Supplementary Provisions, Article 5
第五条
With regard to a pre-effective-date violation (limited to one prescribed in Article 7-2, paragraph (1) or (2) or Article 8-3 of the Former Antimonopoly Act) for which five years have elapsed from the day on which its period of implementation (meaning the period of implementation prescribed in Article 7-2, paragraph (1) of the Former Antimonopoly Act (including as applied mutatis mutandis following the deemed replacement of terms pursuant to paragraph (2) of that Article and Article 8-3 of the Former Antimonopoly Act)) ended at the time this Act comes into effect, notwithstanding Article 7-8, paragraph (6) of the New Antimonopoly Act (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 7-9, paragraph (3) and Article 8-3 of the New Antimonopoly Act), payment of a surcharge cannot be ordered.
この法律の施行の際その実行期間（旧独占禁止法第七条の二第一項（同条第二項及び旧独占禁止法第八条の三において読み替えて準用する場合を含む。）に規定する実行期間をいう。）の終了した日から五年を経過している施行日前違反行為（旧独占禁止法第七条の二第一項若しくは第二項又は第八条の三に規定するものに限る。）については、新独占禁止法第七条の八第六項（新独占禁止法第七条の九第三項及び第八条の三において準用する場合を含む。）の規定にかかわらず、課徴金の納付を命ずることができない。
With regard to a pre-effective-date violation (limited to one prescribed in Article 7-2, paragraph (4) of the Former Antimonopoly Act) for which five years have elapsed from the day on which its violation period (meaning the violation period prescribed in Article 7-2, paragraph (4) of the Former Antimonopoly Act) ended at the time this Act comes into effect, notwithstanding Article 7-8, paragraph (6) of the New Antimonopoly Act as applied mutatis mutandis following the deemed replacement of terms pursuant to Article 7-9, paragraph (4) of the New Antimonopoly Act, payment of a surcharge cannot be ordered.
この法律の施行の際その違反行為期間（旧独占禁止法第七条の二第四項に規定する違反行為期間をいう。）の終了した日から五年を経過している施行日前違反行為（同項に規定するものに限る。）については、新独占禁止法第七条の九第四項において読み替えて準用する新独占禁止法第七条の八第六項の規定にかかわらず、課徴金の納付を命ずることができない。
With regard to a pre-effective-date violation (limited to one prescribed in Articles 20-2 through 20-6 of the Former Antimonopoly Act) for which five years have elapsed from the day on which the act prescribed in Article 7-2, paragraph (27) of the Former Antimonopoly Act, as applied mutatis mutandis following the deemed replacement of terms pursuant to Article 20-7 of the Former Antimonopoly Act, ceased at the time this Act comes into effect, notwithstanding Article 7-8, paragraph (6) of the New Antimonopoly Act as applied mutatis mutandis following the deemed replacement of terms pursuant to Article 20-7 of the New Antimonopoly Act, payment of a surcharge cannot be ordered.
この法律の施行の際旧独占禁止法第二十条の七において読み替えて準用する旧独占禁止法第七条の二第二十七項に規定する当該行為がなくなった日から五年を経過している施行日前違反行為（旧独占禁止法第二十条の二から第二十条の六までに規定するものに限る。）については、新独占禁止法第二十条の七において読み替えて準用する新独占禁止法第七条の八第六項の規定にかかわらず、課徴金の納付を命ずることができない。
New Antimonopoly Actmachine translation
「新独占禁止法」
This Act as amended by Article 2 of Act No. 45 of 2019.
Short name set inSupplementary Provisions, Article 3, paragraph (1)
Former Antimonopoly Actmachine translation
「旧独占禁止法」
This Act as it stood before Article 2 of Act No. 45 of 2019 amended it.
Short name set inSupplementary Provisions, Article 3, paragraph (1)
pre-effective-date violationmachine translation
「施行日前違反行為」
A violation of the kind described in Article 7-2, paragraph (1), (2) or (4), Article 8-3 or Articles 20-2 to 20-6 of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade as it stood before Act No. 45 of 2019 amended it (旧独占禁止法), the provisions on surcharges (課徴金), committed before the day that Act came into effect.
Defined inSupplementary Provisions, Article 4, paragraph (1)· applies only in this provision and in Supplementary Provisions, Articles 5 and 6