Act on Measures against Infringement of Rights, etc. Arising from the Distribution of Information through Specified Telecommunications

• ChangedArticle 2, paragraph (1), item (ix)

  the term "transmission prevention measures" means measures for preventing transmission of violating information and other measures for preventing transmission of information through specified telecommunications (including measures for preventing transmission of that information and also suspending the provision of specified telecommunications service to the sender of that information (referred to as "service suspension measures" in Article 2627, paragraph (2), item (ii)));

  送信防止措置　侵害情報送信防止措置その他の特定電気通信による情報の送信を防止する措置（当該情報の送信を防止するとともに、当該情報の発信者に対する特定電気通信役務の提供を停止する措置（第二十六七条第二項第二号において「役務提供停止措置」という。）を含む。）をいう。

• ChangedArticle 2, paragraph (1), item (xiv)

  the term "large-scale specified telecommunications service provider" means a specified telecommunications service provider designated pursuant to the provisions of Article 2021, paragraph (1).

  大規模特定電気通信役務提供者　第二十一条第一項の規定により指定された特定電気通信役務提供者をいう。

• ChangedArticle 9, paragraph (4)

  If electronic or magnetic records (meaning records used in computer data processing which are created in electronic form, magnetic form, or any other form that is impossible to recognize through the human senses alone; the same applies hereinafter) in which the content of the agreement is recorded are used to execute the agreement as referred to in paragraph (2), the agreement is deemed to have been executed by means of a written document, and the provisions of the preceding paragraph apply.

  第二項の合意がその内容を記録した電磁的記録（電子的方式、磁気的方式その他人の知覚によっては認識することができない方式で作られる記録であって、電子計算機による情報処理の用に供されるものをいう。以下同じ。）によってされたときは、その合意は、書面によってされたものとみなして、前項の規定を適用する。

• ChangedCaption

  (Inspection of Records ofHard-Copy Case of Sender Identification Information Disclosure Order)Records

  発信者情報開示命令事件の非電磁的事件記録の閲覧等

• ChangedArticle 12, paragraph (1)

  The parties to a case and any third party that makes a prima facie showing of interest in the case may file a request with the court clerk to inspect or copy the case record, to issue an authenticated copy, transcript, or extracthard-copy case records (meaning the portion of the case records of the case record, or to issue a certificate of of a sender identification information disclosure order excluding the particulars of theelectronic or magnetic case record prescribed in paragraph (1) of the sender identification information disclosure orderfollowing Article; the same applies hereinafter in this Article), or to issue an authenticated copy, transcript, or extract of the hard-copy case records.

  当事者又は利害関係を疎明した第三者は、裁判所書記官に対し、非電磁的事件記録（発信者情報開示命令事件の記録の中次条第一項に規定する電磁的事件記録を除いた部分をいう。以下この条において同じ。）の閲覧若しくは謄写、又はその正本、謄本若しくは抄本の交付又は発信者情報開示命令事件に関する事項の証明書の交付を請求することができる。

• ChangedArticle 12, paragraph (2)

  The provisions of the preceding paragraph do not apply with respect to case records of thehard-copy case of a sender identification information disclosure orderrecords that are being prepared in the form of audiotapes or videotapes (including any other matters that have been recorded by means equivalent thereto). Nevertheless, the relevant parties or a third party that makes a prima facie showing of interest may file a request with the court clerk for a reproduction of these matters.

  前項の規定は、発信者情報開示命令事件の非電磁的事件記録中の録音テープ又はビデオテープ（これらに準ずる方法により一定の事項を記録した物を含む。）については、適用しない。この場合において、当事者又は利害関係を疎明した第三者は、裁判所書記官に対し、これらの物の複製を請求することができる。

• ChangedArticle 12, paragraph (3)

  The request for inspection, copying and reproduction of records of ahard-copy case of a sender identification information disclosure orderrecords pursuant to the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs may not be filed if these actions would be detrimental to the preservation of the case record or the performance of the court duties.

  前二項の規定による発信者情報開示命令事件の非電磁的事件記録の閲覧、謄写及び複製の請求は、当該記録の保存又は裁判所の執務に支障があるときは、することができない。

• AddedArticle 12-2, paragraph (1)

  The parties to a case and any third party that makes a prima facie showing of interest in the case may file a request with the court clerk, as provided by the Rules of the Supreme Court, for inspection of the content of an electronic or magnetic case record (meaning the portion of the case records of the case of a sender identification information disclosure order that pertains to matters recorded in a file (referred to simply as the "file" in Article 17, paragraph (2)) provided on a computer used by the court (including input-output devices; the same applies in the following paragraph, paragraph (3) and the following Article) pursuant to the provisions of this Act or other laws and regulations; the same applies hereinafter in this Article) as displayed by a method specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court.

  当事者又は利害関係を疎明した第三者は、裁判所書記官に対し、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、電磁的事件記録（発信者情報開示命令事件の記録中この法律その他の法令の規定により裁判所の使用に係る電子計算機（入出力装置を含む。次項及び第三項並びに次条において同じ。）に備えられたファイル（第十七条第二項において単に「ファイル」という。）に記録された事項に係る部分をいう。以下この条において同じ。）の内容を最高裁判所規則で定める方法により表示したものの閲覧を請求することができる。

• AddedArticle 12-2, paragraph (2)

  The parties to a case and any third party that makes a prima facie showing of interest in the case may file a request with the court clerk, as provided by the Rules of the Supreme Court, for the copying of matters recorded in an electronic or magnetic case record by a method specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court, such as recording them in a file provided on a computer used by that person using an electronic data processing system specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court (meaning an electronic data processing system connecting a computer used by the court and a computer used by the other party to the procedure by a telecommunications line; the same applies in the following paragraph and the following Article).

  当事者又は利害関係を疎明した第三者は、裁判所書記官に対し、電磁的事件記録に記録されている事項について、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、最高裁判所規則で定める電子情報処理組織（裁判所の使用に係る電子計算機と手続の相手方の使用に係る電子計算機とを電気通信回線で接続した電子情報処理組織をいう。次項及び次条において同じ。）を使用してその者の使用に係る電子計算機に備えられたファイルに記録する方法その他の最高裁判所規則で定める方法による複写を請求することができる。

• AddedArticle 12-2, paragraph (3)

  The parties to a case and any third party that makes a prima facie showing of interest in the case may file a request with the court clerk, as provided by the Rules of the Supreme Court, for the delivery of a document stating all or part of the matters recorded in an electronic or magnetic case record, with respect to which the court clerk has certified by a method specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court that the content of the document is identical to the matters recorded in the electronic or magnetic case record, or for the provision of an electronic or magnetic record recording all or part of those matters, with respect to which the court clerk has certified by a method specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court that the content of the electronic or magnetic record is identical to the matters recorded in the electronic or magnetic case record, by a method specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court, such as recording it in a file provided on a computer used by that person using an electronic data processing system specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court.

  当事者又は利害関係を疎明した第三者は、裁判所書記官に対し、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、電磁的事件記録に記録されている事項の全部若しくは一部を記載した書面であって裁判所書記官が最高裁判所規則で定める方法により当該書面の内容が電磁的事件記録に記録されている事項と同一であることを証明したものを交付し、又は当該事項の全部若しくは一部を記録した電磁的記録であって裁判所書記官が最高裁判所規則で定める方法により当該電磁的記録の内容が電磁的事件記録に記録されている事項と同一であることを証明したものを最高裁判所規則で定める電子情報処理組織を使用してその者の使用に係る電子計算機に備えられたファイルに記録する方法その他の最高裁判所規則で定める方法により提供することを請求することができる。

• AddedArticle 12-2, paragraph (4)

  The provisions of paragraph (3) of the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis to a request for inspection and copying of electronic or magnetic case records pursuant to the provisions of paragraphs (1) and (2).

  前条第三項の規定は、第一項及び第二項の規定による電磁的事件記録に係る閲覧及び複写の請求について準用する。

• AddedArticle 12-3, paragraph (1)

  The parties to a case and any third party that makes a prima facie showing of interest in the case may file a request with the court clerk, as provided by the Rules of the Supreme Court, for the delivery of a document stating the particulars of the case of a sender identification information disclosure order, with respect to which the court clerk has certified those particulars by a method specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court, or for the provision of an electronic or magnetic record recording those particulars, with respect to which the court clerk has certified those particulars by a method specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court, by a method specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court, such as recording it in a file provided on a computer used by that person using an electronic data processing system specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court.

  当事者又は利害関係を疎明した第三者は、裁判所書記官に対し、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、発信者情報開示命令事件に関する事項を記載した書面であって裁判所書記官が最高裁判所規則で定める方法により当該事項を証明したものを交付し、又は当該事項を記録した電磁的記録であって裁判所書記官が最高裁判所規則で定める方法により当該事項を証明したものを最高裁判所規則で定める電子情報処理組織を使用してその者の使用に係る電子計算機に備えられたファイルに記録する方法その他の最高裁判所規則で定める方法により提供することを請求することができる。

• ChangedCaption

  Concealment of Domicile, NamePetitions, etc. of the Partiesthrough Electronic Data Processing System

  当事者に対する住所、氏名等の秘匿電子情報処理組織による申立て等

• ChangedArticle 17, paragraph (1)

