When a notification of any of the following judicial decisions has been made, the ruling under Article 345-2 (including the case where it applies mutatis mutandis pursuant to the following Article; the same applies hereinafter in this paragraph) loses its effect:
A judgment reversing the original judgment of a fine pertaining to the ruling under Article 345-2;
第三百四十五条の二の規定による決定に係る罰金の原判決を破棄する判決
A ruling dismissing prosecution in the case charged to the court relating to the original judgment of a fine pertaining to the ruling under Article 345-2.
第三百四十五条の二の規定による決定に係る罰金の原判決に係る被告事件についての公訴を棄却する決定
When the pronouncement of the judgment set out in item (i) of the preceding paragraph has been made (excluding the case where a judicial decision prescribed in Article 345 has further been rendered pursuant to the proviso to Article 400), the detention warrant pertaining to the ruling under Article 342-8, paragraph (1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) as applied mutatis mutandis with replacement of terms pursuant to Article 345-3 (including the case where it applies mutatis mutandis pursuant to the following Article) loses its effect.
Read this with the articles around it
fine
罰金
A criminal punishment of paying money to the state, of 10,000 yen or more, or less where it is reduced (Penal Code, Article 15). It ranks below imprisonment (拘禁刑) and above penal detention (拘留) and a petty fine (科料) (Articles 9 and 10, paragraph (1)). A person who cannot pay it in full is held in a workhouse (労役場) for one day to two years, or up to three years where fines are imposed together, a period set when the sentence is passed (Article 18, paragraphs (1), (3) and (4)); not within thirty days of the sentence becoming final without the person's consent (paragraph (5)). If it is not enforced for three years after the sentence becomes final, the person is released from it by prescription (Articles 31 and 32, item (v)); the three years do not run while its execution is suspended under law or the person is abroad, and an act of execution interrupts them (Articles 33 and 34, paragraph (2)).
Written by AI using Penal Code, Arts. 9, 10, 15, 18, 31 to 34 as a reference.