Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

by 13 June 2028, on a day set by

Civil Enforcement Act

民事執行法(みんじしっこうほう)

Amended by

Act on the Arrangement of Related Acts to Promote the Use of Information and Communications Technology in Civil Procedures, etc.

民事関係手続等における情報通信技術の活用等の推進を図るための関係法律の整備に関する法律

The whole text as amended, on e-Gov

On a day set by , no later than 13 June 2028 — the amending law allows up to five years from . The exact day is not fixed yet.

The same amending law also changes

110 provisions changed · 38 provisions added · 14 provisions removed

Each provision the amendment changes, before and after in one: words it removes are struck through, words it adds are highlighted. The Japanese is the law; the icon beside each English column says whose English it is.

Article 15-2 · Special Provisions on Summons for the Date第十五条の二(期日の呼出しの特例)

  • RemovedArticle 15-2, paragraph (1)

    A summons for the date in a civil enforcement procedure is to be made by serving a writ of summons, announcing the date to a person who has appeared in connection with the case in question, or any other method found to be appropriate.

    民事執行の手続における期日の呼出しは、呼出状の送達、当該事件について出頭した者に対する期日の告知その他相当と認める方法によつてする。

  • RemovedArticle 15-2, paragraph (2)

    If a summons for the date is made by a method other than serving a writ of summons or announcing the date to a person who has appeared in connection with the case in question, no legal sanction or other disadvantage due to non-compliance with the date may be attributed to a person who does not appear on the date; however, this does not apply if that person has submitted a document stating that the person has received a summons for the date.

    呼出状の送達及び当該事件について出頭した者に対する期日の告知以外の方法による期日の呼出しをしたときは、期日に出頭しない者に対し、法律上の制裁その他期日の不遵守による不利益を帰することができない。ただし、その者が期日の呼出しを受けた旨を記載した書面を提出したときは、この限りでない。

Article 16 · (Special Provisions on Service)第十六条(送達の特例)

Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedArticle 16, paragraph (1)

    A person who has filed a petition, made an offer, or filed a notification with an enforcement court in connection with a civil enforcement procedure, or been served with a document or an electronic or magnetic record (meaning any record which is produced by electronic, magnetic or any other means unrecognizable by natural perceptive senses and is used for information processing by a computer; the same applies below) by an enforcement court in connection with a civil enforcement procedure must notify the enforcement court of the place (limited to within Japan) at whichif they are to be served with documents. In this case, the person may also notify the enforcement court of the designated person to be served.

    民事執行の手続について、執行裁判所に対し申立て、申出若しくは届出をし、又は執行裁判所から文書の若しくは電磁的記録(電子的方式、磁気的方式その他人の知覚によつては認識することができない方式で作られる記録であつて、電子計算機による情報処理の用に供されるものをいう。以下同じ。)の送達を受けた者は、書類の送達を受けるべき場所(日本国内に限る。)を執行裁判所に届け出なければならない。この場合においては、送達受取人をも届け出ることができる。

  • ChangedArticle 16, paragraph (3)

    Service on of documents about a person who has not filed a notification under the first sentence of paragraph (1) (excluding the person prescribed in Article 104, paragraph (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph) isare to be made at the person's domicile, residence, business office, or office that is indicated in the case record.

    第一項前段の規定による届出をしない者(前項において準用する民事訴訟法第百四条第三項に規定する者を除く。)に対する書類の送達は、事件の記録に表れたその者の住所、居所、営業所又は事務所においてする。

  • ChangedArticle 16, paragraph (4)

    If service under the preceding paragraph is to be effected but it is not possible to effect service pursuant to the provisions of Article 106 of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 20 (excluding when service is possible pursuant to the provisions of Article 109-2 of that Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 20), the court clerk may send the document to the domicile, residence, business office, or office referred to in the preceding paragraph by registered mail or using services for delivering correspondence that are prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (2) of the Act on Correspondence Delivery by Private Business Operators (Act No. 99 of 2002) that are provided by a general correspondence delivery provider prescribed in paragraph (6) of thatthe Article or specified correspondence delivery provider prescribed in paragraph (9) of thatthe Article and that are specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court as services equivalent to registered mail. In this case, the provisions of Article 107, paragraphs (2) and (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis.

    前項の規定による送達をすべき場合において、第二十条において準用する民事訴訟法第百六条の規定により送達をすることができないとき(第二十条において準用する同法第百九条の二の規定により送達をすることができるときを除く。)は、裁判所書記官は、同項の住所、居所、営業所又は事務所に宛てて、書類を書留郵便又は民間事業者による信書の送達に関する法律(平成十四年法律第九十九号)第二条第六項に規定する一般信書便事業者若しくは同条第九項に規定する特定信書便事業者の提供する同条第二項に規定する信書便の役務のうち書留郵便に準ずるものとして最高裁判所規則で定めるものに付して発送することができる。この場合においては、民事訴訟法第百七条第二項及び第三項の規定を準用する。

  • RemovedArticle 16, paragraph (5)

    Service by publication in a civil enforcement procedure is to be made by the court clerk keeping the document to be served and posting, on the court's bulletin board, a notice to the effect that the document is to be delivered to the person to be served at any time.

    民事執行の手続における公示送達は、裁判所書記官が送達すべき書類を保管し、いつでも送達を受けるべき者に交付すべき旨を裁判所の掲示場に掲示してする。

Article 17 · (Access to Non-Electronic or Magnetic Case Record)第十七条(非電磁的事件記録の閲覧等)

Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedCaption

    (Access to Case Records of Civil Enforcement CasesNon-Electronic or Magnetic Case Record)

    民事執行の事件の非電磁的事件記録の閲覧等

  • ChangedArticle 17, paragraph (1)

    An interested person, in connection with the civil enforcement that the enforcement court carries out, may file a request with the court clerk to inspect or copy the hard-copy case record, to be issued an authenticated copy, transcript, records (meaning the portion of a case record excluding the electronic or extract magnetic case record prescribed in paragraph (1) of the recordfollowing Article), or to be issued a certificate of matters relating to an authenticated copy, transcript, or extract of the caserecord.

    執行裁判所の行う民事執行について、利害関係を有する者は、裁判所書記官に対し、事件非電磁的事件記録(事件の記録中次条第一項に規定する電磁的事件記録を除いた部分をいう。)の閲覧若しくは謄写、又はその正本、謄本若しくは抄本の交付又は事件に関する事項の証明書の交付を請求することができる。

  • AddedArticle 17, paragraph (2)

    The provisions of Article 91, paragraphs (4) and (5) of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to requests made under the preceding paragraph.

    民事訴訟法第九十一条第四項及び第五項の規定は、前項の規定による請求について準用する。

Article 17-2 · (Access to Electronic or Magnetic Case Record)第十七条の二(電磁的事件記録の閲覧等)

Read it in the amended law
  • AddedArticle 17-2, paragraph (1)

    An interested person, in connection with the civil enforcement that the enforcement court carries out, may file a request with the court clerk pursuant to the provisions of the Rules of the Supreme Court to inspect the content of electronic or magnetic case records (meaning the portion of a case record relating to matters recorded in files stored on a computer (including input and output devices; the same applies below) used by the court pursuant to the provisions of this Act and other laws and regulations; the same applies in this Article) displayed in a manner prescribed by the Rules of the Supreme Court.

    執行裁判所の行う民事執行について、利害関係を有する者は、裁判所書記官に対し、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、電磁的事件記録(事件の記録中この法律その他の法令の規定により裁判所の使用に係る電子計算機(入出力装置を含む。以下同じ。)に備えられたファイルに記録された事項に係る部分をいう。以下この条において同じ。)の内容を最高裁判所規則で定める方法により表示したものの閲覧を請求することができる。

  • AddedArticle 17-2, paragraph (2)

    An interested person, in connection with the civil enforcement that the enforcement court carries out, may file a request with the court clerk, pursuant to the provisions of the Rules of the Supreme Court, to copy the matters recorded in electronic or magnetic case records by recording the matters in files stored on computers by using an electronic data processing system (meaning an electronic data processing system connecting a computer used by the court to a computer used by the other person of the procedure via a telecommunications line; the same applies below) or any other method prescribed by the Rules of the Supreme Court.

    執行裁判所の行う民事執行について、利害関係を有する者は、裁判所書記官に対し、電磁的事件記録に記録されている事項について、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、最高裁判所規則で定める電子情報処理組織(裁判所の使用に係る電子計算機と手続の相手方の使用に係る電子計算機とを電気通信回線で接続した電子情報処理組織をいう。以下同じ。)を使用してその者の使用に係る電子計算機に備えられたファイルに記録する方法その他の最高裁判所規則で定める方法による複写を請求することができる。

  • AddedArticle 17-2, paragraph (3)

    An interested person, in connection with the civil enforcement that the enforcement court carries out, may file a request with the court clerk, pursuant to the provisions of the Rules of the Supreme Court, to issue a document stating all or part of the matters recorded in electronic or magnetic case records as certified by the court clerk to contain information identical to the matters recorded in the electronic or magnetic record according to the methods prescribed by the Rules of the Supreme Court, or to provide an electronic or magnetic record containing all or part of the matters as certified by the court clerk to contain information identical to the matters recorded in the electronic or magnetic case records according to the methods prescribed by the Rules of the Supreme Court, by recording it in a file stored on a computer used by the person via an electronic data processing system prescribed by the Rules of the Supreme Court or any other method prescribed by the Rules of the Supreme Court.