  With regard to petitions and other statements (referred to as "petitions, etc." in the following paragraph and the following Article) in court proceedings relating to a case of a sender identification information disclosure order, the provisions of Part I, Chapter VIII of Articles 132-10, 132-11 and 132-12 (excluding the Code of Civil Procedure (Act No. 109 of 1996) (excluding Article 133-2, paragraphs (5) and (6) and Article 133-3, paragraph (2)portion pertaining to paragraph (1), item (i)) of the Code of Civil Procedure (Act No. 109 of 1996) apply mutatis mutandis. In this case, the phrase "party" in Article 133, paragraph (1) of that Act is deemed to be replaced with "party or interested party intervenor (meaning an interested party intervenor prescribed term "service" in Article 21, paragraph132-10, paragraphs (5) of the Non-Contentious Case Procedures Act (Act No. 51 of 2011); the same applies inand (6) and Article 133-4132-12, paragraphs (1), (2) and (7))"; the phrase "case records, etc. (meaning case records or the records of a case pertaining to a petition for a disposition under Article 132-4, paragraph (1)" in paragraph (3) of that ArticleAct is deemed to be replaced with "case of a sender identification information disclosure order (meaning a case of a sender identification information disclosure order prescribed in Article 2, item (xiii) of the Act on Measures against Infringement of Rights, etc. Arising from the Distribution of Information through specified telecommunications", and the phrase "), within" in that paragraph with "), within service or sending", the record of the case"; the phrase "inspection of case records, etc. (meaning inspection of case records, inspection of non-electronic evidence collection disposition records, or inspection of electronic or magnetic evidence collection disposition records; hereinafter the same applies in this Chapter) with regard to" in that paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "inspection or copying, or issuance ofa person (excluding a person who has become a transcript or extract, of";litigation counsel with the phrase "inspection of case records, etc. pertainingpermission under the proviso to" in Article 133-254, paragraph (1) of that Act is deemed to be replaced with "inspection or copying, or issuance of a transcript or extract, of"; the phrase ")" in the case records, etc." in paragraph (2Article 132-11, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Article is deemed to be replacedAct with "in the case records of the case of a sender identification information disclosure order";a person", the phrase "inspection of case records, etc. pertaining toterm "Article 2" in that paragraph and paragraph (3item (ii) of that Article is deemed to be replacedparagraph with "inspection or copying, issuance of an authenticated copy, transcript or extract, or reproduction, of"; the phrase "written or recorded document or electronic or magnetic record" in Article 133-3, paragraph (1)2 of that Act is deemed to be replaced with "written document", the phrase "the document or electronic or magnetic record" with "the documentas applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 9", and the phrase "or electronic or magnetic record, or other similar document or electronic or magnetic record, inspection of case records, etc. pertaining to" with "or other similar document, inspection or copying, or issuance of a transcript or extract, of"; the phrase "person, case records, etc.Article 133-2, paragraph (2)" in Article 133-4132-12, paragraph (1) , item (iii) of that Act is deemed to be replaced with "party or interested party intervenor, or a third party who has made a prima facie showing of interest, case records of the case of a sender identification information disclosure order"; the phrase "party" in Article 133-2, paragraph (2) of that Article is deemed to be replacedas applied mutatis mutandis with "party or interested party intervenor", the phrase "where case records, etc. are kept" with "where case recordsreplacement of terms pursuant to Article 18 of the case of a sender identification information disclosure order are kept", and the phrase "inspectionAct on Measures against Infringement of case recordsRights, etc." with "inspection or copying, issuance of an authenticated copy, transcript or extract, or reproduction"; and Arising from the phrase "party" in paragraph (7)Distribution of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "party or interested party intervenorInformation through specified telecommunications".

  発信者情報開示命令事件に関する裁判手続における申立てその他の申述に（次項及び次条において「申立て等」という。）については、民事訴訟法（平成八年法律第百九号）第一編第八章（第百三十三条の二第五項二条の十、第百三十二条の十一及び第六項並びに第百三十三条の三第二項二条の十二（第一項第一号に係る部分を除く。）の規定を準用する。この場合において、同法第百三十三条第一項中「当事者」とあるのは「当事者又は利害関係参加人（非訟事件手続法（平成二十三年法律第五十一号）第二十一条第五項に規定する利害関係参加人をいう。第百三十三条の四第一項、第二項二条の十第五項及び第七項において同じ。）」と、同条第三項中「訴訟記録等（訴訟記録又は第六項並びに第百三十二条の四第一項の処分の申立てに係る事件の記録」とあるのは「発信者情報開示命令事件（特定電気通信による情報の流通によって発生する権利侵害等への対処に関する法律第二条第十三号に規定する発信者情報開示命令事件」と、「）中」とあるのは「）の記録中」と、「について訴訟記録等の閲覧等（訴訟記録の閲覧等、非電磁的証拠収集処分記録の閲覧等又は電磁的証拠収集処分記録の閲覧等をいう。以下この章において同じ。）十二第二項及び第三項中「送達」とあるのは「の閲覧若しくは謄写又はその謄本若しくは抄本の交送達又は送付」と、同法第百三十三条の二二条の十一第一項中「に係る訴訟記録等の閲覧等」とあるのは「の閲覧若しくは謄写又はその謄本若しくは抄本の交付」と、同条第二項中「訴訟記録等中第一号中「もの（第五十四条第一項ただし書の許可を得て訴訟代理人となったものを除く。）」とあるのは「発信者情報開示命令事件の記録中もの」と、同項及び同条第三項中「に係る訴訟記録等の閲覧等第二号中「第二条」とあるのは「の閲覧若しくは謄写、その正本、謄本若しくは抄本の交付又はその複製第九条において準用する同法第二条」と、同法第百三十三条の三二条の十二第一項中「記載され、又は記録された書面又は電磁的記録」とあるのは「記載された書面」と、「当該書面又は電磁的記録」とあるのは「当該書面」と、「又は電磁的記録その他これに類する書面又は電磁的記録に係る訴訟記録等の閲覧等」とあるのは「その他これに類する書面の閲覧若しくは謄写又はその謄本若しくは抄本の交付」と、同法第三号中「第百三十三条の四第一項中「者は、訴訟記録等二第二項」とあるのは「当事者若しくは利害関係参加人又は利害関係を疎明した第三者は、発信者情報開示命令事件の記録」と、同条第二項中「当事者」とあるのは「当事者又は利害関係参加人」と、「訴訟記録等の存する」とあるのは「発信者情報開示命令事件の記録の存する」と、「訴訟記録等の閲覧等」とあるのは「閲覧若しくは謄写、その正本、謄本若しくは抄本の交付又はその複製」と、同条第七項中「当事者」とあるのは「当事者若しくは利害関係参加人特定電気通信による情報の流通によって発生する権利侵害等への対処に関する法律第十八条において読み替えて準用する第百三十三条の二第二項」と読み替えるものとする。

• AddedArticle 17, paragraph (2)

  With regard to the recording in a file of matters stated or recorded in documents, etc. (meaning written documents, papers, texts, transcripts, extracts, authenticated copies, duplicate copies, reproductions, and other paper or other tangible objects bearing information that can be recognized through the human senses, such as characters and figures; the same applies hereinafter in this paragraph) (excluding such documents, etc. where a petition, etc. is made by documents, etc.) or in a recording medium on which an electronic or magnetic record is recorded, which have been submitted to the court pursuant to the provisions of this Act or other laws and regulations in court proceedings relating to a case of a sender identification information disclosure order, the provisions of Article 132-13 (excluding the portion pertaining to item (i)) of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis. In this case, the phrase "Article 133-2, paragraph (2)" in item (iii) of that Article is deemed to be replaced with "Article 133-2, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis with replacement of terms pursuant to Article 18 of the Act on Measures against Infringement of Rights, etc. Arising from the Distribution of Information through specified telecommunications", and the phrase "Article 133-3, paragraph (1)" in item (iv) of that Article with "Article 133-3, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis with replacement of terms pursuant to Article 18 of the Act on Measures against Infringement of Rights, etc. Arising from the Distribution of Information through specified telecommunications".

  発信者情報開示命令事件に関する裁判手続においてこの法律その他の法令の規定に基づき裁判所に提出された書面等（書面、書類、文書、謄本、抄本、正本、副本、複本その他文字、図形等人の知覚によって認識することができる情報が記載された紙その他の有体物をいう。以下この項において同じ。）（申立て等が書面等により行われたときにおける当該書面等を除く。）又は電磁的記録を記録した記録媒体に記載され、又は記録されている事項のファイルへの記録については、民事訴訟法第百三十二条の十三（第一号に係る部分を除く。）の規定を準用する。この場合において、同条第三号中「第百三十三条の二第二項」とあるのは「特定電気通信による情報の流通によって発生する権利侵害等への対処に関する法律第十八条において読み替えて準用する第百三十三条の二第二項」と、同条第四号中「第百三十三条の三第一項」とあるのは「特定電気通信による情報の流通によって発生する権利侵害等への対処に関する法律第十八条において読み替えて準用する第百三十三条の三第一項」と読み替えるものとする。

• ChangedCaption

  Exclusion from ApplicationConcealment of the Non-Contentious Case Procedures ActDomicile, Name, etc. of the Parties

  非訟事件手続法の適用除外当事者に対する住所、氏名等の秘匿

• ChangedArticle 18, paragraph (1)

  The provisoWith regard to petitions, etc. in court proceedings relating to a case of a sender identification information disclosure order, the provisions of Part I, Chapter VIII of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis. In this case, the terms listed in the middle column of the following table in the provisions of that Act listed in the left column of the same table are deemed to be replaced with the terms listed in the right column of the same table, respectively. Article 22133, paragraph (1) and parties parties or interested party intervenors (meaning an interested party intervenor prescribed in Article 21, paragraph (5) of the provisions Non-Contentious Case Procedures Act (Act No. 51 of Articles 27, 40 2011); the same applies in Article 133-4, paragraphs (1), (2) and 42-2 (7)) Article 133, paragraph (3) case records, etc. (meaning case records or the records of a case pertaining to a petition for a disposition under Article 132-4, paragraph (1) case of a sender identification information disclosure order (meaning a case of a sender identification information disclosure order prescribed in Article 2, item (xiii) of the Non-Contentious Case Procedures Act on Measures against Infringement of Rights, etc. Arising from the Distribution of Information through specified telecommunications ) in ) records in inspection of case records, etc. (meaning inspection of case records, inspection of non-electronic records of a disposition on the collection of evidence, or inspection of electronic or magnetic records of a disposition on the collection of evidence inspection of case records of the case of a sender identification information disclosure order (meaning inspection or copying of hard-copy case records (meaning the hard-copy case records prescribed in Article 12, paragraph (1) of that Act do not apply ), issuance of an authenticated copy, transcript, or extract thereof, or reproduction thereof, or inspection or copying of an electronic or magnetic case record (meaning the electronic or magnetic case record prescribed in Article 12-2, paragraph (1) of that Act; the same applies in the following Article), or delivery of a document, or provision of an electronic or magnetic record, certifying all or part of the content thereof Article 133-2, paragraphs (1) through (3), Article 133-3, paragraph (1) and Article 133-4, paragraph (2) inspection of case records, etc. inspection of case records of the case of a sender identification information disclosure order Article 133-2, paragraph (2) in case records, etc. in case records of the case of a sender identification information disclosure order Article 133-2, paragraph (5) electronic or magnetic case records, etc. (meaning electronic or magnetic case records or the portion of the records of a case pertaining to court proceedings relating a petition for a disposition under Article 132-4, paragraph (1) that pertains to a matters recorded in a file; the same applies in this paragraph and the following paragraph) electronic or magnetic case record from electronic or magnetic case records, etc. from electronic or magnetic case record Article 133-2, paragraph (6) electronic or magnetic case records, etc. electronic or magnetic case record Article 133-4, paragraph (1) a person, case records, etc. a party or interested party intervenor, or a third party who has made a prima facie showing of interest, case records of the case of a sender identification information disclosure order. Article 133-4, paragraph (2) parties parties or interested party intervenors in which case records, etc. are kept in which case records of the case of a sender identification information disclosure order are kept Article 133-4, paragraph (7) parties parties or interested party intervenors

