The main text is read a page at a time: a chapter to a page, and a long chapter in runs of articles. The whole main text, and the supplementary provisions and appended tables this amendment changes. Those it leaves untouched are on the page for the text in force.
Section 2 Petitions for Mediation of Domestic Relations第二節 家事調停の申立て等
Article 255第二百五十五条
Petition for Mediation of Domestic Relations(家事調停の申立て)
Article 255, paragraph (1)
A petition for mediation of domestic relations must be filed by submitting a written petition (referred to as a "written petition for mediation of domestic relations" in the following paragraph and the following Article) to a family court.
A written petition for mediation of domestic relations must state the following matters:
家事調停の申立書には、次に掲げる事項を記載しなければならない。
Article 255, paragraph (2), item (i)
the party (parties) and the legal representative(s); and
当事者及び法定代理人
Article 255, paragraph (2), item (ii)
the object of and reasons for the petition.
申立ての趣旨及び理由
Article 255, paragraph (3)
An immediate appeal may be filed against a ruling to dismiss a petition for mediation of domestic relations as unlawful.
家事調停の申立てを不適法として却下する審判に対しては、即時抗告をすることができる。
Article 255, paragraph (4)
The provisions of Article 49, paragraphs (3) through (6) and Article 50 (excluding the proviso to paragraph (1)) apply mutatis mutandis to a petition for mediation of domestic relations. In this case, the term "paragraph (2)" in Article 49, paragraph (4) is deemed to be replaced with "Article 255, paragraph (2)".
Sending of Copies of Written Petitions for Mediation of Domestic Relations(家事調停の申立書の写しの送付等)
Article 256, paragraph (1)
When a petition for mediation of domestic relations is filed, the family court must send a copy of a written petition for mediation of domestic relations to the respondent, except when the petition is unlawful or when it closes the case for mediation of domestic relations pursuant to the provisions of Article 271 without holding a date for proceedings for mediation of domestic relations; provided, however, that if it is found that there is a risk of interfering with the smooth progress in proceedings for mediation of domestic relations, the family court may give notice to the respondent of the fact that a petition for mediation of domestic relations is filed, in lieu of sending a copy of a written petition for mediation of domestic relations.
The provisions of Article 49, paragraphs (4) through (6) apply mutatis mutandis when it is impossible to send a copy of a written petition for mediation of domestic relations or to give notice in lieu of sending the copy under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, and the provisions of Article 67, paragraphs (3) and (4) apply mutatis mutandis to the prepayment of costs for sending a copy of a written petition for mediation of domestic relations or for giving notice in lieu of sending the copy under the provisions of the preceding paragraph.
A person who intends to file an action on a case where a mediation may be possible pursuant to the provisions of Article 244 must first file a petition for mediation of domestic relations with a family court.
When a person files an action on the case set forth in the preceding paragraph without filing a petition for mediation of domestic relations, the court must, by its own authority, refer the case to a mediation of domestic relations; provided, however, that this does not apply when the court finds it to be inappropriate to refer the case to mediation.
When the court refers a case pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, it must have the case processed by a family court which has jurisdiction over the case; provided, however, that when it finds it to be particularly necessary in order to process a case for mediation of domestic relations, it may have the case processed by a family court other than the family court which has jurisdiction over the case.
Section 3 Proceedings for Mediation of Domestic Relations第三節 家事調停の手続
Article 258第二百五十八条
Application Mutatis Mutandis of Provisions Concerning Proceedings for the Adjudication of Domestic Relations(家事審判の手続の規定の準用等)
Article 258, paragraph (1)
The provisions of Articles 41 through 43 apply mutatis mutandis to the intervention in or exclusion from proceedings for mediation of domestic relations; the provisions of Article 44 apply mutatis mutandis to the taking over of proceedings for the mediation of domestic relations; the provisions of Articles 51 through 55 apply mutatis mutandis to a date for proceedings for mediation of domestic relations; the provisions of Articles 56 through 62 and Article 64 apply mutatis mutandis to the investigation of facts and examination of evidence in proceedings for mediation of domestic relations; the provisions of Article 65 apply mutatis mutandis to understanding the intention of a child, etc. in proceedings for mediation of domestic relations; the provisions of Articles 73, 74, 76 (excluding the proviso to paragraph (1)), 77, and 79 apply mutatis mutandis to a ruling regarding mediation of domestic relations; and the provisions of Article 81 apply mutatis mutandis to a judicial decision other than a ruling regarding mediation of domestic relations.
