Supplementary Provisions, Article 8Transitional Measures Concerning Decisions and Cease and Desist Orders
第八条（審決及び排除措置命令に関する経過措置）
With regard to the application of Article 20-2 of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization, if the enterprise has, within 10 years counting back from the day on which a disposition listed in Article 47, paragraph (1), item (iv) of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade was first carried out in a case concerning the violation prescribed in Article 20-2 of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization (or, where such a disposition was not carried out, within 10 years counting back from the day on which the enterprise received advance notification of the violation), received a decision pursuant to Article 48, paragraph (4), Article 53-3, or Article 54 of the Antimonopoly Act Before the January 2006 Amendment for an act in violation of the provisions of Article 19 of the Antimonopoly Act Before the January 2006 Amendment (limited to one equivalent to the act prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (9), item (i) of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization) (limited to the case where that decision has become final and binding), or has, for an act in violation of the provisions of Article 19 of the Former Antimonopoly Act (limited to one equivalent to the act prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (9), item (i) of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization), received an order pursuant to Article 20 of the Former Antimonopoly Act (limited to the case where that order has become final and binding) or a decision pursuant to Article 66, paragraph (4) of the Former Antimonopoly Act (limited to one rescinding the whole of the original disposition) (limited to the case where that decision has become final and binding), that decision or order is deemed to be an order pursuant to Article 20-2 of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization that has become final and binding.
新私的独占禁止法第二十条の二の規定の適用については、当該事業者が、同条に規定する違反行為に係る事件について私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律第四十七条第一項第四号に掲げる処分が最初に行われた日から遡り十年以内（当該処分が行われなかったときは、当該事業者が当該違反行為について事前通知を受けた日から遡り十年以内）に、平成十八年一月改正前独占禁止法第十九条の規定に違反する行為（新私的独占禁止法第二条第九項第一号に規定する行為に相当するものに限る。）について平成十八年一月改正前独占禁止法第四十八条第四項、第五十三条の三若しくは第五十四条の規定による審決を受けたことがあるとき（当該審決が確定している場合に限る。）又は旧独占禁止法第十九条の規定に違反する行為（新私的独占禁止法第二条第九項第一号に規定する行為に相当するものに限る。）について旧独占禁止法第二十条の規定による命令を受けたことがあるとき（当該命令が確定している場合に限る。）若しくは旧独占禁止法第六十六条第四項の規定による審決（原処分の全部を取り消す場合のものに限る。）を受けたことがあるとき（当該審決が確定している場合に限る。）は、当該審決又は命令を新私的独占禁止法第二十条の二の規定による命令であって確定しているものとみなす。
With regard to the application of Article 20-3 of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization, if the enterprise has, within 10 years counting back from the day on which a disposition listed in Article 47, paragraph (1), item (iv) of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade was first carried out in a case concerning the violation prescribed in Article 20-3 of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization (or, where such a disposition was not carried out, within 10 years counting back from the day on which the enterprise received advance notification of the violation), received a decision pursuant to Article 48, paragraph (4), Article 53-3, or Article 54 of the Antimonopoly Act Before the January 2006 Amendment for an act in violation of the provisions of Article 19 of the Antimonopoly Act Before the January 2006 Amendment (limited to one equivalent to the act prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (9), item (ii) of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization) (limited to the case where that decision has become final and binding), or has, for an act in violation of the provisions of Article 19 of the Former Antimonopoly Act (limited to one equivalent to the act prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (9), item (ii) of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization), received an order pursuant to Article 20 of the Former Antimonopoly Act (limited to the case where that order has become final and binding) or a decision pursuant to Article 66, paragraph (4) of the Former Antimonopoly Act (limited to one rescinding the whole of the original disposition) (limited to the case where that decision has become final and binding), that decision or order is deemed to be an order pursuant to Article 20-3 of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization that has become final and binding.
