Article 126Actions Against Orders on Petition for Bankruptcy Claim Assessment
第百二十六条(破産債権査定申立てについての決定に対する異議の訴え)
A person that is dissatisfied with an order on a petition for bankruptcy claim assessment may file an action to oppose the order (referred to below as an "action to oppose a bankruptcy claim assessment") within an inalterable period of one month after the day on which the person received the service of the order.
破産債権査定申立てについての決定に不服がある者は、その送達を受けた日から一月の不変期間内に、異議の訴え(以下「破産債権査定異議の訴え」という。)を提起することができる。
An action to oppose a bankruptcy claim assessment is subject to the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court.
破産債権査定異議の訴えは、破産裁判所が管轄する。
The court of first instance with which an action to oppose a bankruptcy claim assessment is filed may transfer by its own authority the suit pertaining to the action to oppose the bankruptcy claim assessment to the district court prescribed in Article 5, paragraph (1) (or the district court prescribed in Article 5, paragraph (2) if there is no appropriate court that corresponds to the court prescribed in Article 5, paragraph (1)) notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph when it finds it necessary to do so in order to avoid substantial detriment or delay when the bankruptcy court's jurisdiction over the bankruptcy case is based on only the provisions of Article 5, paragraph (8) or (9) (including cases in which the bankruptcy court has accepted the bankruptcy case transferred to it pursuant to the provisions of Article 7, item (iv) and the acceptance of the transferred case is based on only the provisions of Article 7, item (iv), sub-item (b) or (c)).
In an action to oppose bankruptcy claim assessment, all of the denying or disputing parties must stand as defendants if the action is filed by the bankruptcy creditor that holds the denied or disputed bankruptcy claim, and the bankruptcy creditor must stand as a defendant if it is filed by a denying or disputing party.
破産債権査定異議の訴えは、これを提起する者が、異議等のある破産債権を有する破産債権者であるときは異議者等の全員を、当該異議者等であるときは当該破産債権者を、それぞれ被告としなければならない。
Oral argument for an action to oppose bankruptcy claim assessment may not be commenced until the period stated in paragraph (1) has expired.
破産債権査定異議の訴えの口頭弁論は、第一項の期間を経過した後でなければ開始することができない。
If two or more actions to oppose bankruptcy claim assessment are pending with respect to the same bankruptcy claim concurrently, oral arguments and judicial decisions of these actions must be made in a consolidated manner. In this case, the provisions of Article 40, paragraphs (1) through (3) of the Code of Civil Procedure apply mutatis mutandis.
同一の破産債権に関し破産債権査定異議の訴えが数個同時に係属するときは、弁論及び裁判は、併合してしなければならない。この場合においては、民事訴訟法第四十条第一項から第三項までの規定を準用する。
A judgment rendered with regard to an action to oppose a bankruptcy claim assessment approves or changes the order on the petition for bankruptcy claim assessment except when the action is dismissed as unlawful.
破産債権査定異議の訴えについての判決においては、訴えを不適法として却下する場合を除き、破産債権査定申立てについての決定を認可し、又は変更する。
Article 127Taking Over of Actions Relating to Denied or Disputed Bankruptcy Claims
第百二十七条(異議等のある破産債権に関する訴訟の受継)
If an action relating to a denied or disputed bankruptcy claim is pending at the time of commencement of bankruptcy proceedings, when a bankruptcy creditor seeks the finalization of the amount, etc. of the claim, the creditor must file a petition for taking over the action, designating all of the denying or disputing parties as the opponents.
異議等のある破産債権に関し破産手続開始当時訴訟が係属する場合において、破産債権者がその額等の確定を求めようとするときは、異議者等の全員を当該訴訟の相手方として、訴訟手続の受継の申立てをしなければならない。
The provisions of Article 125, paragraph (2) apply mutatis mutandis to the petition stated in the preceding paragraph.
Article 128Limitations to Assertion
第百二十八条(主張の制限)
In proceedings for assessment relating to a petition for bankruptcy claim assessment, or in court proceedings relating to the filing of an action to oppose a bankruptcy claim assessment or to the taking over of an action pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, a bankruptcy creditor may assert, with regard to the particulars stated in Article 111, paragraph (1), items (i) through (iii) concerning the denied or disputed bankruptcy claim, only the particulars entered in the schedule of bankruptcy creditors.
破産債権査定申立てに係る査定の手続又は破産債権査定異議の訴えの提起若しくは前条第一項の規定による受継に係る訴訟手続においては、破産債権者は、異議等のある破産債権についての第百十一条第一項第一号から第三号までに掲げる事項について、破産債権者表に記載されている事項のみを主張することができる。
Article 129Assertion of Objection to Claims with Enforceable Title of Obligation
第百二十九条(執行力ある債務名義のある債権等に対する異議の主張)
With regard to a denied or disputed bankruptcy claim accompanied by an enforceable title of obligation or final judgment, the denying or disputing party may assert an objection only through the court proceedings that the bankrupt may carry out.
