Supplementary Provisions, Article 6
第六条
The provisions then in force continue to govern the calculation of the amount of the surcharge for a pre-effective-date violation that had already ceased before the Effective Date.
The provisions then in force continue to govern the calculation of the amount of the surcharge (limited to the part relating to the pre-effective-date violation) for an act that began as a pre-effective-date violation (limited to one prescribed in Article 7-2, paragraph (1) or (2) or Article 8-3 of the Former Antimonopoly Act) and ceased on or after the Effective Date (limited to one that, on or after the Effective Date, falls under a violation prescribed in Article 7-2, paragraph (1), Article 7-9, paragraph (1) or Article 8-3 of the New Antimonopoly Act), notwithstanding Article 7-2 of the New Antimonopoly Act (including as applied mutatis mutandis following the deemed replacement of terms pursuant to Article 7-9, paragraph (3) or Article 8-3 of the New Antimonopoly Act), Article 7-3 of the New Antimonopoly Act (including as applied mutatis mutandis following the deemed replacement of terms pursuant to Article 7-9, paragraph (3) of the New Antimonopoly Act), Article 7-8, paragraph (4) of the New Antimonopoly Act (including as applied mutatis mutandis following the deemed replacement of terms pursuant to Article 7-9, paragraph (3) of the New Antimonopoly Act, and limited to the part relating to the application of Articles 7-2 and 7-3 of the New Antimonopoly Act) and Article 7-9, paragraph (1) of the New Antimonopoly Act. In this case, the phrase "to the day on which the business activities as the implementation of the act cease, the period (if that period exceeds three years, the three years going back from the day on which the business activities as the implementation of the act cease" in Article 7-2, paragraph (1) of the Former Antimonopoly Act is deemed to be replaced with "(if the day on which the business activities were carried out falls before the day 10 years prior to the day on which a disposition listed in Article 47, paragraph (1), item (i), (iii) or (iv), a disposition prescribed in Article 102, paragraph (1) or (2), or a disposition listed in each item of Article 103-3 was first made against that enterprise regarding the violation (or, if no such disposition was made against that enterprise, the day on which that enterprise received advance notification (meaning the advance notification prescribed in paragraph (6)) regarding the violation), or before the day three years prior to the day on which the Act Partially Amending the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (Act No. 45 of 2019) comes into effect (hereinafter in this paragraph referred to as the "Effective Date of the Amending Act"), the later of that day 10 years prior or that day three years prior) to the day before the Effective Date of the Amending Act, the period (".
施行日前違反行為（旧独占禁止法第七条の二第一項若しくは第二項又は第八条の三に規定するものに限る。）として開始された行為であって、施行日以後になくなったもの（施行日以後において、新独占禁止法第七条の二第一項、第七条の九第一項又は第八条の三に規定する違反行為に該当するものに限る。）についての課徴金の額（施行日前違反行為に係る部分に限る。）の計算については、新独占禁止法第七条の二（新独占禁止法第七条の九第三項又は第八条の三において読み替えて準用する場合を含む。）、第七条の三（新独占禁止法第七条の九第三項において読み替えて準用する場合を含む。）、第七条の八第四項（新独占禁止法第七条の九第三項において読み替えて準用する場合を含み、新独占禁止法第七条の二及び第七条の三の規定の適用に係る部分に限る。）及び第七条の九第一項の規定にかかわらず、なお従前の例による。この場合において、旧独占禁止法第七条の二第一項中「から当該行為の実行としての事業活動がなくなる日までの期間（当該期間が三年を超えるときは、当該行為の実行としての事業活動がなくなる日からさかのぼつて三年間とする。」とあるのは、「（当該事業活動を行つた日が、当該事業者に対し当該違反行為について第四十七条第一項第一号、第三号若しくは第四号に掲げる処分、第百二条第一項若しくは第二項に規定する処分又は第百三条の三各号に掲げる処分が最初に行われた日（当該事業者に対し当該処分が行われなかつたときは、当該事業者が当該違反行為について事前通知（第六項に規定する事前通知をいう。）を受けた日）の十年前の日前であるとき、又は私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律の一部を改正する法律（令和元年法律第四十五号）の施行の日（以下この項において「改正法施行日」という。）の三年前の日前であるときは、当該十年前の日又は当該三年前の日のいずれか遅い日）から改正法施行日の前日までの期間（」とする。
