Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

1 article

Article 24

第二十四条

When it is clear that the recusal of a judge has been made merely for the purpose of delaying proceedings, such recusal must be dismissed by a ruling. Paragraph (3) of the preceding Article does not apply to such case. The same applies to a ruling of dismissal against a recusal which was made in violation of Article 22 or the procedures established by the Rules of Court.

訴訟を遅延させる目的のみでされたことの明らかな忌避の申立は、決定でこれを却下しなければならない。この場合には、前条第三項の規定を適用しない。第二十二条の規定に違反し、又は裁判所の規則で定める手続に違反してされた忌避の申立を却下する場合も、同様である。

In the cases given in the preceding paragraph, a recused commissioned judge or the recused individual judge of a district court, or the recused judge of a family court or summary court, may dismiss the recusal.

前項の場合には、忌避された受命裁判官、地方裁判所の一人の裁判官又は家庭裁判所若しくは簡易裁判所の裁判官は、忌避の申立てを却下する裁判をすることができる。

Read this in its chapter

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (源氏道合同会社) · contact@genjido.comContactSourcesTermsPrivacy