A decision must be made using a written administrative determination stating the following matters and on which the reviewing agency has affixed its name and seal:
裁決は、次に掲げる事項を記載し、審査庁が記名押印した裁決書によりしなければならない。
the text;
主文
the outline of the case;
事案の概要
the summary of the allegations by the persons concerned with proceedings; and
審理関係人の主張の要旨
the reasons (when the text of item (i) differs from the content of the review officer's written opinion or the written response from the Administrative Complaint Review Board, etc. or the Council, etc., including the reasons for the difference).
When consultation with the Administrative Complaint Review Board, etc. pursuant to the provisions of Article 43, paragraph (1) is not necessary, the review officer's written opinion must be attached to the written administrative determination referred to in the preceding paragraph.
When making an administrative determination for which a request for re-examination may be filed, the reviewing agency must state the fact that a request for re-examination may be filed, and an administrative agency with which a request for re-examination should be filed and the period for filing a request for re-examination (meaning the period of time prescribed in Article 62) in a written administrative determination to inform the relevant person of these matters.
Read this with the articles around it