新私的独占禁止法第二十条の三の規定の適用については、当該事業者が、同条に規定する違反行為に係る事件について私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律第四十七条第一項第四号に掲げる処分が最初に行われた日から遡り十年以内（当該処分が行われなかったときは、当該事業者が当該違反行為について事前通知を受けた日から遡り十年以内）に、平成十八年一月改正前独占禁止法第十九条の規定に違反する行為（新私的独占禁止法第二条第九項第二号に規定する行為に相当するものに限る。）について平成十八年一月改正前独占禁止法第四十八条第四項、第五十三条の三若しくは第五十四条の規定による審決を受けたことがあるとき（当該審決が確定している場合に限る。）又は旧独占禁止法第十九条の規定に違反する行為（新私的独占禁止法第二条第九項第二号に規定する行為に相当するものに限る。）について旧独占禁止法第二十条の規定による命令を受けたことがあるとき（当該命令が確定している場合に限る。）若しくは旧独占禁止法第六十六条第四項の規定による審決（原処分の全部を取り消す場合のものに限る。）を受けたことがあるとき（当該審決が確定している場合に限る。）は、当該審決又は命令を新私的独占禁止法第二十条の三の規定による命令であって確定しているものとみなす。
With regard to the application of Article 20-4 of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization, if the enterprise has, within 10 years counting back from the day on which a disposition listed in Article 47, paragraph (1), item (iv) of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade was first carried out in a case concerning the violation prescribed in Article 20-4 of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization (or, where such a disposition was not carried out, within 10 years counting back from the day on which the enterprise received advance notification of the violation), received a decision pursuant to Article 48, paragraph (4), Article 53-3, or Article 54 of the Antimonopoly Act Before the January 2006 Amendment for an act in violation of the provisions of Article 19 of the Antimonopoly Act Before the January 2006 Amendment (limited to one equivalent to the act prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (9), item (iii) of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization) (limited to the case where that decision has become final and binding), or has, for an act in violation of the provisions of Article 19 of the Former Antimonopoly Act (limited to one equivalent to the act prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (9), item (iii) of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization), received an order pursuant to Article 20 of the Former Antimonopoly Act (limited to the case where that order has become final and binding) or a decision pursuant to Article 66, paragraph (4) of the Former Antimonopoly Act (limited to one rescinding the whole of the original disposition) (limited to the case where that decision has become final and binding), that decision or order is deemed to be an order pursuant to Article 20-4 of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization that has become final and binding.
新私的独占禁止法第二十条の四の規定の適用については、当該事業者が、同条に規定する違反行為に係る事件について私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律第四十七条第一項第四号に掲げる処分が最初に行われた日から遡り十年以内（当該処分が行われなかったときは、当該事業者が当該違反行為について事前通知を受けた日から遡り十年以内）に、平成十八年一月改正前独占禁止法第十九条の規定に違反する行為（新私的独占禁止法第二条第九項第三号に規定する行為に相当するものに限る。）について平成十八年一月改正前独占禁止法第四十八条第四項、第五十三条の三若しくは第五十四条の規定による審決を受けたことがあるとき（当該審決が確定している場合に限る。）又は旧独占禁止法第十九条の規定に違反する行為（新私的独占禁止法第二条第九項第三号に規定する行為に相当するものに限る。）について旧独占禁止法第二十条の規定による命令を受けたことがあるとき（当該命令が確定している場合に限る。）若しくは旧独占禁止法第六十六条第四項の規定による審決（原処分の全部を取り消す場合のものに限る。）を受けたことがあるとき（当該審決が確定している場合に限る。）は、当該審決又は命令を新私的独占禁止法第二十条の四の規定による命令であって確定しているものとみなす。
With regard to the application of Article 20-5 of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization, if the enterprise has, within 10 years counting back from the day on which a disposition listed in Article 47, paragraph (1), item (iv) of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade was first carried out in a case concerning the violation prescribed in Article 20-5 of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization (or, where such a disposition was not carried out, within 10 years counting back from the day on which the enterprise received advance notification of the violation), received a decision pursuant to Article 48, paragraph (4), Article 53-3, or Article 54 of the Antimonopoly Act Before the January 2006 Amendment for an act in violation of the provisions of Article 19 of the Antimonopoly Act Before the January 2006 Amendment (limited to one equivalent to the act prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (9), item (iv) of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization) (limited to the case where that decision has become final and binding), or has, for an act in violation of the provisions of Article 19 of the Former Antimonopoly Act (limited to one equivalent to the act prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (9), item (iv) of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization), received an order pursuant to Article 20 of the Former Antimonopoly Act (limited to the case where that order has become final and binding) or a decision pursuant to Article 66, paragraph (4) of the Former Antimonopoly Act (limited to one rescinding the whole of the original disposition) (limited to the case where that decision has become final and binding), that decision or order is deemed to be an order pursuant to Article 20-5 of the New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization that has become final and binding.
