Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

This text is not in force yetIt by 13 June 2028, on a day set by — at the latest in 2 years

Read the text in force →

Act on Measures against Infringement of Rights, etc. Arising from the Distribution of Information through Specified Telecommunications

特定電気通信による情報の流通によって発生する権利侵害等への対処に関する法律(とくていでんきつうしんによるじょうほうのりゅうつうによってはっせいするけんりしんがいとうへのたいしょにかんするほうりつ)

Chapter IV Court Proceedings for Case of Sender Identification Information Disclosure Order (Articles 12 to 14)

The law as Act on the Arrangement of Related Acts to Promote the Use of Information and Communications Technology in Civil Procedures, etc. (Act No. 53 of 2023) leaves it, with the words it changes marked.

The main text is read a page at a time: a chapter to a page, and a long chapter in runs of articles. The whole main text, and the supplementary provisions and appended tables this amendment changes. Those it leaves untouched are on the page for the text in force.

Article 12第十二条Caption changed

Inspection of Records of Case of Sender Identification Information Disclosure OrderInspection of Hard-Copy Case Records発信者情報開示命令事件の記録の閲覧等非電磁的事件記録の閲覧等
3 changes in this article
Article 12, paragraph (1)(非電磁的事件記録の閲覧等)Inspection of Hard-Copy Case RecordsChanged

The parties to a case and any third party that makes a prima facie showing of interest in the case may file a request with the court clerk to inspect or copy the case record, to issue an authenticated copy, transcript, or extracthard-copy case records (meaning the portion of the case records of the case record, or to issue a certificate of of a sender identification information disclosure order excluding the particulars of theelectronic or magnetic case record prescribed in paragraph (1) of the sender identification information disclosure orderfollowing Article; the same applies hereinafter in this Article), or to issue an authenticated copy, transcript, or extract of the hard-copy case records.

当事者又は利害関係を疎明した第三者は、裁判所書記官に対し、非電磁的事件記録(発信者情報開示命令事件の記録の中次条第一項に規定する電磁的事件記録を除いた部分をいう。以下この条において同じ。)の閲覧若しくは謄写、又はその正本、謄本若しくは抄本の交付又は発信者情報開示命令事件に関する事項の証明書の交付を請求することができる。

Article 12, paragraph (2)(非電磁的事件記録の閲覧等)Inspection of Hard-Copy Case RecordsChanged

The provisions of the preceding paragraph do not apply with respect to case records of thehard-copy case of a sender identification information disclosure orderrecords that are being prepared in the form of audiotapes or videotapes (including any other matters that have been recorded by means equivalent thereto). Nevertheless, the relevant parties or a third party that makes a prima facie showing of interest may file a request with the court clerk for a reproduction of these matters.

前項の規定は、発信者情報開示命令事件の非電磁的事件記録中の録音テープ又はビデオテープ(これらに準ずる方法により一定の事項を記録した物を含む。)については、適用しない。この場合において、当事者又は利害関係を疎明した第三者は、裁判所書記官に対し、これらの物の複製を請求することができる。

Article 12, paragraph (3)(非電磁的事件記録の閲覧等)Inspection of Hard-Copy Case RecordsChanged

The request for inspection, copying and reproduction of records of ahard-copy case of a sender identification information disclosure orderrecords pursuant to the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs may not be filed if these actions would be detrimental to the preservation of the case record or the performance of the court duties.

前二項の規定による発信者情報開示命令事件の非電磁的事件記録の閲覧、謄写及び複製の請求は、当該記録の保存又は裁判所の執務に支障があるときは、することができない。

Article 12-2第十二条の二Caption added

Inspection of Electronic or Magnetic Case Records

電磁的事件記録の閲覧等

4 changes in this article
Article 12-2, paragraph (1)(電磁的事件記録の閲覧等)Inspection of Electronic or Magnetic Case RecordsAdded

The parties to a case and any third party that makes a prima facie showing of interest in the case may file a request with the court clerk, as provided by the Rules of the Supreme Court, for inspection of the content of an electronic or magnetic case record (meaning the portion of the case records of the case of a sender identification information disclosure order that pertains to matters recorded in a file (referred to simply as the "file" in Article 17, paragraph (2)) provided on a computer used by the court (including input-output devices; the same applies in the following paragraph, paragraph (3) and the following Article) pursuant to the provisions of this Act or other laws and regulations; the same applies hereinafter in this Article) as displayed by a method specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court.

