第二十七条の十四(和解)
The Labor Relations Commission may recommend settlement to the parties at any time in the course of the examination.
労働委員会は、審査の途中において、いつでも、当事者に和解を勧めることができる。
When a settlement has been established between the parties and both parties make motions before the order for relief, etc. becomes final and binding, and when the Labour Relations Commission finds that the content of the settlement is appropriate to maintain or establish normal order of labor relationships between the parties, the examination procedure is terminated.
救済命令等が確定するまでの間に当事者間で和解が成立し、当事者双方の申立てがあつた場合において、労働委員会が当該和解の内容が当事者間の労働関係の正常な秩序を維持させ、又は確立させるため適当と認めるときは、審査の手続は終了する。
In cases as prescribed in the preceding paragraph, the order for relief, etc. already issued for the case related to the settlement (limited to the settlement that the Labour Relations Commission finds appropriate pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph; the same applies in the following paragraph) ceases to be effective.
The Labour Relations Commission, in the case that a settlement includes agreement on payments of a certain amount of money or delivery of a certain quantity of fungible things or securities, draw up a record of settlement concerning the agreement upon request from both parties.
労働委員会は、和解に金銭の一定額の支払又はその他の代替物若しくは有価証券の一定の数量の給付を内容とする合意が含まれる場合は、当事者双方の申立てにより、当該合意について和解調書を作成することができる。
The record of settlement prescribed in the preceding paragraph, where compulsory execution is concerned, is deemed to be the title of obligation listed in Article 22, item (v) of the Civil Execution Act (Act No. 4 of 1979).
前項の和解調書は、強制執行に関しては、民事執行法(昭和五十四年法律第四号)第二十二条第五号に掲げる債務名義とみなす。
Granting of certificate of execution concerning the title of obligation set forth in the preceding paragraph is performed by the chairperson of the Labour Relations Commission. The service pursuant to the second sentence of Article 29 of the Civil Enforcement Act is to be made in the same way.
前項の規定による債務名義についての執行文の付与は、労働委員会の会長が行う。民事執行法第二十九条後段の送達も、同様とする。
Trial on objections concerning the granting of the certificate of execution, pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, is to be conducted at the district court having jurisdiction over the location of the Labour Relations Commission.
前項の規定による執行文付与に関する異議についての裁判は、労働委員会の所在地を管轄する地方裁判所においてする。
Particulars necessary for the service of the record of settlement set forth in paragraph (4) and for the service pursuant to the second sentence of paragraph (6) are specified by Cabinet Order.
Article 27-15Request for Re-examination
第二十七条の十五(再審査の申立て)
When receiving order for relief, etc. from a Prefectural Labour Relations Commission, employers may request re-examination to the Central Labour Relations Commission within fifteen days (if there are compelling reasons, such as natural disaster for not making a request within that period, within one week from the day following the date the reasons ceased to exist); provided, however, that the request does not suspend the validity of the order for relief, etc., and the order for relief, etc. ceases to be effective when the Central Labour Relations Commission rescinds or modifies the order as a result of re-examination conducted pursuant to the provisions of Article 25, paragraph (2).
The provisions of the preceding paragraph apply mutatis mutandis to requests for re-examination by labor unions or workers of the Central Labour Relations Commission.
Article 27-16Relations between Re-examination and Lawsuit
第二十七条の十六(再審査と訴訟との関係)
The Central Labour Relations Commission may not re-examine an order for relief, etc. when the whole or part of the order for relief, etc. by a Prefectural Labour Relations Commission is supported by a final and binding judgment based on the action pursuant to Article 27-19, paragraph (1).