    執行裁判所の行う民事執行について、利害関係を有する者は、裁判所書記官に対し、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、電磁的事件記録に記録されている事項の全部若しくは一部を記載した書面であつて裁判所書記官が最高裁判所規則で定める方法により当該書面の内容が電磁的事件記録に記録されている事項と同一であることを証明したものを交付し、又は当該事項の全部若しくは一部を記録した電磁的記録であつて裁判所書記官が最高裁判所規則で定める方法により当該電磁的記録の内容が電磁的事件記録に記録されている事項と同一であることを証明したものを最高裁判所規則で定める電子情報処理組織を使用してその者の使用に係る電子計算機に備えられたファイルに記録する方法その他の最高裁判所規則で定める方法により提供することを請求することができる。

  • AddedArticle 17-2, paragraph (4)

    The provisions of Article 91, paragraph (5) of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to requests made under paragraphs (1) and (2).

    民事訴訟法第九十一条第五項の規定は、第一項及び第二項の規定による請求について準用する。

Article 17-3 · (Certification of Matters Related to the Case)第十七条の三(事件に関する事項の証明)

Read it in the amended law
  • AddedArticle 17-3, paragraph (1)

    An interested person, in connection with the civil enforcement that the enforcement court carries out, may file a request with the court clerk, pursuant to the provisions of the Rules of the Supreme Court, to issue a document stating the matters related to the case as certified by the court clerk with respect to the matters according to the methods prescribed by the Rules of the Supreme Court, or to provide an electronic or magnetic record containing the matters as certified by the court clerk with respect to the matters according to the methods prescribed by the Rules of the Supreme Court, by recording it in a file stored on a computer used by the person via an electronic data processing system prescribed by the Rules of the Supreme Court or any other method prescribed by the Rules of the Supreme Court.

    執行裁判所の行う民事執行について、利害関係を有する者は、裁判所書記官に対し、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、事件に関する事項を記載した書面であつて裁判所書記官が最高裁判所規則で定める方法により当該事項を証明したものを交付し、又は当該事項を記録した電磁的記録であつて裁判所書記官が最高裁判所規則で定める方法により当該事項を証明したものを最高裁判所規則で定める電子情報処理組織を使用してその者の使用に係る電子計算機に備えられたファイルに記録する方法その他の最高裁判所規則で定める方法により提供することを請求することができる。

Article 19-2 · (Filing Motion or Statements with the Court Through Electronic Data Processing Systems)第十九条の二(裁判所に対する電子情報処理組織による申立て等)

Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedCaption

    (Filing MotionsMotion or Statements with the Court Through Electronic Data Processing Systems)

    裁判所に対する電子情報処理組織による申立て等

  • ChangedArticle 19-2, paragraph (1)

    A petition or other statement in aconnected with civil enforcement procedureproceedings (referred to as a "motion or statement" in this Article) that through Article 19-6) which, pursuant to the provisions of this Act or other laws and regulations concerning the motionpetition or other statement, is to be made filed or entered with the court (including those to be filed or entered with that court's presiding judge, authorized judge, commissioned judge, or court clerk) through a document or other tangible medium (meaning a document, transcript, extract, authenticated copy, or duplicate of a document, duplicate of a bill or note, or any other paper or other tangible object into which information that can be perceived with the human senses, as characters and shapes, has been entered; the same applies in the following paragraph and paragraph (4)below), and that is made to a court specifiedmay be filed or entered by the Supreme Court (including one maderecording in a file the matters to that court's presiding judge, authorized judge, commissioned judge, or court clerk), may be made, notwithstandingstated in the provisions of those laws and regulations, bydocument or other tangible medium using an electronic data processing system (meaning an electronic data processing system connecting a computer (including input and output devices; the same applies below) used by the courtsystems pursuant to a computer used by the person makingprovisions of the motion or statement via a telecommunications line) pursuant toRules of the Supreme Court, notwithstanding the provisions of the Rules of the Supreme Courtlaws and regulations.

    民事執行の手続における申立てその他の申述(以下この条から第十九条の六までにおいて「申立て等」という。)のうち、当該申立て等に関するこの法律その他の法令の規定により書面等(書面、書類、文書、謄本、抄本、正本、副本、複本その他文字、図形等人の知覚によつて認識することができる情報が記載された紙その他の有体物をいう。次項及び第四項において以下同じ。)をもつてするものとされているものであつて、最高裁判所の定める裁判所に対してするもの(当該裁判所の裁判長、受命裁判官、受託裁判官又は裁判所書記官に対してするものを含む。)については、当該法令の規定にかかわらず、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、電子情報処理組織(最高裁判所の使用に係る電子計算機(入出力装置を含む。以下同じ。)と申立て等をする者の使用に係る電子計算機とを電気通信回線で接続した規則で定める電子情報処理組織をいう。)を用いてする使用して当該書面等に記載すべき事項をファイルに記録する方法により行うことができる。

  • ChangedArticle 19-2, paragraph (2)

    With regard to a motion or statement made pursuant to theThe provisions of the preceding paragraph, the provisions of laws and regulations concerningArticle 132-10, paragraphs (2) through (6) of the motion or statement are applied by deeming itCode of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to have been made through the document or other tangible mediumpetitions and other statements filed by the method prescribed in the provisions of the laws and regulations concerningpreceding paragraph. In this case, the motion or statement that prescribe that the motion or statementterm "service" in Article 132-10, paragraph (5) and (6) is deemed to be made through a documentreplaced with "service or other tangible medium.delivery."

    前項民事訴訟法第百三十二条の十第二項から第六項までの規定によりされたは、前項の方法による申立て等については、当該申立て等を書面等をもつてするものとして規定した申立て等に関する法令の規定に規定する書面等をもつてされたものとみなして、当該申立て等に関する法令の規定を適用準用する。この場合において、同条第五項及び第六項中「送達」とあるのは、「送達又は送付」と読み替えるものとする。

  • RemovedArticle 19-2, paragraph (3)

    A motion or statement made pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) is deemed to have reached the court referred to in that paragraph at the time when it is recorded in a file stored on the computer used by that court.

    第一項の規定によりされた申立て等は、同項の裁判所の使用に係る電子計算機に備えられたファイルへの記録がされた時に、当該裁判所に到達したものとみなす。

  • RemovedArticle 19-2, paragraph (4)

    In the case referred to in paragraph (1), with regard to a motion or statement for which a signature, etc. (meaning signing, printing one's name, affixing one's seal, or otherwise stating one's name or trade name in a document or other tangible medium; the same applies below in this paragraph) is to be made pursuant to the provisions of other laws and regulations concerning the motion or statement, the person making the motion or statement must, notwithstanding the provisions of those laws and regulations, take measures to make clear the person's name or trade name in lieu of the signature, etc., pursuant to the provisions of the Rules of the Supreme Court.

    第一項の場合において、当該申立て等に関する他の法令の規定により署名等(署名、記名、押印その他氏名又は名称を書面等に記載することをいう。以下この項において同じ。)をすることとされているものについては、当該申立て等をする者は、当該法令の規定にかかわらず、当該署名等に代えて、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、氏名又は名称を明らかにする措置を講じなければならない。

  • RemovedArticle 19-2, paragraph (5)

    When a motion or statement made pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) has been recorded in the file prescribed in paragraph (3), the court referred to in paragraph (1) must output the details of the information recorded in the file in the form of a document.

    第一項の規定によりされた申立て等が第三項に規定するファイルに記録されたときは、第一項の裁判所は、当該ファイルに記録された情報の内容を書面に出力しなければならない。

  • RemovedArticle 19-2, paragraph (6)

    The inspection or copying of the case record, or the issuance of an authenticated copy, transcript, or extract of it, under the provisions of this Act or other laws and regulations in relation to a motion or statement made pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1), is to be made by means of the document referred to in the preceding paragraph. The same applies to the service or sending of documents relating to the motion or statement.

    第一項の規定によりされた申立て等に係るこの法律その他の法令の規定による事件の記録の閲覧若しくは謄写又はその正本、謄本若しくは抄本の交付は、前項の書面をもつてするものとする。当該申立て等に係る書類の送達又は送付も、同様とする。

Article 19-3 · (Special Provisions on Filing Petitions with the Court Through Electronic Data Processing Systems)第十九条の三(裁判所に対する電子情報処理組織による申立て等の特例)

Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedCaption

    Written Judgments(Special Provisions on Filing Petitions with the Court Through Electronic Data Processing Systems)

    裁判書所に対する電子情報処理組織による申立て等の特例

  • ChangedArticle 19-3, paragraph (1)

    When preparing a written judgment for a judicial decision concerningthe person stated in the following items files a civil enforcement procedure, petition or other statement with the written judgment must statecourt in relation to the main text, cases provided in the respective items (including petitions or other statement filed with that court's presiding judge, authorized judge, commissioned judge, or court clerk; the parties and statutory agents, and same applies in the following Article), that petition or other statement must be filed by the court relating to means prescribed in paragraph (1) of the judicial decisionpreceding Article; provided, however, that this does not apply when petitions or other statement that may be filed orally are, filed orally.