  発信者情報開示命令事件に関する裁判手続における申立て等については、民事訴訟法第一編第八章の規定を準用する。この場合において、次の表の上欄に掲げる同法の規定中同表の中欄に掲げる字句は、それぞれ同表の下欄に掲げる字句に読み替えるものとする。 第百三十三条第一項 当事者 当事者又は利害関係参加人（非訟事件手続法第二十二条第一項ただし書、第二十七条、第四十条（平成二十三年法律第五十一号）第二十一条第五項に規定する利害関係参加人をいう。第百三十三条の四第一項、第二項及び第七項において同じ。） 第百三十三条第三項 訴訟記録等（訴訟記録又は第百三十二条の四第一項の処分の申立てに係る事件の記録 発信者情報開示命令事件（特定電気通信による情報の流通によって発生する権利侵害等への対処に関する法律第二条第十三号に規定する発信者情報開示命令事件 ）中 ）の記録中 訴訟記録等の閲覧等（訴訟記録の閲覧等、非電磁的証拠収集処分記録の閲覧等又は電磁的証拠収集処分記録の閲覧等 発信者情報開示命令事件の記録の閲覧等（非電磁的事件記録（同法第十二条第一項に規定する非電磁的事件記録をいう。）の閲覧若しくは謄写、その正本、謄本若しくは抄本の交付若しくはその複製又は電磁的事件記録（同法第十二条の二第一項に規定する電磁的事件記録をいう。次条において同じ。）の閲覧若しくは複写若しくはその内容の全部若しくは一部を証明した書面の交付若しくは電磁的記録の提供 第百三十三条の二第一項から第三項まで、第百三十三条の三第一項及び第四十二百三十三条の四第二項 訴訟記録等の閲覧等 発信者情報開示命令事件の記録の閲覧等 第百三十三条の二第二項 訴訟記録等中 発信者情報開示命令事件の記録中 第百三十三条の二の規定は、適用しない。第五項 電磁的訴訟記録等（電磁的訴訟記録又は第百三十二条の四第一項の処分の申立てに係る事件の記録中ファイル記録事項に係る部分をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。） 電磁的事件記録 電磁的訴訟記録等から 電磁的事件記録から 第百三十三条の二第六項 電磁的訴訟記録等 電磁的事件記録 第百三十三条の四第一項 者は、訴訟記録等 当事者若しくは利害関係参加人又は利害関係を疎明した第三者は、発信者情報開示命令事件の記録 第百三十三条の四第二項 当事者 当事者又は利害関係参加人 訴訟記録等の存する 発信者情報開示命令事件の記録の存する 第百三十三条の四第七項 当事者 当事者若しくは利害関係参加人

• ChangedCaption

  (RulesApplication of the Supreme Court)Non-Contentious Case Procedures Act

  最高裁判所規則非訟事件手続法の適用関係

• ChangedArticle 19, paragraph (1)

  Beyond what is provided for in this Act, necessary particulars in connection with The proviso to Article 22, paragraph (1) and the provisions of Articles 27, 40, 42 and 42-2 of the Non-Contentious Case Procedures Act do not apply to court proceedings relating to a case of a sender identification information disclosure order are prescribed by the Rules of the Supreme Court.

  この法律に定めるもののほか、発信者情報開示命令事件に関する裁判手続に関し必要な事項は、最高裁判所規則で定めるついては、非訟事件手続法第二十二条第一項ただし書、第二十七条、第四十条、第四十二条及び第四十二条の二の規定は、適用しない。

• AddedArticle 19, paragraph (2)

  With regard to the application of the provisions of Article 38 of the Non-Contentious Case Procedures Act to court proceedings relating to a case of a sender identification information disclosure order, the phrase "Article 42, paragraph (1) of the Non-Contentious Case Procedures Act" in that Article is deemed to be replaced with "Article 17, paragraph (1) of the Act on Measures against Infringement of Rights, etc. Arising from the Distribution of Information through specified telecommunications".

  発信者情報開示命令事件に関する裁判手続についての非訟事件手続法第三十八条の規定の適用については、同条中「非訟事件手続法第四十二条第一項」とあるのは、「特定電気通信による情報の流通によって発生する権利侵害等への対処に関する法律第十七条第一項」とする。

• ChangedCaption

  DesignationRules of Large-scale Specified Telecommunications Service Providersthe Supreme Court

  大規模特定電気通信役務提供者の指定最高裁判所規則

• ChangedArticle 20, paragraph (1)

  The Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications may designate, as a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider, a specified telecommunications service provider that providesBeyond what is provided for in this Act, necessary particulars in connection with court proceedings relating to a specified telecommunications service that falls under allcase of the following items and for which it is found that there is a particularly high need for expediting the implementation procedures for measures for preventing transmission of violatinga sender identification information and for transparency of the implementation status of transmission prevention measures with regard todisclosure order are prescribed by the disseminationRules of information through specified telecommunications pertaining to its use, and other need to take measures based on the provisions of this Chapter (hereinafter referred to as a "large-scale specified telecommunications service")Supreme Court.

  総務大臣は、次の各号のいずれにも該当する特定電気通信役務であって、その利用に係る特定電気通信による情報の流通について侵害情報送信防止措置の実施手続の迅速化及び送信防止措置の実施状況の透明化を図る必要性その他この章の規定に基づく措置を講ずる必要性が特に高いと認められるもの（以下「大規模特定電気通信役務」という。）を提供する特定電気通信役務提供者を、大規模特定電気通信役務提供者として指定することができこの法律に定めるもののほか、発信者情報開示命令事件に関する裁判手続に関し必要な事項は、最高裁判所規則で定める。

• RemovedArticle 20, paragraph (1), item (i)

  that specified telecommunications service falls under any of the following;

  当該特定電気通信役務が次のいずれかに該当すること。

• RemovedArticle 20, paragraph (1), item (i), (a)

  the average, over the period specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, of the number of persons who became senders in a month by using that specified telecommunications service (excluding persons presumed to be located outside Japan; the same applies in (b)) and persons specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications as equivalent thereto (hereinafter referred to as the "average monthly number of senders" in this Article and Article 24, paragraph (2)) exceeds the number specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications according to the type of specified telecommunications service;

  当該特定電気通信役務を利用して一月間に発信者となった者（日本国外にあると推定される者を除く。ロにおいて同じ。）及びこれに準ずる者として総務省令で定める者の数の総務省令で定める期間における平均（以下この条及び第二十四条第二項において「平均月間発信者数」という。）が特定電気通信役務の種類に応じて総務省令で定める数を超えること。

• RemovedArticle 20, paragraph (1), item (i), (b)

  the average, over the period specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, of the total number of persons who became senders in a month by using that specified telecommunications service (hereinafter referred to as the "average monthly total number of senders" in this Article and Article 24, paragraph (2)) exceeds the number specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications according to the type of specified telecommunications service.

  当該特定電気通信役務を利用して一月間に発信者となった者の延べ数の総務省令で定める期間における平均（以下この条及び第二十四条第二項において「平均月間延べ発信者数」という。）が特定電気通信役務の種類に応じて総務省令で定める数を超えること。

• RemovedArticle 20, paragraph (1), item (ii)

  it is technically possible to take measures for preventing transmission of violating information (limited to those taken to the extent necessary for preventing the transmission of violating information to unspecified persons; the same applies hereinafter) in light of the general nature of that specified telecommunications service;

  当該特定電気通信役務の一般的な性質に照らして侵害情報送信防止措置（侵害情報の不特定の者に対する送信を防止するために必要な限度において行われるものに限る。以下同じ。）を講ずることが技術的に可能であること。

• RemovedArticle 20, paragraph (1), item (iii)

  that specified telecommunications service is other than one specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications as a specified telecommunications service with little risk of violation of rights, etc. occurring due to the dissemination of information through specified telecommunications pertaining to its use.

  当該特定電気通信役務が、その利用に係る特定電気通信による情報の流通によって権利の侵害等が発生するおそれの少ない特定電気通信役務として総務省令で定めるもの以外のものであること。

• RemovedArticle 20, paragraph (2)

  If the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications finds that the grounds for the designation under the provisions of the preceding paragraph no longer exist with regard to a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider, the Minister must, without delay, rescind the designation.

  総務大臣は、大規模特定電気通信役務提供者について前項の規定による指定の理由がなくなったと認めるときは、遅滞なく、その指定を解除しなければならない。

• RemovedArticle 20, paragraph (3)

  To the extent necessary for the designation under the provisions of paragraph (1) and the rescission of designation under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications may, as provided by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, have a specified telecommunications service provider report the average monthly number of senders and the average monthly total number of senders of the specified telecommunications service it provides.

  総務大臣は、第一項の規定による指定及び前項の規定による指定の解除に必要な限度において、総務省令で定めるところにより、特定電気通信役務提供者に対し、その提供する特定電気通信役務の平均月間発信者数及び平均月間延べ発信者数を報告させることができる。

• RemovedArticle 20, paragraph (4)

  If the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications finds that it is difficult to ascertain the average monthly number of senders or the average monthly total number of senders of a specified telecommunications service provided by a specified telecommunications service provider by means of the collection of reports under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the Minister may estimate that average monthly number of senders or average monthly total number of senders by a reasonable method specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, and make the designation under the provisions of paragraph (1) and the rescission of designation under the provisions of paragraph (2).

  総務大臣は、前項の規定による報告の徴収によっては特定電気通信役務提供者の提供する特定電気通信役務の平均月間発信者数又は平均月間延べ発信者数を把握することが困難であると認めるときは、当該平均月間発信者数又は平均月間延べ発信者数を総務省令で定める合理的な方法により推計して、第一項の規定による指定及び第二項の規定による指定の解除を行うことができる。

• ChangedCaption

  Notification byDesignation of Large-scale Specified Telecommunications Service Providers

  大規模特定電気通信役務提供者による届出の指定

• ChangedArticle 21, paragraph (1)

  A The Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications may designate, as a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider must notify the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications , a specified telecommunications service provider that provides a specified telecommunications service that falls under all of the following matters, as provided by Order items and for which it is found that there is a particularly high need, with regard to the dissemination of information through specified telecommunications pertaining to its use, for expediting the Ministry implementation procedures for measures for preventing transmission of Internal Affairsviolating information and Communications, within three months from the date on which it was designated under for transparency of the implementation status of transmission prevention measures, or any other need to take measures based on the provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Articlethis Chapter (hereinafter referred to as a "large-scale specified telecommunications service").