当事者又は利害関係を疎明した第三者は、裁判所書記官に対し、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、電磁的事件記録(発信者情報開示命令事件の記録中この法律その他の法令の規定により裁判所の使用に係る電子計算機(入出力装置を含む。次項及び第三項並びに次条において同じ。)に備えられたファイル(第十七条第二項において単に「ファイル」という。)に記録された事項に係る部分をいう。以下この条において同じ。)の内容を最高裁判所規則で定める方法により表示したものの閲覧を請求することができる。

Article 12-2, paragraph (2)(電磁的事件記録の閲覧等)Inspection of Electronic or Magnetic Case RecordsAdded

The parties to a case and any third party that makes a prima facie showing of interest in the case may file a request with the court clerk, as provided by the Rules of the Supreme Court, for the copying of matters recorded in an electronic or magnetic case record by a method specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court, such as recording them in a file provided on a computer used by that person using an electronic data processing system specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court (meaning an electronic data processing system connecting a computer used by the court and a computer used by the other party to the procedure by a telecommunications line; the same applies in the following paragraph and the following Article).

当事者又は利害関係を疎明した第三者は、裁判所書記官に対し、電磁的事件記録に記録されている事項について、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、最高裁判所規則で定める電子情報処理組織(裁判所の使用に係る電子計算機と手続の相手方の使用に係る電子計算機とを電気通信回線で接続した電子情報処理組織をいう。次項及び次条において同じ。)を使用してその者の使用に係る電子計算機に備えられたファイルに記録する方法その他の最高裁判所規則で定める方法による複写を請求することができる。

Article 12-2, paragraph (3)(電磁的事件記録の閲覧等)Inspection of Electronic or Magnetic Case RecordsAdded

The parties to a case and any third party that makes a prima facie showing of interest in the case may file a request with the court clerk, as provided by the Rules of the Supreme Court, for the delivery of a document stating all or part of the matters recorded in an electronic or magnetic case record, with respect to which the court clerk has certified by a method specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court that the content of the document is identical to the matters recorded in the electronic or magnetic case record, or for the provision of an electronic or magnetic record recording all or part of those matters, with respect to which the court clerk has certified by a method specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court that the content of the electronic or magnetic record is identical to the matters recorded in the electronic or magnetic case record, by a method specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court, such as recording it in a file provided on a computer used by that person using an electronic data processing system specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court.

当事者又は利害関係を疎明した第三者は、裁判所書記官に対し、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、電磁的事件記録に記録されている事項の全部若しくは一部を記載した書面であって裁判所書記官が最高裁判所規則で定める方法により当該書面の内容が電磁的事件記録に記録されている事項と同一であることを証明したものを交付し、又は当該事項の全部若しくは一部を記録した電磁的記録であって裁判所書記官が最高裁判所規則で定める方法により当該電磁的記録の内容が電磁的事件記録に記録されている事項と同一であることを証明したものを最高裁判所規則で定める電子情報処理組織を使用してその者の使用に係る電子計算機に備えられたファイルに記録する方法その他の最高裁判所規則で定める方法により提供することを請求することができる。

Article 12-2, paragraph (4)(電磁的事件記録の閲覧等)Inspection of Electronic or Magnetic Case RecordsAdded

The provisions of paragraph (3) of the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis to a request for inspection and copying of electronic or magnetic case records pursuant to the provisions of paragraphs (1) and (2).

前条第三項の規定は、第一項及び第二項の規定による電磁的事件記録に係る閲覧及び複写の請求について準用する。

Article 12-3第十二条の三Caption added

Certification of Particulars of Case

事件に関する事項の証明

1 change in this article
Article 12-3, paragraph (1)(事件に関する事項の証明)Certification of Particulars of CaseAdded

The parties to a case and any third party that makes a prima facie showing of interest in the case may file a request with the court clerk, as provided by the Rules of the Supreme Court, for the delivery of a document stating the particulars of the case of a sender identification information disclosure order, with respect to which the court clerk has certified those particulars by a method specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court, or for the provision of an electronic or magnetic record recording those particulars, with respect to which the court clerk has certified those particulars by a method specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court, by a method specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court, such as recording it in a file provided on a computer used by that person using an electronic data processing system specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court.

当事者又は利害関係を疎明した第三者は、裁判所書記官に対し、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、発信者情報開示命令事件に関する事項を記載した書面であって裁判所書記官が最高裁判所規則で定める方法により当該事項を証明したものを交付し、又は当該事項を記録した電磁的記録であって裁判所書記官が最高裁判所規則で定める方法により当該事項を証明したものを最高裁判所規則で定める電子情報処理組織を使用してその者の使用に係る電子計算機に備えられたファイルに記録する方法その他の最高裁判所規則で定める方法により提供することを請求することができる。

Article 13第十三条

Withdrawal of Petition for Sender Identification Information Disclosure Order(発信者情報開示命令の申立ての取下げ)
Article 13, paragraph (1)

A petition for a sender identification information disclosure order may be withdrawn in whole or in part before a decision on the petition becomes final and binding; provided that, after any of the following decisions is made, withdrawal of the petition is invalid without the consent of the opposite party:

発信者情報開示命令の申立ては、当該申立てについての決定が確定するまで、その全部又は一部を取り下げることができる。ただし、当該申立ての取下げは、次に掲げる決定がされた後にあっては、相手方の同意を得なければ、その効力を生じない。

Article 13, paragraph (1), item (i)

a decision on the petition;

当該申立てについての決定

Article 13, paragraph (1), item (ii)

an order under the provisions of Article 15, paragraph (1) where the case of a sender identification information disclosure order pertaining to the petition is the primary matter.

