Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

1 article

Supplementary Provisions, Article 7Transitional Measures Concerning Decisions and Payment Orders

第七条(審決及び納付命令に関する経過措置)

If a decision pursuant to , , or or of the Former Act (excluding one ordering the measures prescribed in of the Former Act) has become final and binding, and a claim for damages is made on or after the Effective Date against the person who received the decision, the decision is deemed to be a cease and desist order that has become final and binding under the provisions of the New Act, and Article 26 of the New Act applies.

、又は若しくはの規定による審決(に規定する措置を命ずるものを除く。)が確定した場合において、当該審決を受けた者に対して施行日以後に損害賠償の請求がされるときは、当該審決を新法の規定により確定した排除措置命令とみなして、新法第二十六条の規定を適用する。

If the decision prescribed in the preceding paragraph has not been made and a decision pursuant to of the Former Act (excluding one against a constituent enterprise of a trade association that committed an act in violation of or of the Former Act) has become final and binding, and a claim for damages is made on or after the Effective Date against the person who received the decision, the decision is deemed to be a payment order that has become final and binding under the provisions of the New Act, and Article 26 of the New Act applies.

前項に規定する審決がされず、の規定による審決(又はの規定に違反する行為をした事業者団体の構成事業者に対するものを除く。)が確定した場合において、当該審決を受けた者に対して施行日以後に損害賠償の請求がされるときは、当該審決を新法の規定により確定した納付命令とみなして、新法第二十六条の規定を適用する。

If a decision pursuant to , , or or of the Former Act (excluding one ordering the measures prescribed in of the Former Act) has become final and binding, and the person who received the decision does not comply with it on or after January 4, 2006, the decision is deemed to be a cease and desist order that has become final and binding under the provisions of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (hereinafter referred to as the "Antimonopoly Act"), and Article 90, item (iii), Article 92, Article 95, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (iv) (limited to the part pertaining to Article 90, item (iii) of the Antimonopoly Act), paragraph (2), items (ii) and (iv) (limited to the part pertaining to Article 90, item (iii) of the Antimonopoly Act), and paragraph (5), Article 95-2, and Article 95-3 of the Antimonopoly Act apply.

、又は若しくはの規定による審決(に規定する措置を命ずるものを除く。)が確定した場合において、当該審決を受けた者が平成十八年一月四日以後においてこれに従わないときは、当該審決を私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律(以下「独占禁止法」という。)の規定により確定した排除措置命令とみなして、独占禁止法第九十条第三号、第九十二条、第九十五条第一項第二号及び第四号(独占禁止法第九十条第三号に係る部分に限る。)、第二項第二号及び第四号(独占禁止法第九十条第三号に係る部分に限る。)並びに第五項、第九十五条の二並びに第九十五条の三の規定を適用する。

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (源氏道合同会社) · contact@genjido.comContactSourcesTermsPrivacy