  大規模総務大臣は、次の各号のいずれにも該当する特定電気通信役務提供者は、前条第一項の規定であって、その利用に係る特定電気通信による指定を受けた日から三月以内に、総務省令で定めるところにより、次に掲げる事項を総務大臣に届け出なければならない情報の流通について侵害情報送信防止措置の実施手続の迅速化及び送信防止措置の実施状況の透明化を図る必要性その他この章の規定に基づく措置を講ずる必要性が特に高いと認められるもの（以下「大規模特定電気通信役務」という。）を提供する特定電気通信役務提供者を、大規模特定電気通信役務提供者として指定することができる。

• ChangedArticle 21, paragraph (1), item (i)

  the name or title and address and, in the casethat specified telecommunications service falls under any of a corporation, the name of its representativefollowing;

  氏名又は名称及び住所並びに法人にあっては、その代表者の氏名当該特定電気通信役務が次のいずれかに該当すること。

• AddedArticle 21, paragraph (1), item (i), (a)

  the average, over the period specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, of the number of persons who became senders in a month by using that specified telecommunications service (excluding persons presumed to be located outside Japan; the same applies in (b)) and persons specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications as equivalent thereto (hereinafter referred to as the "average monthly number of senders" in this Article and Article 25, paragraph (2)) exceeds the number specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications according to the type of specified telecommunications service;

  当該特定電気通信役務を利用して一月間に発信者となった者（日本国外にあると推定される者を除く。ロにおいて同じ。）及びこれに準ずる者として総務省令で定める者の数の総務省令で定める期間における平均（以下この条及び第二十五条第二項において「平均月間発信者数」という。）が特定電気通信役務の種類に応じて総務省令で定める数を超えること。

• AddedArticle 21, paragraph (1), item (i), (b)

  the average, over the period specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, of the total number of persons who became senders in a month by using that specified telecommunications service (hereinafter referred to as the "average monthly total number of senders" in this Article and Article 25, paragraph (2)) exceeds the number specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications according to the type of specified telecommunications service.

  当該特定電気通信役務を利用して一月間に発信者となった者の延べ数の総務省令で定める期間における平均（以下この条及び第二十五条第二項において「平均月間延べ発信者数」という。）が特定電気通信役務の種類に応じて総務省令で定める数を超えること。

• ChangedArticle 21, paragraph (1), item (ii)

  in the case of a foreign corporation or association or an individual who has a domicile in a foreign country, it is technically possible to take measures for preventing transmission of violating information (limited to those taken to the extent necessary for preventing the name or title and transmission of violating information to unspecified persons; the address same applies hereinafter) in Japanlight of the representative in Japan or the agent in Japangeneral nature of that specified telecommunications service;

  外国の法人若しくは団体又は外国に住所を有する個人にあっては、国内における代表者又は国内における代理人の氏名又は名称及び国内の住所当該特定電気通信役務の一般的な性質に照らして侵害情報送信防止措置（侵害情報の不特定の者に対する送信を防止するために必要な限度において行われるものに限る。以下同じ。）を講ずることが技術的に可能であること。

• ChangedArticle 21, paragraph (1), item (iii)

  in addition to the matters set forth in the preceding two items, the mattersthat specified telecommunications service is other than one specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications as a specified telecommunications service with little risk of infringement of rights, etc. occurring due to the dissemination of information through specified telecommunications pertaining to its use.

  前二号に掲げる事項のほか、当該特定電気通信役務が、その利用に係る特定電気通信による情報の流通によって権利の侵害等が発生するおそれの少ない特定電気通信役務として総務省令で定める事項もの以外のものであること。

• ChangedArticle 21, paragraph (2)

  When there is a change in the matters set forth inthe Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications finds that the items of grounds for designation under the preceding paragraph, no longer exist for a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider must notify, the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications to that effectmust rescind the designation without delay.

  大総務大臣は、大規模特定電気通信役務提供者は、前項各号に掲げる事項に変更があについて前項の規定による指定の理由がなくなったと認めるときは、遅滞なく、その旨を総務大臣に届け出指定を解除しなければならない。

• AddedArticle 21, paragraph (3)

  To the extent necessary for the designation under the provisions of paragraph (1) and the rescission of designation under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications may, as provided by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, have a specified telecommunications service provider report the average monthly number of senders and the average monthly total number of senders of the specified telecommunications service it provides.

  総務大臣は、第一項の規定による指定及び前項の規定による指定の解除に必要な限度において、総務省令で定めるところにより、特定電気通信役務提供者に対し、その提供する特定電気通信役務の平均月間発信者数及び平均月間延べ発信者数を報告させることができる。

• AddedArticle 21, paragraph (4)

  If the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications finds that it is difficult to ascertain the average monthly number of senders or the average monthly total number of senders of a specified telecommunications service provided by a specified telecommunications service provider by means of the collection of reports under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the Minister may estimate that average monthly number of senders or average monthly total number of senders by a reasonable method specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, and make the designation under the provisions of paragraph (1) and the rescission of designation under the provisions of paragraph (2).

  総務大臣は、前項の規定による報告の徴収によっては特定電気通信役務提供者の提供する特定電気通信役務の平均月間発信者数又は平均月間延べ発信者数を把握することが困難であると認めるときは、当該平均月間発信者数又は平均月間延べ発信者数を総務省令で定める合理的な方法により推計して、第一項の規定による指定及び第二項の規定による指定の解除を行うことができる。

• ChangedCaption

  Publication of Method for Receiving Requests from Infringed PartiesNotification by Large-scale Specified Telecommunications Service Providers

  被侵害者からの申出を受け付ける方法の公表大規模特定電気通信役務提供者による届出

• ChangedArticle 22, paragraph (1)

  A large-scale specified telecommunications service provider (limited to one that has mademust notify the notification under Article 21, paragraph (1); the same applies hereinafter) mustMinister for Internal Affairs and Communications of the following matters, as specifiedprovided by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, establish and publish a method for a person who alleges thatwithin three months from the person's rights have been violated due to dissemination of information through specified telecommunications conducted usingdate on which it was designated under the large-scale specified telecommunications service it provides (referred to as an "infringed party" in the following Article) to make a request to that large-scale specified telecommunications service provider, by indicatingprovisions of paragraph (1) of the violating information, etc., to take measures for preventing transmission of violating information.preceding Article:

  大規模特定電気通信役務提供者（は、前条第一項の規定による届出をした者に限る。以下同じ。）は指定を受けた日から三月以内に、総務省令で定めるところにより、その提供する大規模特定電気通信役務を利用して行われる特定電気通信による情報の流通によって自己の権利を侵害されたとする者（次条において「被侵害者」という。）が侵害情報等を示して当該大規模特定電気通信役務提供者に対し侵害情報送信防止措置を講ずるよう申出を行うための方法を定め、これを公表し次に掲げる事項を総務大臣に届け出なければならない。

• AddedArticle 22, paragraph (1), item (i)

  the name or title and address and, in the case of a corporation, the name of its representative;

  氏名又は名称及び住所並びに法人にあっては、その代表者の氏名

• AddedArticle 22, paragraph (1), item (ii)

  in the case of a foreign corporation or association or an individual who has a domicile in a foreign country, the name or title of its representative in Japan or its agent in Japan, and its address in Japan;

  外国の法人若しくは団体又は外国に住所を有する個人にあっては、国内における代表者又は国内における代理人の氏名又は名称及び国内の住所

• AddedArticle 22, paragraph (1), item (iii)

  beyond the matters set forth in the preceding two items, matters specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications.

  前二号に掲げる事項のほか、総務省令で定める事項

• ChangedArticle 22, paragraph (2)

  The method under When there is a change to the matters set forth in the items of the preceding paragraph must be one that conforms to all of, a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider must notify the following items:Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications to that effect without delay.

  前項の方法は、次の各号のいずれにも適合するもので大規模特定電気通信役務提供者は、前項各号に掲げる事項に変更があったときは、遅滞なく、その旨を総務大臣に届け出なければならない。

• RemovedArticle 22, paragraph (2), item (i)

  it enables a request to be made by a method using an electronic data processing system;

  電子情報処理組織を使用する方法による申出を行うことができるものであること。

• RemovedArticle 22, paragraph (2), item (ii)

  it does not impose an excessive burden on a person who intends to make a request;

  申出を行おうとする者に過重な負担を課するものでないこと。

• RemovedArticle 22, paragraph (2), item (iii)

  it makes clear to the person who made the request (referred to as the "person making the request" in Article 25) the date and time when the large-scale specified telecommunications service provider received the request.

  当該大規模特定電気通信役務提供者が申出を受けた日時が当該申出を行った者（第二十五条において「申出者」という。）に明らかとなるものであること。

• ChangedCaption

  ConductPublication of Investigation into Violating InformationMethod for Receiving Requests from Infringed Parties

  侵害情報に係る調査の実施被侵害者からの申出を受け付ける方法の公表

• ChangedArticle 23, paragraph (1)

  When an infringed party has made a requestA large-scale specified telecommunications service provider (limited to take measures for preventing transmission of violating information in accordance withone that has made a notification under the method underprovisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, a large-scale ; the same applies hereinafter) must, as specified telecommunications service provider must, without delay, conduct the necessary investigation into whether the rights of by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, establish and publish a method for a person who alleges that infringed party are being unjustlythe person's rights have been violated due to the dissemination of information through specified telecommunications conducted using the large-scale specified telecommunications service it provides (referred to as an "infringed party" in the following Article) to show violating information pertaining to , etc. and request that requestlarge-scale specified telecommunications service provider to take measures for preventing transmission of violating information.

  大規模特定電気通信役務提供者は、被侵害者から（前条第一項の方法に従って侵害情報送信防止措置を講ずるよう申出があったときは、当該申出に係る侵害規定による届出をした者に限る。以下同じ。）は、総務省令で定めるところにより、その提供する大規模特定電気通信役務を利用して行われる特定電気通信による情報の流通によって当該被侵害者自己の権利が不当にを侵害されているかどうかについて、遅滞なく必要な調査を行わたとする者（次条において「被侵害者」という。）が侵害情報等を示して当該大規模特定電気通信役務提供者に対し侵害情報送信防止措置を講ずるよう申出を行うための方法を定め、これを公表しなければならない。

• AddedArticle 23, paragraph (2)

  The method under the preceding paragraph must conform to all of the following items:

  前項の方法は、次の各号のいずれにも適合するものでなければならない。

• AddedArticle 23, paragraph (2), item (i)

  it enables requests to be made by a method using an electronic data processing system;

  電子情報処理組織を使用する方法による申出を行うことができるものであること。

• AddedArticle 23, paragraph (2), item (ii)

  it does not impose an excessive burden on a person who intends to make a request;

  申出を行おうとする者に過重な負担を課するものでないこと。

• AddedArticle 23, paragraph (2), item (iii)

  it makes clear to the person who made the request (referred to as the "person making the request" in Article 26) the date and time on which the relevant large-scale specified telecommunications service provider received the request.

