1 article
When a suspect who is asked for confirmation under paragraph (3) of the preceding Article is to declare whether the suspect consents to being tried by expedited trial proceedings, and unable to appoint a defense counsel due to indigence or any other grounds, a judge must appoint a defense counsel for the suspect upon request from the suspect; provided, however, that this does not apply when the defense counsel is appointed by a person other than the suspect.
前条第三項の確認を求められた被疑者が即決裁判手続によることについて同意をするかどうかを明らかにしようとする場合において、被疑者が貧困その他の事由により弁護人を選任することができないときは、裁判官は、その請求により、被疑者のため弁護人を付さなければならない。ただし、被疑者以外の者が選任した弁護人がある場合は、この限りでない。
The provisions of Article 37-3 apply mutatis mutandis when a suspect makes the request under the preceding paragraph.
This names a provision as it read when this amending Act was made. It may have been amended since, so today's text can say something else. That is why it is not a link.This names a law that is not in this collection, so there is nothing here to open.We could not tell which provision this names, so it is not a link.