当該申立てに係る発信者情報開示命令事件を本案とする第十五条第一項の規定による命令

Article 13, paragraph (2)

In the case that a petition for a sender identification information disclosure order is withdrawn, if the opposite party's consent is required for the withdrawal of the petition pursuant to the provisions of the proviso to the preceding paragraph, the court must notify the opposite party of the withdrawal of the petition; provided that, this does not apply if the petition is withdrawn orally on the date for proceedings of the case of the sender identification information disclosure order and if the opposite party appears on the required date.

発信者情報開示命令の申立ての取下げがあった場合において、前項ただし書の規定により当該申立ての取下げについて相手方の同意を要するときは、裁判所は、相手方に対し、当該申立ての取下げがあったことを通知しなければならない。ただし、当該申立ての取下げが発信者情報開示命令事件の手続の期日において口頭でされた場合において、相手方がその期日に出頭したときは、この限りでない。

Article 13, paragraph (3)

If the opposite party does not state an objection within two weeks from the day on which that party receives a notice pursuant to the provisions in the main text of the preceding paragraph, the opposite party is deemed to have consented to the withdrawal of the petition under the formal notice. The same applies in the case prescribed in the proviso to the relevant paragraph if the opposite party does not state an objection within two weeks from the day on which the petition is withdrawn.

前項本文の規定による通知を受けた日から二週間以内に相手方が異議を述べないときは、当該通知に係る申立ての取下げに同意したものとみなす。同項ただし書の規定による場合において、当該申立ての取下げがあった日から二週間以内に相手方が異議を述べないときも、同様とする。

Article 14第十四条

Action to Oppose a Decision on Petition for Sender Identification Information Disclosure Order(発信者情報開示命令の申立てについての決定に対する異議の訴え)
Article 14, paragraph (1)

A party who is dissatisfied with a decision on a petition for a sender identification information disclosure order (except for a decision to dismiss the petition on the ground that the petition is unlawful) may file an action to oppose the decision within an inalterable time frame of one month from the day on which the notice of the decision is received.

発信者情報開示命令の申立てについての決定(当該申立てを不適法として却下する決定を除く。)に不服がある当事者は、当該決定の告知を受けた日から一月の不変期間内に、異議の訴えを提起することができる。

Article 14, paragraph (2)

An action prescribed in the preceding paragraph is under the exclusive jurisdiction of the court which made the decision prescribed in the paragraph.

前項に規定する訴えは、同項に規定する決定をした裁判所の管轄に専属する。

Article 14, paragraph (3)

In a judgment on the action prescribed in paragraph (1), the court approves, modifies or withdraws the decision prescribed in the paragraph except if the action is dismissed on the ground that the action is unlawful.

第一項に規定する訴えについての判決においては、当該訴えを不適法として却下するときを除き、同項に規定する決定を認可し、変更し、又は取り消す。

Article 14, paragraph (4)

A judgment that approves or modifies the order prescribed in paragraph (1) and that orders the disclosure of sender identification information has the same effect in terms of compulsory execution as a judgment that orders payment.

第一項に規定する決定を認可し、又は変更した判決で発信者情報の開示を命ずるものは、強制執行に関しては、給付を命ずる判決と同一の効力を有する。

Article 14, paragraph (5)

If an action prescribed in paragraph (1) is not filed within the time frame prescribed in that paragraph or is dismissed, the decision prescribed in that paragraph with regard to the action has the same effect as the final and binding judgment.

第一項に規定する訴えが、同項に規定する期間内に提起されなかったとき、又は却下されたときは、当該訴えに係る同項に規定する決定は、確定判決と同一の効力を有する。

Article 14, paragraph (6)

In applying the provisions of Article 59, paragraph (1) of the Non-Contentious Case Procedures Act to the case if the court makes the decision prescribed in paragraph (1), the phrase "an immediate appeal may be filed" in Article 59, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Act is read as "an action of opposition may be filed".

裁判所が第一項に規定する決定をした場合における非訟事件手続法第五十九条第一項の規定の適用については、同項第二号中「即時抗告をする」とあるのは、「異議の訴えを提起する」とする。

Change 1 of 9
© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (Genjido 合同会社) · [email protected]ContactSourcesTermsPrivacy