  当該大規模特定電気通信役務提供者が申出を受けた日時が当該申出を行った者（第二十六条において「申出者」という。）に明らかとなるものであること。

• ChangedCaption

  Violating InformationConduct of Investigation Specialistsinto Violating Information

  侵害情報調査専門員に係る調査の実施

• ChangedArticle 24, paragraph (1)

  In order to have those parts of the investigation under the preceding Article that require specialized knowledge and experience properly conducted, a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider must appoint a violating information investigation specialist (referred to as an "investigation specialist" in this Article and Article 25, paragraph (2), item (ii)) from among persons who have sufficient knowledge and experience in dealing with violations of rights arising from When a request to take measures for preventing transmission of violating information has been made by an infringed party in accordance with the method under paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider must, without delay, conduct the necessary investigation as to whether the rights of that infringed party are being unjustly violated due to the dissemination of the violating information through specified telecommunicationspertaining to the request.

  大規模特定電気通信役務提供者は、前条の調査のうち専門的な知識経験を必要とするものを適正に行わせるため、特定電気通信による被侵害者から前条第一項の方法に従って侵害情報送信防止措置を講ずるよう申出があったときは、当該申出に係る侵害情報の流通によって発生する権利侵害への対処に関して十分な知識経験を有する者のうちから、侵害情報調査専門員（以下この条及び次条第二項第二号において「専門員」という。）を選任し当該被侵害者の権利が不当に侵害されているかどうかについて、遅滞なく必要な調査を行わなければならない。

• RemovedArticle 24, paragraph (2)

  The number of investigation specialists of a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider must be the number specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications according to the average monthly number of senders or average monthly total number of senders, and the type, of the large-scale specified telecommunications service provided by that large-scale specified telecommunications service provider, or more (in the case where that large-scale specified telecommunications service provider provides multiple large-scale specified telecommunications services, the sum of the numbers specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications according to the average monthly number of senders or average monthly total number of senders, and the type, of each large-scale specified telecommunications service).

  大規模特定電気通信役務提供者の専門員の数は、当該大規模特定電気通信役務提供者の提供する大規模特定電気通信役務の平均月間発信者数又は平均月間延べ発信者数及び種別に応じて総務省令で定める数（当該大規模特定電気通信役務提供者が複数の大規模特定電気通信役務を提供している場合にあっては、それぞれの大規模特定電気通信役務の平均月間発信者数又は平均月間延べ発信者数及び種別に応じて総務省令で定める数を合算した数）以上でなければならない。

• RemovedArticle 24, paragraph (3)

  When a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider has appointed an investigation specialist, it must, as specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, notify the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications to that effect and of the matters specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, without delay. The same applies when it has changed these.

  大規模特定電気通信役務提供者は、専門員を選任したときは、総務省令で定めるところにより、遅滞なく、その旨及び総務省令で定める事項を総務大臣に届け出なければならない。これらを変更したときも、同様とする。

• ChangedCaption

  Notification to Person Making the RequestViolating Information Investigation Specialists

  申出者に対する通知侵害情報調査専門員

• ChangedArticle 25, paragraph (1)

  When a request under Article 23 has been made, a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider must determine, based onIn order to have the resultspart of the investigation under that Article, whether to take measures for preventing transmission of violating information,the preceding Article that requires specialized knowledge and notify the person making the request of the mattersexperience conducted properly, a large-scale specified in each of the following items for the categories set forth in those items, within the period specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairstelecommunications service provider must appoint violating information investigation specialists (hereinafter referred to as "investigation specialists" in this Article and Communications that is within 14 daysArticle 26, paragraph (2), item (ii)) from the day on which it received the request; provided, however, that this does not apply when a requestamong persons with sufficient knowledge and experience regarding addressing infringement of the same content has previously been made by the person makingrights arising from the request or when there is otherwise a justifiable reason for not giving notificationdissemination of information through specified telecommunications.

  大規模特定電気通信役務提供者は、第二十三条の申出があったときは、同前条の調査の結果に基づき侵害情報送信防止措置を講ずるかどうかを判断し、当該申出を受けた日から十四日以内の総務省令で定める期間内に、次の各号に掲げる区分に応じ、当該各号に定める事項を申出者に通知しなければならない。ただし、申出者から過去に同一の内容の申出が行われていたときその他の通知しないことについて正当な理由があるときは、この限りでうち専門的な知識経験を必要とするものを適正に行わせるため、特定電気通信による情報の流通によって発生する権利侵害への対処に関して十分な知識経験を有する者のうちから、侵害情報調査専門員（以下この条及び次条第二項第二号において「専門員」という。）を選任しなければならない。

• RemovedArticle 25, paragraph (1), item (i)

  if it has taken measures for preventing transmission of violating information in response to the request: that fact;

  当該申出に応じて侵害情報送信防止措置を講じたとき　その旨

• RemovedArticle 25, paragraph (1), item (ii)

  if it has not taken measures for preventing transmission of violating information in response to the request: that fact and the reason therefor.

  当該申出に応じた侵害情報送信防止措置を講じなかったとき　その旨及びその理由

• ChangedArticle 25, paragraph (2)

  Notwithstanding the main clauseThe number of the preceding paragraph,investigation specialists of a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider need only, if it falls under any ofmust be at least the following items, notify the person makingnumber specified by Order of the requestMinistry of the matters specified in the relevant items of that paragraph for the categories set forth in the itemsInternal Affairs and Communications according to the average monthly number of senders or average monthly total number of that paragraph, without delay after determining whether to take measures for preventing transmission of violating information based on the results ofsenders and the category of the large-scale specified telecommunications service provided by that large-scale specified telecommunications service provider (in the investigation under Article 23. In this case, it must notify the person making case where that large-scale specified telecommunications service provider provides multiple large-scale specified telecommunications services, the request, withinsum of the periodnumbers specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications under that paragraph, of which ofaccording to the following items it falls under (and, if it falls under item (iii), that factaverage monthly number of senders or average monthly total number of senders and the contentcategory of the unavoidable reasoneach large-scale specified telecommunications service).

  前項本文の規定にかかわらず、大規模特定電気通信役務提供者は、次の各号のいずれかに該当するときは、第二十三条の調査の結果に基づき侵害情報送信防止措置を講ずるかどうかを判断した後、遅滞なく、同項各号に掲げる区分に応じ、当該各号に定める事項を申出者に通知すれば足りる。この場合においては、同項のの専門員の数は、当該大規模特定電気通信役務提供者の提供する大規模特定電気通信役務の平均月間発信者数又は平均月間延べ発信者数及び種別に応じて総務省令で定める期間内に、次の各号のいずれに該当するか（第三号に該当す数（当該大規模特定電気通信役務提供者が複数の大規模特定電気通信役務を提供している場合にあっては、その旨及びやむを得ない理由の内容）を申出者に通知しれぞれの大規模特定電気通信役務の平均月間発信者数又は平均月間延べ発信者数及び種別に応じて総務省令で定める数を合算した数）以上でなければならない。

• RemovedArticle 25, paragraph (2), item (i)

  if it has decided to hear the opinion of the sender of the violating information for the purpose of the investigation under Article 23;

  第二十三条の調査のため侵害情報の発信者の意見を聴くこととしたとき。

• RemovedArticle 25, paragraph (2), item (ii)

  if it has decided to have the investigation under Article 23 conducted by an investigation specialist;

  第二十三条の調査を専門員に行わせることとしたとき。

• RemovedArticle 25, paragraph (2), item (iii)

  if, in addition to the cases set forth in the preceding two items, there is an unavoidable reason.

  前二号に掲げる場合のほか、やむを得ない理由があるとき。

• AddedArticle 25, paragraph (3)

  When a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider has appointed investigation specialists, it must, as provided by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, notify the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications without delay of that fact and the matters specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. The same applies when it has changed any of these.

  大規模特定電気通信役務提供者は、専門員を選任したときは、総務省令で定めるところにより、遅滞なく、その旨及び総務省令で定める事項を総務大臣に届け出なければならない。これらを変更したときも、同様とする。

• ChangedCaption

  Publication of Standards, etc. for Implementation of Transmission Prevention MeasuresNotification to Person Making the Request

  送信防止措置の実施に関する基準等の公表申出者に対する通知

• ChangedArticle 26, paragraph (1)

  With regard to the dissemination of information through specified telecommunications conducted using theWhen a request under Article 24 has been made, a large-scale specified telecommunications service it provides, a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider may take transmission prevention measures only where it complies with the standards that it has itself established and published, other than in a case falling under anyprovider must determine, based on the result of the investigation under that Article, whether to take measures for preventing transmission of violating information, and notify the person making the request of the matters specified in each of the following items. In this case, those standards must have been published no later than a fixed for the category set forth in that item, within the period specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications before that is within 14 days from the daydate on which it received the transmission prevention measures are taken.request; provided, however, that this does not apply if a request with the same content has been made by the person making the request in the past or if there is any other legitimate ground for not giving notice:

  大規模特定電気通信役務提供者は、その提供する大規模特定電気通信役務を利用して行われる特定電気通信による情報の流通については、次の各号のいずれかに該当する場合のほか、自ら定め、公表している基準に従う場合に限り、第二十四条の申出があったときは、同条の調査の結果に基づき侵害情報送信防止措置を講ずることができる。この場合において、当該基準はかどうかを判断し、当該送信防止措置を講ずる日申出を受けた日から十四日以内の総務省令で定める一定の期間前までに公表されてい期間内に、次の各号に掲げる区分に応じ、当該各号に定める事項を申出者に通知しなければならない。ただし、申出者から過去に同一の内容の申出が行われていたときその他の通知しないことについて正当な理由があるときは、この限りでない。

• ChangedArticle 26, paragraph (1), item (i)

  if the large-scale specified telecommunications service provider is the senderit has taken measures for preventing transmission of theviolating information for which it intendsin response to take transmission prevention measuresthe request: that fact;

  当該大規模特定電気通信役務提供者が申出に応じて侵害情報送信防止措置を講じようとする情報の発信者であるとき。たとき　その旨

• ChangedArticle 26, paragraph (1), item (ii)

  if, in a case where there is an obligation to prevent the it has not taken measures for preventing transmission of information that unjustly violates the rights of others or any other legal obligation (excluding an obligation to make efforts)violating information in response to take transmission prevention measures, it takes transmission prevention measures based on that obligation;the request: that fact and the reason therefor.

  他人の権利を不当に侵害する情報の送信を防止する義務がある場合その他送信防止当該申出に応じた侵害情報送信防止措置を講ずる法令上の義務（努力義務を除く。）がある場合において、当該義務に基づき送信防止措置を講ずるとき。じなかったとき　その旨及びその理由

• RemovedArticle 26, paragraph (1), item (iii)

  if it takes transmission prevention measures out of urgent necessity, and the type of information for which it takes the transmission prevention measures is not expressly indicated as a subject of transmission prevention measures in those standards because it is one that cannot ordinarily be foreseen.

