Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

1 article

Article 337Appeal with Permission

第三百三十七条(許可抗告)

An appeal may be specially filed with the Supreme Court against a ruling or order of the high court (excluding a ruling or order on an appeal against a ruling as referred to in Article 330 or on a petition as referred to in the following paragraph) other than in a case under the provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, but only if the high court permits it pursuant to the provisions of the following paragraph; provided, however, that this applies only if the judicial decision in question is one that it would be possible to appeal in the form of an appeal against a ruling, if it were the judicial decision of the district court.

高等裁判所の決定及び命令(第三百三十条の抗告及び次項の申立てについての決定及び命令を除く。)に対しては、前条第一項の規定による場合のほか、その高等裁判所が次項の規定により許可したときに限り、最高裁判所に特に抗告をすることができる。ただし、その裁判が地方裁判所の裁判であるとした場合に抗告をすることができるものであるときに限る。

Upon petition, the high court referred to in the preceding paragraph must rule to permit an appeal against a ruling in respect of the judicial decision referred to in the preceding paragraph, if it reflects a determination that is inconsistent with Supreme Court precedent (or, if there is no Supreme Court precedent, conflicts with precedent of the former Great Court of Cassation or precedent of the high court as the final appellate court or the court in charge of the appeal against the ruling) or if it is otherwise found to involve matters of material import involving the interpretation of laws and regulations.

前項の高等裁判所は、同項の裁判について、最高裁判所の判例(これがない場合にあっては、大審院又は上告裁判所若しくは抗告裁判所である高等裁判所の判例)と相反する判断がある場合その他の法令の解釈に関する重要な事項を含むと認められる場合には、申立てにより、決定で、抗告を許可しなければならない。

The circumstances provided for in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article may not be given as the grounds for the petition in a petition as referred to in the preceding paragraph.

前項の申立てにおいては、前条第一項に規定する事由を理由とすることはできない。

If permission under the provisions of paragraph (2) is granted, the appeal against a ruling as referred to in paragraph (1) is deemed to have been filed.

第二項の規定による許可があった場合には、第一項の抗告があったものとみなす。

The Supreme Court may reverse the judicial decision of the prior instance if a violation of law or regulation has clearly influenced the judicial decision.

最高裁判所は、裁判に影響を及ぼすことが明らかな法令の違反があるときは、原裁判を破棄することができる。

The provisions of Article 313; Article 315; and paragraph (2) of the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis to a petition as referred to in paragraph (2); the provisions of Article 318, paragraph (3) apply mutatis mutandis if the court grants the permission under the provisions of paragraph (2); and the provisions of the second sentence of Article 318, paragraph (4) and paragraph (3) of the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis if the permission under the provisions of paragraph (2) is granted.

第三百十三条、第三百十五条及び前条第二項の規定は第二項の申立てについて、第三百十八条第三項の規定は第二項の規定による許可をする場合について、同条第四項後段及び前条第三項の規定は第二項の規定による許可があった場合について準用する。

Read this in its chapter

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (Genjido 合同会社) · [email protected]ContactSourcesTermsPrivacy