    民事執行の手続に関する裁判次の各号に掲げる者は、それぞれ当該各号に定める事件について、裁判所に対する申立て等(当該裁判所の裁判書を作成する場合には、当該裁判書には、当該裁判に係る主文、当事者及び法定代理人並びに裁判所を記載し長、受命裁判官、受託裁判官又は裁判所書記官に対するものを含む。次条において同じ。)をするときは、前条第一項の方法により、これを行わなければならない。ただし、口頭ですることができる申立て等について、口頭でするときは、この限りでない。

  • AddedArticle 19-3, paragraph (1), item (i)

    a representative who has been delegated a case (excluding a person who became a representative with approval pursuant to Article 13, paragraph (1) of this Act or the proviso to Article 54, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure):the delegated case;

    代理人のうち委任を受けたもの(第十三条第一項又は民事訴訟法第五十四条第一項ただし書の許可を得て代理人となつたものを除く。) 当該委任を受けた事件

  • AddedArticle 19-3, paragraph (1), item (ii)

    a person designated under Article 2, Article 5, paragraph (1), Article 6, paragraph (2), Article 6-2, paragraph (4) or (5), Article 6-3, paragraph (4) or (5), or Article 7, paragraph (3) of the Act on the Authority of the Minister of Justice over Suits Relating to the Interests of the State (Act No. 194 of 1947) (including cases where these provisions apply mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 9 of that Act):the case subject to the designation; and

    国の利害に関係のある訴訟についての法務大臣の権限等に関する法律(昭和二十二年法律第百九十四号)第二条、第五条第一項、第六条第二項、第六条の二第四項若しくは第五項、第六条の三第四項若しくは第五項又は第七条第三項の規定(これらの規定を同法第九条において準用する場合を含む。)による指定を受けた者 当該指定の対象となつた事件

  • AddedArticle 19-3, paragraph (1), item (iii)

    an official delegated under Article 153, paragraph (1) of the Local Autonomy Act (Act No. 67 of 1947):the delegated case.

    地方自治法(昭和二十二年法律第六十七号)第百五十三条第一項の規定による委任を受けた職員 当該委任を受けた事件

  • ChangedArticle 19-3, paragraph (2)

    When The provisions of Article 132-11, paragraph (2) of the written judgment referred Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to the person stated in the preceding paragraph is served, items of the preceding paragraph, and the service is to be made by an authenticated copy provisions of paragraph (3) of that Article apply mutatis mutandis tomotion or other statement prescribed in the main clause of that written judgmentthe preceding paragraph, respectively.

    前項の裁判書を送達する場合には、当該送達は、当該裁判書の正本によつて民事訴訟法第百三十二条の十一第二項の規定は前項各号に掲げる者について、同条第三項の規定は前項本文の申立て等について、それぞれ準用する。

Article 19-4 · (Filing a Motion or Statement Using a Paper Document)第十九条の四(書面等による申立て等)

Read it in the amended law
  • AddedArticle 19-4, paragraph (1)

    When a motion or statement is filed with the court by document or other tangible medium (unless it is filed in violation of the provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article) in a civil enforcement procedure, the court clerk must record in a file the matters detailed in that document or other tangible medium (excluding the matters prescribed in the following items in the cases stated in the respective items); provided, however, that this does not apply if there are circumstances that make it difficult to record these particulars in a file:

    民事執行の手続において、裁判所に対する申立て等が書面等により行われたとき(前条第一項の規定に違反して行われたときを除く。)は、裁判所書記官は、当該書面等に記載された事項(次の各号に掲げる場合における当該各号に定める事項を除く。)をファイルに記録しなければならない。ただし、当該事項をファイルに記録することにつき困難な事情があるときは、この限りでない。

  • AddedArticle 19-4, paragraph (1), item (i)

    if, regarding the document or other tangible medium to which that motion or statement pertains, a petition as referred to in Article 92, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure applicable mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 20 (limited to those filed because the grounds stated in item (ii) of that paragraph exist; the same applies in this item) is filed together with that motion or statement, and the use of a trade secret (meaning a trade secret prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (6) of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act (Act No. 47 of 1993); this applies in this item and paragraph (1), item (i) of the following Article) detailed in that document or other tangible medium for purposes other than that of conducting the procedure or the disclosure of that trade secret would be detrimental to the business activities carried out by a party based on that trade secret, and the court finds it to be particularly necessary to prevent this (unless the petition referred to in that paragraph is denied or a judicial decision revoking a ruling on the petition referred to in Article 92, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure applicable mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 20 becomes final and binding):the trade secret detailed in that document or other tangible medium;

    当該申立て等に係る書面等について、当該申立て等とともに第二十条において準用する民事訴訟法第九十二条第一項の申立て(同項第二号に掲げる事由があることを理由とするものに限る。以下この号において同じ。)がされた場合において、当該書面等に記載された営業秘密(不正競争防止法(平成五年法律第四十七号)第二条第六項に規定する営業秘密をいう。以下この号及び次条第一項第一号において同じ。)がその手続の追行の目的以外の目的で使用され、又は当該営業秘密が開示されることにより、当該営業秘密に基づく当事者の事業活動に支障を生ずるおそれがあり、これを防止するため裁判所が特に必要があると認めるとき(当該第二十条において準用する民事訴訟法第九十二条第一項の申立てが却下されたとき又は当該同項の申立てに係る決定を取り消す裁判が確定したときを除く。) 当該書面等に記載された営業秘密

  • AddedArticle 19-4, paragraph (1), item (ii)

    if a notification under Article 133, paragraph (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure applicable mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 20 is submitted by a document or other tangible medium:the matters detailed in that document or other tangible medium; and

    書面等により第二十条において準用する民事訴訟法第百三十三条第二項の規定による届出があつた場合 当該書面等に記載された事項

  • AddedArticle 19-4, paragraph (1), item (iii)

    if, regarding the document or other tangible medium to which that motion or statement pertains, a petition referred to in Article 133-2, paragraph (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure applicable mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 20 is filed together with that motion or statement and the court finds it to be necessary (unless the petition referred to in that paragraph is denied or a judicial decision revoking a ruling on the petition referred to in that paragraph becomes final and binding):the part containing concealed information prescribed in that paragraph which is detailed in that document or other tangible medium.

    当該申立て等に係る書面等について、当該申立て等とともに第二十条において準用する民事訴訟法第百三十三条の二第二項の申立てがされた場合において、裁判所が必要があると認めるとき(当該同項の申立てが却下されたとき又は当該同項の申立てに係る決定を取り消す裁判が確定したときを除く。) 当該書面等に記載された同項に規定する秘匿事項記載部分

  • AddedArticle 19-4, paragraph (2)

    The provisions of Article 132-12, paragraphs (2) and (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to service or delivery of a motion or statement with the court by a document or other tangible medium when the matters stated in the document or other tangible medium are recorded in a file pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph.

    民事訴訟法第百三十二条の十二第二項及び第三項の規定は、前項の規定により書面等に記載された事項がファイルに記録された場合における当該書面等による裁判所に対する申立て等に係る送達又は送付について準用する。

Article 19-5 · ( Recording the Information Detailed in Paper Documents into the Court's Computer Files)第十九条の五(書面等に記録された事項のファイルへの記録等)

Read it in the amended law
  • AddedArticle 19-5, paragraph (1)

    A court clerk must file the matters recorded in a document or other tangible medium or recorded on a recording medium storing electronic or magnetic records submitted to the court pursuant to the provisions of this Act or any other laws and regulations in civil enforcement proceedings, in addition to documents or other tangible medium concerning a motion or statement prescribed in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article (excluding the particulars prescribed in the following items in the cases stated in the respective items).;provided, however, that this does not apply if there are circumstances that make it difficult to record these particulars in a file:

    裁判所書記官は、前条第一項に規定する申立て等に係る書面等のほか、民事執行の手続においてこの法律その他の法令の規定に基づき裁判所に提出された書面等又は電磁的記録を記録した記録媒体に記載され、又は記録されている事項(次の各号に掲げる場合における当該各号に定める事項を除く。)をファイルに記録しなければならない。ただし、当該事項をファイルに記録することにつき困難な事情があるときは、この限りでない。

