Article 185-8 · (Suspension of the Validity of a Decision)第百八十五条の八(決定の効力の停止)
- ChangedArticle 185-8, paragraph (1)
If, after the decision referred to in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article (limited to a decision connected with Article 178, paragraph (1), item (iv)
or, (xi), or (xi)-6, items (xii) through (xvi), or item (xviii); hereinafter the same applies in paragraphs (4), (5), (8), and (11)) or the decision referred to in Article 185-7, paragraph (6), (7), (12), (13through (15), or (1622) (but only if the Prime Minister finds a fact set forth in Article 178, paragraph (1), item (iv), (xi),or(xi)-6, (xvi), or (xviii) to have occurred; the same applies in paragraphs (4), (5), (8), and (11) of this Article), or Article 185-7, paragraph (1725) (but only if the Prime Minister finds a fact set forth in Article 178, paragraph (1), item (iv)or, (xi), or (xi)-6, items (xii) through (xvi), or item (xviii) to have occurred; the same applies in paragraphs (4), (5), (8), and (11) of this Article) is reached and before the due date for payment in connection with that decision, prosecution is instituted against the person subject to that decision in connection with the same case, the Prime Minister must suspend the validity of the decision until the judicial decision in the same case becomes final and binding; provided, however, that this does not apply if the administrative monetary penalty under that decision has already been paid in full.前条第一項の決定(第百七十八条第一項第四号、第十一号
又は第十、第十一号の六、第十二号から第十六号まで又は第十八号に係るものに限る。第四項、第五項、第八項及び第十一項において同じ。)又は前条第六項、第七項、第十二項、第十三項、第十六から第十五項まで、第二十二項(第百七十八条第一項第四号、第十一号、第十一号の六、第十六号又は第十六八号に掲げる事実があると認める場合に限る。第四項、第五項、第八項及び第十一項において同じ。)若しくは第十七二十五項(第百七十八条第一項第四号、第十一号又は第十、第十一号の六、第十二号から第十六号まで又は第十八号に掲げる事実があると認める場合に限る。第四項、第五項、第八項及び第十一項において同じ。)の決定の後、当該決定に係る納付期限前に同一事件について当該決定を受けた者に対し公訴の提起があつたときは、内閣総理大臣は、当該事件についての裁判が確定するまでの間、当該決定の効力を停止しなければならない。ただし、当該決定に係る課徴金の全部が納付されているときは、この限りでない。 - ChangedArticle 185-8, paragraph (2)
If the validity of the decision referred to in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article (limited to a decision connected with Article 178, paragraph (1), item (iv)
, (xi), or (xi)-6; hereinafter the same applies in paragraph (6)) or the validity of the decision referred to in Article 185-7, paragraph (6), (7), (12), (13through (15), or (1622) (but only if the Prime Minister finds a fact set forth in Article 178, paragraph (1), item (iv), (xi), or (xi)-6 to have occurred; the same applies in paragraph (6) of this Article), or Article 185-7, paragraph (1725) (but only if the Prime Minister finds a fact set forth in Article 178, paragraph (1), item (iv), (xi), or (xi)-6 to have occurred; the same applies in paragraph (6) of this Article) is suspended pursuant to the main clause of the preceding paragraph, and the final and binding judicial decision in the case imposes a fine on the person subject to that decision, the Prime Minister must suspend the validity of the decision until the electronic or magnetic record concerning a disposition for changes under paragraph (6) is served.前項本文の規定により前条第一項の決定(第百七十八条第一項第四号、第十一号又は第十一号の六に係るものに限る。第六項において同じ。)又は前条第六項、第七項、第十二項
、第十三項、第十六から第十五項まで、第二十二項(第百七十八条第一項第四号、第十一号又は第十一号の六に掲げる事実があると認める場合に限る。第六項において同じ。)若しくは第十七二十五項(第百七十八条第一項第四号、第十一号又は第十一号の六に掲げる事実があると認める場合に限る。第六項において同じ。)の決定の効力が停止された場合において、当該事件について、当該決定を受けた者に対し、罰金の確定裁判があつたときは、内閣総理大臣は、第六項の規定による変更の処分に係る電磁的記録が送達されるまでの間、当該決定の効力を停止しなければならない。 - ChangedArticle 185-8, paragraph (3)
If the validity of the decision referred to in Article 185-7, paragraph (1) (limited to a decision connected with any of Article 178, paragraph (1), items (xii) through (xvi) or item (xviii); the same applies in paragraph (7) of this Article), Article 185-7, paragraph (