  緊急の必要により送信防止措置を講ずる場合であって、当該送信防止措置を講ずる情報の種類が、通常予測することができないものであるため、当該基準における送信防止措置の対象として明示されていないとき。

• ChangedArticle 26, paragraph (2)

  In establishingNotwithstanding the standards under main clause of the preceding paragraph, if a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider must endeavor falls under any of the following items, it suffices for it to ensure notify the person making the request, without delay after determining whether to take measures for preventing transmission of violating information based on the result of the investigation under Article 24, of the matters specified in each item of that paragraph for the content category set forth in that item; in this case, it must notify the person making the request, within the period specified by Order of those standards conforms the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications referred to all in that paragraph, of which of the following items it falls under (if it falls under item (iii), that fact and the content of the unavoidable reason):

  前項本文の規定にかかわらず、大規模特定電気通信役務提供者は、前項の基準を次の各号のいずれかに該当するときは、第二十四条の調査の結果に基づき侵害情報送信防止措置を講ずるかどうかを判断した後、遅滞なく、同項各号に掲げる区分に応じ、当該各号に定めるに当たっ事項を申出者に通知すれば足りる。この場合においては、当該基準の内容が同項の総務省令で定める期間内に、次の各号のいずれにも適合したものとなるよう努め該当するか（第三号に該当する場合にあっては、その旨及びやむを得ない理由の内容）を申出者に通知しなければならない。

• ChangedArticle 26, paragraph (2), item (i)

  the types of information subjectif it has decided to transmission prevention measures are specified as concretely as possible, according tohear the cause by whichopinion of the large-scale specified telecommunications service provider came to know ofsender of the violating information for the dissemination of that informationinvestigation under Article 24;

  送信防止措置の対象となる第二十四条の調査のため侵害情報の種類が、当該大規模特定電気通信役務提供者が当該情報の流通を知る発信者の意見を聴くこととなった原因の別に応じて、できる限り具体的に定められていることしたとき。

• ChangedArticle 26, paragraph (2), item (ii)

  if there are cases in which service suspension measures may be taken, the standards forit has decided to have investigation specialists conduct the implementation of service suspension measures are specified as concretely as possibleinvestigation under Article 24;

  役務提供停止措置を講ずることがある場合においては、役務提供停止措置の実施に関する基準ができる限り具体的に定められてい第二十四条の調査を専門員に行わせることとしたとき。

• ChangedArticle 26, paragraph (2), item (iii)

  the standards are written in expressions that can be readily understood by senders and other persons concerned;if there is an unavoidable reason, beyond the cases set forth in the preceding two items.

  発信者その他の関係者が容易に理解することのできる表現を用いて記載されていること前二号に掲げる場合のほか、やむを得ない理由があるとき。

• RemovedArticle 26, paragraph (2), item (iv)

  consideration is given to consistency with laws and regulations that provide for obligations to make efforts concerning the implementation of transmission prevention measures.

  送信防止措置の実施に関する努力義務を定める法令との整合性に配慮されていること。

• RemovedArticle 26, paragraph (3)

  When a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider has taken transmission prevention measures on the ground that it falls under paragraph (1), item (iii), it must promptly amend the standards under that paragraph so that it becomes clear that the type of information for which it took those transmission prevention measures is a subject of transmission prevention measures.

  大規模特定電気通信役務提供者は、第一項第三号に該当することを理由に送信防止措置を講じたときは、速やかに、当該送信防止措置を講じた情報の種類が送信防止措置の対象となることが明らかになるよう同項の基準を変更しなければならない。

• RemovedArticle 26, paragraph (4)

  A large-scale specified telecommunications service provider that has published the standards under paragraph (1) must endeavor to prepare and publish, approximately once a year, materials that organize, by type of information, those cases of information for which transmission prevention measures were taken in accordance with those standards that should serve as a reference for senders and other persons concerned.

  第一項の基準を公表している大規模特定電気通信役務提供者は、おおむね一年に一回、当該基準に従って送信防止措置を講じた情報の事例のうち発信者その他の関係者に参考となるべきものを情報の種類ごとに整理した資料を作成し、公表するよう努めなければならない。

• ChangedCaption

  Measures such as Notification to SendersPublication of Standards, etc. for Implementation of Transmission Prevention Measures

  発信者に対する通知等の措置送信防止措置の実施に関する基準等の公表

• ChangedArticle 27, paragraph (1)

  When a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider has taken transmission prevention measures withWith regard to the dissemination of information through specified telecommunications conducted using the large-scale specified telecommunications service it provides, it must, except in a case falling under either of the following items, without delay,a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider may take measures to notify the sender of the information whose transmission was prevented by those transmission prevention measures of that fact and the reasons therefor, or to place that factonly where it complies with the standards that it has itself established and those reasons in a statepublished, other than in which the sender of that information can readily learna case falling under any of them (referred to as "notification or similar measures" in item (ii) and in Article 28, item (iii))the following items. In this case, if those transmission prevention measures were taken in accordance with the standards under paragraph (1) standards must have been published no later than a fixed period specified by Order of the preceding Article, it must make clear, in those reasons,Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications before the relationship between those day on which the transmission prevention measures and those standardsare taken.

  大規模特定電気通信役務提供者は、その提供する大規模特定電気通信役務を利用して行われる特定電気通信による情報の流通について送信防止措置を講じたときは、次の各号のいずれかに該当する場合を除き、遅滞なく、その旨及びその理由を当該送信防止措置により送信を防止された情報の発信者に通知し、又は当該情報の発信者が容易に知り得る状態に置く措置（第二号及び第二十八条第三号において「通知等の措置」という。）を講じなければならないのほか、自ら定め、公表している基準に従う場合に限り、送信防止措置を講ずることができる。この場合において、当該送信防止措置が前条第一項の基準に従って講じられたものであるとき基準は、当該理由において、当該送信防止措置と当該基準との関係を明らかにしを講ずる日の総務省令で定める一定の期間前までに公表されていなければならない。

• ChangedArticle 27, paragraph (1), item (i)

  if the large-scale specified telecommunications service provider is the sender of the information for which it tookis about to take transmission prevention measures;

  当該大規模特定電気通信役務提供者が送信防止措置を講じたようとする情報の発信者であるとき。

• ChangedArticle 27, paragraph (1), item (ii)

  if it has previously taken notification or similar measures with regard there is a legal obligation (excluding an obligation to make efforts) to having prevented the transmission of similar information take transmission prevention measures, such as an obligation to the same sender for a similar reason, or if there is otherwise a justifiable reason for not taking notification or similar measuresprevent the transmission of information that unjustly violates the rights of others, and transmission prevention measures are taken based on that obligation;

  過去に同一の発信者に対して同様の他人の権利を不当に侵害する情報の送信を同様の理由により防止したことについて通知等の措置を講じていたとき防止する義務がある場合その他の通知等の送信防止措置を講じないことについて正当な理由があずる法令上の義務（努力義務を除く。）がある場合において、当該義務に基づき送信防止措置を講ずるとき。

• AddedArticle 27, paragraph (1), item (iii)

  if transmission prevention measures are taken due to an urgent necessity, and the type of information for which the transmission prevention measures are taken is not explicitly stated as subject to transmission prevention measures in those standards because it is not ordinarily foreseeable.

  緊急の必要により送信防止措置を講ずる場合であって、当該送信防止措置を講ずる情報の種類が、通常予測することができないものであるため、当該基準における送信防止措置の対象として明示されていないとき。

• AddedArticle 27, paragraph (2)

  In establishing the standards under the preceding paragraph, a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider must endeavor to ensure that the content of the standards conforms to all of the following items:

  大規模特定電気通信役務提供者は、前項の基準を定めるに当たっては、当該基準の内容が次の各号のいずれにも適合したものとなるよう努めなければならない。

• AddedArticle 27, paragraph (2), item (i)

  the types of information subject to transmission prevention measures are specified as concretely as possible according to the cause by which the relevant large-scale specified telecommunications service provider came to know of the dissemination of that information;

  送信防止措置の対象となる情報の種類が、当該大規模特定電気通信役務提供者が当該情報の流通を知ることとなった原因の別に応じて、できる限り具体的に定められていること。

• AddedArticle 27, paragraph (2), item (ii)

  if service suspension measures may be taken, the standards for the implementation of service suspension measures are specified as concretely as possible;

  役務提供停止措置を講ずることがある場合においては、役務提供停止措置の実施に関する基準ができる限り具体的に定められていること。

• AddedArticle 27, paragraph (2), item (iii)

  the standards are written in expressions that senders and other persons concerned can easily understand;

  発信者その他の関係者が容易に理解することのできる表現を用いて記載されていること。

• AddedArticle 27, paragraph (2), item (iv)

  consideration is given to consistency with laws and regulations that provide for an obligation to make efforts regarding the implementation of transmission prevention measures.

  送信防止措置の実施に関する努力義務を定める法令との整合性に配慮されていること。

• AddedArticle 27, paragraph (3)

  When a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider has taken transmission prevention measures on the ground that it falls under item (iii) of paragraph (1), it must promptly change the standards under that paragraph so that it is clear that the type of information for which it took those transmission prevention measures is subject to transmission prevention measures.

  大規模特定電気通信役務提供者は、第一項第三号に該当することを理由に送信防止措置を講じたときは、速やかに、当該送信防止措置を講じた情報の種類が送信防止措置の対象となることが明らかになるよう同項の基準を変更しなければならない。

• AddedArticle 27, paragraph (4)

  A large-scale specified telecommunications service provider that has published the standards under paragraph (1) is to endeavor to prepare and publish, approximately once a year, materials organizing, by type of information, those cases of information for which it has taken transmission prevention measures in accordance with those standards that should serve as a reference for senders and other persons concerned.

