Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

1 article

Article 6-2-4Replacement of Terms in the Case Where a Specified Person under the Reduced Minimum Wage Exception Who Has Not Made the Request under Article 4-6, paragraph (2) of the Supplementary Provisions of the Act Ceases to Be a Specified Person under the Reduced Minimum Wage Exception and the Person Who Has Ceased to Be One Holds Status Relating to a Different Insured Category

第六条の二の四(法附則第四条の六第二項の申出をしていない特定減額特例対象者が特定減額特例対象者に該当しなくなつた場合であつて当該該当しなくなつた者が異なる被保険者の種別に係る資格を有する場合の読替え)

With regard to the application of Article 18-2, paragraph (1) of the Act in the case where a specified person under the reduced minimum wage exception who has not made the request under Article 4-6, paragraph (2) of the Supplementary Provisions of the Act ceases to be a specified person under the reduced minimum wage exception, and the person who has ceased to be one has been continuously employed at the same place of business since before the day on which the person ceased to be one, and does not fall under any of the items of Article 12 of the Act on that day, the phrase "the provisions of Article 13" in Article 18-2, paragraph (1) of the Act is deemed to be replaced with "the provisions of Article 13, paragraph (1) as replaced pursuant to the provisions of Article 6-2-3 of the Order for Enforcement of the Employees' Pension Insurance Act (Cabinet Order No. 110 of 1954)".

法附則第四条の六第二項の申出をしていない特定減額特例対象者が特定減額特例対象者に該当しなくなつた場合であつて、当該該当しなくなつた者が当該該当しなくなつた日前から引き続き同一の事業所に使用され、かつ、同日において法第十二条各号のいずれにも該当しない場合における法第十八条の二第一項の規定の適用については、同項中「第十三条」とあるのは、「厚生年金保険法施行令(昭和二十九年政令第百十号)第六条の二の三の規定により読み替えられた第十三条第一項」とする。

Read this with the articles around it

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (源氏道合同会社) · contact@genjido.comContactSourcesTermsPrivacy