The provisions then in force continue to govern the calculation of the amount of the surcharge (limited to the part relating to the pre-effective-date violation) for an act that began as a pre-effective-date violation (limited to one prescribed in Article 7-2, paragraph (4) of the Former Antimonopoly Act) and ceased on or after the Effective Date (limited to one that, on or after the Effective Date, falls under a violation prescribed in Article 7-9, paragraph (2) of the New Antimonopoly Act), notwithstanding Article 7-9, paragraph (2) of the New Antimonopoly Act, and Article 7-2, Article 7-3 and Article 7-8, paragraph (4) of the New Antimonopoly Act (limited to the part relating to the application of Articles 7-2 and 7-3) as applied mutatis mutandis following the deemed replacement of terms pursuant to Article 7-9, paragraph (4) of the New Antimonopoly Act. In this case, the phrase "to the day on which the act ceases, the period (if that period exceeds three years, the three years going back from the day on which the act ceases" in Article 7-2, paragraph (4) of the Former Antimonopoly Act is deemed to be replaced with "(if the day on which the act was carried out falls before the day 10 years prior to the day on which a disposition listed in Article 47, paragraph (1), item (i), (iii) or (iv), a disposition prescribed in Article 102, paragraph (1) or (2), or a disposition listed in each item of Article 103-3 was first made against that enterprise regarding the violation (or, if no such disposition was made against that enterprise, the day on which that enterprise received advance notification (meaning the advance notification prescribed in paragraph (6)) regarding the violation), or before the day three years prior to the day on which the Act Partially Amending the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (Act No. 45 of 2019) comes into effect (hereinafter in this paragraph referred to as the "Effective Date of the Amending Act"), the later of that day 10 years prior or that day three years prior) to the day before the Effective Date of the Amending Act, the period (".
施行日前違反行為（旧独占禁止法第七条の二第四項に規定するものに限る。）として開始された行為であって、施行日以後になくなったもの（施行日以後において、新独占禁止法第七条の九第二項に規定する違反行為に該当するものに限る。）についての課徴金の額（施行日前違反行為に係る部分に限る。）の計算については、新独占禁止法第七条の九第二項並びに同条第四項において読み替えて準用する新独占禁止法第七条の二、第七条の三及び第七条の八第四項（新独占禁止法第七条の二及び第七条の三の規定の適用に係る部分に限る。）の規定にかかわらず、なお従前の例による。この場合において、旧独占禁止法第七条の二第四項中「から当該行為がなくなる日までの期間（当該期間が三年を超えるときは、当該行為がなくなる日からさかのぼつて三年間とする。」とあるのは、「（当該行為を行つた日が、当該事業者に対し当該違反行為について第四十七条第一項第一号、第三号若しくは第四号に掲げる処分、第百二条第一項若しくは第二項に規定する処分又は第百三条の三各号に掲げる処分が最初に行われた日（当該事業者に対し当該処分が行われなかつたときは、当該事業者が当該違反行為について事前通知（第六項に規定する事前通知をいう。）を受けた日）の十年前の日前であるとき、又は私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律の一部を改正する法律（令和元年法律第四十五号）の施行の日（以下この項において「改正法施行日」という。）の三年前の日前であるときは、当該十年前の日又は当該三年前の日のいずれか遅い日）から改正法施行日の前日までの期間（」とする。
The provisions then in force continue to govern the calculation of the amount of the surcharge (limited to the part relating to the pre-effective-date violation) for an act that began as a pre-effective-date violation (limited to one prescribed in Articles 20-2 through 20-6 of the Former Antimonopoly Act) and ceased on or after the Effective Date (limited to one that, on or after the Effective Date, falls under a violation prescribed in Articles 20-2 through 20-6 of the New Antimonopoly Act), notwithstanding Articles 20-2 through 20-6 of the New Antimonopoly Act, and Article 7-2 and Article 7-8, paragraph (4) of the New Antimonopoly Act (limited to the part relating to the application of Article 7-2) as applied mutatis mutandis following the deemed replacement of terms pursuant to Article 20-7 of the New Antimonopoly Act. In this case, the phrase "to the day on which the act ceases, the period (if that period exceeds three years, the three years going back from the day on which the act ceases)" in Article 20-2 of the Former Antimonopoly Act is deemed to be replaced with "(if the day on which the act was