新私的独占禁止法第二十条の五の規定の適用については、当該事業者が、同条に規定する違反行為に係る事件について私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律第四十七条第一項第四号に掲げる処分が最初に行われた日から遡り十年以内（当該処分が行われなかったときは、当該事業者が当該違反行為について事前通知を受けた日から遡り十年以内）に、平成十八年一月改正前独占禁止法第十九条の規定に違反する行為（新私的独占禁止法第二条第九項第四号に規定する行為に相当するものに限る。）について平成十八年一月改正前独占禁止法第四十八条第四項、第五十三条の三若しくは第五十四条の規定による審決を受けたことがあるとき（当該審決が確定している場合に限る。）又は旧独占禁止法第十九条の規定に違反する行為（新私的独占禁止法第二条第九項第四号に規定する行為に相当するものに限る。）について旧独占禁止法第二十条の規定による命令を受けたことがあるとき（当該命令が確定している場合に限る。）若しくは旧独占禁止法第六十六条第四項の規定による審決（原処分の全部を取り消す場合のものに限る。）を受けたことがあるとき（当該審決が確定している場合に限る。）は、当該審決又は命令を新私的独占禁止法第二十条の五の規定による命令であって確定しているものとみなす。
enterprise
「事業者」
Anyone who carries on a commercial, industrial, financial or other business; an officer, employee, agent or other person acting for the benefit of an enterprise is also treated as one for the purposes of Article 2, paragraph (2) and Chapter 3 (trade associations).
Defined inArticle 2, paragraph (1)· applies throughout the law
Former Antimonopoly Actmachine translation
「旧独占禁止法」
This Act as it stood before Act No. 51 of 2009 amended it.
Short name set inSupplementary Provisions, Article 2, paragraph (1)
New Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolizationmachine translation
「新私的独占禁止法」
The Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade as amended by the Act Partially Amending the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (Act No. 100 of 2013).
Short name set inSupplementary Provisions, Article 5, paragraph (1)· applies only in this provision and in Supplementary Provisions, Articles 6 to 8 and 15; and Supplementary Provisions, Article 16, paragraph (2)
advance notification
「事前通知」
In the supplementary provisions (附則) of Act No. 51 of 2009, the notice under Article 50, paragraph (1), as applied with modified wording by Article 62, paragraph (4), of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade as amended by Act No. 100 of 2013 (新私的独占禁止法), given about a violation under Article 7-2, paragraph (1), (2) or (4) or Articles 20-2 to 20-6 of that text.
Short name set inSupplementary Provisions, Article 6, paragraph (4)
Antimonopoly Act Before the January 2006 Amendmentmachine translation
「平成十八年一月改正前独占禁止法」
The Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade as it stood before the Act Partially Amending the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (Act No. 35 of 2005) amended it, as the supplementary provisions (附則) of Act No. 51 of 2009 name it.
Short name set inSupplementary Provisions, Article 7, paragraph (1)