中央労働委員会は、第二十七条の十九第一項の訴えに基づく確定判決によつて都道府県労働委員会の救済命令等の全部又は一部が支持されたときは、当該救済命令等について、再審査することができない。
Article 27-17Application Mutatis Mutandis to the Procedure for Re-examination
第二十七条の十七(再審査の手続への準用)
The provisions of Article 27, paragraph (1); Article 27-2 through Article 27-9; Article 27-10, paragraphs (3) through (6); and Article 27-11 through Article 27-14 apply mutatis mutandis to the procedure for re-examination taken by the Central Labour Relations Commission. In this case, the phrase "when the public member bears witness to the case" in Article 27-2, paragraph (1), item (iv) is deemed to be replaced with "when the public member bears witness to the case, or when the public member gets involved in the order for relief, etc. of a Prefectural Labour Relations Commission which has already been issued for the case."
第二十七条第一項、第二十七条の二から第二十七条の九まで、第二十七条の十第三項から第六項まで及び第二十七条の十一から第二十七条の十四までの規定は、中央労働委員会の再審査の手続について準用する。この場合において、第二十七条の二第一項第四号中「とき」とあるのは「とき又は事件について既に発せられている都道府県労働委員会の救済命令等に関与したとき」と読み替えるものとする。
Article 27-18Period of Examination
第二十七条の十八(審査の期間)
The Labour Relations Commission, for the purpose of conducting expeditious examinations, is to set a target for the period of examination, and publicize the degree of achievement of the target and any other implementation status of the examination.
労働委員会は、迅速な審査を行うため、審査の期間の目標を定めるとともに、目標の達成状況その他の審査の実施状況を公表するものとする。
Section 3 Lawsuits
第三節 訴訟
Article 27-19Filing an Action for Rescission
第二十七条の十九(取消しの訴え)
When an employer has not requested the Central Labour Relations Commission to review an order for relief, etc. by the Prefectural Labour Relations Commission, or when the Central Labour Relations Commission has issued an order for relief, etc., the employer may file an action for rescission of the order for relief, etc. within thirty days from the day on which the order-for-relief, etc. was delivered. This period is unextendable.
使用者が都道府県労働委員会の救済命令等について中央労働委員会に再審査の申立てをしないとき、又は中央労働委員会が救済命令等を発したときは、使用者は、救済命令等の交付の日から三十日以内に、救済命令等の取消しの訴えを提起することができる。この期間は、不変期間とする。
When an employer has requested the Central Labour Relations Commission to re-examine an order pursuant to the provisions of Article 27-15, paragraph (1), the employer may file an action for rescission only against the order for relief, etc. by the Central Labour Relations Commission for that request. The provisions of Article 12, paragraphs (3) through paragraph (5) of the Administrative Case Litigation Act (Act No. 139 of 1962) do not apply to this action.
使用者は、第二十七条の十五第一項の規定により中央労働委員会に再審査の申立てをしたときは、その申立てに対する中央労働委員会の救済命令等に対してのみ、取消しの訴えを提起することができる。この訴えについては、行政事件訴訟法(昭和三十七年法律第百三十九号)第十二条第三項から第五項までの規定は、適用しない。
The provisions of the preceding paragraph apply mutatis mutandis to actions for rescission filed by labor unions or workers, pursuant to the Administrative Case Litigation Act.
第二十七条の二十(緊急命令)
In the case where an employer has filed an action to a court pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, the court in charge of the case, at the request of the Labour Relations Commission which has issued the order for relief, etc., may order the employer to comply with the whole or part of the order for relief, etc. in accordance with a ruling until the judgment becomes final and binding, or rescind or modify this ruling upon the request from the parties or by its authority.
Article 27-21Restrictions on Offer of Evidences
第二十七条の二十一(証拠の申出の制限)
A person who has not submitted an object notwithstanding the order to submit objects by the Labour Relations Commission (excluding persons who are not the party to the procedure for examination) may not offer evidence for the object to the court to prove facts which could be certified by the object specified in the order to submit objects; provided, however, that this does not apply when it is found that there are legitimate grounds for not submitting the object.
Section 4 Miscellaneous Provisions
第四節 雑則
Article 27-22Recommendations of the Central Labour Relations Commission
第二十七条の二十二(中央労働委員会の勧告等)
The Central Labour Relations Commission may request a Prefectural Labour Relations Commission to report on administrative affairs conducted by the Prefectural Labour Relations Commission pursuant to the provisions of this Act, or make recommendations, give advice, provide training of members and staff members of the secretariat, or provide any other assistance necessary for the application of laws and regulations and for conducting those administrative affairs.