異議等のある破産債権のうち執行力ある債務名義又は終局判決のあるものについては、異議者等は、破産者がすることのできる訴訟手続によってのみ、異議を主張することができる。
If an action relating to the denied or disputed bankruptcy claim prescribed in the preceding paragraph is pending at the time of commencement of bankruptcy proceedings, when the denying or disputing party stated in that paragraph seeks to assert an objection under the provisions of that paragraph, the denying or disputing party must take over the action in which the bankruptcy creditor that holds the bankruptcy claim in question stands as their opponent.
The provisions of Article 125, paragraph (2) apply mutatis mutandis to the assertion of an objection under the provisions of paragraph (1) or the taking over of the action under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, and the provisions of Article 126, paragraphs (5) and (6) and the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis to the cases referred to in the preceding two paragraphs. In these cases, the phrase "the period stated in paragraph (1)" in Article 126, paragraph (5) is deemed to be replaced with "an inalterable period of one month from the last day of the ordinary period for investigation, or special period for investigation for the denied or disputed bankruptcy claim or from the ordinary date of investigation or special date of investigation for the claim".
When the assertion of an objection under the provisions of paragraph (1) or the taking over of the action under the provisions of paragraph (2) has not taken place within the period prescribed in Article 125, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph, if the denying or disputing party is a bankruptcy creditor, it is deemed that no objection under Article 118, paragraph (1), Article 119, paragraph (5), or Article 121, paragraph (2) has been made (including as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 121, paragraph (7) or Article 122, paragraph (2)), and if the denying or disputing party is a bankruptcy trustee, it is deemed that the bankruptcy trustee has approved the bankruptcy claim in question.
Article 130Entry of Outcome of Actions Concerning Finalization of Bankruptcy Claims
第百三十条(破産債権の確定に関する訴訟の結果の記載)
Upon petition by a bankruptcy trustee or a bankruptcy creditor, the court clerk must enter the outcome of an action concerning the finalization of a bankruptcy claim (if an action to oppose a bankruptcy claim assessment against an order on a petition for bankruptcy claim assessment is not filed within the period prescribed in Article 126, paragraph (1) or is dismissed without prejudice, the content of that order) in the schedule of bankruptcy creditors.
Article 131Effect of Judgment on Actions Concerning Finalization of Bankruptcy Claims
第百三十一条(破産債権の確定に関する訴訟の判決等の効力)
A judgment made upon an action concerning the finalization of a bankruptcy claim is effective against all bankruptcy creditors.
If an action to oppose bankruptcy claim assessment against an order on a petition for bankruptcy claim assessment is not filed within the period prescribed in Article 126, paragraph (1) or is dismissed, the order has the same effect as the final and binding judgment against all bankruptcy creditors.
破産債権査定申立てについての決定に対する破産債権査定異議の訴えが、第百二十六条第一項に規定する期間内に提起されなかったとき、又は却下されたときは、当該決定は、破産債権者の全員に対して、確定判決と同一の効力を有する。
Article 132Reimbursement of Court Costs
第百三十二条(訴訟費用の償還)
When the bankruptcy estate has been enriched from an action concerning the finalization of a bankruptcy claim (including an order on a petition for bankruptcy claim assessment), the bankruptcy creditor that asserted an objection, as a holder of the claim on the estate, may claim a reimbursement of the court costs to the extent that the bankruptcy estate has been enriched.
第百三十三条(破産手続終了の場合における破産債権の確定手続の取扱い)
Proceedings for petition for bankruptcy claim assessment which are pending at the time of the closing of bankruptcy proceedings are to be closed if the closing of bankruptcy proceedings results from an order of reversal of the order commencing bankruptcy proceedings or an order of discontinuance of bankruptcy proceedings, which has become final and binding, and is to continue to be pending if the closing of bankruptcy proceedings results from an order of termination of bankruptcy proceedings.
If bankruptcy proceedings are closed as a result of an order of termination of bankruptcy proceedings, when an order on a petition for bankruptcy claim assessment is made after the closing of bankruptcy proceedings, an action to oppose bankruptcy claim assessment may be filed pursuant to the provisions of Article 126, paragraph (1).