1622) (but only if the Prime Minister finds a fact set forth in Article 178, paragraph (1), item (xvi) or (xviii) to have occurred; the same applies in paragraph (7) of this Article), or Article 185-7, paragraph (1725) (but only if the Prime Minister finds a fact set forth in any of Article 178, paragraph (1), items (xii) through (xvi) or item (xviii) to have occurred; the same applies in paragraph (7) of this Article) is suspended pursuant to the main clause of paragraph (1), and the final and binding judicial decision in the case imposes a confiscation of the properties set forth in the items of Article 198-2, paragraph (1) or the collection of the value of the properties set forth in the items of Article 198-2, paragraph (1) against the person subject to the decision, the Prime Minister must suspend the validity of the decision until the electronic or magnetic record concerning a disposition for changes under paragraph (7) is served.第一項本文の規定により前条第一項の決定(第百七十八条第一項第十二号から第十六号まで又は第十八号に係るものに限る。第七項において同じ。)又は前条第
十六項(同号二十二項(第百七十八条第一項第十六号又は第十八号に掲げる事実があると認める場合に限る。第七項において同じ。)若しくは第十七二十五項(第百七十八条第一項第十二号から第十六号まで又は第十八号に掲げる事実があると認める場合に限る。第七項において同じ。)の決定の効力が停止された場合において、当該事件について、当該決定を受けた者に対し、第百九十八条の二第一項各号に掲げる財産の没収又は同項各号に掲げる財産の価額の追徴の確定裁判があつたときは、内閣総理大臣は、第七項の規定による変更の処分に係る電磁的記録が送達されるまでの間、当該決定の効力を停止しなければならない。 - ChangedArticle 185-8, paragraph (4)
Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (
2331) of the preceding Article, if the validity of the decision referred to in paragraph (1), (6), (7), (12), (13through (15), (1622) or (1725) of that Article is suspended pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1), the due date for the administrative monetary penalty payment is the day on which two months have elapsed since the day that the judicial decision in the case becomes final and binding.第一項の規定により前条第一項、第六項、第七項、第十二項
、第十三項、第十六から第十五項まで、第二十二項又は第十七二十五項の決定の効力が停止された場合においては、課徴金の納付期限は、同条第二十三三十一項の規定にかかわらず、当該事件についての裁判が確定した日から二月を経過した日とする。 - ChangedArticle 185-8, paragraph (5)
Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (
2331) of the preceding Article and the preceding paragraph, if the validity of the decision referred to in paragraph (1), (6), (7), (12), (13through (15), (1622) or (1725) of that Article is suspended pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) or (3) of this Article, the due date for the payment of an administrative monetary penalty is the day on which two months have elapsed since the day that, with regard to the electronic or magnetic record concerning a disposition for changes under the following paragraph or paragraph (7), a document under the provisions of Article 185-10-2 is dispatched or a notice under the provisions of Article 109-2, paragraph (1), main text of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 185-10 is dispatched.第二項又は第三項の規定により前条第一項、第六項、第七項、第十二項
、第十三項、第十六から第十五項まで、第二十二項又は第十七二十五項の決定の効力が停止された場合においては、課徴金の納付期限は、同条第二十三三十一項及び前項の規定にかかわらず、次項又は第七項の規定による変更の処分に係る電磁的記録について第百八十五条の十の二の規定による書面を発し、又は第百八十五条の十において準用する民事訴訟法第百九条の二第一項本文の規定による通知を発した日から二月を経過した日とする。 - ChangedArticle 185-8, paragraph (6)
After the issuance of the decision referred to in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article or the decision referred to in paragraph (6), (7), (12)