  • AddedArticle 19-5, paragraph (1), item (i)

    if, regarding the document or other tangible medium or recording medium, a petition referred to in Article 92, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure applicable mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 20 is filed together with these submissions, and the use of a trade secret detailed or recorded in that document or other tangible medium or recording medium for purposes other than the purpose of conducting the procedure or the disclosure of that trade secret would be detrimental to the business activities carried out by a party based on that trade secret, and the court finds it to be particularly necessary in order to prevent this(unless the petition is denied or a judicial decision revoking a ruling on the petition becomes final and binding):the trade secret detailed or recorded in that document or other tangible medium or recording medium;

    当該書面等又は当該記録媒体について、これらの提出とともに第二十条において準用する民事訴訟法第九十二条第一項の申立て(同項第二号に掲げる事由があることを理由とするものに限る。)がされた場合において、当該書面等若しくは当該記録媒体に記載され、若しくは記録された営業秘密がその手続の追行の目的以外の目的で使用され、又は当該営業秘密が開示されることにより、当該営業秘密に基づく当事者の事業活動に支障を生ずるおそれがあり、これを防止するため裁判所が特に必要があると認めるとき(当該申立てが却下されたとき又は当該申立てに係る決定を取り消す裁判が確定したときを除く。) 当該書面等又は当該記録媒体に記載され、又は記録された営業秘密

  • AddedArticle 19-5, paragraph (1), item (ii)

    if a notification under Article 133, paragraph (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure applicable mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 20 is submitted through a recording medium:the matters detailed on that recording medium;

    当該記録媒体を提出する方法により第二十条において準用する民事訴訟法第百三十三条第二項の規定による届出があつた場合 当該記録媒体に記録された事項

  • AddedArticle 19-5, paragraph (1), item (iii)

    if, regarding the document or other tangible medium or recording medium, a petition referred to in Article 133-2, paragraph (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure applicable mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 20 is filed together with these submissions, and the court finds it to be necessary (unless the petition is denied or a judicial decision revoking a ruling on the petition becomes final and binding):the part containing concealed information prescribed in that paragraph which is detailed or recorded in that document or other tangible medium or recording medium; and

    当該書面等又は当該記録媒体について、これらの提出とともに第二十条において準用する民事訴訟法第百三十三条の二第二項の申立てがされた場合において、裁判所が必要があると認めるとき(当該申立てが却下されたとき又は当該申立てに係る決定を取り消す裁判が確定したときを除く。) 当該書面等又は当該記録媒体に記載され、又は記録された同項に規定する秘匿事項記載部分

  • AddedArticle 19-5, paragraph (1), item (iv)

    if a decision under Article 133-3, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure applicable mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 20 is made and the court finds it to be necessary (unless a judicial decision revoking a ruling on the petition becomes final and binding):the matters detailed in documents or other tangible medium or recorded on a recording medium storing an electronic or magnetic record of the decision.

    第二十条において準用する民事訴訟法第百三十三条の三第一項の規定による決定があつた場合において、裁判所が必要があると認めるとき(当該決定を取り消す裁判が確定したときを除く。) 当該決定に係る書面等及び電磁的記録を記録した記録媒体に記載され、又は記録された事項

  • AddedArticle 19-5, paragraph (2)

    The provisions of Article 132-12, paragraphs (2) and (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to service or delivery of a document or other tangible medium or a recording medium storing an electronic or magnetic record of the matters stated or recorded in the document or other tangible medium or recording medium storing an electronic or magnetic record are recorded in a file pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph.

    民事訴訟法第百三十二条の十二第二項及び第三項の規定は、前項の規定により書面等又は電磁的記録を記録した記録媒体に記載され、又は記録されている事項がファイルに記録された場合における当該書面等又は当該記録媒体に記録された電磁的記録に係る送達又は送付について準用する。

Article 19-6 · (Motion or Statement to a Court Enforcement Officer)第十九条の六(執行官に対する申立て等)

Read it in the amended law
  • AddedArticle 19-6, paragraph (1)

    The provisions of Articles 19-2 through 19-4 apply mutatis mutandis to a motion or statement filed with a court enforcement officer, and the provisions of the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis to a document or other tangible medium or a recording medium storing an electronic or magnetic record submitted to a court enforcement officer pursuant to the provisions of this Act of other laws and regulations in a civil enforcement procedure, respectively. In this case, the term "file" in Article 19-2, paragraph (1), Article 19-4, and the preceding Article is deemed to be replaced with "file stored on a computer (including input and output devices) used by the court enforcement officer," and the phrase "excluding a person who became a representative with approval pursuant to Article 13, paragraph (1) of this Act or the proviso to Article 54, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure" in Article 19-3, paragraph (1), item (i) is deemed to be replaced with "limited to attorneys at law."

    第十九条の二から第十九条の四までの規定は執行官に対する申立て等について、前条の規定は民事執行の手続においてこの法律その他の法令の規定に基づき執行官に提出された書面等又は電磁的記録を記録した記録媒体について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第十九条の二第一項、第十九条の四及び前条中「ファイル」とあるのは「執行官の使用に係る電子計算機(入出力装置を含む。)に備えられたファイル」と、第十九条の三第一項第一号中「第十三条第一項又は民事訴訟法第五十四条第一項ただし書の許可を得て代理人となつたものを除く」とあるのは「弁護士に限る」と読み替えるものとする。

Article 20 · (Application Mutatis Mutandis of the Code of Civil Procedure)第二十条(民事訴訟法の準用)

Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedArticle 20, paragraph (1)

    Except where there are special provisionsUnless otherwise provided, and unless contrary to its nature, the provisions of Part I1 through Part IV4 of the Code of Civil Procedure (excluding Article 71, paragraph (2), Article 91-2, Article 92, paragraphs (9) and (10), Article 92-2, paragraph (2), Article 94, Article 100, paragraph (2), Part I, Chapter V, Section 4, Subsection 3, Article 111, Part I, Chapter VII, Article 133-2, paragraphs (5) and (6), Article 133-3, paragraph (2), Article 151, paragraph (3), Article 160, paragraph (2), Article 185, paragraph (3),apply mutatis mutandis to civil enforcement procedures. In this case, the phrase "the items of Article 205132-11, paragraph (2), Article 215, paragraph (2),1)" in Article 227109-4, paragraph (2), and Article 232-2 1) of that Code) apply mutatis mutandis to a civil enforcement procedure to the extent that they are not contraryCode of Civil Procedure is deemed to its nature. In this case, the words listed in be replaced with "the middle columnitems of Appended Table 1 in the provisionsArticle 19-3, paragraph (1) of that Code listed in the upper column of that table are deemed to beCivil Enforcement Act (including as replaced with the words listed in the lower column of that table, respectively.and applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 19-6)."

    特別の定めがある場合を除き、民事執行の手続に関しては、その性質に反しない限り、民事訴訟法第一編から第四編までの規定(同法第七十一条第二項、第九十一条の二、第九十二条第九項及び第十項、第九十二条の二第二項、第九十四条、第百条第二項、第一編第五章第四節第三款、第百十一条、第一編第七章、第百三十三条の二第五項及び第六項、を準用する。この場合において、同法第百九条の四第一項中「第百三十三条の三第二項、第百五十一条第三項、第百六十条第二項、第百八十五条第三項、第二百五条第二項、第二百十五条第二項、第二百二十七条第二項並びに第二百三十二条の二の規定を除く。)を二条の十一第一項各号」とあるのは、「民事執行法第十九条の三第一項各号(同法第十九条の六において読み替えて準用する。この場合において、別表第一の上欄に掲げる同法の規定中同表の中欄に掲げる字句は、それぞれ同表の下欄に掲げる字句に場合を含む。)」と読み替えるものとする。

Article 21-2 · Special Provisions on Enforcement-Related Action Procedures in a Family Court第二十一条の二(家庭裁判所における執行関係訴訟手続に関する特例)

  • RemovedArticle 21-2, paragraph (1)

    With regard to the procedure for a case relating to an action under Article 24 or Articles 33 through 35 that falls under the jurisdiction of a family court (referred to as "enforcement-related action procedure in a family court" in this Article), the provisions of Article 71, paragraph (2), Article 91-2, Article 92, paragraphs (9) and (10), Article 92-2, paragraph (2), Article 94, Article 100, paragraph (2), Part I, Chapter V, Section 4, Subsection 3, Article 111, Article 132-6, paragraph (3), Part I, Chapter VII, Article 133-2, paragraphs (5) and (6), Article 133-3, paragraph (2), Article 151, paragraph (3), Article 160, paragraph (2), Article 161, paragraph (3), item (iii), Article 185, paragraph (3), Article 205, paragraph (2), Article 215, paragraph (2), Article 227, paragraph (2), Article 232-2, Article 253, paragraph (2), and Article 267, paragraph (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, and Part VII of that Code, do not apply.

