphs (1) and (2) of the Code apply mutatis mutandis when a party appears but refuses to swear under oath or make statements without justifiable grounds.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
Subsection 6 Special Provisions for Proceedings for Adjudication of Domestic Relations Regarding Matters Eligible for Conciliation of Domestic Relations
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
Except as otherwise provided, notice of a ruling must be given to parties and an interested party intervenors as well as any other person subject to adjudication, by means considered to be appropriate.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)