  第一項の基準を公表している大規模特定電気通信役務提供者は、おおむね一年に一回、当該基準に従って送信防止措置を講じた情報の事例のうち発信者その他の関係者に参考となるべきものを情報の種類ごとに整理した資料を作成し、公表するよう努めなければならない。

• ChangedCaption

  Publication of Implementation Status of Measures, etc.Measures such as Notification to Senders

  措置の実施状況等の公表発信者に対する通知等の措置

• ChangedArticle 28, paragraph (1)

  A When a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider has taken transmission prevention measures with regard to the dissemination of information through specified telecommunications conducted using the large-scale specified telecommunications service it provides, it must, once every year, as specified without delay, except in the case where it falls under any of the following items, take measures to notify the sender of the information whose transmission was prevented by Order those transmission prevention measures of that fact and the Ministry reason therefor, or to put it in a state where the sender of Internal Affairs that information can easily know (referred to as "notification or similar measures" in item (ii) and Communications, publish Article 29, item (iii)); in this case, if those transmission prevention measures were taken in accordance with the following mattersstandards under paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, it must make clear, in that reason, the relationship between those transmission prevention measures and those standards:

  大規模特定電気通信役務提供者は、毎年一回、総務省令で定めるところにより、次に掲げる事項を公表その提供する大規模特定電気通信役務を利用して行われる特定電気通信による情報の流通について送信防止措置を講じたときは、次の各号のいずれかに該当する場合を除き、遅滞なく、その旨及びその理由を当該送信防止措置により送信を防止された情報の発信者に通知し、又は当該情報の発信者が容易に知り得る状態に置く措置（第二号及び第二十九条第三号において「通知等の措置」という。）を講じなければならない。この場合において、当該送信防止措置が前条第一項の基準に従って講じられたものであるときは、当該理由において、当該送信防止措置と当該基準との関係を明らかにしなければならない。

• ChangedArticle 28, paragraph (1), item (i)

  if the status of receipt relevant large-scale specified telecommunications service provider is the sender of requests under Article 23the information for which it took the transmission prevention measures;

  第二十三条の申出の受付の状況当該大規模特定電気通信役務提供者が送信防止措置を講じた情報の発信者であるとき。

• ChangedArticle 28, paragraph (1), item (ii)

  the implementation status ofif it has taken notification under or similar measures in the provisions past with regard to having prevented the transmission of Article 25;similar information to the same sender for a similar reason, or if there is any other legitimate ground for not taking notification or similar measures.

  第二十五条の規定による通知の実施状況過去に同一の発信者に対して同様の情報の送信を同様の理由により防止したことについて通知等の措置を講じていたときその他の通知等の措置を講じないことについて正当な理由があるとき。

• RemovedArticle 28, paragraph (1), item (iii)

  the implementation status of notification or similar measures under the provisions of Article 27;

  第二十七条の規定による通知等の措置の実施状況

• RemovedArticle 28, paragraph (1), item (iv)

  the implementation status of transmission prevention measures (excluding the matters set forth in the preceding three items);

  送信防止措置の実施状況（前三号に掲げる事項を除く。）

• RemovedArticle 28, paragraph (1), item (v)

  the implementation status of the measures pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article;

  前条第一項の規定による措置の実施状況

• RemovedArticle 28, paragraph (1), item (vi)

  its own evaluation of the matters set forth in the preceding items;

  前各号に掲げる事項について自ら行った評価

• RemovedArticle 28, paragraph (1), item (vii)

  in addition to the matters set forth in the preceding items, the matters specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications as necessary to make clear the implementation status of the measures that a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider is to take based on the provisions of this Chapter.

  前各号に掲げる事項のほか、大規模特定電気通信役務提供者がこの章の規定に基づき講ずべき措置の実施状況を明らかにするために必要な事項として総務省令で定める事項

Its words stay the same; only its number changes.

• ChangedCaption

  CollectionPublication of ReportsImplementation Status of Measures, etc.

  報告の徴収措置の実施状況等の公表

• ChangedArticle 29, paragraph (1)

  The Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications may, to the extent necessary for the enforcement ofA large-scale specified telecommunications service provider must publish the provisions of Article 22, Article 24, Article 25, Article 26, paragraph (1) or (3), Article 27 orfollowing matters once a year, as provided by Order of the preceding Article, require a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider to make a report on its business.Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications:

  総務大臣は、第二十二条、第二十四条、第二十五条、第二十六条第一項若しくは第三項、第二十七条又は前条の規定の施行に必要な限度において、大規大規模特定電気通信役務提供者に対し、その業務に関し報告をさせることができるは、毎年一回、総務省令で定めるところにより、次に掲げる事項を公表しなければならない。

• AddedArticle 29, paragraph (1), item (i)

  the status of acceptance of requests under Article 24;

  第二十四条の申出の受付の状況

• AddedArticle 29, paragraph (1), item (ii)

  the implementation status of notices pursuant to the provisions of Article 26;

  第二十六条の規定による通知の実施状況

• AddedArticle 29, paragraph (1), item (iii)

  the implementation status of notification or similar measures pursuant to the provisions of Article 28;

  第二十八条の規定による通知等の措置の実施状況

• AddedArticle 29, paragraph (1), item (iv)

  the implementation status of transmission prevention measures (excluding the matters set forth in the preceding three items);

  送信防止措置の実施状況（前三号に掲げる事項を除く。）

• AddedArticle 29, paragraph (1), item (v)

  the implementation status of the measures pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article;

  前条第一項の規定による措置の実施状況

• AddedArticle 29, paragraph (1), item (vi)

  its own evaluation of the matters set forth in the preceding items;

  前各号に掲げる事項について自ら行った評価

• AddedArticle 29, paragraph (1), item (vii)

  beyond the matters set forth in the preceding items, matters specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications as necessary for clarifying the implementation status of the measures to be taken by large-scale specified telecommunications service providers pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter.

  前各号に掲げる事項のほか、大規模特定電気通信役務提供者がこの章の規定に基づき講ずべき措置の実施状況を明らかにするために必要な事項として総務省令で定める事項

• ChangedCaption

  Recommendation and OrderCollection of Reports

  勧告及び命令報告の徴収

• ChangedArticle 30, paragraph (1)

  When theThe Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications finds that a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider is in violationmay, to the extent necessary for the enforcement of the provisions of Article 2223, Article 2425, Article 2526, Article 2627, paragraph (1) or (3), Article 2728 or Article 28, the Minister may recommend to thatpreceding Article, have a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider that it take the measures necessary to rectify the violationmake a report on its business.

  総務大臣は、大規模特定電気通信役務提供者が第二十二三条、第二十四五条、第二十五六条、第二十六七条第一項若しくは第三項、第二十七八条又は第二十八前条の規定に違反していると認めるときは、当該の施行に必要な限度において、大規模特定電気通信役務提供者に対し、その違反を是正するために必要な措置を講ずべきことを勧告す業務に関し報告をさせることができる。

• RemovedArticle 30, paragraph (2)

  If a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider that has received a recommendation under the preceding paragraph fails, without a justifiable reason, to take the measures pertaining to the recommendation, the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications may order that large-scale specified telecommunications service provider to take the measures pertaining to the recommendation.

  総務大臣は、前項の規定による勧告を受けた大規模特定電気通信役務提供者が、正当な理由がなく当該勧告に係る措置を講じなかったときは、当該大規模特定電気通信役務提供者に対し、当該勧告に係る措置を講ずべきことを命ずることができる。

• ChangedCaption

  Document to be ServedRecommendation and Order

  送達すべき書類勧告及び命令

• ChangedArticle 31, paragraph (1)

  A designation under Article 20, paragraph (1), the collection of reports under the provisions of Article 29, a recommendation under paragraph (1)If the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications finds that a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider is in violation of the provisions of the precedingArticle 23, Article, or an order under 25, Article 26, Article 27, paragraph (2) of that1) or (3), Article is made by serving28 or Article 29, the document Minister may recommend that the large-scale specified by Order of telecommunications service provider take the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communicationsmeasures necessary to rectify the violation.

  総務大臣は、大規模特定電気通信役務提供者が第二十条第一項の規定による指定三条、第二十五条、第二十九条の規定による報告の徴収、前六条、第二十七条第一項の規定による勧告又は同条第二項若しくは第三項、第二十八条又は第二十九条の規定による命令は、総務省令で定める書類を送達して行う違反していると認めるときは、当該大規模特定電気通信役務提供者に対し、その違反を是正するために必要な措置を講ずべきことを勧告することができる。

• ChangedArticle 31, paragraph (2)

  The notice under Article 30 of the Administrative Procedure Act (Act No. 88 of 1993) pertaining toIf a large-scale specified telecommunications service provider that has received a designation under Article 20, paragraph (1) or an orderrecommendation under paragraph (2)the provisions of the preceding Article is given by serving the document under that Article. In this caseparagraph fails, without legitimate grounds, to take the measures pertaining to the recommendation, the provisions of Article 15, paragraph (3) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuantMinister for Internal Affairs and Communications may order the large-scale specified telecommunications service provider to Article 31 of that Act withtake the terms deemedmeasures pertaining to be replaced do not applythe recommendation.

  第二十条第一項の規定による指定又は前条第二総務大臣は、前項の規定による命令に係る行政手続法（平成五年法律第八十八号）第三十条の規定による通知は、同条の書類を送達して行う。この場合において、同法第三十一条において読み替えて準用する同法第十五条第三項の規定は適用しない勧告を受けた大規模特定電気通信役務提供者が、正当な理由がなく当該勧告に係る措置を講じなかったときは、当該大規模特定電気通信役務提供者に対し、当該勧告に係る措置を講ずべきことを命ずることができる。

• ChangedCaption

  Application Mutatis Mutandis of the Code of Civil ProcedureDocument to Servicebe Served

  送達に関する民事訴訟法の準用すべき書類

• ChangedArticle 32, paragraph (1)

  The designation under the provisions of Article 10021, paragraph (1), Article 101, Article 102-2, Article 103, Article 105, Article 106 and Article 108 of the Codecollection of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to servicereports under the preceding Article. In this caseprovisions of Article 30, the term "court" in that paragraph andrecommendation under the term "presiding judge" in that Article are deemed to be replaced with "Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications", andprovisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, or the term "court execution officer" in Article 101,order under the provisions of paragraph (12) of that ActArticle is deemed to be replaced with "official made by serving a document specified by Order of the Minister forMinistry of Internal Affairs and Communications".

  前条第二十一条第一項の規定による送達については、民事訴訟法第百条第一項、第百一条、第百二条の二、第百三条、第百五条、第百六条及び第百八指定、第三十条の規定を準用する。この場合において、同項中「裁判所」とあり、及び同条中「裁判長」とあるのは「総務大臣」と、同法第百一条第一項中「執行官」とあるのは「総務大臣の職員」と読み替えるものとするによる報告の徴収、前条第一項の規定による勧告又は同条第二項の規定による命令は、総務省令で定める書類を送達して行う。

• AddedArticle 32, paragraph (2)

  The notice under the provisions of Article 30 of the Administrative Procedure Act (Act No. 88 of 1993) pertaining to the designation under the provisions of Article 21, paragraph (1) or the order under the provisions of paragraph (2) of the preceding Article is given by serving the document referred to in Article 30 of that Act. In this case, the provisions of Article 15, paragraph (3) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis with replacement of terms pursuant to Article 31 of that Act do not apply.