    第二十四条又は第三十三条から第三十五条までの訴えに係る事件であつて、家庭裁判所の管轄に属するものに関する手続(以下この条において「家庭裁判所における執行関係訴訟手続」という。)については、民事訴訟法第七十一条第二項、第九十一条の二、第九十二条第九項及び第十項、第九十二条の二第二項、第九十四条、第百条第二項、第一編第五章第四節第三款、第百十一条、第百三十二条の六第三項、第一編第七章、第百三十三条の二第五項及び第六項、第百三十三条の三第二項、第百五十一条第三項、第百六十条第二項、第百六十一条第三項第三号、第百八十五条第三項、第二百五条第二項、第二百十五条第二項、第二百二十七条第二項、第二百三十二条の二、第二百五十三条第二項、第二百六十七条第二項並びに第七編の規定は、適用しない。

  • RemovedArticle 21-2, paragraph (2)

    With regard to the application of the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure to an enforcement-related action procedure in a family court, the words listed in the middle column of Appended Table 2 in the provisions of that Code listed in the upper column of that table are to be the words listed in the lower column of that table, respectively.

    家庭裁判所における執行関係訴訟手続における民事訴訟法の規定の適用については、別表第二の上欄に掲げる同法の規定中同表の中欄に掲げる字句は、それぞれ同表の下欄に掲げる字句とする。

  • RemovedArticle 21-2, paragraph (3)

    The provisions of Article 15-2, Article 16, paragraph (5) and Article 19-2 apply mutatis mutandis to an enforcement-related action procedure in a family court.

    第十五条の二、第十六条第五項及び第十九条の二の規定は、家庭裁判所における執行関係訴訟手続について準用する。

Article 22 · (Titles of Obligation)第二十二条(債務名義)

Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedArticle 22, paragraph (1), item (vi-3)

    an order for interim measures prescribed in Article 4850 of the Arbitration Act (Act No. 138 of 2003) for which an enforcement approval order has become final and binding;

    確定した執行等認可決定のある仲裁法(平成十五年法律第百三十八号)第四十八五十条に規定する暫定保全措置命令

Article 30 · (Judicial Enforcement in Situations Involving the Arrival of a Fixed Due Date or Provision of Security)第三十条(期限の到来又は担保の提供に係る場合の強制執行)

Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedArticle 30, paragraph (2)

    Judicial enforcement based on a title of obligation that establishes provision of security as a condition for implementing judicial enforcement may begin only once the obligee produces a document or electronic or magnetic record proving that the obligee has provided security.

    担保を立てることを強制執行の実施の条件とする債務名義による強制執行は、債権者が担保を立てたことを証する文書又は電磁的記録を提出したときに限り、開始することができる。

Article 39 · (Stay of Judicial Enforcement)第三十九条(強制執行の停止)

Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedArticle 39, paragraph (1)

    Judicial enforcement must be stayed if any of the following documents or electronic or magnetic records has been submitted:

    強制執行は、次に掲げる文書又は電磁的記録の提出があつたときは、停止しなければならない。

  • ChangedArticle 39, paragraph (1), item (iv)

    an authenticated copy of a record, or a certificate of recorded information of an electronica record (meaning anor electronic record prescribed in Article 160, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure; the same applies in Article 167-2, paragraph (1), item (iv)), of a judicial settlement or mediation in which it is indicated that the obligation will not be enforced or that the petition for enforcement is withdrawn;

    強制執行をしない旨又はその申立てを取り下げる旨を記載した裁判上の和解又は調停の調書の正本又は電子調書(民事訴訟法第百六十条第一項に規定する電子調書をいう。第百六十七条の二第一項第四号において同じ。)の記録事項証明書

  • ChangedArticle 39, paragraph (1), item (iv-2)

    an authenticated copy of a record of mediation,a written tribunal decision or of aan electronically written tribunal decision of a labor(meaning an electronic tribunal decision that has the same effect as a judicial settlement pursuant to the provisions ofdocument prescribed in Article 2120, paragraph (43) of the Labor Tribunal Act (Act No. 45 of 2004) or) of the record referred to in Article 20, paragraph (7) of that Act, indicating a labor tribunal decision that has the same effect as a judicial settlement in which it is indicated that the obligation will not be enforced or that the petition for enforcement is withdrawn, or an authenticated copy or certificate of recorded information of a record or electronic record containing a statement or record of the main text of the order and an outline of the reasons for a labor tribunal decision made by making an oral announcement in lieu of preparing these items;

    強制執行をしない旨又はその申立てを取り下げる旨を記載した調停の調書又は裁判上の和解と同一の効力を有する労働審判の審判書若しくは電子審判書(労働審判法(平成十六年法律第四十五号)第二十一条第四項の規定により裁判上の和解と同一の効力を有する条第三項に規定する電子審判書をいう。)又はこれらの作成に代えて口頭で告知する方法により行われた労働審判の審判主文及び理由の要旨を記載し、若しくは記録した調書若しくは同法第二十条第七項の電子調書の正本又は記録事項証明書

  • ChangedArticle 39, paragraph (1), item (v)

    a document or electronic or magnetic record proving that security for avoiding judicial enforcement has been provided;

    強制執行を免れるための担保を立てたことを証する文書又は電磁的記録

  • ChangedArticle 39, paragraph (1), item (viii)

    a document or electronic or magnetic record indicating or recording that, after the establishment of a title of obligation, the obligee has had their claim satisfied or consented to granting a grace period for performance.

    債権者が、債務名義の成立後に、弁済を受け、又は弁済の猶予を承諾した旨を記載し、又は記録した文書又は電磁的記録

  • ChangedArticle 39, paragraph (2)

    A stay of judicial enforcement based on submission of a document or electronic or magnetic record stated in item (viii) of the preceding paragraph which contains or records a statement that an obligee received performance is limited to a period of four weeks.

    前項第八号に掲げる文書又は電磁的記録のうち弁済を受けた旨を記載し、又は記録した文書又は電磁的記録の提出による強制執行の停止は、四週間に限るものとする。

  • ChangedArticle 39, paragraph (3)

    A stay of judicial enforcement based on submission of a document or electronic or magnetic record stated in paragraph (1), item (viii) which contains or records a statement that an obligee consented to granting a grace period forof performance that may only be effected only twice, and the total period maydoes not exceed six months.

    第一項第八号に掲げる文書又は電磁的記録のうち弁済の猶予を承諾した旨を記載し、又は記録した文書又は電磁的記録の提出による強制執行の停止は、二回に限り、かつ、通じて六月を超えることができない。

  • AddedArticle 39, paragraph (4)

    If a document (excluding a certificate of recorded information) stated in paragraph (1), item (iii) should be submitted pursuant to the provisions of that paragraph, a person seeking to submit a petition to stay enforcement may, pursuant to the provisions of the Rules of the Supreme Court, submit the information prescribed in the Rules of the Supreme Court as the information necessary to identify the case concerning which the grounds prescribed in the item have arisen in lieu of submitting the document. In this case, that person is deemed to have submitted the relevant document.

    第一項の規定により同項第三号に掲げる文書(記録事項証明書を除く。)を提出すべき場合には、強制執行の停止の申立てをしようとする者は、当該文書の提出に代えて、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、同号の事由が生じた事件を特定するために必要な情報として最高裁判所規則で定めるものを提供することができる。この場合において、当該者は、当該文書を提出したものとみなす。

Article 40 · (Voiding an Enforcement Disposition)第四十条(執行処分の取消し)

Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedArticle 40, paragraph (1)

    If a document or electronic or magnetic record stated in paragraph (1), itemsitem (i) through (vi) of the preceding Article has been submitted, the enforcement court or court enforcement officer must void even an enforcement measuredisposition that has already been taken.

    前条第一項第一号から第六号までに掲げる文書又は電磁的記録が提出されたときは、執行裁判所又は執行官は、既にした執行処分をも取り消さなければならない。

Article 42 · (Sharing of Enforcement Costs)第四十二条(執行費用の負担)

Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedArticle 42, paragraph (4)

    The portion of the enforcement cost to be borne by an obligor pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1), other than (excluding costs that were collected pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2), ; the same applies in the following paragraph and paragraph (7)) and the amount of money to be returned by an obligee pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph are established by a court clerk of the enforcement court, upon petition.

    第一項の規定により債務者が負担すべき執行費用で(第二項の規定により取り立てられたもの以外のものを除く。次項及び第七項において同じ。)及び前項の規定により債権者が返還すべき金銭の額は、申立てにより、執行裁判所の裁判所書記官が定める。

  • ChangedArticle 42, paragraph (5)

    A person may file an objection withpetition prescribed in the enforcement court to the court clerk's disposition concerning a petition underpreceding paragraph must be filed within 10 years from the preceding paragraph, within an inalterable period of one week fromday stated in the following items in accordance with the day on whichcategories of the person is notified of it.amounts stated in the respective items:

    前項の申立てについての裁判所書記官の処分に対しては、その告知を受けたは、次の各号に掲げる額の区分に応じ、それぞれ当該各号に定める日から一週間の不変期間内に、執行裁判所に異議を申し立てることができる十年以内にしなければならない。

  • AddedArticle 42, paragraph (5), item (i)

    the amount of the enforcement cost prescribed in the preceding paragraph:the day on which the judicial enforcement proceedings are completed; or

    前項に規定する執行費用の額 強制執行の手続の終了の日

  • AddedArticle 42, paragraph (5), item (ii)

    the amount of money to be returned prescribed in the preceding paragraph:the day on which the judicial decision or judgment prescribed in paragraph (3) becomes final and binding.