, (13through (15), (1622) or (1725) of that Article, if a final and binding judicial decision in the same case imposes a fine on the person subject to the decision, the Prime Minister must change the amount of the administrative monetary penalty subject to the decision, from the amount under those provisions to the amount equivalent to what is arrived at when the amount set forth in item (ii) is deducted from the amount set forth in item (i), and the difference is divided proportionally in parallel to the amount of the administrative monetary penalty subject to the decision, pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Office Order; provided however, that this does not apply unless the amount set forth in item (i) exceeds the amount set forth in item (ii):内閣総理大臣は、前条第一項の決定又は同条第六項、第七項、第十二項
、第十三項、第十六から第十五項まで、第二十二項若しくは第十七二十五項の決定の後、同一事件について、当該決定を受けた者に対し、罰金の確定裁判があつたときは、当該決定に係る課徴金の額を、これらの規定による額から、第一号に掲げる額から第二号に掲げる額を控除した額を内閣府令で定めるところにより当該決定に係る課徴金の額に応じて按分して得た額に相当する額に変更しなければならない。ただし、第一号に掲げる額が第二号に掲げる額を超えないときは、この限りでない。 - ChangedArticle 185-8, paragraph (7)
After the decision referred to in paragraph (1), (
1622), or (1725) of the preceding Article, if the final and binding judicial decision in the same case imposes a confiscation of the properties set forth in the items of Article 198-2, paragraph (1) or the collection of the value of the properties set forth in the items of Article 198-2, paragraph (1) against the person subject to the decision, the Prime Minister must change the amount of the administrative monetary penalty subject to the decision referred to in paragraph (1), (1622), or (1725) of the preceding Article, to the amount arrived at when the amount set forth in item (ii) is deducted from the amount set forth in item (i); provided, however, this does not apply unless the amount set forth in item (i) exceeds the amount set forth in item (ii):内閣総理大臣は、前条第一項の決定又は同条第
十六二十二項若しくは第十七二十五項の決定の後、同一事件について、当該決定を受けた者に対し、第百九十八条の二第一項各号に掲げる財産の没収又は同項各号に掲げる財産の価額の追徴の確定裁判があつたときは、前条第一項の決定又は同条第十六二十二項若しくは第十七二十五項の決定に係る課徴金の額を、第一号に掲げる額から第二号に掲げる額を控除した額に変更しなければならない。ただし、第一号に掲げる額が、第二号に掲げる額を超えないときは、この限りでない。 - ChangedArticle 185-8, paragraph (7), item (i)
the amount specified in the provisions of Article 173, paragraph (1), Article 174, paragraph (1), Article 174-2, paragraph (1), Article 174-2-2, paragraph (1), Article 174-3, paragraph (1), Article 175, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (
910) of that Article) or paragraph (2) of that Article, Article 175-3, paragraph (1) (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (12) of that Article), paragraph (2) of that Article (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (13) of that Article) or paragraph (3) of that Article, or Article 185-7, paragraph (1622) or (1725);第百七十三条第一項、第百七十四条第一項、第百七十四条の二第一項、第百七十四条の二の二第一項、第百七十四条の三第一項、第百七十五条第一項(同条第十項において準用する場合を含む。)若しくは第二項若しくは第百七十五条の三第一項(同条第
九十二項において準用する場合を含む。)、第二項(同条第十三項において準用する場合を含む。)若しくは第二三項又は前条第十六二十二項若しくは第十七二十五項の規定による額 - ChangedArticle 185-8, paragraph (8)
In a case as referred to in the proviso to paragraph (6) or the proviso to the preceding paragraph, the Prime Minister must rescind the decision referred to in paragraph (1), (6), (7), (12)
, (13through (15), (1622) or (1725) of the preceding Article.第六項ただし書又は前項ただし書の場合においては、内閣総理大臣は、前条第一項、第六項、第七項、第十二項
、第十三項、第十六から第十五項まで、第二十二項又は第十七二十五項の決定を取り消さなければならない。 - ChangedArticle 185-8, paragraph (11)
Prescription of a claim for an administrative monetary penalty does not run while the validity of the decision referred to in paragraph (1), paragraph (6), paragraph (7),
paragraphparagraphs (12), paragraph (13through (15), paragraph (1622), or paragraph (1725) of the preceding Article is suspended pursuant to the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (3).課徴金に係る請求権の時効は、第一項から第三項までの規定により前条第一項、第六項、第七項、第十二項
、第十三項、第十六から第十五項まで、第二十二項又は第十七二十五項の決定の効力が停止されている間は、進行しない。