carried out falls before the day 10 years prior to the day on which a disposition listed in Article 47, paragraph (1), item (i), (iii) or (iv) was first made against that enterprise regarding the violation (or, if no such disposition was made against that enterprise, the day on which that enterprise received advance notification (meaning the advance notification prescribed in Article 7-2, paragraph (6); the same applies hereinafter in this Chapter) regarding the violation), or before the day three years prior to the day on which the Act Partially Amending the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (Act No. 45 of 2019) comes into effect (hereinafter in this Chapter referred to as the "Effective Date of the Amending Act"), the later of that day 10 years prior or that day three years prior) to the day before the Effective Date of the Amending Act, the period", and where the phrase "to the day on which the act ceases, the period (if that period exceeds three years, the three years going back from the day on which the act ceases)" appears in the provisions of Articles 20-3 through 20-5 and in Article 20-6 of the Former Antimonopoly Act, it is deemed to be replaced with "(if the day on which the act was carried out falls before the day 10 years prior to the day on which a disposition listed in Article 47, paragraph (1), item (i), (iii) or (iv) was first made against that enterprise regarding the violation (or, if no such disposition was made against that enterprise, the day on which that enterprise received advance notification regarding the violation), or before the day three years prior to the Effective Date of the Amending Act, the later of that day 10 years prior or that day three years prior) to the day before the Effective Date of the Amending Act, the period".
施行日前違反行為（旧独占禁止法第二十条の二から第二十条の六までに規定するものに限る。）として開始された行為であって、施行日以後になくなったもの（施行日以後において、新独占禁止法第二十条の二から第二十条の六までに規定する違反行為に該当するものに限る。）についての課徴金の額（施行日前違反行為に係る部分に限る。）の計算については、新独占禁止法第二十条の二から第二十条の六まで並びに第二十条の七において読み替えて準用する新独占禁止法第七条の二及び第七条の八第四項（新独占禁止法第七条の二の適用に係る部分に限る。）の規定にかかわらず、なお従前の例による。この場合において、旧独占禁止法第二十条の二中「から当該行為がなくなる日までの期間（当該期間が三年を超えるときは、当該行為がなくなる日から遡つて三年間とする。）」とあるのは「（当該行為を行つた日が、当該事業者に対し当該違反行為について第四十七条第一項第一号、第三号又は第四号に掲げる処分が最初に行われた日（当該事業者に対し当該処分が行われなかつたときは、当該事業者が当該違反行為について事前通知（第七条の二第六項に規定する事前通知をいう。以下この章において同じ。）を受けた日）の十年前の日前であるとき、又は私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律の一部を改正する法律（令和元年法律第四十五号）の施行の日（以下この章において「改正法施行日」という。）の三年前の日前であるときは、当該十年前の日又は当該三年前の日のいずれか遅い日）から改正法施行日の前日までの期間」と、第二十条の三から第二十条の五までの規定中「から当該行為がなくなる日までの期間（当該期間が三年を超えるときは、当該行為がなくなる日から遡つて三年間とする。）」とあり、及び第二十条の六中「から当該行為がなくなる日までの期間（当該期間が三年を超えるときは、当該行為がなくなる日からさかのぼつて三年間とする。）」とあるのは「（当該行為を行つた日が、当該事業者に対し当該違反行為について第四十七条第一項第一号、第三号又は第四号に掲げる処分が最初に行われた日（当該事業者に対し当該処分が行われなかつたときは、当該事業者が当該違反行為について事前通知を受けた日）の十年前の日前であるとき、又は改正法施行日の三年前の日前であるときは、当該十年前の日又は当該三年前の日のいずれか遅い日）から改正法施行日の前日までの期間」とする。
The provisions then in force continue to govern the reduction of the amount of the surcharge and the exemption from payment of the surcharge for an enterprise that, before the Effective Date, made a report of facts and submission of materials pursuant to Article 7-2, paragraph (10), item (i) of the Former Antimonopoly Act (including as applied mutatis mutandis following the deemed replacement of terms pursuant to Article 8-3 of the Former Antimonopoly Act), paragraph (11), items (i) through (iii) of that Article (including as applied mutatis mutandis following the deemed replacement of terms pursuant to Article 8-3 of the Former Antimonopoly Act), or paragraph (12), item (i) of that Article (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 8-3 of the Former Antimonopoly Act), notwithstanding Articles 7-4 through 7-6 of the New Antimonopoly Act (including where these provisions apply mutatis mutandis following the deemed replacement of terms pursuant to Article 8-3 of the New Antimonopoly Act).