    前項に規定する返還すべき金銭の額 第三項に規定する裁判又は判決が確定した日

  • ChangedArticle 42, paragraph (6)

    If the enforcement court finds there to be grounds A person may file an objection with the enforcement court to the filing of an objection tocourt clerk's disposition concerning a court clerk's disposition underpetition referred to in paragraph (4), and the enforcement cost and the amountwithin an inalterable period of money to be returned prescribed in that paragraph are required to be established,one week from the day on which the court must establish those amounts itselfperson is notified of those measures.

    執行裁判所は、第四項の規定による申立てについての裁判所書記官の処分に対する異議の申立てを理由があると認める場合において、同項に規定する執行費用及び返還すべき金銭の額を定めるべきときは、自らその額を定めなければならないしては、その告知を受けた日から一週間の不変期間内に、執行裁判所に異議を申し立てることができる。

  • ChangedArticle 42, paragraph (7)

    An appeal against anIf the enforcement decision may be filed against an order oncourt finds there to be grounds to the filing of an objection to a court clerk's disposition under paragraph (4), and the provisions enforcement cost and the amount of money to be returned prescribed in that paragraph (5)are required to be established, the court must establish those amounts itself.

    第五執行裁判所は、第四項の規定による裁判所書記官の処分に対する異議の申立てについての決定に対しては、執行抗告をすることができるを理由があると認める場合において、同項に規定する執行費用及び返還すべき金銭の額を定めるべきときは、自らその額を定めなければならない。

  • ChangedArticle 42, paragraph (8)

    A court clerk's disposition under paragraph (4) does not become effective until it becomes final and bindingAn appeal may be filed against a ruling on the objection under paragraph (6).

    第四六項の規定による裁判所書記官の処分は、確定しなければその効力を生じない異議の申立てについての決定に対しては、執行抗告をすることができる。

  • ChangedArticle 42, paragraph (9)

    The provisions of Article 74, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to aA court clerk's disposition under paragraph (4). In this case, the provisions of paragraphs (5) and (7) and the preceding paragraph, does not become effective until it becomes final and of Article 74, paragraph (3) of that Code, apply mutatis mutandisbinding.

    民事訴訟法第七十四条第一第四項の規定は、第四項の規定による裁判所書記官の処分について準用する。この場合においては、第五項、第七項及び前項並びに同条第三項の規定を準用するは、確定しなければその効力を生じない。

  • AddedArticle 42, paragraph (10)

    The provisions of Article 74, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis to a court clerk's disposition under paragraph (4). In this case, the provisions of paragraph (6), paragraph (8), the preceding paragraph and Article 74, paragraph (3) apply mutatis mutandis.

    民事訴訟法第七十四条第一項の規定は、第四項の規定による裁判所書記官の処分について準用する。この場合においては、第六項、第八項及び前項並びに同条第三項の規定を準用する。

Article 48 · (Commissioning the Registration of a Seizure)第四十八条(差押えの登記の嘱託等)

Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedArticle 48, paragraph (2)

    When aA registrar has must, when having made registration of a seizure based on a commission under the preceding paragraph, notify the registrar must send a certificate enforcement court to that effect and of registered information of that registration to the matters prescribed in the Rules of the enforcement courtSupreme Court.

    登記官は、前項の規定による嘱託に基づいて差押えの登記をしたときは、その登記事項証明書旨及び最高裁判所規則で定める事項を執行裁判所に送付通知しなければならない。

Article 49 · (Public Notice of a Commencement Order and the Deadline for a Distribution Demand)第四十九条(開始決定及び配当要求の終期の公告等)

Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedArticle 49, paragraph (1)

    When a seizure associated with an order commencing compulsory auctioncompulsory-auction proceedings becomes effective (unless another order commencing compulsory auctioncompulsory-auction proceedings or auction proceedings has been issued before the commencement order in question), the court clerk must set a deadline for any distribution demands by taking into consideration the period required for the procedure for preparation of the electronic description of property (meaning an electronic description of property prescribed in Article 62, paragraph (2)).

    強制競売の開始決定に係る差押えの効力が生じた場合(その開始決定前に強制競売又は競売の開始決定がある場合を除く。)においては、裁判所書記官は、電子物件明細書(第六十二条第二項に規定する電子物件明細書をいう。)の作成までの手続に要する期間を考慮して、配当要求の終期を定めなければならない。

Article 51 · (Distribution Demand)第五十一条(配当要求)

Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedArticle 51, paragraph (1)

    An obligee that has an authenticated copy of a title of obligation based on which judicial enforcement may be implemented pursuant to the provisions of Article 25 (referred to as an "authenticated copy of an enforceable title of obligation" below),; an obligee effecting a provisional seizure that was who has been registered after the registration of the seizure resulting from an order commencing compulsory auction proceedings, and ; an obligee who has a registered (excluding provisional registration) general statutory lien; or an obligee who has proved that the obligee has a general statutory lien by based on any of the documents stated in the items of or electronic or magnetic records stated in Article 181, paragraph (1) , item (ii) may demand distribution.

    第二十五条の規定により強制執行を実施することができる債務名義の正本(以下「執行力のある債務名義の正本」という。)を有する債権者、強制競売の開始決定に係る差押えの登記後に登記された仮差押債権者、登記(仮登記を除く。)がされた一般の先取特権を有する債権者及び第百八十一条第一項各第二号に掲げる文書又は電磁的記録により一般の先取特権を有することを証明した債権者は、配当要求をすることができる。

Article 62 · (Electronic Property Description)第六十二条(電子物件明細書)

Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedCaption

    Description of(Electronic Property Description)

    電子物件明細書

  • ChangedArticle 62, paragraph (1)

    AThe court clerk must prepare a description, for the sale of immovable property stating , prepare an electronic or magnetic record in advance in which the matters stated in the following matters.items are recorded pursuant to the provisions of the Rules of the Supreme Court and record that record in a file:

    裁判所書記官は、不動産の売却をするには、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、あらかじめ次に掲げる事項を記載した物件明細書録した電磁的記録を作成し、これをファイルに記録しなければならない。

  • ChangedArticle 62, paragraph (2)

    A court clerk must keep a copy of document prepared by outputting the matters recorded in the electronic description of property under(meaning the electronic or magnetic record recorded to a file pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph ; the same applies in this paragraph and Article 71, item (vii)) at the enforcement court and take measures to make it available for public inspection, take the measures to put those matters in a condition where they can be viewed on the screen of a computer installed at the court, or take athe measure specified by the Rules of the Supreme Court as one by whichfor enabling many and unspecified persons can be provided withto access the contents of thatthe relevant electronic description of property.

    裁判所書記官は、前項の電子物件明細書の写し(前項の規定によりファイルに記録された電磁的記録をいう。以下この項及び第七十一条第七号において同じ。)に記録されている事項を出力することにより作成した書面を執行裁判所に備え置いて一般の閲覧に供し、する措置、当該事項を裁判所に設置した電子計算機の映像面に表示したものの閲覧をすることができる状態に置く措置又は不特定多数の者が当該電子物件明細書の内容の提供を受けることができるものとして最高裁判所規則で定める措置を講じなければならない。

Article 64 · (Sales Method and Public Notice)第六十四条(売却の方法及び公告)

Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedArticle 64, paragraph (4)

    In the case referred to inof the preceding paragraph, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 93, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 20,court clerk must, simultaneously with a disposition to have a sale implemented, designate the period for the court clerk is to designateexpression of opinions pursuant to the date for the ruling on the sale atprovisions of Article 70, paragraph (1) and the same time asday on which the disposition ordering the sale to be implementedruling specified in Article 69, paragraph (1) is rendered.

    前項の場合においては、第二十条において準用する民事訴訟法第九十三条第一項の規定にかかわらず、売却決定期日は、、裁判所書記官がは、売却を実施させる旨の処分と同時に指定する、第七十条第一項の規定により意見を陳述すべき期間及び第六十九条第一項の決定をする日を指定しなければならない。

Article 69 · (Ruling on a Sale)第六十九条(売却決定)

Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedCaption

    Date for the (Ruling on thea Sale)

    売却決定期日

  • ChangedArticle 69, paragraph (1)

    TheAn enforcement court must hold the date for the ruling on the sale and announce whetherrule to permit or not to permit thethat sale.

    執行裁判所は、売却決定期日を開き、売却の許可又は不許可を言い渡さの決定をしなければならない。

  • AddedArticle 69, paragraph (2)

    A ruling specified in the preceding paragraph must be done by preparing an electronic ruling (meaning an electronic or magnetic record prepared pursuant to the provisions of Article 252, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 122 of that Code applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 20; the same applies in Article 190, paragraph (1), item (iii)), pursuant to the provisions of the Rules of the Supreme Court.