  第二十一条第一項の規定による指定又は前条第二項の規定による命令に係る行政手続法（平成五年法律第八十八号）第三十条の規定による通知は、同条の書類を送達して行う。この場合において、同法第三十一条において読み替えて準用する同法第十五条第三項の規定は適用しない。

• ChangedCaption

  Service by PublicationApplication Mutatis Mutandis of the Code of Civil Procedure to Service

  公示送達送達に関する民事訴訟法の準用

• ChangedArticle 33, paragraph (1)

  The provisions of Article 100, paragraph (1), Article 101, Article 102-2, Article 103, Article 105, Article 106 and Article 108 of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to service under the provisions of the preceding Article. In this case, the term "court" in Article 100, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure and the term "presiding judge" in Article 108 of the Code of Civil Procedure are deemed to be replaced with "Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications may effect service by publication ", and the term "court execution officer" in Article 101, paragraph (1) of the following cases:Code of Civil Procedure is deemed to be replaced with "official of the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications".

  総務大臣は、次に掲げる場合には、公示送達をすることができ前条の規定による送達については、民事訴訟法第百条第一項、第百一条、第百二条の二、第百三条、第百五条、第百六条及び第百八条の規定を準用する。この場合において、同項中「裁判所」とあり、及び同条中「裁判長」とあるのは「総務大臣」と、同法第百一条第一項中「執行官」とあるのは「総務大臣の職員」と読み替えるものとする。

• RemovedArticle 33, paragraph (1), item (i)

  if the domicile or residence of the person to be served or the place where service is to be effected is unknown;

  送達を受けるべき者の住所、居所その他送達をすべき場所が知れない場合

• RemovedArticle 33, paragraph (1), item (ii)

  if it is found that, with regard to service to be effected in a foreign country, it is impossible to follow the provisions of Article 108 of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis with the terms replaced pursuant to the preceding Article, or that service cannot be effected even by following those provisions;

  外国においてすべき送達について、前条において読み替えて準用する民事訴訟法第百八条の規定によることができず、又はこれによっても送達をすることができないと認めるべき場合

• RemovedArticle 33, paragraph (1), item (iii)

  if six months have passed since a commission was issued to the competent government agency of a foreign country pursuant to the provisions of Article 108 of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis with the terms replaced pursuant to the preceding Article, and no document proving the service has been sent.

  前条において読み替えて準用する民事訴訟法第百八条の規定により外国の管轄官庁に嘱託を発した後六月を経過してもその送達を証する書面の送付がない場合

• RemovedArticle 33, paragraph (2)

  Service by publication is carried out by taking measures to place in a state where it can be viewed by unspecified and numerous persons, by the method specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, the effect that the documents to be served will be delivered to the person to be served at any time, and to place in a state where it can be viewed a document stating that effect posted on the bulletin board of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, or that effect displayed on the screen of a computer installed at an office of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications.

  公示送達は、送達をすべき書類を送達を受けるべき者にいつでも交付すべき旨を総務省令で定める方法により不特定多数の者が閲覧することができる状態に置くとともに、その旨が記載された書面を総務省の掲示場に掲示し、又はその旨を総務省の事務所に設置した電子計算機の映像面に表示したものの閲覧をすることができる状態に置く措置をとることにより行う。

• RemovedArticle 33, paragraph (3)

  Service by publication takes effect upon the lapse of two weeks from the day on which the measures were commenced under the provisions of the preceding paragraph.

  公示送達は、前項の規定による措置を開始した日から二週間を経過することによって、その効力を生ずる。

• RemovedArticle 33, paragraph (4)

  In the case of service by publication made in respect of service to be effected in a foreign country, the period referred to in the preceding paragraph is six weeks.

  外国においてすべき送達についてした公示送達にあっては、前項の期間は、六週間とする。

• ChangedCaption

  Use of Electronic Data Processing SystemsService by Publication

  電子情報処理組織の使用公示送達

• ChangedArticle 34, paragraph (1)

  If an employee of theThe Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications has handled affairs relating to a disposition notice, etc. prescribed in Article 3, item (ix) of the Act on the Advancement of Government Administration Processes That Utilize Information and Communications Technology (Act No. 151 of 2002) that is to be given by serving a document pursuant to the provisions of Article 31, using the electronic data processing system prescribed in Article 6, paragraph (1) of that Act pursuant to Article 7, paragraph (1) of that Act, the employee must, in lieu of preparing and submitting a document stating the matters concerningmay effect service under the provisions of Article 100, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis with the terms replaced pursuant to Article 32, record those matters, using that electronic data processing system,by publication in a file kept on a computer (including input-output devices) used by the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications.following cases:

  総務大臣の職員が、情報通信技術を活用した行政の推進等に関する法律（平成十四年法律第百五十一号）第三条第九号に規定する処分通知等であって第三十一条の規定により書類を送達して行うこととしているものに関する事務を、同法第七条第一項の規定により同法第六条第一項に規定する電子情報処理組織を使用して行ったときは、第三十二条において読み替えて準用する民事訴訟法第百条第一項の規定による送達に関する事項を記載した書面の作成及び提出に代えて、当該事項を当該電子情報処理組織を使用して総務大臣の使用に係る電子計算機（入出力装置を含む。）に備えられたファイルに記録しなければならないは、次に掲げる場合には、公示送達をすることができる。

• AddedArticle 34, paragraph (1), item (i)

  if the domicile, residence or other place where service is to be effected of the person to be served is unknown;

  送達を受けるべき者の住所、居所その他送達をすべき場所が知れない場合

• AddedArticle 34, paragraph (1), item (ii)

  with regard to service to be effected in a foreign country, if it is found that service cannot be effected by the means prescribed in Article 108 of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis with replacement of terms pursuant to the preceding Article, or that service cannot be effected even by those means;

  外国においてすべき送達について、前条において読み替えて準用する民事訴訟法第百八条の規定によることができず、又はこれによっても送達をすることができないと認めるべき場合

• AddedArticle 34, paragraph (1), item (iii)

  if no document certifying the service has been sent even after six months have passed since a commission was issued to the competent government agency of a foreign country pursuant to the provisions of Article 108 of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis with replacement of terms pursuant to the preceding Article.

  前条において読み替えて準用する民事訴訟法第百八条の規定により外国の管轄官庁に嘱託を発した後六月を経過してもその送達を証する書面の送付がない場合

• AddedArticle 34, paragraph (2)

  Service by publication is effected by taking measures to put in a state where an unspecified large number of persons can view, by a method specified by Order of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, the fact that the document to be served will be delivered to the person to be served at any time, and also to post a document stating that fact on the bulletin board of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, or to put in a state where what is displayed to that effect on the screen of a computer installed in the office of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications can be viewed.

  公示送達は、送達をすべき書類を送達を受けるべき者にいつでも交付すべき旨を総務省令で定める方法により不特定多数の者が閲覧することができる状態に置くとともに、その旨が記載された書面を総務省の掲示場に掲示し、又はその旨を総務省の事務所に設置した電子計算機の映像面に表示したものの閲覧をすることができる状態に置く措置をとることにより行う。

• AddedArticle 34, paragraph (3)

  Service by publication takes effect upon the lapse of two weeks from the date on which the measures under the provisions of the preceding paragraph were commenced.

  公示送達は、前項の規定による措置を開始した日から二週間を経過することによって、その効力を生ずる。

• AddedArticle 34, paragraph (4)

  The period stated in the preceding paragraph is six weeks for service by publication that is done for service that would be effected in a foreign country.

  外国においてすべき送達についてした公示送達にあっては、前項の期間は、六週間とする。

• ChangedCaption

  Use of Electronic Data Processing Systems

  No English for the wording before the change.

  電子情報処理組織の使用

• ChangedArticle 35, paragraph (1)

  IfWhen an order underofficial of the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications has conducted, using the electronic data processing system prescribed in Article 6, paragraph (1) of the Act on the Advancement of Government Administration Processes That Utilize Information and Communications Technology (Act No. 151 of 2002) pursuant to the provisions of Article 307, paragraph (2) is violated, a person who has committed said violation 1) of that Act, affairs relating to a notice of disposition, etc. prescribed in Article 3, item (ix) of that Act that is subject to be given by serving a document pursuant to imprisonment for not more than one year or a fine the provisions of Article 32, the official must, instead of preparing and submitting a document stating the particulars relating to service under the provisions of not more than one million yenArticle 100, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis with replacement of terms pursuant to Article 33, record those particulars, using that electronic data processing system, in a file provided on a computer (including input-output devices) used by the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications.

  第三十条第二項総務大臣の職員が、情報通信技術を活用した行政の推進等に関する法律（平成十四年法律第百五十一号）第三条第九号に規定する処分通知等であって第三十二条の規定による命令に違反した場合には、当該違反行為をした者は、一年以下の拘禁刑又は百万円以下の罰金に処するり書類を送達して行うこととしているものに関する事務を、同法第七条第一項の規定により同法第六条第一項に規定する電子情報処理組織を使用して行ったときは、第三十三条において読み替えて準用する民事訴訟法第百条第一項の規定による送達に関する事項を記載した書面の作成及び提出に代えて、当該事項を当該電子情報処理組織を使用して総務大臣の使用に係る電子計算機（入出力装置を含む。）に備えられたファイルに記録しなければならない。

• AddedArticle 36, paragraph (1)

  If an order under the provisions of Article 31, paragraph (2) is contravened, the person who committed the violation is subject to imprisonment for not more than one year or a fine of not more than 1,000,000 yen.

  第三十一条第二項の規定による命令に違反した場合には、当該違反行為をした者は、一年以下の拘禁刑又は百万円以下の罰金に処する。

• ChangedArticle 37, paragraph (1), item (i)

  when a person fails to make a notification under the provisions of Article 2122, or makes a false notification;

  第二十一二条の規定による届出をせず、又は虚偽の届出をしたとき。

• ChangedArticle 37, paragraph (1), item (ii)

  when a person fails to make a report under the provisions of Article 2930, or makes a false report.

  第二十九三十条の規定による報告をせず、又は虚偽の報告をしたとき。

• ChangedArticle 38, paragraph (1), item (i)

  Article 3536 or item (i) of the preceding Article: a fine of not more than one hundred million yen;

  第三十五六条又は前条第一号　一億円以下の罰金刑

• ChangedArticle 39, paragraph (1), item (i)

  a person who, without justifiable grounds, fails to make a report under the provisions of Article 2021, paragraph (3), or makes a false report;

  正当な理由がなく、第二十一条第三項の規定による報告をせず、又は虚偽の報告をした者

• ChangedArticle 39, paragraph (1), item (ii)

  a person who fails to make a notification under the provisions of Article 2425, paragraph (3), or makes a false notification.

  第二十四五条第三項の規定による届出をせず、又は虚偽の届出をした者