Supplementary Provisions, Article 6
第六条
With regard to the application of Article 20-2 of the New Act, if the enterprise has, within 10 years going back from the date on which the disposition set forth in Article 47, paragraph (1), item (iv) of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade was first carried out in the case concerning the violation prescribed in Article 20-2 of the New Act (or, where that disposition was not carried out, within 10 years going back from the date on which the enterprise received advance notification concerning the violation), received a decision under Article 66, paragraph (4) of the Former Act (limited to a decision rescinding the whole of the original disposition, and including a decision in the case where, pursuant to Article 2 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provisions then in force continue to govern) with regard to an act in violation of Article 19 of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (limited to one falling under Article 2, paragraph (9), item (i) of that Act) (limited to the case where that decision has become final and binding), that decision is deemed to be an order under Article 20-2 of the New Act that has become final and binding.
新法第二十条の二の規定の適用については、当該事業者が、同条に規定する違反行為に係る事件について私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律第四十七条第一項第四号に掲げる処分が最初に行われた日から遡り十年以内（当該処分が行われなかったときは、当該事業者が当該違反行為について事前通知を受けた日から遡り十年以内）に、同法第十九条の規定に違反する行為（同法第二条第九項第一号に該当するものに限る。）について旧法第六十六条第四項の規定による審決（原処分の全部を取り消す場合のものに限り、附則第二条の規定によりなお従前の例によることとされる場合におけるものを含む。）を受けたことがあるとき（当該審決が確定している場合に限る。）は、当該審決を新法第二十条の二の規定による命令であって確定しているものとみなす。
With regard to the application of Article 20-3 of the New Act, if the enterprise has, within 10 years going back from the date on which the disposition set forth in Article 47, paragraph (1), item (iv) of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade was first carried out in the case concerning the violation prescribed in Article 20-3 of the New Act (or, where that disposition was not carried out, within 10 years going back from the date on which the enterprise received advance notification concerning the violation), received a decision under Article 66, paragraph (4) of the Former Act (limited to a decision rescinding the whole of the original disposition, and including a decision in the case where, pursuant to Article 2 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provisions then in force continue to govern) with regard to an act in violation of Article 19 of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (limited to one falling under Article 2, paragraph (9), item (ii) of that Act) (limited to the case where that decision has become final and binding), that decision is deemed to be an order under Article 20-3 of the New Act that has become final and binding.
新法第二十条の三の規定の適用については、当該事業者が、同条に規定する違反行為に係る事件について私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律第四十七条第一項第四号に掲げる処分が最初に行われた日から遡り十年以内（当該処分が行われなかったときは、当該事業者が当該違反行為について事前通知を受けた日から遡り十年以内）に、同法第十九条の規定に違反する行為（同法第二条第九項第二号に該当するものに限る。）について旧法第六十六条第四項の規定による審決（原処分の全部を取り消す場合のものに限り、附則第二条の規定によりなお従前の例によることとされる場合におけるものを含む。）を受けたことがあるとき（当該審決が確定している場合に限る。）は、当該審決を新法第二十条の三の規定による命令であって確定しているものとみなす。
With regard to the application of Article 20-4 of the New Act, if the enterprise has, within 10 years going back from the date on which the disposition set forth in Article 47, paragraph (1), item (iv) of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade was first carried out in the case concerning the violation prescribed in Article 20-4 of the New Act (or, where that disposition was not carried out, within 10 years going back from the date on which the enterprise received advance notification concerning the violation), received a decision under Article 66, paragraph (4) of the Former Act (limited to a decision rescinding the whole of the original disposition, and including a decision in the case where, pursuant to Article 2 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provisions then in force continue to govern) with regard to an act in violation of Article 19 of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (limited to one falling under Article 2, paragraph (9), item (iii) of that Act) (limited to the case where that decision has become final and binding), that decision is deemed to be an order under Article 20-4 of the New Act that has become final and binding.
新法第二十条の四の規定の適用については、当該事業者が、同条に規定する違反行為に係る事件について私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律第四十七条第一項第四号に掲げる処分が最初に行われた日から遡り十年以内（当該処分が行われなかったときは、当該事業者が当該違反行為について事前通知を受けた日から遡り十年以内）に、同法第十九条の規定に違反する行為（同法第二条第九項第三号に該当するものに限る。）について旧法第六十六条第四項の規定による審決（原処分の全部を取り消す場合のものに限り、附則第二条の規定によりなお従前の例によることとされる場合におけるものを含む。）を受けたことがあるとき（当該審決が確定している場合に限る。）は、当該審決を新法第二十条の四の規定による命令であって確定しているものとみなす。
With regard to the application of Article 20-5 of the New Act, if the enterprise has, within 10 years going back from the date on which the disposition set forth in Article 47, paragraph (1), item (iv) of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade was first carried out in the case concerning the violation prescribed in Article 20-5 of the New Act (or, where that disposition was not carried out, within 10 years going back from the date on which the enterprise received advance notification concerning the violation), received a decision under Article 66, paragraph (4) of the Former Act (limited to a decision rescinding the whole of the original disposition, and including a decision in the case where, pursuant to Article 2 of the Supplementary Provisions, the provisions then in force continue to govern) with regard to an act in violation of Article 19 of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (limited to one falling under Article 2, paragraph (9), item (iv) of that Act) (limited to the case where that decision has become final and binding), that decision is deemed to be an order under Article 20-5 of the New Act that has become final and binding.
新法第二十条の五の規定の適用については、当該事業者が、同条に規定する違反行為に係る事件について私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律第四十七条第一項第四号に掲げる処分が最初に行われた日から遡り十年以内（当該処分が行われなかったときは、当該事業者が当該違反行為について事前通知を受けた日から遡り十年以内）に、同法第十九条の規定に違反する行為（同法第二条第九項第四号に該当するものに限る。）について旧法第六十六条第四項の規定による審決（原処分の全部を取り消す場合のものに限り、附則第二条の規定によりなお従前の例によることとされる場合におけるものを含む。）を受けたことがあるとき（当該審決が確定している場合に限る。）は、当該審決を新法第二十条の五の規定による命令であって確定しているものとみなす。
enterprise
「事業者」
Anyone who carries on a commercial, industrial, financial or other business; an officer, employee, agent or other person acting for the benefit of an enterprise is also treated as one for the purposes of Article 2, paragraph (2) and Chapter 3 (trade associations).
Defined inArticle 2, paragraph (1)· applies throughout the law
the Former Actmachine translation
「旧法」
This Act as it stood before Act No. 100 of 2013 amended it.
Short name set inSupplementary Provisions, Article 2, paragraph (1)
advance notification
「事前通知」
In Article 6 of the supplementary provisions (附則) of Act No. 100 of 2013, the notice an enterprise (事業者) receives about a violation under Article 50, paragraph (1) of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade as amended by that Act, as applied with modified wording by Article 62, paragraph (4) of that text.
Short name set inSupplementary Provisions, Article 5, paragraph (1)· applies only in this provision and in Supplementary Provisions, Article 6
the New Actmachine translation
「新法」
This Act as amended by Act No. 100 of 2013.
Short name set inSupplementary Provisions, Article 5, paragraph (1)