    前項の決定は、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、電子決定書(第二十条において準用する民事訴訟法第百二十二条において準用する同法第二百五十二条第一項の規定により作成される電磁的記録をいう。第百九十条第一項第三号において同じ。)を作成してしなければならない。

Article 70 · (Statement of Opinions on Permitting or Not Permitting a Sale)第七十条(売却の許可又は不許可に関する意見の陳述)

Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedArticle 70, paragraph (1)

    A person who has an interest in whether athe sale of immovable property isbeing permitted or not permitted may state their opinion, at the date for the ruling on the sale, regarding any of the grounds stated in the items of the following Article that affect their rights.

    不動産の売却の許可又は不許可に関し利害関係を有する者は、次条各号に掲げる事由で自己の権利に影響のあるものについて、売却決定期日において意見を陳述することができる。

  • AddedArticle 70, paragraph (2)

    Statements of opinion under the preceding paragraph must be made in writing within the period designated in accordance with the provisions of Article 64, paragraph (4).

    前項の規定による意見の陳述は、第六十四条第四項の規定により指定された期間内に、書面でしなければならない。

Article 71 · (Grounds for Not Permitting a Sale)第七十一条(売却不許可事由)

Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedArticle 71, paragraph (1), item (vii)

    there is a serious error in the determinationan order of the standard sales price or of a, an order of package sale, in the preparation of the an electronic description of property, or in the procedures for those;procedure of that order or preparation; or

    売却基準価額若しくは一括売却の決定、電子物件明細書の作成又はこれらの手続に重大な誤りがあること。

Article 72 · (Measures for When a Judicial Decision to Stay Enforcement Has Been Submitted After Sale Procedures Have Finished Being Implemented)第七十二条(売却の実施の終了後に執行停止の裁判等の提出があつた場合の措置)

Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedArticle 72, paragraph (1)

    If athe document stated in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (vii) has been submitted during the period from when the implementation of a sale has endedsale procedures have finished being implemented until the date for the ruling on the sale endsruling to permit or not permit a sale, the enforcement court may not hold the date for the ruling on therule to permit or not permit a sale, unless it will issue an orderrule not permittingto permit the sale based on different grounds. In this case, the highest bidder or the next highest bidder may make a filing with the enforcement court rescinding their purchase offer.

    売却の実施の終了から売却決定期日の終了の許可又は不許可の決定までの間に第三十九条第一項第七号に掲げる文書の提出があつた場合には、執行裁判所は、他の事由により売却不許可決定をするときを除き、売却決定期日を開くの許可又は不許可の決定をすることができない。この場合においては、最高価買受申出人又は次順位買受申出人は、執行裁判所に対し、買受けの申出を取り消すことができる。

  • ChangedArticle 72, paragraph (2)

    If athe document prescribed in the preceding paragraph has been submitted after the date for the ruling on the sale has endedruling to permit or not permit a sale, the provisions of Article 39 apply only if the order permitting a ruling to permit the sale made on that date has beenis set aside or has ceased to be effective, or the order a ruling to not permittingpermit the sale made on that date has becomebecame final and binding.

    売却決定期日の終了の許可又は不許可の決定後に前項に規定する文書の提出があつた場合には、その期日にされた売却許可決定が取り消され、若しくは効力を失つたとき、又はその期日にされた売却不許可決定が確定したときに限り、第三十九条の規定を適用する。

  • ChangedArticle 72, paragraph (3)

    If athe document or electronic or magnetic record stated in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (viii) is submitted after the implementation of the sale has endedsale procedures have finished being implemented, the provisions of that Article apply only if the order permitting the sale in relationruling to permit that sale has beenis set aside or has ceasedceases to be effective, or the order not permitting the sale in relation toruling to not permit that sale has become final and binding.

    売却の実施の終了後に第三十九条第一項第八号に掲げる文書又は電磁的記録の提出があつた場合には、その売却に係る売却許可決定が取り消され、若しくは効力を失つたとき、又はその売却に係る売却不許可決定が確定したときに限り、同条の規定を適用する。

Article 74 · (Appeal Against a Ruling to Permit or Not Permit a Sale)第七十四条(売却の許可又は不許可の決定に対する執行抗告)

Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedArticle 74, paragraph (4)

    A courtRegarding application of appeal may, if it finds it the provisions of Article 10, paragraph (2) for an appeal against a ruling to be necessary, specify permit or not permit a sale, the phrase "the opposite party day on which the person is notified of the appellant.judicial decision" in that paragraph is deemed to be replaced with "the day of the ruling to permit or not permit a sale."

    抗告裁判所は、必要があると認めるときは、抗告人の相手方を定めることができ売却の許可又は不許可の決定に対する執行抗告についての第十条第二項の規定の適用については、同項中「裁判の告知を受けた日」とあるのは、「売却の許可又は不許可の決定の日」とする。

  • ChangedArticle 74, paragraph (5)

    A ruling to permit or not permit a sale does not take effect until it becomes final and bindingcourt of appeal may, if it finds it to be necessary, specify the opposite party of the appellant.

    売却の許可又は不許可の決定は、確定しなければその効力を生じない抗告裁判所は、必要があると認めるときは、抗告人の相手方を定めることができる。

  • AddedArticle 74, paragraph (6)

    A ruling to permit or not permit a sale does not take effect until it becomes final and binding.

    売却の許可又は不許可の決定は、確定しなければその効力を生じない。

Article 76 · (Withdrawal of a Petition for a Compulsory Auction After a Purchase Offer Has Been Made)第七十六条(買受けの申出後の強制競売の申立ての取下げ等)

Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedArticle 76, paragraph (2)

    The provisions of the preceding paragraph apply mutatis mutandis to the case of submitting athe document or electronic or magnetic record stated in Article 39, paragraph (1), items (iv) through (v) after a purchase offer has been made.

    前項の規定は、買受けの申出があつた後に第三十九条第一項第四号から第五号までに掲げる文書又は電磁的記録を提出する場合について準用する。

Article 78 · (Payment of the Fee)第七十八条(代金の納付)

Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedArticle 78, paragraph (4)

    If the purchaser is an obligee who is to receive a distribution or payment from the proceeds of the sale, the purchaser may pay the price from which the amount of distribution or payment to be received has been deducted, by making a requestthe proposal to the enforcement court by the time when the order permitting the of permission of sale becomes final and binding, pay . In this case, the sales price on the distribution date ormust be paid by the day of delivery of payment, after deducting when the period for filing an objection (meaning the amount to be received as a distribution or payment; provided, however, that if an opposition has been filed period for filing an objection prescribed in Article 85-2, paragraph (1); the same applies in the following paragraph) ends or paid on the distribution date regarding(meaning the amount of distribution to be received by the purchaser, the purchaser must pay, within one week from that distribution date, money equivalent todate prescribed in Article 85-3, paragraph (1); the same applies in the following paragraph and Article 85, paragraph (1)) or the portion pertaining to the oppositionday of delivery of payment.

    買受人は、売却代金から配当又は弁済を受けるべき債権者であるときは、売却許可決定が確定するまでに執行裁判所に申し出て、配当又は弁済を受けるべき額を差し引いて代金を配当期日又は弁済金の交付の日に納付することができる。ただし、配当期日この場合において、買受人の受けるべき配当の額について異議の申出があつたときは、買受人は、当該代金は、異議申出期間(第八十五条の二第一項に規定する異議申出期間をいう。次項において同じ。)が満了する日までに納付し、又は配当期日から一週間以内に、異議に係る部分に相当する金銭を(第八十五条の三第一項に規定する配当期日をいう。次項及び第八十五条第一項において同じ。)若しくは弁済金の交付の日に納付しなければならない。

  • ChangedArticle 78, paragraph (5)

    The court clerk may changeIn the case of the time limit under paragraph (1) if preceding paragraph, if an objection is filed regarding the clerk finds itamount of distribution to be particularly necessaryreceived by the purchaser, the purchaser must pay money equivalent to the portion that the objection concerns within one week from the day that the period for filing an objection ends or the distribution date.

    裁判所書記官は、特に必要があると認める前項の場合において、買受人の受けるべき配当の額について異議の申出があつたときは、第一項の期限を変更することができる買受人は、異議申出期間が満了する日又は配当期日から一週間以内に、異議に係る部分に相当する金銭を納付しなければならない。

  • ChangedArticle 78, paragraph (6)

    A person may file an objection withThe court clerk may change the enforcement court to a court clerk's dispositiontime limit under paragraph (1) orif the preceding paragraphclerk finds it to be particularly necessary.

    第一項又は前項の規定による裁判所書記官の処分に対しては、執行裁判所に異議を申し立ては、特に必要があると認めるときは、第一項の期限を変更することができる。

  • ChangedArticle 78, paragraph (7)

    The provisions of the first sentence of Article 10, paragraph (6) and Article 10, A person may file an objection with the enforcement court to a court clerk's disposition under paragraph (9) apply mutatis mutandis to cases where an objection under1) or the preceding paragraph has been filed.

    第十条第六項前段及び第九項の規定は、一項又は前項の規定による異議の申立てがあつた場合について準用す裁判所書記官の処分に対しては、執行裁判所に異議を申し立てることができる。

  • AddedArticle 78, paragraph (8)

    The provisions of the first sentence of Article 10, paragraph (6) and Article 10, paragraph (9) apply mutatis mutandis to cases where an objection under the preceding paragraph has been filed.

