Search

Search provisions, jump to a law or an article

1 article

Article 42Lapse of Other Procedures

第四十二条(他の手続の失効等)

If an order commencing bankruptcy proceedings is issued, enforcement against property that belong to the bankruptcy estate, provisional seizures, provisional dispositions against the property, general statutory liens, enterprise mortgages or disposal of foreign tax delinquency, which is based on a bankruptcy claim or claim on the estate, or is intended to secure a bankruptcy claim or claim on the estate, cannot be exercised.

破産手続開始の決定があった場合には、破産財団に属する財産に対する強制執行、仮差押え、仮処分、一般の先取特権の実行、企業担保権の実行又は外国租税滞納処分で、破産債権若しくは財団債権に基づくもの又は破産債権若しくは財団債権を被担保債権とするものは、することができない。

In the case prescribed in the preceding paragraph, the procedures for enforcement, provisional seizure, provisional disposition, exercise of a general statutory lien or exercise of an enterprise mortgage or disposal of foreign tax delinquency prescribed in that paragraph, which have already been initiated against property that belong to the bankruptcy estate, cease to be effective in relation to the bankruptcy estate; provided, however, that with regard to the procedure for enforcement or exercise of a general statutory lien prescribed in that paragraph (referred to below as "enforcement or exercise of a statutory lien" in this Article), this does not preclude a bankruptcy trustee from continuing the procedure in the interest of the bankruptcy estate.

前項に規定する場合には、同項に規定する強制執行、仮差押え、仮処分、一般の先取特権の実行及び企業担保権の実行の手続並びに外国租税滞納処分で、破産財団に属する財産に対して既にされているものは、破産財団に対してはその効力を失う。ただし、同項に規定する強制執行又は一般の先取特権の実行(以下この条において「強制執行又は先取特権の実行」という。)の手続については、破産管財人において破産財団のためにその手続を続行することを妨げない。

With regard to the procedure for enforcement or exercise of a statutory lien continued pursuant to the provisions of the proviso to the preceding paragraph, the provisions of Article 63 and Article 129 of the Civil Enforcement Act (including cases in which these provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to that Act or other laws and regulations concerning a procedure for enforcement) do not apply.

前項ただし書の規定により続行された強制執行又は先取特権の実行の手続については、民事執行法第六十三条及び第百二十九条(これらの規定を同法その他強制執行の手続に関する法令において準用する場合を含む。)の規定は、適用しない。

A claim for expenses against the bankrupt for the procedure for enforcement or exercise of a statutory lien continued pursuant to the provisions of the proviso to paragraph (2) is a claim on the estate.

第二項ただし書の規定により続行された強制執行又は先取特権の実行の手続に関する破産者に対する費用請求権は、財団債権とする。

With regard to a third party action against the enforcement or exercise of a statutory lien continued pursuant to the provisions of the proviso to paragraph (2), the bankruptcy trustee stands as a defendant.

第二項ただし書の規定により続行された強制執行又は先取特権の実行に対する第三者異議の訴えについては、破産管財人を被告とする。

If an order commencing bankruptcy proceedings is issued, no petition may be filed for an asset disclosure procedure (meaning an asset disclosure procedure prescribed in Article 196 of the Civil Enforcement Act; the same applies below in this paragraph and Article 249, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2)) or procedure for acquiring information from a third party (meaning the procedures for acquiring information from third parties prescribed in Article 204 of that Act; the same applies below in this paragraph and Article 249, paragraphs (1) and (2)) based on a bankruptcy claim or claim on the estate, and an asset disclosure procedure and a procedure for acquiring information from a third party based on a bankruptcy claim or claim on the estate, cease to be effective.

破産手続開始の決定があったときは、破産債権又は財団債権に基づく財産開示手続(民事執行法第百九十六条に規定する財産開示手続をいう。以下この項並びに第二百四十九条第一項及び第二項において同じ。)又は第三者からの情報取得手続(同法第二百四条に規定する第三者からの情報取得手続をいう。以下この項並びに第二百四十九条第一項及び第二項において同じ。)の申立てはすることができず、破産債権又は財団債権に基づく財産開示手続及び第三者からの情報取得手続はその効力を失う。

Read this with the articles around it

© 2026 japanlaw.orgA copy for reading and reference — not an official source, and not legal advice. Only the Japanese text published by the government has legal effect.Run by Genjido LLC (Genjido 合同会社) · [email protected]ContactSourcesTermsPrivacy