A court that is commissioned to examine the facts in proceedings for mediation of domestic relations pursuant to the provisions of Article 61, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph may, when it finds it to be appropriate, have a court clerk conduct the investigation of facts as commissioned; provided, however, that this does not apply when a commissioned family court finds it to be appropriate to have a family court investigating officer conduct the examination of facts as commissioned.
The provisions of Article 152-2 apply mutatis mutandis to a mediation case for a disposition regarding cooperation and mutual assistance between a husband and wife, a mediation case for a disposition regarding the sharing of living expenses (meaning a mediation case regarding the matters set forth in Appended Table 2, row (2)), a mediation case for a disposition regarding the custody of a child (limited to a mediation case for a disposition regarding the sharing of expenses required for the custody of a child), a mediation case for a disposition regarding the division of property (meaning a mediation case regarding the matters set forth in row (4) of that table), and a mediation case regarding divorce; the provisions of Article 152-3 apply mutatis mutandis to a mediation case for a disposition regarding the custody of a child (excluding a mediation case for a disposition regarding the sharing of expenses required for the custody of a child) and a mediation case regarding divorce; and the provisions of Article 184-2 apply mutatis mutandis to a mediation case for a determination of the extent or method of support, and change or revocation of the determination (meaning a mediation case regarding the matters set forth in row (10) of that table), respectively.
Control over Proceedings for Mediation of Domestic Relations Conducted by a Mediation Committee(調停委員会が行う家事調停の手続の指揮)
Article 259, paragraph (1)
Proceedings for mediation of domestic relations conducted by a mediation committee are subject to the control of a judge who composes the mediation committee.
調停委員会が行う家事調停の手続は、調停委員会を組織する裁判官が指揮する。
Article 260第二百六十条
Power of Mediation Committees(調停委員会等の権限)
Article 260, paragraph (1)
When a mediation committee conducts a mediation of domestic relations, the power of a court in relation to the following matters is exercised by the mediation committee:
調停委員会が家事調停を行う場合には、次に掲げる事項に関する裁判所の権限は、調停委員会が行う。
Article 260, paragraph (1), item (i)
permission, etc. for a counsel under the provisions of Article 22;
第二十二条の規定による手続代理人の許可等
Article 260, paragraph (1), item (ii)
permission, etc. for an assistant in court under the provisions of Article 60, paragraphs (1) and (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27;
第二十七条において準用する民事訴訟法第六十条第一項及び第二項の規定による補佐人の許可等
Article 260, paragraph (1), item (iii)
permission for attendance under the provisions of proviso to Article 33;
第三十三条ただし書の規定による傍聴の許可
Article 260, paragraph (1), item (iv)
consolidation of proceedings, etc. under the provisions of Article 35;
第三十五条の規定による手続の併合等
Article 260, paragraph (1), item (v)
amendment to a petition under the provisions of Article 50, paragraphs (3) and (4) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the provisions of Article 255, paragraph (4); and
第二百五十五条第四項において準用する第五十条第三項及び第四項の規定による申立ての変更
Article 260, paragraph (1), item (vi)
intervention in proceedings under the provisions of Article 41, paragraphs (1) and (2) and Article 42, paragraphs (1) through (3) and (5), exclusion from proceedings under the provisions of Article 43, paragraph (1), taking over of proceedings under the provisions of Article 44, paragraphs (1) and (3), summoning a person concerned with a case under the provisions of Article 51, paragraph (1), conducting proceedings by the method of communication through audio transmissions under the provisions of Article 54, paragraph (1), and the investigation of facts and examination of evidence (excluding the particulars concerning a non-criminal fine and subpoena) under the provisions of Article 56, paragraph (1), Article 59, paragraphs (1) through (3) (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 60, paragraph (2)), Article 61, paragraph (1), Article 62, and Article 64, paragraph (5), as well as under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 64, paragraph (1), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 258, paragraph (1).
When a mediation committee conducts proceedings for mediation of domestic relations, the power of the presiding judge in relation to the appointment, etc. of a counsel under the provisions of Article 23, paragraphs (1) and (2), the designation of a date for proceedings under the provisions of Article 34, paragraph (1), and the preparation of a record under the provisions of the proviso to Article 253 is exercised by a judge who composes the mediation committee.
In the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, a judge may have a family court investigating officer examine facts or a technical official of the court who is a physician diagnose the physical and mental condition of a person concerned with a case.
The provisions of Article 58, paragraphs (3) and (4) apply mutatis mutandis to the investigation of facts and the diagnosis of the physical and mental condition of the person under the provisions of the preceding paragraph.