中央労働委員会は、都道府県労働委員会に対し、この法律の規定により都道府県労働委員会が処理する事務について、報告を求め、又は法令の適用その他当該事務の処理に関して必要な勧告、助言若しくはその委員若しくは事務局職員の研修その他の援助を行うことができる。
In a lawsuit in which a prefecture is the defendant pursuant to the provisions of Article 11, paragraph (1) of the Administrative Case Litigation Act (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 38, paragraph (1) of the same Act; the same applies in the following paragraph) related to the disposition (meaning dispositions pursuant to the provisions of Article 3, paragraph (2) of the same Act and including dispositions imposed by public interest members pursuant to the provisions of Article 24-2, paragraph (4) and dispositions imposed by local members for adjustment representing public interests pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (5) of the same Article; the same applies in the following paragraph), the Prefectural Labour Relations Commission represents the prefecture.
都道府県労働委員会は、その処分(行政事件訴訟法第三条第二項に規定する処分をいい、第二十四条の二第四項の規定により公益委員がした処分及び同条第五項の規定により公益を代表する地方調整委員がした処分を含む。次項において同じ。)に係る行政事件訴訟法第十一条第一項(同法第三十八条第一項において準用する場合を含む。次項において同じ。)の規定による都道府県を被告とする訴訟について、当該都道府県を代表する。
The Prefectural Labour Relations Commission may designate persons from among its public interest members, directors-general or staff members of its secretariat, and have them file an action regarding the disposition of Prefectural Labour Relations Commission pursuant to the provisions of Article 11, paragraph (1) of the Administrative Case Litigation Act in which a prefecture is the defendant, or file an action in which the Prefectural Labour Relations Commission is a party.
都道府県労働委員会は、公益委員、事務局長又は事務局の職員でその指定するものに都道府県労働委員会の処分に係る行政事件訴訟法第十一条第一項の規定による都道府県を被告とする訴訟又は都道府県労働委員会を当事者とする訴訟を行わせることができる。
Article 27-24Reimbursement of Expenses
第二十七条の二十四(費用弁償)
A person who has been required to appear pursuant to the provisions of Article 22, paragraph (1) or a witness pursuant to Article 27-7, paragraph (1), item (i) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-17), may be compensated for the expenses as specified by Cabinet Order.
第二十二条第一項の規定により出頭を求められた者又は第二十七条の七第一項第一号(第二十七条の十七の規定により準用する場合を含む。)の証人は、政令の定めるところにより、費用の弁償を受けることができる。
Article 27-25Exclusion from Application of the Administrative Procedure Act
第二十七条の二十五(行政手続法の適用除外)
The provisions of Chapter 2 and Chapter 3 of the Administrative Procedure Act (Act No. 88 of 1993) do not apply to dispositions imposed by a Labour Relations Commission (including dispositions imposed by public interest members pursuant to the provisions of Article 24-2, paragraph (4) of this Act and dispositions imposed by local members for adjustment representing public interests pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (5) of the same Article).
労働委員会がする処分(第二十四条の二第四項の規定により公益委員がする処分及び同条第五項の規定により公益を代表する地方調整委員がする処分を含む。)については、行政手続法(平成五年法律第八十八号)第二章及び第三章の規定は、適用しない。
Article 27-26Limitation on Requests for Review
第二十七条の二十六(審査請求の制限)
No request for review may be made against the dispositions imposed by a Labour Relations Commission (including dispositions imposed by public interest members pursuant to the provisions of Article 24-2, paragraph (4) of this Act and dispositions imposed by local members for adjustment representing public interests pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (5) of the same Article) or against its inaction.
労働委員会がする処分(第二十四条の二第四項の規定により公益委員がする処分及び同条第五項の規定により公益を代表する地方調整委員がする処分を含む。)又はその不作為については、審査請求をすることができない。