    第十条第六項前段及び第九項の規定は、前項の規定による異議の申立てがあつた場合について準用する。

Article 84 · (Implementing a Distribution Out of the Proceeds of a Sale)第八十四条(売却代金の配当等の実施)

Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedArticle 84, paragraph (1)

    If the sales price has been paid, thean enforcement court must implement distribution based on the an electronic distribution list, (an electronic distribution list prescribed in paragraph (3) of the following Article recorded in a file pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (5) of that Article) except in the cases prescribed in the following paragraph.

    執行裁判所は、代金の納付があつた場合には、次項に規定する場合を除き、電子配当表(次条第三項に規定する電子配当表であつて、同条第五項の規定によりファイルに記録されたものをいう。)に基づいて配当を実施しなければならない。

  • ChangedArticle 84, paragraph (2)

    If there is only one obligee or if there are two or more obligees and it is possible to fully perform the claims and enforcement costs of the respective obligees with the proceeds of the sale, the enforcement court prepares a an electronic statement of delivery of the proceeds of the sale, (meaning an electronic or magnetic record prepared by the enforcement court, pursuant to the provisions of the Rules of the Supreme Court, by recording the amount of the proceeds of the sale, the amounts of the principal of the claims, interest, and any other incidental claims of each obligee, the amount of the enforcement costs, and the order and amounts of delivery of payment money to enable the payment money and surplus to be delivered; the same applies in the following paragraph) pursuant to the provisions of the Rules of the Supreme Court, and delivers payment money to the obligees, and delivers any surplus to the obligor.

    債権者が一人である場合又は債権者が二人以上であつて売却代金で各債権者の債権及び執行費用の全部を弁済することができる場合には、執行裁判所は、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、売却代金の電子交付計算書(執行裁判所が、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、弁済金及び剰余金を交付するために、売却代金の額、各債権者の債権の元本及び利息その他の附帯の債権の額、執行費用の額並びに弁済金の交付の順位及び額を記録して作成する電磁的記録をいう。次項において同じ。)を作成して、債権者に弁済金を交付し、剰余金を債務者に交付する。

  • ChangedArticle 84, paragraph (3)

    If a document stated in Article 39, paragraph (1), items (i) through (vi) has been submitted afteran enforcement court has prepared an electronic statement of delivery pursuant to the paymentprovisions of the sales price, and there is another obligee who is to receive a distribution of the proceeds ofpreceding paragraph, the enforcement court must record the sale or deliveryelectronic statement of payment (referred to as "distribution or payment" below),delivery in a file pursuant to the enforcement court must implementprovisions of the distribution or payment for that obligeeRules of the Supreme Court.

    代金の納付後に第三十九条第一項第一号から第六号までに掲げる文書の提出があつ執行裁判所は、前項の規定により電子交付計算書を作成した場合において、他に売却代金の配当又は弁済金の交付(以下「配当等」という。)を受けるべき債権者があるときは、執行は、最高裁判所は、その債権者のために配当等を実施規則で定めるところにより、これをファイルに記録しなければならない。

  • ChangedArticle 84, paragraph (4)

    Even ifIf a document or electronic or magnetic record stated in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (vii) or item (viiiitems (i) through (vi) has been submitted after the payment of the sales price, and there is another obligee who is to receive a distribution of the proceeds of the sale or delivery of payment (referred to as "distribution or payment" below), the enforcement court must implement the distribution or payment for that obligee.

    代金の納付後に第三十九条第一項第七号又は第八号一号から第六号までに掲げる文書又は電磁的記録の提出があつた場合においても、、他に売却代金の配当又は弁済金の交付(以下「配当等」という。)を受けるべき債権者があるときは、執行裁判所は、その債権者のために配当等を実施しなければならない。

  • AddedArticle 84, paragraph (5)

    Even if a document or electronic or magnetic record stated in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (vii) or item (viii) has been submitted after the payment of the sales price, the enforcement court must implement distribution or payment.

    代金の納付後に第三十九条第一項第七号又は第八号に掲げる文書又は電磁的記録の提出があつた場合においても、執行裁判所は、配当等を実施しなければならない。

Article 85 · (Preparation of Electronic Distribution List)第八十五条(電子配当表の作成)

Read it in the amended law
  • ChangedCaption

    (Preparation of theElectronic Distribution List)

    電子配当表の作成

  • ChangedArticle 85, paragraph (1)

    On the distribution date, theAn enforcement court determines, for each of the obligees stated in the items of Article 87, paragraph (1), the amounts of the principal of the claim, interest, and any other incidental claims, the amount of enforcement costs, and the order and amount of distribution for each of the obligees stated in the items of Article 87, paragraph (1); provided, however, that this does not apply to the order and amount of distribution if an agreement has been reached among all of the obligees and notification to that effect is submitted to the enforcement court or an agreement has been reached among all of the obligees on the distribution date.

    執行裁判所は、配当期日において、第八十七条第一項各号に掲げる各債権者について、その債権の元本及び利息その他の附帯の債権の額、執行費用の額並びに配当の順位及び額を定める。ただし、配当の順位及び額については、全ての債権者間に合意が成立し、執行裁判所に対しその旨の届出があつた場合又は配当期日においてすべ全ての債権者間に合意が成立した場合は、この限りでない。

  • ChangedArticle 85, paragraph (3)

    OnWhen the distribution date, matters prescribed in the main clause of paragraph (1) (excluding the order and amount of the distribution, in the obligeescase prescribed in the proviso to that paragraph ; the same applies in paragraph (1) andof the obligor following Article) have been determined pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1), a court clerk must be summonedprepare an electronic distribution list (meaning an electronic or magnetic record prepared by the court clerk, pursuant to the provisions of the Rules of the Supreme Court, by recording the matters stated in the following paragraph to implement a distribution; the same applies below) pursuant to the provisions of the Rules of the Supreme Court.

    配当期日には、第一項の規定により同項本文に規定する事項(同項ただし書に規定する場合には、配当の順位及び額を除く。次条第一項に規定する債権者及び債務者を呼び出さおいて同じ。)が定められたときは、裁判所書記官は、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、電子配当表(裁判所書記官が、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、配当を実施するために次項に規定する事項を記録して作成する電磁的記録をいう。以下同じ。)を作成しなければならない。

  • ChangedArticle 85, paragraph (4)

    On A statement of the distribution date, if amount of the proceeds of the enforcement court finds it to be necessary for determining sale and the content of the enforcement court's determination on the matters prescribed in the main clause of paragraph (1), it may interrogate the obligees and (and, in a case as provided in the obligor who appeared and immediately examine any documentary evidence that may be examined or proviso to that paragraph, the content of the agreement on the order and amount of the details of informationdistribution) must be recorded in electronic or magnetic recordsan electronic distribution list.

    執行裁判所は、配当期日において、電子配当表には、売却代金の額及び第一項本文に規定する事項を定めるため必要があると認めるときは、出頭した債権者及び債務者を審尋し、かつ、即時に取り調べることができる書証又は電磁的記録に記録された情報の内容の取調べをすることができるについての執行裁判所の定めの内容(同項ただし書に規定する場合にあつては、配当の順位及び額については、その合意の内容)を記録しなければならない。

  • ChangedArticle 85, paragraph (5)

    When the matters prescribed in the main clause of paragraph (1) (excludingIf a court clerk has prepared an electronic distribution list pursuant to the order and amountprovisions of distribution, inparagraph (3), the case prescribed in the proviso to that paragraph) have been determinedcourt clerk must record the electronic distribution list in a file pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1), the court clerk must prepare a distribution list onRules of the distribution dateSupreme Court.

    第一裁判所書記官は、第三項の規定により同項本文に規定する事項(同項ただし書に規定する場合には、配当の順位及び額を除く。)が定められたときは、電子配当表を作成した場合には、最高裁判所書記官は、配当期日において、配当表を作成規則で定めるところにより、これをファイルに記録しなければならない。

  • RemovedArticle 85, paragraph (6)

    The amount of the proceeds of the sale and the content of the enforcement court's determination on the matters prescribed in the main clause of paragraph (1) (and, in the case prescribed in the proviso to that paragraph, the content of the agreement on the order and amount of distribution) must be stated in the distribution list.

    配当表には、売却代金の額及び第一項本文に規定する事項についての執行裁判所の定めの内容(同項ただし書に規定する場合にあつては、配当の順位及び額については、その合意の内容)を記載しなければならない。

  • RemovedArticle 85, paragraph (7)

    The provisions of Article 16, paragraphs (3) and (4) apply mutatis mutandis to the service of a summons on the obligees prescribed in paragraph (1) (excluding those prescribed in the first sentence of paragraph (1) of that Article).

    第十六条第三項及び第四項の規定は、第一項に規定する債権者(同条第一項前段に規定する者を除く。)に対する呼出状の送達について準用する。