In the case referred to in paragraph (1), a judge may, when the judge finds it to be appropriate, have a court clerk investigate facts; provided, however, that this does not apply when the judge finds it to be appropriate to have a family court investigating officer examine facts.
A judge who composes a mediation committee may, by a resolution of the mediation committee, have a family court investigating officer take the measures under the provisions of Article 59, paragraph (4).
Investigation of Facts by Domestic Relations Mediation Commissioner(家事調停委員による事実の調査)
Article 262, paragraph (1)
A mediation committee may, when it finds it to be appropriate, have a domestic relations mediation commissioner who composes the mediation committee investigate facts; provided, however, that this does not apply when it finds it to be appropriate to have a family court investigating officer examine the facts.
A mediation committee may commission another family court or a summary court to hear the opinion of a party concerned with a case with regard to the resolution of a dispute.
A family court that is commissioned to hear opinions under the provisions of the preceding paragraph may, when it finds it to be appropriate, have a domestic relations mediation commissioner hear opinions as commissioned.
Hearing of the Expert Opinion of a Domestic Relations Mediation Commissioner(家事調停委員の専門的意見の聴取)
Article 264, paragraph (1)
A mediation committee may, when it finds it to be necessary, hear the opinions of a domestic relations mediation commissioner who is not a member of the mediation committee, based on the commissioner's expert knowledge and experience.
A domestic relations mediation commissioner whose opinions are heard pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph is designated by a family court.
前項の規定により意見を聴取する家事調停委員は、家庭裁判所が指定する。
Article 264, paragraph (3)
A domestic relations mediation commissioner who is designated under the provisions of the preceding paragraph is to attend a mediation committee and state opinions.
前項の規定による指定を受けた家事調停委員は、調停委員会に出席して意見を述べるものとする。
Article 265第二百六十五条
Place of Mediation(調停の場所)
Article 265, paragraph (1)
A mediation committee may mediate a case at an appropriate place outside a court, in consideration of the circumstances of the case.
調停委員会は、事件の実情を考慮して、裁判所外の適当な場所で調停を行うことができる。
Article 266第二百六十六条
Disposition Prior to Mediation(調停前の処分)
Article 266, paragraph (1)
While a case for mediation of domestic relations is pending, a mediation committee may issue a disposition that it finds to be necessary for mediation.
If there are pressing circumstances, a judge who composes a mediation committee may order the disposition set forth in the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as a "disposition prior to mediation").
A disposition prior to mediation does not have enforceability.
調停前の処分は、執行力を有しない。
Article 266, paragraph (4)
If a party or interested party intervenor who has been ordered to take a necessary measure as a disposition prior to mediation does not comply with the order without justifiable grounds, a family court punishes the party or interested party intervenor by a non-criminal fine of up to 100,000 yen.
The day a law or an amendment starts to apply. It is often months or years after promulgation, so that people have time to prepare. The Ministry of Justice's English usually says a law "comes into force" or "comes into effect", and sometimes calls the day its "enforcement date". Its "enforcement" more often means the word's other sense, carrying a law out, as in an Order for Enforcement (施行令), the Cabinet Order (政令) that sets out the details for carrying out an Act.
Rules made by the Cabinet to carry out the Constitution and Acts. A Cabinet Order cannot impose duties, restrict rights or set penalties unless an Act delegates that to it.
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
A petition for conciliation of domestic relations must be filed by submitting a written petition (referred to as a "written petition for conciliation of domestic relations" in the following paragraph and the following Article) to a family court.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
The provisions of Article 49, paragraphs (3) through (6) and Article 50 (excluding the proviso to paragraph (1)) apply mutatis mutandis to a petition for conciliation of domestic relations. In this case, the term "paragraph (2)" in Article 49, paragraph (4) is deemed to be replaced with "Article 255, paragraph (2) ".