破産手続終結の決定により破産手続が終了した場合において、破産手続終了後に破産債権査定申立てについての決定があったときは、第百二十六条第一項の規定により破産債権査定異議の訴えを提起することができる。
An action to oppose bankruptcy claim assessment or an action to take over pursuant to the provisions of Article 127, paragraph (1) or Article 129, paragraph (2), which is pending at the time of closing of bankruptcy proceedings and in which a bankruptcy trustee stands as a party, is not to be subject to a continuance, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 44, paragraph (4), if the closing of bankruptcy proceedings results from an order of termination of bankruptcy proceedings.
An action to oppose bankruptcy claim assessment, which is pending at the time of closing of bankruptcy proceedings and in which a bankruptcy trustee does not stand as a party, is to be concluded if the closing of bankruptcy proceedings results from an order of reversal of the order commencing bankruptcy proceedings or an order of discontinuance of bankruptcy proceedings, which has become final and binding, and continues to be pending if the closing of bankruptcy proceedings results from an order of termination of bankruptcy proceedings.
破産手続が終了した際現に係属する破産債権査定異議の訴えに係る訴訟手続であって、破産管財人が当事者でないものは、破産手続開始の決定の取消し又は破産手続廃止の決定の確定により破産手続が終了したときは終了するものとし、破産手続終結の決定により破産手続が終了したときは引き続き係属するものとする。
An action taken over pursuant to the provisions of Article 127, paragraph (1) or Article 129, paragraph (2) which is pending at the time of closing of bankruptcy proceedings and in which a bankruptcy trustee does not stand as a party is subject to a continuance if the closing of bankruptcy proceedings results from an order of reversal of the order commencing bankruptcy proceedings or an order of discontinuance of bankruptcy proceedings, which has become final and binding, and is to continue to be pending if the closing of bankruptcy proceedings results from an order of termination of bankruptcy proceedings.
If an action is subject to a continuance pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, the provisions of Article 44, paragraph (5) apply mutatis mutandis.
Subsection 5 Special Provisions for Tax Claims
第五款 租税等の請求権等についての特例
第百三十四条
With regard to a claim for tax, etc. and a claim for a fine, etc., the provisions from Subsection 1 (excluding Article 115) through the preceding Subsection do not apply.
When the cause of a claim (excluding claims for a fine, petty fine, and court costs for a criminal case) filed under the provisions of Article 114 (in the case of a claim for a foreign tax subject to mutual assistance, a decision of implementation of mutual assistance) is a disposition against which a request for review, an action (excluding a criminal action; the same applies in the following paragraph), or any other appeal may be filed, a bankruptcy trustee may assert an objection with regard to the filed claim by a means of filing an appeal.
In the case referred to in the preceding paragraph, if an action relating to the filed claim is pending at the time of the commencement of bankruptcy proceedings, a bankruptcy trustee that seeks to assert an objection prescribed in that paragraph must take over the action in which the bankruptcy creditor that holds the filed claim stands as the opponent. The same applies when a case relating to the bankruptcy estate is pending before an administrative agency with regard to the filed claim at the time of the commencement of bankruptcy proceedings.
The assertion of an objection under the provisions of paragraph (2) or the taking over of the action under the provisions of the preceding paragraph must be performed within an inalterable period of one month after the day on which a bankruptcy trustee came to know the fact of the filing prescribed in paragraph (2).
The provisions of Article 124, paragraph (2) apply mutatis mutandis to a claim filed pursuant to the provisions of Article 114, and the provisions of Article 128, Article 130, Article 131, paragraph (1), and paragraph (3) of the preceding Article apply mutatis mutandis to cases in which the assertion of an objection under the provisions of paragraph (2) or the taking over of the action under the provisions of paragraph (3) has taken place.
Section 4 Creditors' Meetings and Creditors' Committees
第四節 債権者集会及び債権者委員会
Subsection 1 Creditors' Meetings
第一款 債権者集会
Article 135Convocation of Creditors' Meetings
第百三十五条(債権者集会の招集)
The court must convoke a creditors' meeting upon the petition of any of the persons stated in the following items; provided, however, that this does not apply when the court finds it inappropriate to convoke a creditors' meeting taking into consideration the number of known bankruptcy creditors and other circumstances:
裁判所は、次の各号に掲げる者のいずれかの申立てがあった場合には、債権者集会を招集しなければならない。ただし、知れている破産債権者の数その他の事情を考慮して債権者集会を招集することを相当でないと認めるときは、この限りでない。
the creditors' committee prescribed in Article 144, paragraph (2); or
a bankruptcy creditor that holds a bankruptcy claim that accounts for one-tenth or more of the amount of total claims held by known bankruptcy creditors as estimated by the court.
The court may convoke a creditors' meeting when the court finds it appropriate even when the petition stated in the main clause of the preceding paragraph is not filed.
裁判所は、前項本文の申立てがない場合であっても、相当と認めるときは、債権者集会を招集することができる。