施行日前に旧独占禁止法第七条の二第十項第一号（旧独占禁止法第八条の三において読み替えて準用する場合を含む。）、第十一項第一号から第三号まで（旧独占禁止法第八条の三において読み替えて準用する場合を含む。）又は第十二項第一号（旧独占禁止法第八条の三において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により事実の報告及び資料の提出を行った事業者の課徴金の額の減額及び課徴金の納付の免除については、新独占禁止法第七条の四から第七条の六まで（これらの規定を新独占禁止法第八条の三において読み替えて準用する場合を含む。）の規定にかかわらず、なお従前の例による。
enterprise
「事業者」
Anyone who carries on a commercial, industrial, financial or other business; an officer, employee, agent or other person acting for the benefit of an enterprise is also treated as one for the purposes of Article 2, paragraph (2) and Chapter 3 (trade associations).
Defined inArticle 2, paragraph (1)· applies throughout the law
New Antimonopoly Actmachine translation
「新独占禁止法」
This Act as amended by Article 2 of Act No. 45 of 2019.
Short name set inSupplementary Provisions, Article 3, paragraph (1)
Former Antimonopoly Actmachine translation
「旧独占禁止法」
This Act as it stood before Article 2 of Act No. 45 of 2019 amended it.
Short name set inSupplementary Provisions, Article 3, paragraph (1)
the Effective Datemachine translation
「施行日」
The date Act No. 45 of 2019, the amending Act these supplementary provisions (附則) belong to, comes into effect.
Short name set inSupplementary Provisions, Article 4, paragraph (1)
pre-effective-date violationmachine translation
「施行日前違反行為」
A violation of the kind described in Article 7-2, paragraph (1), (2) or (4), Article 8-3 or Articles 20-2 to 20-6 of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade as it stood before Act No. 45 of 2019 amended it (旧独占禁止法), the provisions on surcharges (課徴金), committed before the day that Act came into effect.
Defined inSupplementary Provisions, Article 4, paragraph (1)· applies only in this provision and in Supplementary Provisions, Articles 5 and 6
Effective Date of the Amending Actmachine translation
「改正法施行日」
The day the Act Partially Amending the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (Act No. 45 of 2019) came into effect, as used in the wording Article 6 of its supplementary provisions (附則) reads into the surcharge (課徴金) provisions of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade as they stood before it for violations begun before that day and ended on or after it: the period the surcharge is calculated on ends the day before it and begins no earlier than three years before it.
Short name set inSupplementary Provisions, Article 6, paragraph (2)· applies only in this paragraph
Effective Date of the Amending Actmachine translation
「改正法施行日」
The day the Act Partially Amending the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (Act No. 45 of 2019) came into effect, as used in the wording Article 6 of its supplementary provisions (附則) reads into the surcharge (課徴金) provisions of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade as they stood before it for violations begun before that day and ended on or after it: the period the surcharge is calculated on ends the day before it and begins no earlier than three years before it.
Short name set inSupplementary Provisions, Article 6, paragraph (3)· applies only in this paragraph