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
When a petition for conciliation of domestic relations is filed, the family court must send a copy of a written petition for conciliation of domestic relations to the respondent, except when the petition is unlawful or when it closes the case for conciliation of domestic relations pursuant to the provisions of Article 271 without holding a date for proceedings for conciliation of domestic relations; provided, however, that if it is found that there is a risk of interfering with the smooth progress in proceedings for conciliation of domestic relations, the family court may give notice to the respondent of the fact that a petition for conciliation of domestic relations is filed, in lieu of sending a copy of a written petition for conciliation of domestic relations.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
The provisions of Article 49, paragraphs (4) through (6) apply mutatis mutandis when it is impossible to send a copy of a written petition for conciliation of domestic relations or to give notice in lieu of sending the copy under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, and the provisions of Article 67, paragraphs (3) and (4) apply mutatis mutandis to sending a copy of a written petition for conciliation of domestic relations or the prepayment of costs for giving notice in lieu of sending the copy under the provisions of the preceding paragraph.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
A person who intends to file an action on a case where a conciliation may be possible pursuant to the provisions of Article 244 must first file a petition for conciliation of domestic relations with a family court.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
When a person files an action on the case set forth in the preceding paragraph without filing a petition for conciliation of domestic relations, the court must, by its own authority, refer the case to a conciliation of domestic relations; provided, however, that this does not apply when the court finds it to be inappropriate to refer the case to conciliation.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
When the court refers a case pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, it must have the case processed by a family court which has jurisdiction over the case; provided, however, that when it finds it to be particularly necessary in order to process a case for conciliation of domestic relations, it may have the case processed by a family court other than the family court which has jurisdiction over the case.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
The provisions of Articles 41 through 43 apply mutatis mutandis to the intervention in or exclusion from proceedings for conciliation of domestic relations; the provisions of Article 44 apply mutatis mutandis to the taking over of proceedings for the conciliation of domestic relations; the provisions of Articles 51 through 55 apply mutatis mutandis to a date for proceedings for conciliation of domestic relations; the provisions of Articles 56 through 62 and Article 64 apply mutatis mutandis to the investigation of facts and examination of evidence in proceedings for conciliation of domestic relations; the provisions of Article 65 apply mutatis mutandis to understanding the intention of a child, etc.; the provisions of Articles 73, 74, 76 (excluding the proviso to paragraph (1)), 77, and 79 apply mutatis mutandis to a ruling regarding conciliation of domestic relations; and the provisions of Article 81 apply mutatis mutandis to a judicial decision other than a ruling regarding conciliation of domestic relations.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
A court that is commissioned to examine the facts in proceedings for conciliation of domestic relations pursuant to the provisions of Article 61, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph may, when it finds it to be appropriate, have a court clerk conduct the investigation of facts as commissioned; provided, however, that this does not apply when a commissioned family court finds it to be appropriate to have a family court investigating officer conduct the examination of facts as commissioned.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
Proceedings for conciliation of domestic relations conducted by a conciliation committee is subject to the control of a judge who composes the conciliation committee.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
When a conciliation committee conducts a conciliation of domestic relations, the power of a court in relation to the following matters are exercised by the conciliation committee:
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
When a conciliation committee conducts proceedings for conciliation of domestic relations, the power of the presiding judge in relation to the appointment, etc. of a counsel under the provisions of Article 23, paragraphs (1) and (2), the designation of a date for proceedings under the provisions of Article 34, paragraph (1), and the preparation of a record under the provisions of proviso to Article 253 is exercised by a judge who composes the conciliation committee.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
A conciliation committee may, when it finds it to be appropriate, have a domestic relations conciliation commissioner who composes the conciliation committee investigate facts; provided, however, that this does not apply when it finds it to be appropriate to have a family court investigating officer examine the facts.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
A conciliation committee may commission another family court or a summary court to hear the opinion of a party concerned with a case with regard to the resolution of a dispute.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
A family court that is commissioned to hear opinions under the provisions of the preceding paragraph may, when it finds it to be appropriate, have a domestic relations conciliation commissioner hear opinions as commissioned.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
A conciliation committee may, when it finds it to be necessary, hear the opinions of a domestic relations conciliation commissioner who is not a member of the conciliation committee, based on the commissioner's expert knowledge and experience.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
A domestic relations conciliation commissioner whose opinions are heard pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph is designated by a family court.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
A domestic relations conciliation commissioner who is designated under the provisions of the preceding paragraph is to attend a conciliation committee and state opinions.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
While a case for conciliation of domestic relations is pending, a conciliation committee may issue a disposition that it finds to be necessary for conciliation.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
If there are pressing circumstances, a judge who composes a conciliation committee may order the disposition set forth in the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as a "disposition prior to conciliation").
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)
The Ministry of Justice's English of this passage has a slip, so the English shown is this site's correction of it. The Ministry printed:
If a party or interested party intervenor who has been ordered to take a necessary measure as a disposition prior to conciliation does not comply with the order without justifiable grounds, a family court punishes the party or interested party intervenor by a non-criminal fine of up to 100,000 yen.
Japanese Law Translation, Ministry of Justice
Translates the law as amended by Act No. 34 of 2019 (令和元年法律第三十四号)